Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  BlackRock, Inc.    BLK


News SummaryMost relevantAll newsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

BlackRock Flexes Muscles on Climate -- WSJ

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
01/21/2020 | 02:48am EST

By James Mackintosh

Climate change poses two distinct risks for investors, and a special one for fund managers. The pledge last week by Larry Fink, CEO of fund giant BlackRock Inc., to push clients toward environmental, social and governance investing highlights another risk: that markets are shifting from harnessing the wisdom of crowds to the wisdom of a handful of powerful money-management executives.

Leave the pros and cons of ESG aside for a moment. Whatever you think of Mr. Fink's view, his letter highlights the power he wields over the direction of corporate America, thanks to the votes of BlackRock's extensive holdings. Shareholders used to have diverse views, with individual managers even within the same organization often disagreeing on what companies should do. Just as the market is meant to set prices by balancing many different opinions, there were many people deciding on any given shareholder vote.

That's changing fast. Index funds are now as big as actively run mutual funds, but are disproportionately run by just three companies: BlackRock, Vanguard Group and State Street Corp. We shouldn't exaggerate: BlackRock doesn't own enough stock to dictate to CEOs. But between them, the three indexing giants hold roughly a fifth of the S&P 500 through funds they run for investors, and are often -- as with JP Morgan Chase & Co. -- the three biggest shareholders.

Their decisions on any controversial vote are already highly influential on the outcome, and the trend toward indexing shows no sign of slowing.

Agree or disagree with Mr. Fink's demand for more action from companies on climate issues, the fact that just one man -- albeit a very smart man -- is in a position to do this in the first place is scary. This is probably one reason Mr. Fink promised more transparency over voting. But as the power of just three companies keeps growing, it is time governments started to think about spreading voting more widely. One way would be to give investors in index funds the decision on how to vote. After all, it is investors' money, not Mr. Fink's.

Still, Mr. Fink is surely right that investors should worry about climate risks leading to big shifts of capital, and therefore big price moves. The trouble is that we know very little about what those shifts of capital will be and where they will lead to profit or loss, both because we cannot be sure how weather patterns will be affected and because much else depends on politics.

Aside from some obvious examples -- beachfront real estate in Florida -- it is hard to have much confidence in assessments of the physical effect of climate change on economies or companies, let alone on share prices.

BlackRock thinks it is starting to get a handle on which municipalities, and so their bonds, will suffer most; on increased risk to commercial mortgages from hurricanes; and on which electric utilities have, like PG&E, invested too little to counter climate risk. But these are early days.

The political impact is even harder to quantify, because governments might do a lot, or nothing. Even when governments do act, shareholders of "dirty" companies might benefit; anticipation of multibillion-euro compensation payments in Germany's belated deal last week to end coal-fired power by 2038 led the shares of the country's coal-reliant utility RWE AG to jump.

The risk for fund managers is clearer: If they don't act, they face the prospect of protests and loss of assets from clients most worried about climate. BlackRock is the obvious target, as the world's biggest manager: Extinction Rebellion activists glued themselves to its London building last year. Worse for Mr. Fink, its approach to engaging with companies was a contributing factor to last year's loss of roughly half its $50 billion mandate from Japan's Government Pension Investment Fund, the world's biggest institutional investor. Going public with a strong commitment to tackling climate change is a sensible way to counter the risk to BlackRock itself.

That doesn't mean Mr. Fink is right that incorporating ESG into investment will lead to better performance, something he insists in a letter to clients is the reason to integrate "sustainability" into how the company manages money.

Performance of BlackRock's own iShares range of ESG funds shows that ESG is no guarantee of gold-plated returns.

Its two oldest in the U.S., set up in 2005 and 2006 and now tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select index and the MSCI KLD 400 Social index, have both lagged behind iShares' S&P 500 fund.

Two more recent funds set up in 2016 and last year are slightly ahead, as U.S. ESG approaches have mostly beaten the S&P in the past three years. It's possible that U.S. ESG is starting to outperform as it becomes fashionable. It's also possible that this is just a temporary advantage from holding less in oil stocks during a rough patch for crude producers.

Whatever your views on the merits of ESG investing, BlackRock will now be nudging clients toward ESG funds and pushing companies to act. The chances are that this will be marginal in the efforts to do more to tackle climate change, at best. But by sending a signal that serious money is not just prepared for government action on carbon but might even welcome it, it is just possible it will make that government action more likely.

Write to James Mackintosh at James.Mackintosh@wsj.com

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
BLACKROCK, INC. -6.42% 475.82 Delayed Quote.-5.35%
DJ INDUSTRIAL -4.42% 25766.64 Delayed Quote.-5.54%
NASDAQ 100 -4.93% 8436.666084 Delayed Quote.1.17%
NASDAQ COMP. -4.61% 8566.479823 Delayed Quote.-0.08%
S&P 500 -4.42% 2978.76 Delayed Quote.-3.54%
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on BLACKROCK, INC.
02/27Investment Funds Move to Exit From Sector -- WSJ
02/26BLACKROCK LONG TERM PRIVATE CAPITAL : to Invest in Luxury Fragrance Company Cree..
02/26NOTIFICATION ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 9, : BlackRock Inc.'s holding in Metso
02/26As Investors Cast Off Coal Stakes, Miners Rely on a Few Big Funds
02/25AI computing startup SambaNova raises $250 million in BlackRock-led funding
02/25JPMorgan Chase plans to unveil climate initiatives at investor day
02/25JPMorgan to Increase Restrictions on Coal Funding
02/24BLACKROCK : reg; Canada Announces Final February Cash Distributions for the iSha..
02/24Bank of America veteran deal-maker Boueiz resigns after 21 years
02/24Bank of America veteran deal-maker Boueiz resigns after 21 years - source
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2020 15 814 M
EBIT 2020 6 440 M
Net income 2020 4 958 M
Finance 2020 1 933 M
Yield 2020 2,98%
P/E ratio 2020 14,9x
P/E ratio 2021 13,7x
EV / Sales2020 4,55x
EV / Sales2021 4,19x
Capitalization 73 847 M
Duration : Period :
BlackRock, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends BLACKROCK, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 18
Average target price 589,17  $
Last Close Price 475,82  $
Spread / Highest target 35,3%
Spread / Average Target 23,8%
Spread / Lowest Target 6,13%
EPS Revisions
Laurence Douglas Fink Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Robert Steven Kapito President & Non-Independent Director
Robert L. Goldstein Chief Operating Officer & Senior Managing Director
Gary S. Shedlin Chief Financial Officer & Senior Managing Director
Derek N. Stein Global Head-Business Operations & Technology
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
BLACKROCK, INC.-5.35%73 847
UBS GROUP-4.34%41 248