Item 8.01 Other Events.

As previously disclosed, on October 14, 2019, Jagged Peak Energy Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Jagged Peak"), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among Parsley Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parsley"), and Jackal Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parsley ("Merger Sub"). The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into Jagged Peak, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement (the "Merger"), with Jagged Peak continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger. As a result of the Merger, Jagged Peak would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Parsley. On November 26, 2019, Jagged Peak filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a Definitive Proxy Statement for the solicitation of proxies in connection with the special meeting of Jagged Peak's stockholders, to be held on January 9, 2020, to vote upon, among other things, matters necessary to complete the Merger (the "Proxy Statement").

Litigation Related to the Merger

Following the initial filing of the Proxy Statement with the SEC, six purported stockholders of Jagged Peak filed separate complaints (including several putative class actions complaints, on behalf of themselves and all owners of Jagged Peak's common stock, other than defendants and related or affiliated persons) against Jagged Peak and the directors of Jagged Peak. The six complaints (collectively referred to as the "Stockholder Actions") are captioned as follows: Eric Sabatini v. Jagged Peak Energy Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-02114 (D. Del.) (the "Sabatini Action"), Jean-Pierre Enguehard v. Jagged Peak Energy, Inc. et al., Case No. 2019-cv-34328 (Distr. Ct., Denver, CO) (the "Enguehard Action"), Kelly Small v. Jagged Peak Energy Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-10698 (S.D.N.Y.) (the "Small Action"), Sherrie Wynne v. Jagged Peak Energy Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-03281 (D. Colo.) (the "Wynne Action"), Mark Prinzel v. Jagged Peak Energy Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-10886 (S.D.N.Y.) (the "Prinzel Action"), and Stephen Bushansky v. Jagged Peak Energy Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-3433 (D. Colo.) (the "Bushansky Action").

The Stockholder Actions allege that, among other things, the Proxy Statement fails to disclose certain allegedly material information in violation of Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as well as Rule 14a-9 under the Exchange Act. The Enguehard Action further alleges that the directors of Jagged Peak failed to fulfill their fiduciary duties in connection with the Merger by purportedly initiating a process to sell Jagged Peak in a transaction that undervalues Jagged Peak. The complaints seek injunctive relief enjoining the Merger and damages and costs, among other remedies. Copies of the complaint in each of the Stockholder Actions are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5 and 99.6, respectively, and incorporated by reference herein.

It is possible that additional, similar complaints may be filed or the complaints described above may be amended. If this occurs, Jagged Peak does not intend to announce the filing of each additional, similar complaint or any amended complaint unless it contains materially new or different allegations. Although Jagged Peak cannot predict the outcome of or estimate the possible loss or range of loss from these matters, Jagged Peak and Jagged Peak's defendant directors believe that these complaints are without merit and intend to vigorously defend them.

Jagged Peak believes that no supplemental disclosures are required under applicable laws; however, in order to avoid the risk of the Stockholder Actions delaying the Merger and minimize the expense of defending the Stockholder Actions, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, Jagged Peak is voluntarily making certain disclosures below that supplement those contained in the Proxy Statement. These disclosures, and disclosures on certain other matters, are provided in this Current Report on Form 8-K. Nothing in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, Jagged Peak specifically denies all allegations in the foregoing complaints, including that any additional disclosure was or is required.



                         SUPPLEMENT TO PROXY STATEMENT

Jagged Peak is supplementing the Proxy Statement with certain additional information set forth below. These disclosures should be read in connection with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. All page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement. New text is underlined and bolded, and deleted text is stricken through.

The disclosure on page 66 is hereby supplemented by adding the following sentence at the end of the last paragraph on the page.

The mutual confidentiality agreement with Company E was on customary terms, did not contain a "don't ask, don't waive" provision, permitted private offers during the standstill period and provided that the standstill provisions would fall-away if Jagged Peak entered into an agreement similar to the merger agreement.





                                       2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The disclosure on page 68 is hereby supplemented by adding the following sentence at the end of the last paragraph on the page.

The mutual confidentiality agreement with Company A was on customary terms, did not contain a "don't ask, don't waive" provision, permitted private offers during the standstill period and provided that the standstill provisions would fall-away if Jagged Peak entered into an agreement similar to the merger agreement.

The disclosure on page 88 of the Proxy Statement is hereby supplemented by inserting the following as line items on the table at the top of the page under the heading "Oil and Gas Strip Pricing" and revising footnote (1) in such table as follows: Interest expense

$   20   $   50   $   50   $   47   $   40   $   33
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as free
cash flow plus interest expense) (4)          $ (126 ) $ (116 ) $   24   $  158   $  206   $  212
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as
EBITDA less capital expenditures and cash
taxes excluding the effect of interest
expense) (5)                                  $ (142 ) $ (116 ) $   24   $  158   $  206   $  212

______________

(1) EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, adjusted for exploration expense. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. 2025E EBITDA used by RBCCM in its discounted cash flow analysis to derive the terminal value was $743 million.

(4) Arithmetically derived by RBCCM for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

(5) Arithmetically derived by Citi for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management; assumes additional leasehold and acquisition-related capital expenditures of approximately $15 million in the second half of fiscal year 2019. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The disclosure on page 88 of the Proxy Statement is hereby supplemented by inserting the following as line items on the table at the bottom of the page under the heading "Wall Street Consensus Pricing" and revising footnote (1) in such table as follows: Interest expense

$   20   $   49   $   45   $   36   $   30   $   29
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as free
cash flow plus interest expense) (4)          $ (121 ) $  (96 ) $  151   $  296   $  338   $  341
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as
EBITDA less capital expenditures and cash
taxes excluding the effect of interest
expense) (5)                                  $ (136 ) $  (96 ) $  151   $  296   $  338   $  345

______________

(1) EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, adjusted for exploration expense. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. 2025E EBITDA used by RBCCM in its discounted cash flow analysis to derive terminal value was $880 million.

(4) Arithmetically derived by RBCCM for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

(5) Arithmetically derived by Citi for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management; assumes additional leasehold and acquisition-related capital expenditures of approximately $15 million in the second half of fiscal year 2019. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.





                                       3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The disclosure on page 89 of the Proxy Statement is hereby supplemented by inserting the following as line items on the table in the middle of the page under the heading "Oil and Gas Strip Pricing" and revising footnote (1) in such table as follows: Interest expense

$   60   $  123   $  123   $  123   $  123   $  123
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as free
cash flow plus interest expense) (4)          $  162   $  281   $  202   $  215   $  389   $  496
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as
EBITDA less capital expenditures and cash
taxes excluding the effect of interest
expense) (5)                                  $  163   $  281   $  144   $  189   $  363   $  471

______________

(1) EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, adjusted for exploration expense. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. 2025E EBITDA used by RBCCM in its discounted cash flow analysis to derive terminal value was $2,283 million.

(4) Arithmetically derived by RBCCM for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

(5) Arithmetically derived by Citi for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The disclosure on page 89 of the Proxy Statement is hereby supplemented by inserting the following as line items on the table at the bottom of the page under the heading "Wall Street Consensus Pricing" and revising footnote (1) in such table as follows: Interest expense

$   60   $  123   $  123   $  123   $  123   $  123
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as free
cash flow plus interest expense) (4)          $  182   $  345   $  440   $  489   $  668   $  778
Unlevered free cash flow (calculated as
EBITDA less capital expenditures and cash
taxes excluding the effect of interest
expense) (5)                                  $  182   $  345   $  382   $  463   $  643   $  752

______________

(1) EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, adjusted for exploration expense. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. 2025E EBITDA used by RBCCM in its discounted cash flow analysis to derive terminal value was $2,644 million.

(4) Arithmetically derived by RBCCM for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

(5) Arithmetically derived by Citi for purposes of its discounted cash flow analysis based on estimates of Jagged Peak's management. Unlevered free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The disclosure on page 108 of the Proxy Statement is hereby supplemented by revising the third and fourth sentences of the paragraph summarizing the discounted cash flow analysis of Jagged Peak as follows:

Citi calculated terminal values for Jagged Peak by applying to Jagged Peak's fiscal year 2023 estimated EBITDA a selected range of EBITDA multiples of 4.5x to 5.5x selected based on Citi's professional judgment and taking into account, among other things, observed EBITDA trading multiples of Jagged Peak and the . . .

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(d) Exhibits.
Exhibit Number    Description

     99.1           Complaint filed by Eric Sabatini on November 8, 2019 in the
                  United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
     99.2           Complaint filed by Jean-Pierre Enguehard on November 12, 2019
                  in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado.
     99.3           Complaint filed by Kelly Small on November 19, 2019 in the
                  United States District Court for the Southern District of New
                  York.
     99.4           Compliant filed by Sherrie Wynne on November 20, 2019 in the
                  United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
     99.5           Complaint filed by Mark Prinzel on November 25, 2019 in the
                  United States District Court for the Southern District of New
                  York.
     99.6           Complaint filed by Stephen Bushansky on December 5, 2019 in
                  the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
     104          Cover page interactive data file (embedded within the Inline
                  XBRL document).






                                       7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses