Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  C&J Energy Services, Inc.    CJ

C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

(CJ)
  Report  
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsAnalyst Recommendations

Oil service firms eye new survival tactics amid weak U.S. market

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
07/17/2019 | 02:33pm EDT
A drilling crew member raises drill pipe onto the drilling rig floor on an oil rig in the Permian Basin near Wink

(Reuters) - Packers Plus Energy Services, a company built on the North American shale oil boom, is turning to the Middle East to weather a new round of spending cuts by producers amid warnings of a looming oil glut.

Oil production has outpaced demand by 900,000 barrels per day (bpd) this year, according to the International Energy Agency, which expects increases to add a net 136 million barrels to the global surplus by March. Spending cuts by producers also have sharply cut service providers' margins, a June survey of 60 providers by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank revealed.

The last time supplies overwhelmed demand, oilfield service suppliers cut 100s of thousands of jobs and top firms gushed red ink. Memories of that sharp downturn in late 2014 have executives such as Ian Bryant, chief executive officer of privately-held, Calgary-based Packers Plus, again cutting jobs, seeking safe harbors, mergers, or putting business units on the market.

These defensive strategies comes as oil and gas drillers are producing vastly more oil with less investment.

U.S. shale output is estimated to have hit 8.5 million bpd, even as the number of rigs in operation fell by almost 100 in the last year. On average, analysts expect the top 50 U.S. independent oil producers will cut spending by 20% this year, with some by as much as 60%, according to review by researcher DrillingInfo.

That drop has Bryant's Packers Plus, which historically catered to North American onshore producers, looking beyond shale and towards markets in the Middle East for future business.

"There are obviously geopolitical risks, but the cycles are not as vicious as they are in North American land,” said Bryant in an interview. He cut 10% of Packers' staff in North America earlier this year and is planning to open a manufacturing centre at an undisclosed location in the Middle East. The bet: there will be more growth there and better margins than in North America.

“For some exploration and production companies, the downturn is over and behind them. For most service companies, it still feels like we’re in the downturn,” said Bryant. "Service pricing is unsustainable at present levels."

'TOO MANY PLAYERS'

Weatherford International, once a top four oilfield service provider, filed for protection from creditors this month and has been cutting staff, citing "market headwinds" and lack of access to financing.

In the last 18 months, other top service firms, including the world's top oilfield services company Schlumberger, added or acquired new hydraulic fracturing fleets in a bet that a backlog of uncompleted shale wells would grow their businesses.

But across the U.S. the number of yet-to-be-fracked wells hit 8,289 in May, up 22% in a year, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Oil and gas employment in the United States has grown since the last downturn, but last month remained 20% below the same month in 2014, according to U.S. government data.

Some investors and executives believe a wave of mergers and restructurings will be required to prop up declining margins.

"There's just frankly too many players," Roe Patterson, CEO of Fort Worth, Texas-based Basic Energy Services Inc, said of the oilfield services industry in May.

"Everyone understands that trying to reduce our cost structure is not going to be how we improve and fix the OFS (oilfield service) space. We've got to see a shrinking number of bidders and competitors out there."


(GRAPHIC: More oil with fewer workers -

CAN MERGERS FIX MARGIN PRESSURE?

Profits for service companies that added people and equipment following the 2015-2016 oil price collapse also have suffered. Oilfield equipment utilization fell nearly 13 points and profitability tumbled 26 points versus the previous quarter, according a June survey by the Dallas Federal Reserve bank. Its survey polled 60 oilfield service companies in Texas, New Mexico and Louisiana.

Investors have so soured on the sector that there were no public equity offerings by oilfield service firms last quarter, said Drillinginfo, for the first time in more than three years.

C&J Energy Services Inc and Keane Group Inc struck an all-stock deal in June to merge, a move that investors hoped would spark more.

However, that combination still leaves about 14 larger pressure pumping firms in business, estimates Brad Handler, an oilfield services analyst at investment firm Jefferies. He estimates five are candidates to sell their pressuring pumping businesses.

"If a much-needed transaction doesn't happen, service companies will have to look at refinancing or entering into out of court agreements with debt-holders, or filing bankruptcy," said Kelli Norfleet, a restructuring partner at law firm Haynes & Boone.

But even as companies look to consolidate, too many are in such poor shape to attract a buyer.

Patterson's Basic Energy Services ratio of debt to pre-tax earnings is 5.57, according to Moody's Investors Service. By comparison, Keane's debt to EBITDA ratio was 1.05 before it merged with C&J Energy Services.

"There are not very many buyers," said Sajjad Alam, an analyst for debt rating firm Moody's Investors Service. "The market is still very weak and looks more uncertain today than it did earlier in the year."

(Reporting by Liz Hampton; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

By Liz Hampton

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC. -5.90% 0.7623 Delayed Quote.-80.15%
C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 1.15% 8.76 Delayed Quote.-35.11%
HALLIBURTON COMPANY -0.43% 18.43 Delayed Quote.-30.66%
KEANE GROUP, INC. 1.68% 4.83 Delayed Quote.-40.95%
LONDON BRENT OIL -0.68% 58.77 Delayed Quote.9.05%
SCHLUMBERGER NV 1.32% 32.31 Delayed Quote.-10.45%
WTI -0.45% 53.31 Delayed Quote.16.30%
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
10/11C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. : Other Events (form 8-K)
AQ
10/04C&J ENERGY SERVICES : Announces Special Cash Dividend
PR
10/03C&J ENERGY SERVICES : Title C&J Energy Services and Keane Announce Executive Lea..
AQ
08/28New Polls Show Biden Leading 2020 Pack
DJ
08/26C&J ENERGY SERVICES : and Keane to Participate in Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conf..
BU
08/07C&J ENERGY SERVICES : Management's Discussion and Analysist of Financial Conditi..
AQ
08/06C&J ENERGY SERVICES : 2Q Earnings Snapshot
AQ
08/06C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. : Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Regul..
AQ
07/25C&J ENERGY SERVICES : Announces Timing of Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Release a..
PR
07/19C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. : Other Events (form 8-K)
AQ
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2019 1 899 M
EBIT 2019 -83,3 M
Net income 2019 -162 M
Finance 2019 151 M
Yield 2019 -
P/E ratio 2019 -3,55x
P/E ratio 2020 -6,67x
EV / Sales2019 0,22x
EV / Sales2020 0,23x
Capitalization 570 M
Chart C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Duration : Period :
C&J Energy Services, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 11
Average target price 13,51  $
Last Close Price 8,76  $
Spread / Highest target 151%
Spread / Average Target 54,2%
Spread / Lowest Target 2,74%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Donald Jeffrey Gawick President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Patrick M. Murray Chairman
Jan Kees van Gaalen Chief Financial Officer
Patrick Bixenman President-Research & Technology
Stuart Michael Brightman Independent Director
Sector and Competitors