The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR's consolidated
operations and assets, and, where necessary, includes specific references to
AWR's individual segments and/or its subsidiaries: GSWC and ASUS and its
subsidiaries.  Included in the following analysis is a discussion of water and
electric gross margins.  Water and electric gross margins are computed by
subtracting total supply costs from total revenues.  Registrant uses these gross
margins as important measures in evaluating its operating results.  Registrant
believes these measures are useful internal benchmarks in evaluating the
performance of GSWC.
The discussions and tables included in the following analysis also present
Registrant's operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment.
Registrant believes that the disclosure of earnings per share by business
segment provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its
different services.  Furthermore, the retroactive earnings impact for fiscal
2018 resulting from the CPUC's final decision on the electric general rate case
issued in August 2019, has been excluded when communicating the electric
segment's 2019 financial results to help facilitate comparisons of the company's
performance from period to period.
Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares them to historical
periods and to its operating budget. However, these measures, which are not
presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"),
may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other enterprises and
should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or earnings per
share, which are determined in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of water
and electric gross margins to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is
included in the table under the section titled "Operating Expenses: Supply
Costs."  Reconciliations to AWR's diluted earnings per share are included in the
discussions under the sections titled "Summary Results by Segment."
Overview
Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under Forward-Looking
Information.
Water and Electric Segments:
GSWC's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned primarily through
delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and the delivery
of electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California. Rates
charged to GSWC customers are determined by the CPUC. These rates are intended
to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on
capital.  GSWC plans to continue to seek additional rate increases in future
years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs and receive reasonable
returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC are
expected to remain at higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary,
GSWC obtains funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank
borrowings.
General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:
Water Segment:
In July 2017, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water
regions and the general office to determine new rates for the years 2019 - 2021.
On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate
case with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019. Among other things, the final
decision approves in its entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had
been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC's Public Advocates Office. As a
result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $334.5
million over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment
includes $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery
through advice letters when those projects are completed.
Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the new rates approved increased
the water gross margin for 2019 by approximately $7.1 million, adjusted for
updated inflation index values since the August 2018 settlement, as compared to
the 2018 adopted water gross margin. The 2019 water revenue requirement has been
reduced to reflect a decrease of approximately $7.0 million in depreciation
expense, compared to the adopted 2018 depreciation expense, due to a reduction
in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in
the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water
gross margin and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense,
resulting in no impact to net earnings. In addition, the 2019 water revenue
requirement includes a decrease of approximately $2.2 million for excess
deferred tax refunds as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act"),
with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense also resulting in no impact
to net earnings. Had depreciation remained the same as the 2018 adopted amount
and there were no excess deferred tax refunds that lowered the 2019 revenue
requirement, the water gross margin for 2019 would have increased by
approximately $16.3 million.
As a result of the May 2019 CPUC final decision, GSWC implemented new water
rates on June 8, 2019. The CPUC in the final decision also approved the recovery
of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized

                                       26

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



memorandum accounts. This resulted in a reduction to administrative and general
expense of approximately $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, which was recorded
during the second quarter of 2019. The final decision also allowed for a water
gross margin increase of approximately $10.4 million from new customer rates for
2020, which were effective January 1, 2020, as well as a potential additional
increase of approximately $11.4 million in 2021, subject to the results of an
earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values.
Electric Segment:
In May 2017, GSWC filed its electric general rate case application with the CPUC
to determine new electric rates for the years 2018 through 2021. In November
2018, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion to adopt a
settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connection
with the general rate case.
On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on this general rate case,
adopting the settlement agreement in its entirety. Among other things, the
decision (i) extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates were effective for
2018 - 2022); (ii) increases the electric gross margin for 2018 by approximately
$2.3 million compared to the 2017 adopted electric gross margin, adjusted for
Tax Act changes; (iii) authorizes BVES to construct all the capital projects
requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system safety and
reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate cycle; and
(iv) increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for each of the
years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022. The
rate increases for 2019 - 2022 are not subject to an earnings test. The decision
authorizes a return on equity for GSWC's electric segment of 9.60%, as compared
to its previously authorized return of 9.95% and includes a capital structure
and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018
in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding.
Due to the delay in finalizing the electric general rate case, electric revenues
recognized during 2018 were based on 2017 adopted rates. Because the August 2019
CPUC final decision is retroactive to January 1, 2018, the cumulative
retroactive earnings impact was recorded as part of fiscal 2019 results, which
includes approximately $0.04 per share relating to fiscal 2018.
Contracted Services Segment:
ASUS's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water
and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and
construction of facilities at the water and/or wastewater systems at various
military installations, pursuant to 50-year firm fixed-price contracts. The
contract price for each of these 50-year contracts is subject to annual economic
price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are
primarily dependent on new construction activities under contract modifications
with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors.
Fort Riley:
On July 1, 2018, ASUS assumed the operation, maintenance and construction
management of the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment
facilities at Fort Riley, a United States Army installation located in Kansas,
after completing a transition period and a detailed inventory study. The
contract was awarded by the U.S. government in September 2017 with a value of
$681 million over a 50-year period. The 50-year contract is also subject to
annual economic price adjustments.
Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of diluted earnings per share by business segment for AWR's operations:


                                                          Diluted Earnings per Share
                                                        Year Ended
                                               12/31/2019             12/31/2018           CHANGE
Water                                   $         1.61             $         1.19     $         0.42
Electric, adjusted (2019 excludes
retroactive impact of CPUC decision in
the general rate case related to 2018)            0.15                       0.11               0.04
Contracted services                               0.47                       0.42               0.05
AWR (parent)                                      0.01                          -               0.01
Consolidated diluted earnings per
share, adjusted                                   2.24                       1.72               0.52
Retroactive impact of CPUC decision in
the electric general rate case related
to the full year of 2018                          0.04                          -               0.04
Totals from operations, as reported     $         2.28             $         1.72     $         0.56



                                       27

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Water Segment:
Diluted earnings per share from the water segment for the year ended
December 31, 2019 increased by $0.42 per share as compared to the same period in
2018 largely due to the approval of the water general rate case in May 2019 and
effective January 1, 2019. Also included in the earnings for 2019 was a $1.1
million reduction to administrative and general expense, positively impacting
earnings by $0.02 per share, which reflects the CPUC's approval received in the
general rate case for recovery of costs previously expensed as incurred and
tracked in memorandum accounts. Excluding this $0.02 per share impact, diluted
earnings per share from the water segment for 2019 increased by $0.40 per share
due to the following items (excluding billed surcharges):
•      An overall increase in the water gross margin of $0.21 per share, largely

as a result of the May 2019 CPUC decision on the general rate case, which

approved new water rates and adopted supply costs for 2019. The 2019 water

revenue requirement has also been reduced to reflect a decrease in

depreciation expense, due to a reduction in the overall composite

depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in the general rate

case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water gross margin


       and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense,
       resulting in no impact to net earnings.


•      An overall decrease in operating expenses (excluding supply costs)

increased earnings by approximately $0.11 per share due, in large part, to

lower depreciation expense. As discussed above, the lower depreciation

expense is reflected in the new revenue requirement approved in the

general rate case. There was also a decrease in administrative and general

expenses primarily due to lower regulatory-related costs resulting from

timing of the rate case cycle and when such costs are incurred. These

decreases were partially offset by an overall increase in labor costs and

property and other taxes.

• An increase in interest and other income (net of interest expense), which

increased earnings by approximately $0.05 per share due to gains generated

during 2019 on Registrant's investments held to fund a retirement benefit

plan, as compared to losses incurred during 2018 due to market conditions.

These gains were partially offset by interest income on a federal tax

refund recorded in 2018 with no similar item in 2019, and an increase in


       interest expense resulting from higher borrowings to fund a portion of
       GSWC's capital expenditures.


•      Changes in the water segment's effective income tax rate resulting from

certain flow-through taxes and permanent items for the year ended December

31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, increased earnings at the

water segment by approximately $0.03 per share.




Electric Segment:
The CPUC's August 2019 final decision on the electric general rate case set new
rates for 2018 through 2022 and was retroactive to January 1, 2018. As a result,
the retroactive impact of the new electric rates for all of fiscal 2018 has been
reflected in the results for 2019. Of the electric segment's $0.19 earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately $0.04 per share
relates to the full year ended December 31, 2018, which is shown on a separate
line in the table above.
Excluding the retroactive impact related to 2018, diluted earnings from the
electric segment for 2019 were $0.15 per share as compared to $0.11 per share
for the same period in 2018. The increase was due to a higher electric gross
margin as a result of new rates authorized by the CPUC's August 2019 final
decision, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses and a higher
effective income tax rate as compared to 2018 due to changes in certain
flow-through taxes.
Contracted Services Segment:
For the year ended December 31, 2019, diluted earnings from contracted services
were $0.47 per share, compared to $0.42 per share for the same period in 2018.
This was due, in part, to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in
July 2018. There was also an increase in management fees at several other
military bases due to the successful resolution of various price adjustments
during 2018 and 2019.
AWR (parent):
For the year ended December 31, 2019, diluted earnings from AWR (parent)
increased $0.01 per share compared to 2018 due primarily to changes in state
unitary taxes.
The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018 provides information on AWR's consolidated operations and assets and, where
necessary, includes specific references to AWR's individual segments and
subsidiaries: GSWC and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

                                       28

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):


                                           Year Ended     Year Ended         $             %
                                           12/31/2019     12/31/2018      CHANGE        CHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water                                     $  319,830     $  295,258     $  24,572          8.3  %
Electric                                      39,548         34,350         5,198         15.1  %
Contracted services                          114,491        107,208         7,283          6.8  %
Total operating revenues                     473,869        436,816        37,053          8.5  %

OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased                               72,289         68,904         3,385          4.9  %
Power purchased for pumping                    8,660          8,971          (311 )       -3.5  %
Groundwater production assessment             18,962         19,440          (478 )       -2.5  %
Power purchased for resale                    11,796         11,590           206          1.8  %
Supply cost balancing accounts                (7,026 )      (15,649 )       8,623        -55.1  %
Other operation                               32,756         31,650         1,106          3.5  %
Administrative and general                    83,034         82,595           439          0.5  %
Depreciation and amortization                 35,397         40,425        (5,028 )      -12.4  %
Maintenance                                   15,466         15,682          (216 )       -1.4  %
Property and other taxes                      20,042         18,404         1,638          8.9  %
ASUS construction                             55,673         53,906         1,767          3.3  %
Gain on sale of assets                          (253 )          (85 )        (168 )      197.6  %
Total operating expenses                     346,796        335,833        10,963          3.3  %

OPERATING INCOME                             127,073        100,983        26,090         25.8  %

OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense                             (24,586 )      (23,433 )      (1,153 )        4.9  %
Interest income                                3,249          3,578          (329 )       -9.2  %
Other, net                                     3,276            760         2,516        331.1  %
                                             (18,061 )      (19,095 )       1,034         -5.4  %

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX
EXPENSE                                      109,012         81,888        27,124         33.1  %

Income tax expense                            24,670         18,017         6,653         36.9  %

NET INCOME                                $   84,342     $   63,871     $  20,471         32.1  %

Basic earnings per Common Share           $     2.28     $     1.73     $   

0.55 31.8 %

Fully diluted earnings per Common Share $ 2.28 $ 1.72 $


 0.56         32.6  %






                                       29

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Operating Revenues
General
GSWC relies upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating
expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to
fund utility plant. Registrant relies on economic price and equitable
adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and
provide a profit margin for ASUS.  Current operating revenues and earnings can
be negatively impacted if the Military Privatization Subsidiaries do not receive
adequate price increases or adjustments in a timely manner.  ASUS's earnings are
also impacted by the level of additional construction projects at the Military
Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current
levels in future periods.
Water
For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues from water operations increased
by $24.6 million to $319.8 million, compared to the year ended December 31,
2018. This increase was a result of new CPUC-approved water rates effective
January 1, 2019 as part of the May 2019 general rate case final decision. There
were also revenue increases related to CPUC-approved surcharges resulting from
the May 2019 decision, as well as surcharges to cover increases in supply costs
experienced in most ratemaking areas. The increase in surcharge revenues was
offset by a corresponding increase in operating expenses, resulting in no impact
to earnings.
Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased
approximately 6% as compared to 2018. In general, changes in consumption do not
have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM
accounts in place in the majority of GSWC's rate-making areas. GSWC records the
difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is
authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities.
Electric
For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues from electric operations were
$39.5 million as compared to $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
This increase was primarily due to new rates approved in the August 2019 CPUC
final decision on the electric general rate case, which were retroactive to
January 1, 2018. Included in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 was
approximately $2.3 million which related to the full year of 2018.
 Billed electric usage for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased 3% as
compared to the same period in 2018.  Due to the CPUC-approved base revenue
requirement adjustment mechanism ("BRRAM"), which adjusts base revenues to
adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a
significant impact on earnings.
Contracted Services
Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues
(including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and
maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For
the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues from contracted services were $114.5
million as compared to $107.2 million for 2018.  The increase was primarily due
to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July 2018.
ASUS's subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract
modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new
construction projects at the military bases served. During 2019, ASUS was
awarded approximately $23 million in new construction projects for completion in
2019 and 2020. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the original
50-year contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime
contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in
future periods.

                                       30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Operating Expenses:
Supply Costs
Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power
for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply
cost balancing accounts. Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily
of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES's generating
unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply
cost balancing account. Water and electric gross margins are computed by
subtracting total supply costs from total revenues. Registrant uses these gross
margins and related percentages as an important measure in evaluating its
operating results. Registrant believes these measures are useful internal
benchmarks in evaluating the utility business performance within its water and
electric segments. Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares
them to historical periods and to its operating budget. However, these measures,
which are not presented in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures used by other enterprises and should not be considered
as an alternative to operating income, which is determined in accordance with
GAAP.
Total supply costs comprise the largest segment of total operating expenses.
Supply costs accounted for 30.2% and 27.8% of total operating expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The table below provides
the amounts (in thousands) of increases (decreases) and percent changes in water
and electric revenues, supply costs and gross margins during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018. There was an increase in surcharges of $1.4 million
recorded in water revenues to recover previously incurred costs, which did not
impact water earnings. Surcharges to recover previously incurred costs are
recorded to revenues when billed to customers and are offset by a corresponding
amount in operating expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.
                                             Year Ended     Year Ended         $             %
                                             12/31/2019     12/31/2018      CHANGE        CHANGE
WATER OPERATING REVENUES (1)                $  319,830     $  295,258     $  24,572          8.3  %
WATER SUPPLY COSTS:
Water purchased (1)                             72,289         68,904         3,385          4.9  %
Power purchased for pumping (1)                  8,660          8,971          (311 )       -3.5  %
Groundwater production assessment (1)           18,962         19,440          (478 )       -2.5  %
Water supply cost balancing accounts (1)        (8,153 )      (17,116 )       8,963        -52.4  %
TOTAL WATER SUPPLY COSTS                    $   91,758     $   80,199     $  11,559         14.4  %
WATER GROSS MARGIN (2)                      $  228,072     $  215,059     $  13,013          6.1  %

ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES (1)             $   39,548     $   34,350     $   5,198         15.1  %
ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS:
Power purchased for resale (1)                  11,796         11,590           206          1.8  %
Electric supply cost balancing accounts (1)      1,127          1,467          (340 )      -23.2  %
TOTAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS                 $   12,923     $   13,057     $    (134 )       -1.0  %
ELECTRIC GROSS MARGIN (2)                   $   26,625     $   21,293     $   5,332         25.0  %





(1)     As reported on AWR's Consolidated Statements of Income, except for
supply-cost-balancing accounts. The sums of water and electric supply-cost
balancing accounts in the table above are shown on AWR's Consolidated Statements
of Income and totaled $(7,026,000) and $(15,649,000) for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Revenues include surcharges that have
no net earnings impact because they increase both revenues and operating
expenses by corresponding amounts.
(2)     Water and electric gross margins do not include depreciation and
amortization, maintenance, administrative and general, property and other taxes,
and other operation expenses.
   Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of
water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of
producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from
wholesale suppliers. Under the CPUC-approved Modified Cost Balancing Account
("MCBA"), GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water,
power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which
include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and
actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses. GSWC recovers
from or refunds to customers the amount of such variances.  GSWC tracks these
variances individually for each water ratemaking area.

                                       31

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 44% and 41%, respectively, as compared to the
adopted percentages of 36% and 28% for 2019 and 2018, respectively. The higher
actual percentages of purchased water as compared to adopted percentages
resulted primarily from several wells being out of service. For 2020, the
percentage of purchased water is expected to continue being higher than the
adopted percentage. Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 2019
increased to $72.3 million as compared to $68.9 million for the same period in
2018 primarily due to the higher mix of purchased water as compared to pumped
water and an increase in wholesale water costs, partially offset by lower
customer usage.
   The cost of power purchased for pumping decreased to $8.7 million in 2019 as
compared to $9.0 million for the same period in 2018, and groundwater production
assessments decreased to $19.0 million in 2019 as compared to $19.4 million in
2018. The decrease in both of these areas was due, in part, to a higher mix of
purchased water as compared to pumped water resulting from several wells being
out of service as previously discussed, as well as lower customer usage.
 The under-collection in the water supply cost balancing account decreased $9.0
million during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period
in 2018 due to updated adopted supply costs approved in the May 2019 general
rate case decision, as well as CPUC-approved rate increases to cover increases
in supply costs experienced in most ratemaking areas.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the cost of power purchased for resale to
BVES's customers was $11.8 million as compared to $11.6 million for the same
period in 2018 due to an increase in customer usage, partially offset by a lower
average price per megawatt-hour ("MWh"). The average price per MWh, including
fixed costs, decreased to $75.47 per MWh in 2019 from $79.90 per MWh for the
year ended December 31, 2018.
Other Operation
The primary components of other operation expenses for GSWC include payroll,
materials and supplies, chemicals and water-treatment costs, and outside service
costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs
associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter
reading, billing, and operations of district offices.  Registrant's contracted
services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, other operation expenses by business segment
consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
                          Year            Year
                          Ended           Ended           $          %
                       12/31/2019      12/31/2018      CHANGE     CHANGE
Water Services        $     23,664    $     22,525    $ 1,139      5.1  %
Electric Services            2,672           2,809       (137 )   -4.9  %
Contracted Services          6,420           6,316        104      1.6  %
Total other operation $     32,756    $     31,650    $ 1,106      3.5  %


   For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was an increase in billed
surcharges at the water segment related to the recovery of previously incurred
other operation-related expenses of $653,000. This increase in billed surcharges
has a corresponding increase in other operation expense, resulting in no impact
to earnings. The remaining increase was mostly due to higher labor costs.

                                       32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Administrative and General
Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative
and general functions, the related employee benefits, insurance expenses,
outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses,
expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses
charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent),
consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
                                     Year            Year
                                     Ended           Ended           $           %
                                  12/31/2019      12/31/2018       CHANGE     CHANGE
Water Services                   $     51,755    $    54,212     $ (2,457 )   -4.5  %
Electric Services                       8,150          7,944          206      2.6  %
Contracted Services                    23,120         20,446        2,674     13.1  %
AWR (parent)                                9             (7 )         16        *

Total administrative and general $ 83,034 $ 82,595 $ 439

0.5 %




* not meaningful
For the year ended December 31, 2019, administrative and general expenses at the
water segment decreased due, in part, to a $1.1 million reduction to reflect the
CPUC's approval in the May 2019 final decision on the water general rate case
for recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in
CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. The remaining decrease was due primarily to
lower regulatory-related costs resulting from timing of the rate case cycle and
when such costs are incurred. GSWC will file its next water general rate case in
July 2020 and therefore, regulatory costs are expected to increase in 2020
compared to 2019.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, administrative and general expenses for
contracted services increased by $2.7 million due to the commencement of
operations at Fort Riley in July 2018, as well as an increase in legal and
labor-related costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, depreciation and amortization
expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
                                        Year            Year
                                        Ended           Ended           $           %
                                     12/31/2019      12/31/2018       CHANGE      CHANGE
Water Services                      $     29,956    $     36,137    $ (6,181 )   -17.1  %
Electric Services                          2,485           2,258         227      10.1  %
Contracted Services                        2,956           2,030        

926 45.6 % Total depreciation and amortization $ 35,397 $ 40,425 $ (5,028 ) -12.4 %




The final CPUC decision approved in May 2019 in the water general rate case
approved lower overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised
depreciation study. The decrease in composite depreciation rates lowers the
adopted water gross margin, with a corresponding decrease in adopted
depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. The decrease in
depreciation expense resulting from the new composite rates was partially offset
by increased depreciation from additions to utility plant.
The increases in depreciation expense at the electric and contracted services
segments were due to plant additions in 2018 and 2019.



                                       33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):


                        Year            Year
                        Ended           Ended          $          %
                     12/31/2019      12/31/2018      CHANGE    CHANGE
Water Services      $     11,850    $     12,102    $ (252 )   -2.1  %
Electric Services            993           1,002        (9 )   -0.9  %
Contracted Services        2,623           2,578        45      1.7  %
Total maintenance   $     15,466    $     15,682    $ (216 )   -1.4  %


Property and Other Taxes For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):


                                   Year            Year
                                   Ended           Ended          $          %
                                12/31/2019      12/31/2018      CHANGE    CHANGE
Water Services                 $     17,034    $     15,750    $ 1,284      8.2 %
Electric Services                     1,134           1,059         75      7.1 %
Contracted Services                   1,874           1,595        279    

17.5 % Total property and other taxes $ 20,042 $ 18,404 $ 1,638 8.9 %




Property and other taxes increased overall by $1.6 million during 2019 as
compared to 2018 primarily due to capital additions and the associated higher
assessed property values. Increases in property taxes are reflected in the new
adopted water revenue requirement approved by the CPUC in the general rate case.
ASUS Construction
For the year ended December 31, 2019, construction expenses for contracted
services were $55.7 million, increasing by $1.8 million compared to the same
period in 2018 due to an overall increase in construction activity as compared
to 2018 due, in part, to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July
2018.
Interest Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, interest expense by segment,
including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
                           Year            Year
                           Ended           Ended          $          %
                        12/31/2019      12/31/2018      CHANGE    CHANGE
Water Services         $     21,966    $     21,212    $   754      3.6 %
Electric Services             1,433           1,409         24      1.7 %
Contracted Services             587             362        225     62.2 %
AWR (parent)                    600             450        150     33.3 %
Total interest expense $     24,586    $     23,433    $ 1,153      4.9 %


The overall increase in interest expense is due to higher average borrowings, as
well as an overall increase in the weighted average interest rate incurred
during 2019 on the revolving credit facility, as compared to 2018. In March
2019, AWR amended this credit facility to increase its borrowing capacity from
$150.0 million to $200.0 million, and in October 2019 further amended the credit
facility to temporarily increase its borrowing capacity to $225.0 million,
effective until June 30, 2020. Borrowings made during 2019 were used to repay
$40.0 million of GSWC's 6.70% senior note, which matured in March 2019, as well
as to fund a portion of GSWC's capital expenditures. In February 2020, AWR
received a binding commitment from its lender for the option to revise the
temporary increase of the credit facility to $260.0 million through the end of
2020. When needed, AWR will be able to exercise this commitment and have
immediate access to the additional funds. On December 31, 2020, the borrowing
capacity will revert to $200.0 million. GSWC intends to issue debt in 2020 and
use the proceeds to reduce its intercompany borrowings from AWR and to partially
fund capital expenditures. AWR intends to use the proceeds from GSWC to pay down
the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.


                                       34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Interest Income
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, interest income by business
segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in
thousands):
                          Year            Year
                          Ended           Ended           $           %
                       12/31/2019      12/31/2018       CHANGE      CHANGE
Water Services        $      1,662    $     2,809     $ (1,147 )   -40.8  %
Electric Services              205             81          124         *
Contracted Services          1,321            689          632         *
AWR (parent)                    61             (1 )         62         *
Total interest income $      3,249    $     3,578     $   (329 )    -9.2  %


* not meaningful
For the year ended December 31, 2019, interest income decreased overall by
$329,000 as compared to the same period in 2018 due primarily to interest income
related to a federal tax refund recorded at the water segment in 2018, with no
similar item in 2019. This was partially offset by interest income recognized in
2019 on certain initial construction projects performed at the contacted
services segment, as well as interest related to regulatory assets for the
electric segment as a result of the August 2019 CPUC final decision.
Other, net
For the year ended December 31, 2019, other income increased by $2.5 million
primarily due to gains recorded on investments held for a retirement benefit
plan resulting from favorable market conditions, as compared to losses recorded
in 2018. This was partially offset by an increase in the non-service cost
components of net periodic benefit costs related to Registrant's defined benefit
pension plans and other retirement benefits. However, as a result of GSWC's
pension balancing account authorized by the CPUC, changes in net periodic
benefit costs are mostly offset by corresponding changes in revenues, having no
material impact to earnings.
 Income Tax Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, income tax expense by segment,
including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
                             Year            Year
                             Ended           Ended           $          %
                          12/31/2019      12/31/2018      CHANGE     CHANGE
Water Services           $    17,295     $    12,391     $ 4,904      39.6 %
Electric Services              2,882           1,212       1,670     137.8 %
Contracted Services            5,202           4,939         263       5.3 %
AWR (parent)                    (709 )          (525 )      (184 )    35.0 %
Total income tax expense $    24,670     $    18,017     $ 6,653      36.9 %


   Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2018
increased by $6.7 million primarily due to an increase in pretax income at all
segments. AWR's consolidated effective income tax rate ("ETR") was 22.6% and
22.0% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase
was due primarily to the increase in GSWC's ETR, which was 23.2% for 2019 as
compared to 22.1% for 2018 resulting primarily from net changes in certain
permanent and flow-through items, including the amortization of the excess
deferred income tax liability brought about by the lower federal corporate
income tax rate beginning in 2018. Partially offsetting the overall increase in
GSWC's ETR were lower state taxes at AWR (parent).

                                       35

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the
portrayal of AWR's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows,
and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR's
management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are
uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex.
Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory
treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies that are critical
to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the
significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of "Notes to Financial
Statements" included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
 Accounting for Rate Regulation - Because GSWC operates extensively in a
regulated business, it is subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting
for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance
requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations
adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated
operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the
balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that
those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period
different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by
an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are
then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts
are reflected in the rates charged for service.
 Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant
impact on the financial statements of GSWC. When GSWC files for adjustments to
rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to
review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of GSWC's
operations is no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of
certain types of regulation, GSWC is required to write-off related regulatory
assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might
be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of GSWC's assets are not
recoverable in customer rates, GSWC is required to determine if it has suffered
an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.
Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund
of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides
for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event
that GSWC's assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking
process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be
adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory
approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory
liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC
were to disallow costs included in the ratemaking process.
 Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in
accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and
disallowances of plant costs.
 Revenue Recognition - GSWC records water and electric utility operating
revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include
unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not
billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated
based on the number of days and total usage from each customer's most recent
billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is
used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.
Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.
 The CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms
through the adoption of the WRAM and the BRRAM.  With the adoption of these
alternative revenue programs, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM and BRRAM for
the difference between what is billed to its regulated customers and that which
is authorized by the CPUC.
As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC is
required to collect its WRAM and BRRAM balances within 24 months following the
year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for
under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18
months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the
recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and
CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM
revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period, which can affect the
timing of when such revenues are recognized.
 ASUS's 50-year firm fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are
considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession
Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for
under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or
wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on
Registrant's balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS's operations and maintenance
contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government
pursuant to 50-year contracts. Revenues from construction activities are
recognized based on either the percentage-of-completion or cost-plus methods of
accounting.  In accordance with GAAP, revenue recognition under these methods
requires management to estimate the progress toward completion on a contract in
terms of efforts, such as costs incurred.  This approach is used because
management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these
contracts. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and
estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty
provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and
income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Unbilled receivables from the U.S.

                                       36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or
for services rendered pursuant to the 50-year contracts with the U.S government,
which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the
contracts.
Income Taxes - Registrant's income tax calculations require estimates due
principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC, the multiple
states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes.
Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes
under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory
treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law,
could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations
of Registrant.
 As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as
flow-through adjustments in computing its income tax expense consistent with the
income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flow-through
adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an
offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to
these temporary differences as flow-through adjustments typically results in a
greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income
tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC were not
required to account for its income taxes as a regulated enterprise. As of
December 31, 2019, Registrant's total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was
zero.
 Pension Benefits - Registrant's pension benefit obligations and related costs
are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting
guidance for employers' accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits
other than pensions.  Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the
expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or
liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other
assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns,
mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables
Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present
value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a
high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant's discount rates were
determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using
a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates
reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.  A lower
discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases
periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the
present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense.  To
determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant
considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and
expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on
plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the
pension plan's assets was 6.50% in both 2019 and 2018.
   For the pension plan obligation, Registrant decreased the discount rate to
3.43% as of December 31, 2019 from 4.43% as of December 31, 2018 to reflect
market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2019. A hypothetical 25-basis
point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have increased total net
periodic pension expense for 2019 by approximately $761,000, or 17.1%, and would
have increased the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and accumulated benefit
obligation ("ABO") at December 31, 2019 by a total of $8.8 million, or 3.8%.  A
25-basis point further decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset
assumption would have increased 2019 pension cost by approximately $399,000, or
9.0%.
 In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future
pension cost and the Plan's funded status.  Volatile market conditions can
affect the value of plan assets held to fund its future long-term pension
benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased
future expense, an increase in the underfunded position and increased future
contributions.
 The CPUC has authorized GSWC to maintain two-way balancing accounts to track
differences between the forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and
the actual annual expense to be recorded by GSWC in accordance with the
accounting guidance for pension costs.  As of December 31, 2019, GSWC has a $2.7
million over-collection in the two-way pension balancing accounts, consisting of
a $1.5 million over-collection related to the general office and water regions,
and a $1.2 million over-collection related to BVES.
Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined
by government regulations.  In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant
has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension
Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution
as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost
authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In
accordance with this funding policy, for 2020 the pension contribution is
expected to be approximately $3.3 million. Any differences between the
forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are
included in the two-way pension balancing accounts.  Additionally, market
factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with
respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our
assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our

                                       37

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us
to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations
could materially increase.
 Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases
in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our
obligations related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and
a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments.
Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over
the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant's
defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees
hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a
defined contribution plan.

                                       38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR


Registrant's regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable
capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by
internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest
expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external
capital to fund its construction program and as market interest rates increase.
AWR believes that costs associated with capital used to fund construction at
GSWC will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to
customers.
AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common
Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The
ability of GSWC to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under
these restrictions, approximately $257.4 million was available for GSWC to pay
dividends to AWR on December 31, 2019. Approximately $62.1 million was available
for ASUS to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2019 to the extent that the
subsidiaries of ASUS are able to pay dividends in that amount to ASUS under
applicable state laws.
When necessary, Registrant obtains funds from external sources in the capital
markets and through bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable
terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business
conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general, as well as
conditions in the debt and equity capital markets.
AWR borrows under a credit facility, which expires in May 2023, and provides
funds to its subsidiaries, GSWC and ASUS, in support of their operations.  The
interest rate charged to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR's interest
expense under the credit facility. In March 2019, AWR amended this credit
facility to increase its borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to $200.0
million, and in October 2019 further amended the credit facility to temporarily
increase its borrowing capacity to $225.0 million, effective until June 30,
2020. In February 2020, AWR received a binding commitment from its lender for
the option to revise the temporary increase of the credit facility to $260.0
million through the end of 2020. When needed, AWR will be able to exercise this
commitment and have immediate access to the additional funds. On December 31,
2020, the borrowing capacity will revert to $200.0 million. As of December 31,
2019, there was $205.0 million outstanding under this facility. Management
intends to seek additional financing in 2020 through the issuance of long-term
debt at GSWC.  GSWC intends to use the proceeds from any additional long-term
debt to reduce its intercompany borrowings and to partially fund capital
expenditures.  AWR parent intends to use any financing proceeds from GSWC to pay
down the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.
In December 2019, Standard and Poor's Global Ratings ("S&P") affirmed an A+
credit rating with a stable outlook on both AWR and GSWC. S&P's debt ratings
range from AAA (highest possible) to D (obligation is in default). In May 2019,
Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") affirmed its A2 rating with a revised
outlook from positive to stable for GSWC. Securities ratings are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold a security, and are subject to change or
withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies.  Registrant believes that AWR's
sound capital structure and A+ credit rating, combined with its financial
discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets.  However,
unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or
impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case Registrant may
choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.
AWR's ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends
primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying
quarterly cash dividends in the future, on or about March 1, June 1, September 1
and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory
requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Registrant has paid dividends on its Common Shares for over 80 consecutive
years.  On January 28, 2020, AWR's Board of Directors approved a first quarter
dividend of $0.305 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common
Shares will be paid on March 2, 2020 to shareholders of record at the close of
business on February 14, 2020.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to
fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at
GSWC, construction expenses at ASUS and dividend payments. Registrant's future
cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of
factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law and deferred taxes;
maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and
safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water
and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with
local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use;
and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans.  Future
cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business
activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement
infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment
of prices and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other
prime contractors operating at the military bases.

                                       39

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



The lower federal tax rate and the elimination of bonus depreciation brought
about by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act") have and are expected to
continue to reduce Registrant's cash flows from operating activities and result
in higher financing costs arising from an increased need to borrow and/or issue
equity securities more frequently. Pursuant to a CPUC directive, the 2018 impact
of the Tax Act on the water adopted revenue requirement was tracked in a
memorandum account effective January 1, 2018. On July 1, 2018, new lower water
rates, which incorporated the new federal income tax rate, were implemented for
all water ratemaking areas. As a result of receiving the May 2019 CPUC final
decision on the water general rate case, in the third quarter of 2019 GSWC
refunded to water customers approximately $7.2 million of over-collections
recorded in this memorandum account as a one-time surcredit.
ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources,
which include U.S. government funding under 50-year contracts for operations and
maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or
loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS's
subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or its
subsidiaries.
Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income,
adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization.  Cash
generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating
activities was $116.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared
to $136.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.  There was a decrease in
cash receipts in 2019 due to lower water customer usage, delays in receiving
decisions on the water and electric general rate cases and also the refunding of
$7.2 million to water customers during the third quarter related to the Tax Act.
The decrease in water customer usage increases the under-collection balance in
the WRAM regulatory asset, which is filed annually for recovery. These decreases
in cash flows were partially offset by an increase in cash resulting from the
timing in billing of and cash receipts for construction work at military bases
during 2019. The billings (and cash receipts) for construction work at our
contracted services segment generally occur at completion of the work or in
accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S.
government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from
construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such
fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed
and when the cash is received for payment of the work. The timing of cash
receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected
the change in net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $153.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to $128.0 million used in 2018. The increase in
cash used in investing activities during 2019 was due to an increase in capital
expenditures as compared to 2018. Cash used for other investments consists
primarily of cash invested in a trust for a retirement benefit plan.
Registrant invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated
customer base and has an opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on
investments in infrastructure. Registrant's infrastructure investment plan
consists of both infrastructure renewal programs, where infrastructure is
replaced as needed, and major capital investment projects, where new water
treatment and delivery facilities are constructed.  GSWC may also be required
from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate
local infrastructure improvement projects.  Projected capital expenditures and
other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Registrant's financing activities include primarily: (i) the sale proceeds from
the issuance of Common Shares and stock option exercises and the repurchase of
Common Shares; (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes
payable to banks; and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares.  In order
to finance new infrastructure, Registrant also receives customer advances (net
of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Short-term
borrowings are used to fund capital expenditures until long-term financing is
arranged.
 Net cash provided by financing activities was $30.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to net cash used of $1.8 million for the same
period in 2018. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2019
was due largely to increased borrowings on Registrant's credit facility to
partially fund capital expenditures, as well as repay $40 million in GSWC debt,
which became due in 2019.
GSWC
GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends on its
outstanding common shares and a portion of its construction expenditures through
internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by
retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash
generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation
efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred
taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC's ability
to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance
expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable
GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers and CPUC
requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers.

                                       40

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources, including equity investments and
borrowings from AWR, and long-term debt to help fund a portion of its
construction expenditures.
In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers,
homebuilders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend
service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a
rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years.  Amounts that are no
longer subject to refund are reclassified to contributions in aid of
construction. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded
from rate base. Generally, GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction
at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.
As is often the case with public utilities, GSWC's current liabilities may at
times exceed its current assets.  Management believes that internally generated
funds, along with the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, borrowings
from AWR and common share issuances to AWR, will be adequate to provide
sufficient capital to enable GSWC to maintain normal operations and to meet its
capital and financing requirements pending recovery of costs in rates. The CPUC
requires GSWC to completely pay down all intercompany borrowings from AWR within
a 24-month period. The end of the next 24-month period in which GSWC is required
to completely pay down its intercompany borrowings will be in November 2020. As
a result, GSWC's intercompany borrowings of $158.8 million as of December 31,
2019 have been classified as a current liability on GSWC's balance sheet. GSWC
intends to use the proceeds from any new long-term debt to reduce its
intercompany borrowings and to partially fund capital expenditures. AWR parent
intends to use any financing proceeds from GSWC to pay down the amounts
outstanding under its credit facility.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities was $96.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to $120.4 million for the same period in 2018.
 The decrease in cash receipts in 2019 as compared to 2018 was due to lower
water customer usage, delays in receiving decisions on the water and electric
general rate cases and also the refunding of $7.2 million to water customers
during the third quarter of 2019 related to the Tax Act. The decrease in water
customer usage increases the under-collection balance in the WRAM regulatory
asset, which is filed annually for recovery. The timing of cash receipts and
disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in
net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $144.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to $117.9 million for the same period in 2018. The
increase in cash used in investing activities during 2019 was due to an increase
in capital expenditures as compared to 2018.
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, cash paid for capital
expenditures was $142.9 million and $116.4 million, respectively. Capital
expenditures incurred in 2019 and 2018 were consistent with GSWC's capital
investment program. GSWC expects 2020 company-funded capital expenditures to be
between $120 and $135 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net cash provided by financing activities was $43.8 million for 2019 as compared
to net cash used of $1.4 million for 2018. The increase in net cash provided by
financing activities during 2019 was due to an increase in intercompany
borrowings as compared to 2018. These proceeds were used to partially fund
capital expenditures and to repay $40.0 million of GSWC debt, which matured in
2019. There was also a decrease in dividends paid by GSWC to AWR parent in 2019
as compared to 2018.

                                       41

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Registrant has various contractual obligations which are recorded as liabilities
in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase
commitments and operating leases, are not recognized as liabilities in the
consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition
to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain
annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it
will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public
issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt
are generally made from cash flows from operations.
 The following table reflects Registrant's contractual obligations and
commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31,
2019. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore,
performance obligations associated with our 50-year firm, fixed-price contracts
with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in
the amounts below. All obligations and commitments are obligations and
commitments of GSWC unless otherwise noted.
                                                               

Payments/Commitments Due by Period (1)


                                                          Less than 1
($ in thousands)                             Total           Year           1-3 Years       4-5 Years       After 5 Years
Notes/Debentures (2)                      $ 187,000     $           -     $         -     $         -     $       187,000
Private Placement Notes (3)                  83,000                 -               -               -              83,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)                   11,293               156             348             378              10,411
Other Debt Instruments (5)                    3,406               188             409             453               2,356
Total AWR Long-Term Debt                  $ 284,699     $         344             757     $       831     $       282,767

Interest on Long-Term Debt (6)            $ 234,813     $      18,890     $    37,721     $    37,648     $       140,554
Advances for Construction (7)                67,350             3,361           6,708           6,660              50,621
Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (8)         2,323               465           1,858               -                   -
Purchased Power Contracts (9)                26,347             6,224          11,157           8,966                   -
Capital Expenditures (10)                    50,878            50,878               -               -                   -
Water Purchase Agreements (11)                4,116               417             834             834               2,031
Operating Leases (12)                        15,983             2,709           4,750           3,278               5,246
Employer Contributions (13)                   6,469             3,326           3,143               -                   -
SUB-TOTAL                                 $ 408,279     $      86,270     $    66,171     $    57,386     $       198,452

Other Commitments (14)                      214,802

TOTAL                                     $ 907,780





(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.
(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated
September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not
contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any
cross-default provisions.
(3) GSWC issued private placement notes in 1991 in the amount of $28 million
pursuant to the terms of note purchase agreements with substantially similar
terms. These agreements contain restrictions on the payment of dividends,
minimum interest coverage requirements, a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio,
and a negative pledge. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, GSWC must
maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of two times interest expense.  In
addition, a senior note in the amount of $40 million was issued by GSWC in
October 2005 to CoBank, ACB. A senior note in the amount of $15 million was
issued to The Prudential Insurance Company of America in December 2014. Under
the terms of these senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay
any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would
have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more
than 8-to-1. GSWC is in compliance with these covenant provisions as of
December 31, 2019.  GSWC does not currently have any outstanding mortgages or
other liens on indebtedness on its properties.
(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting
$7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control
Financing Authority, and (ii) $3.6 million of obligations with respect to GSWC's
500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project ("SWP"). These
obligations do not contain any financial covenants

                                       42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard
to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers
for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.
(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs
related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to
metered service in GSWC's Arden-Cordova District.
(6) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that
GSWC's long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.
(7) Advances for construction represent contract refunds by GSWC to developers
for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are
generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.
(8) Consists of an agreement by GSWC to purchase renewable energy credits
through 2023. These renewable energy credits are used by GSWC's electric
division to meet California's renewables portfolio standard.
(9) Consists of BVES fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed in September
2019 with Exelon Generation Company, LLC and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
(10) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under
signed contracts at GSWC as of December 31, 2019.
(11) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $2.1 million
under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and
(ii) an aggregate amount of $2.0 million of other water purchase commitments
with other third parties, which expire through 2038.
(12) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for
both GSWC and ASUS.
(13) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant's defined benefit pension
plan for the years 2020 through 2021. Contribution to the pension plan are
expected to be the higher of the minimum required contribution under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") or the amounts that are
recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are
estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits
established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant
impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such
amounts.
(14) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) a $225 million revolving credit
facility, of which $205.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2019; (ii)
a $8.9 million asset retirement obligation of GSWC that reflects the retirement
of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of
removal; (iii) an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $340,000 for the
deductible in Registrant's business automobile insurance policy; (iv) an
irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC in the amount of $585,000
as security for the purchase of power by BVES under an energy scheduling
agreement with Automated Power Exchange; and (v) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of
credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City
of Rancho Cordova. In February 2020, AWR received a binding commitment from its
lender for the option to temporarily increase the revolving credit facility to
$260.0 million through the end of 2020. When needed, AWR will be able to
exercise this commitment and have immediate access to the additional funds. On
December 31, 2020, the borrowing capacity will revert to $200.0 million. All of
the letters of credit are issued pursuant to the revolving credit facility. The
revolving credit facility contains restrictions on prepayments, disposition of
property, mergers, liens and negative pledges, indebtedness and guaranty
obligations, transactions with affiliates, minimum interest coverage
requirements, a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio, and a minimum debt rating.
Pursuant to the credit agreement, AWR must maintain a minimum interest coverage
ratio of 3.25 times interest expense, a maximum total funded debt ratio of
0.65-to-1.00 and a minimum debt rating from Moody's or S&P of Baa3 or BBB-,
respectively. As of December 31, 2019, AWR was in compliance with these
covenants with an interest coverage ratio of 6.89 times interest expense, a debt
ratio of 0.45-to-1.00 and debt ratings of A+ and A2.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Registrant has various contractual obligations that are recorded as liabilities
in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase
commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial
statements but are required to be disclosed.  Except for those disclosed above
in the table, Registrant does not have any other off-balance-sheet arrangements.

                                       43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Effects of Inflation
The rates of GSWC are established to provide recovery of costs and a fair return
on shareholders' investment.  Recovery of the effects of inflation through
higher water rates is dependent upon receiving adequate and timely rate
increases; however, authorized rates charged to customers are usually based on a
forecast of expenses and capital costs for GSWC. Rates may lag increases in
costs caused by unanticipated inflation.  During periods of moderate to low
inflation, as has been experienced for the last several years, the effects of
inflation on operating results have not been significant.  Furthermore, the CPUC
approves projections for a future test year in general rate cases which reduces
the impact of inflation to the extent that GSWC's inflation forecasts are
accurate.
For the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, under the terms of the
contracts with the U.S. government, the contract price is subject to an economic
price adjustment on an annual basis.  ASUS has experienced delays in some of its
economic price adjustments. However, when adjustments are finalized, they are
implemented retroactively to the effective date of the economic price
adjustment.
Climate Change
Water - GSWC considers the potential impacts of climate change in its water
supply portfolio planning and its overall infrastructure replacement plans. In
addition, GSWC considers the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and other
environmental concerns in its operations and infrastructure investments.
Electric - California has established a cap-and-trade program applicable to
greenhouse gas emissions.  While BVES's power-plant emissions are below the
reporting threshold, as a "Covered Entity" BVES has an obligation to file a
report in June of each year under the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting
Regulation.
The State of California and the CPUC have also established renewable energy
procurement targets. BVES has entered into a CPUC-approved ten-year contract for
renewable energy credits. Because of this agreement, BVES believes it will
comply through at least 2023 with California's renewable energy statutes that
address this issue.
BVES is also required to comply with the CPUC's greenhouse gas emission
performance standards. Under these standards, BVES must file an annual
attestation with the CPUC stating that BVES is in compliance. Specifically, BVES
must attest to having no new ownership investment in generation facilities
exceeding the emission performance standards and no long-term commitments for
generation exceeding the standards. In February 2020, BVES filed an attestation
that BVES complied with the standards for 2019. At this time, management cannot
estimate the impact, if any, that these regulations may have on future costs
over BVES's power plant operations or the cost of BVES's purchased power from
third party providers.
BVES Power-Supply Arrangements
BVES began taking power pursuant to purchased power contracts approved by the
CPUC effective in the fourth quarter of 2019 at a fixed cost over three and
five-year terms depending on the amount of power and period during which the
power is purchased under the contracts. In addition to the purchased power
contracts, BVES buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells
surplus power when necessary. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs,
decreased to $75.47 per MWh in 2019 from $79.90 per MWh for the year ended
December 31, 2018. BVES's average energy costs are impacted by pricing
fluctuations on the spot market. However, BVES has implemented an
electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate
any impacts to earnings.
Construction Program
GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout
its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system
materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the
distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC
upgrades its electric and water supply facilities in accordance with industry
standards, local and CPUC requirements, and new legislation.  In September 2018,
the California legislature enacted Senate Bill (SB) 901 mandating investor-owned
electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for
approval. SB 901 requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on
constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to
minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire.
As of December 31, 2019, GSWC has unconditional purchase obligations for capital
projects of approximately $50.9 million.  During the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017, GSWC had capital expenditures of $140.8 million, $125.1
million and $115.3 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital
expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of
construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, capital expenditures
funded by developers were $4.7 million, $4.1 million and $3.5 million,
respectively. During 2020, GSWC's company-funded capital expenditures are
estimated to be approximately $120 - $135 million.

                                       44

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Contracted Services


   Under the terms of the current and future utility privatization contracts
with the U.S. government, each contract's price is subject to an economic price
adjustment ("EPA") on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing
more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S.
government's request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in
substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for
proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the
utility privatization contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory
requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted
to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment ("REA"). The timely
filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for
the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of
operating, maintaining, renewing, and replacing the water and/or wastewater
systems at the military bases it serves.
Under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the "2011 Act"), substantial automatic
spending cuts, known as "sequestration," have impacted the expected levels of
Department of Defense budgeting. The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries
have not experienced any earnings impact to their existing operations and
maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization
contracts are an "excepted service" within the 2011 Act. While the ongoing
effects of sequestration have been mitigated through the passage of the
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, similar issues may
arise as part of fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by
Congress. However, any future impact on ASUS and its operations through the
Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the
timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of
EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for
new construction work not already funded by the U.S. government, and/or (d)
delays in the solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the
Department of Defense utility privatization program. Furthermore, from December
22, 2018 until January 25, 2019, the U.S. government shutdown impacted
non-essential government employees due to the lack of an approved appropriations
bill to fund the operations of the federal government for fiscal year 2019.
However, the shutdown did not have any meaningful impact on ASUS due to the fact
that funding for military operations (including military bases) is provided by
the Department of Defense, which is fully funded for fiscal year 2019 and was
not part of the government shutdown. There were no further shutdowns during the
remainder of 2019 and the start of 2020 as two continuing resolutions and a
spending package were passed allowing the federal government funding to continue
for 2020.
At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer,
perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government
guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review
findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system
requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to
and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.
Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to
operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for the
Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries in fiscal 2020.
                 Military Base                        EPA period       Filing Date
                                                    October 2019 -    Third Quarter
Fort Bliss (FBWS)                                   September 2020        2019
                                                   February 2020 -       Fourth
Andrews Air Force Base (TUS)                         January 2021     Quarter 2019
                                                   February 2020 -       Fourth
Fort Lee (ODUS)                                      January 2021     Quarter 2019
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint
Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story           April 2020 -     First Quarter
(ODUS)                                                March 2021         of 2020
                                                   February 2020 -       Fourth
Fort Jackson (PSUS)                                  January 2021     Quarter 2019
                                                     March 2020 -     First Quarter
Fort Bragg (ONUS)                                   February 2021         2020
                                                   June 2020 - May       Second
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)                              2021         Quarter 2020
                                                   July 2020 - June      Second
Fort Riley (FRUS)                                        2021         Quarter 2020

ASUS assumed the operation of the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at Fort Riley on July 1, 2018. The value of this contract is approximately $681.0 million over its 50-year term, subject to annual economic price adjustments.


                                       45

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Regulatory Matters
Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity
GSWC holds Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity ("CPCN") granted by
the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas it serves. ASUS is regulated, if
applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater
operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a
public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the
right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews,
Maryland, based on certain conditions. The South Carolina Public Service
Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company.  ONUS
is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS and FRUS are
not subject to regulation by their respective states' utility commissions.
Rate Regulation
GSWC is subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service
and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the
purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in
rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of
certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services
and facilities and various other matters.
Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general
rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital,
as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according
to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing
for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base.
Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service,
plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less
accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax
liabilities and certain other deductions.
GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years
according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically
include an increase in the first test year with inflation-rate adjustments for
expenses for the second and third years of the rate case cycle.  For capital
projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses
and capital costs for each test year. Electric general rate cases are typically
filed every four years. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain
expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and
balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant
additions and other operating cost increases.
Neither the operations nor rates of AWR and ASUS are directly regulated by the
CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC and
ASUS and between GSWC and AWR.
General Rate Case Filings
Water Segment:
In July 2017, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water
regions and the general office to determine new rates for the years 2019 - 2021.
On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate
case with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019. Among other things, the final
decision approves in its entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had
been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC's Public Advocates Office. As a
result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $334.5
million over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment
includes $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery
through advice letters when those projects are completed.
Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the new rates approved increased
the adopted water gross margin for 2019 by approximately $7.1 million, adjusted
for updated inflation index values since the August 2018 settlement, as compared
to the 2018 adopted water gross margin. The 2019 water revenue requirement has
been reduced to reflect a decrease of approximately $7.0 million in depreciation
expense, compared to the adopted 2018 depreciation expense, due to a reduction
in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in
the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water
gross margin and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense,
resulting in no impact to net earnings. In addition, the 2019 water revenue
requirement includes a decrease of approximately $2.2 million for excess
deferred tax refunds as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act"),
with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense also resulting in no impact
to net earnings. Had depreciation remained the same as the 2018 adopted amount
and there were no excess deferred tax refunds that lowered the 2019 revenue
requirement, the water gross margin for 2019 would have increased by
approximately $16.3 million.
As a result of the May 2019 CPUC final decision, GSWC implemented new water
rates on June 8, 2019. The final decision also allowed for a water gross margin
increase of approximately $10.4 million from new customer rates for 2020, which
were effective January 1, 2020, as well as an additional increase of
approximately $11.4 million in 2021, subject to the results of an earnings test
and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values.

                                       46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Electric Segment:
In May 2017, GSWC filed its electric general rate case application with the CPUC
to determine new electric rates for the years 2018 through 2021. In November
2018, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion to adopt a
settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connection
with the general rate case.
On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on this general rate case,
adopting the settlement agreement in its entirety. Among other things, the
decision (i) extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates will be effective for
2018 - 2022); (ii) increases the adopted electric gross margin for 2018 by
approximately $2.3 million compared to the 2017 adopted electric gross margin,
adjusted for Tax Act changes; (iii) authorizes BVES to construct all the capital
projects requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system
safety and reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate
cycle; and (iv) increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for
each of the years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in
2022. The rate increases for 2019 - 2022 are not subject to an earnings test.
The decision authorizes a return on equity for GSWC's electric segment of 9.60%,
as compared to its previously authorized return of 9.95% and includes a capital
structure and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in
March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding.
Cost of Capital Proceedings
In March 2018, the CPUC issued a final decision in the cost of capital
proceeding for GSWC and three other water utilities serving California for the
years 2018 - 2020. Among other things, the final decision adopted for GSWC's
water segment a return on equity of 8.90%, with a return on rate base of 7.91%.
The previously authorized return on equity for GSWC's water segment was 9.43%,
with a return on rate base of 8.34%.
Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their
cost of capital applications on a triennial basis with the next scheduled filing
to take place on May 1, 2020 effective for the years 2021 - 2023. In January
2020, GSWC, along with the three other water utilities, requested an extension
of the date by which each of them must file its 2020 cost of capital
applications. If approved, the request would postpone this filing date by one
year until May 1, 2021, with a corresponding effective date of January 1, 2022.
As part of this request, the joint parties agreed to leave the current Water
Cost of Capital Mechanism in place, but that there will be no changes to the
respective costs of capital during the one-year extension, regardless of what
the mechanism might otherwise indicate. The joint parties are currently awaiting
the CPUC's response to the joint request.
Other Regulatory Matters
Application to Transfer Electric Utility Operations to New Subsidiary:
GSWC filed applications with the CPUC and the FERC in December 2018 and
July 2019, respectively, to transfer the assets and liabilities of the BVES
division of GSWC to Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc., a newly created separate
legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR.  Due to the differences in
operations, regulations, and risks, management believes a separate electric
legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR is in the best interests of
customers, employees, and the communities served.  The FERC and CPUC approved
GSWC's application for reorganization in October and December of 2019,
respectively. The reorganization plan is pending the completion of certain
closing procedures to effectuate the transfer of assets and liabilities
including, among other things, an additional FERC approval for tariffs. When
completed, the reorganization plan is not expected to result in a substantive
change to AWR's operations and business segments.
Wildfire Mitigation Plan and New California Legislation:
In September 2018, the California legislature enacted Senate Bill (SB) 901
mandating investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire
mitigation plan (WMP) to the CPUC for approval. SB 901 requires all electric
utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their
electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. In
February 2019 BVES filed its first WMP, which was subsequently approved by the
CPUC in June 2019. Among other things, the WMP approves capital projects and
programs dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and, specifically,
aimed at reducing the possibility of wildfires. Upon approval in June 2019, BVES
commenced executing its WMP immediately. BVES filed its second WMP with the CPUC
on February 7, 2020.
Additionally, the California legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 1054 in July
2019, which among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC
proceedings in which an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeks
to recover wildfire costs. Traditionally, an electric utility seeking to recover
costs has the burden to prove that it acted reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an
electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have
acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a "serious
doubt" as to the reasonableness of the utility's conduct. BVES received its
initial safety certification from the CPUC on February 4, 2020.

                                       47

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



AB 1054 also establishes a Wildfire Fund to pay eligible claims arising from a
covered wildfire under certain circumstances.  The Wildfire Fund is expected to
be funded partially by electrical corporation shareholders, and partly by
ratepayers.  California's three largest electric utilities are participating in
the Wildfire Fund. Other investor-owned electric utilities (referred to as
"regional" utilities), including GSWC's BVES division have decided not to
participate.  It is highly unlikely that the Wildfire Fund will have any
financial value for regional utilities such as BVES because withdrawals by a
regional utility are capped per wildfire at three times the regional utility's
aggregate initial and annual contributions and withdrawals may only be made if
and to the extent that the amount of the claims against the utility (which must
be settled or finally adjudicated) in a given year exceed the greater of the
amount of the utility's insurance or $1 billion dollars. It is remote that
claims within BVES's service territory from a wildfire will reach the $1 billion
minimum, and if they did, the claims would likely exceed the amount that the
electric division would be able to access from the Wildfire Fund.
Solar Energy Project:
BVES is subject to the California renewables portfolio standard ("RPS") law,
which requires BVES to meet certain targets for purchases of energy from
qualified renewable energy resources. BVES has purchased renewable energy
credits from sources outside its service territory, which are being used towards
meeting the RPS requirements. However, to ensure local area reliability and help
meet its RPS requirements over the long-term, in December 2019, BVES filed an
application with the CPUC for the development of a turn-key solar project within
its service territory. BVES has selected a 7.9-megawatt solar generation project
that will be constructed by a third party and will be connected directly with
BVES's existing distribution system, which will help in achieving California's
energy and environmental goals. BVES estimates the total cost of this solar
project to be approximately $14.3 million. In December 2019, BVES filed a joint
motion to adopt a settlement agreement between BVES and the CPUC's Public
Advocates Office for approval to acquire, own and operate the solar generation
project upon completion. The CPUC is scheduled to issue a proposed decision in
this proceeding during the second quarter of 2020.
For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of
"Notes to Financial Statements" included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Environmental Matters
AWR's subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC is
required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA") and the Division of Drinking
Water ("DDW"), under the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB").  The
U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are
known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation
of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The
DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA's program in
California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in
which Registrant operates.
GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among
other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act
("SDWA"). GSWC works proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to
address issues relating to known contamination threatening GSWC water sources.
GSWC also incurs operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of
the constituents in its sources of supply and additional expense to treat
contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level
standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs
as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water
delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources
associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, as well as to meet future water
quality standards and consumer expectations. The CPUC ratemaking process
provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and
operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality
standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs
should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.
Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup
GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at a plant site
("Chadron Plant") that contained an underground storage tank that was used to
store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in
July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has
been involved in various remediation activities at this site.
As of December 31, 2019, the total spent to cleanup and remediate GSWC's plant
facility was approximately $6.3 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by
the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have
been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of
December 31, 2019, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the
estimated additional cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site.
The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and
monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The
ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground
gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available
information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated
additional costs will be approved for inclusion in rate base by the CPUC.

                                       48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels
In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain
fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials,
and used in various industrial processes.  These chemicals were also present in
certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as
perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Notification levels are health-based advisory
levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum
contaminant levels have not been established. The US EPA has also established
health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and
stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are
exceeded.  Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in
January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notification requirements
for water systems detecting levels of PFAS above response levels. GSWC is in the
process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS under the direction of DDW.
GSWC has removed some wells from service, and expects to incur additional
treatment costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with
information regarding PFAS detections, and provided updated information via its
website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the
PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 40
parts per trillion for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS).
Lead Testing in Schools
In January 2017, the California State Water Resources Control Board - Division
of Drinking Water (DDW) issued a permit amendment that required all community
water systems to test the schools in their service area for lead, if sampling is
requested in writing by the institution's officials. In addition, the California
Assembly passed Assembly Bill 746 in October 2017, which required all community
water systems that serve a school site of a local educational agency with a
building constructed before January 1, 2010, to test for lead in the potable
water system of the school site on or before July 1, 2019. GSWC worked
extensively with the schools in its service areas. As a result of concerted
outreach to the schools, GSWC completed lead sampling at all schools that were
subject to Assembly Bill 746 in its service area in 2019.
Matters Relating to Military Privatization Contracts
Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries is responsible for
testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it
operates in accordance with applicable law.
Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries has the right to seek an
equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in
environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water
service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the
air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of the Military Utility
Privatization Subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance
and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is
responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and
for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a
contract.
Security Issues
GSWC has security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent
unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyber-attacks.  GSWC utilizes a
variety of physical security measures to protect its facilities.  GSWC also
considers advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and
relevant industry developments in developing its capital-improvement plans. GSWC
intends to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that it
incurs in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of its water and
electric systems.
The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries operate facilities within the
boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general
public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades were
completed at various military bases through contract modifications funded by the
U.S. government.
Registrant has evaluated its cyber-security systems and continues to address
identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations
regarding cyber-security of government contractors. These improvements include
the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates.
Registrant believes it is in compliance with these regulations.
Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cyber-attacks
or other attacks will not cause water or electric system problems, disrupt
service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in
unintended release of customer or employee information.

                                       49

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



GSWC's Water Supply
During 2019, GSWC delivered approximately 59.5 million hundred cubic feet
("ccf") of water to its customers, which is an average of about 374 acre-feet
per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons).
Approximately 53% of GSWC's supply came from groundwater production wells
situated throughout GSWC's service areas.  GSWC supplemented its groundwater
production with wholesale purchases from Metropolitan Water District ("MWD")
member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 44% of total demand) and
with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 3%) under contracts with the
United States Bureau of Reclamation ("Bureau") and the Sacramento Municipal
Utility District ("SMUD").  GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve
recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its
water rights and groundwater storage assets.
Groundwater
GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater
rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help
meet supply requirements.  The productivity of GSWC's groundwater resources
varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural
replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported
replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater
basins, natural or man-made contamination, legal production limitations, and the
amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC's customers and others. GSWC
actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and
from contamination.  In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in
groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC
also participates in implementation of California's Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act.
From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others
for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights
for an aggregate amount of $4.1 million as of December 31, 2019.  Included in
the $4.1 million is a remaining commitment of $2.1 million under an agreement
with the City of Claremont ("the City") to lease water rights that were ascribed
to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the
agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement
for 10 additional years. The remaining $2.0 million is for commitments for
purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.
Imported Water
GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water
wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area.  For
example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities (principally MWD
member agencies) and other parties to purchase water through a total of 58
connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency
connections.  MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a
supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies.  There are 26 such
member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one
county water authority.  GSWC has 45 connections to MWD's water distribution
facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six
separate member agencies aggregating 49,973 acre-feet annually.  MWD's principal
source of water is the SWP and the Colorado River via the Colorado River
Aqueduct.
Drought Impact
In May 2018, the California Legislature passed two bills that provide a
framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and
resiliency. The initial steps in implementation of this legislation has been
laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources
("DWR") and State Water Resources Control Board ("SWQCB"). Over the next several
years, State agencies, water suppliers and other entities will be working to
meet the requirements and timelines of plan implementation. A notable milestone
is the establishment of indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per
day (gpcd) until 2025 at which time the standard may be reduced to 52.5 gpcd or
a new standard as recommend by DWR.
California's recent period of multi-year drought resulted in reduced recharge to
the state's groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous
groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially
smaller basins, experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought.
Several of GSWC's service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of
supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in California's
Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain
service areas, in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply
shortages beyond the locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport
additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply.
The 2018-2019 water year was a normal year, with rainfall in northern California
being above normal levels. Precipitation to date in 2020 has been slightly below
normal levels with statewide snowpack at about 75% of average. As of February
18, 2020, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that approximately 10% of California
was considered in a "Moderate Drought" as compared to approximately 4% one year
ago. If dry conditions continue or get worse, the SWQCB or other regulatory
agencies may impose emergency drought actions. Due to local conditions,
water-use restrictions and allocations

                                       50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



remain in place for customers in some of GSWC's service areas.  GSWC continues
assessing water supply conditions and water-use restrictions in these service
areas and will make appropriate adjustments as needed.
Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries
The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all
water on each of the bases served by the Military Utility Privatization
Subsidiaries at no cost to the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. Once
received from the U.S. government, ASUS is responsible for ensuring the
continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state
and local regulations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes
in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See
Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                       51

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses