Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nasdaq  >  Columbia Sportswear Company    COLM


News SummaryMost relevantAll newsOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

Columbia Sportswear Company : The success story of a family

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
03/09/2019 | 01:47pm EDT

Like Nike, Columbia Sportswear is a sportswear brand - focused on the ‘outdoor’ and mountain niche. The company was born in Oregon, developed by a visionary entrepreneur and is still closely controlled by the founding family.

Like Nike, Columbia Sportswear is a sportswear brand - focused on the ‘outdoor’ and mountain niche. The company was born in Oregon, developed by a visionary entrepreneur and is still closely controlled by the founding family.



The Boyle family holds 53% of the capital. Fun fact: while Timothy Boyle (69) ensures the management of the company since 1978, it’s his mother Gertrude Boyle (95) who continues to chair the board.

Gertrude is the spouse of the late Neil Boyle, the founder of the company who died in 1970. The latter had fled Nazi Germany in 1937, emigrated to Oregon and, in the wake of that, bought Columbia which at the time was a hat factory.

At the start of the century, the company generates a turnover of $1 billion and is among the most profitable textile brands in the world. Its distribution is then mainly provided by large retailers such as Sears, Wal-Mart, and Target, and limited to North America despite a remarkable breakthrough abroad.

It’s only several years later that Timothy Boyle, who is a witness of the success of rivals such as North Face or Patagonia, takes the initiative to completely reposition its offer: with the assistance of a freshly recruited scientific team, Columbia filed more than 200 patens and positioned itself as a pioneer in textile technology in extreme environments from then on. 

These innovations allowed the brand to upgrade to a higher range, to boost its margins and to seduce a more demanding clientele. However, in parallel with a fierce competition, the Boyle family had to deal with another major strategic challenge: the decline of large general retailers - like Sears, which went bankrupt a couple of months ago.

This is why, on top of polishing the brand’s image and issuing good products, the company had to develop direct sales channels - both physically and online - as well as new distribution networks. Simple in theory, but the operational implementation is much more difficult in reality: there are plenty of failures that, as we all know, provide a prime hunting ground for private equity firms - for which buying and restructuring obsolete brands has long been one of the most profitable niches.

Not only has Columbia been able to escape this kind of doom scenario, but it has done so with panache: the sales have doubled between 2010 and 2018 (from $1.4 to $2.8 billion) while the profit exploded (from $77 to $268 million). The gross margin profile - a true sign of a brand’s seduction power - is close to 50%: this is more than mainstream fashion brands such as Nike, Gap or L Brands (Victoria’s Secret), but of course one or two notches below ‘luxury’ brands such as Moncler or Hugo Boss. 



The strong operating performance of the company must be put into perspective with its extraordinary financial position: the balance sheet is a true fortress - like the majority of the investments in the MarketScreener portfolios - since the current assets alone ($1.7 billion, two-thirds of which consist of cash and equivalents) largely cover all of the company’s liabilities ($678 million).


This strength is the result of an exceptionally non-capital intensive business model that delegates the distribution of the brand to partners rather than to stores it owns - the company only has 261 stores, half of which are in North America: this is also a classic character trait of family-run companies, they are naturally less aggressive than companies in which the management takes risks with money that isn’t theirs.

The other side of an excessive capitalization is that the management sacrifices an optimal return on equity - this remains, however, appropriate, since it hovers around 15% - on the altar of a comfortable long-term financial security. The return on capital - working capital and fixed assets - remains however prodigious, as the intrinsic quality of the business demonstrates.

Certain investors will regret what they without a doubt perceive as a wait-and-see attitude. Others - among which the author - will welcome the heritage logic of the founding family and remember that a capitalization with a higher leverage (almost) always ends up by turning against the company - as the recent difficulties of brands like Hugo Boss show us; always on point fashion-wise but penalized by too much debt.

The business model is also characterized by - we mentioned it earlier - a maximum operating leverage: with a fixed cost structure - that mainly consists of administrative and advertising costs - that’s more or less stable, all the extra dollars earned with the gross margin (top line) find themselves in the net margin (bottom line); an increase in sales generates thus an exponential impact on the profits which is also well-reflected in the evolution of the share price over the past years.

Of course, the opposite is true too if the sales started to drop!

The company’s accounting is conservative and the free cash flow is easily reconcilable with the net result when it isn’t frankly superior to the latter. An appreciable advantage: besides the little capital that’s mobilized, maintaining a modest distribution network of its own allows the company to keep a very limited need for working capital and to maximize its cash generation.

On a valuation level, the share price currently is $100, or, once the company value is adjusted by the excess cash, a multiple of around 23 times the profit of the previous financial year, and barely two times the expected sales for 2019. Please note: we retain the earnings per share here rather than the free cash-flow because the former usually is lower than the latter - this choice, therefore, seems conservative; for a more in-depth discussion on this topic, you can read our article Accounting profit vs. free cash-flow.



More or less in line with the market - despite a potentially above-average growth profile - this valuation seems however very reasonable if the strong sales trend continues. By the way, on the private market, and in the interest rate environment that we have known for nearly twenty years, a growing brand typically trades at higher multiples.

Columbia’s future will depend on its success in Asia, and on the returns it will get from its online investments. The analysts who follow the company - whose consensus is updated in real-time by MarketScreener - believe in these perspectives at least as much as the company’s management: the latter is known for its prudence and its common sense and launched a share buy-back plan of up to $200 million in 2018 - which is essentially the profit of the year - at an average price of $85 per share.  

This probably means that the management considers its share undervalued at this price - which of course doesn’t mean that this is the case.

Let’s note that Columbia’s sales are, unsurprisingly, subject to a rather district seasonal impact: this is why investors who follow ‘timing’ methods if they are interested in the company, will perhaps prefer a mid-year entry point.

Columbia Sportswear Company is an opportunity on the crossroads of growth and momentum and enters as such the MarketScreener USA Portfolio.

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY -1.67% 95.34 Delayed Quote.15.31%
VALUE8 N.V. 0.36% 5.56 Delayed Quote.16.88%

Neelie Verlinden
© MarketScreener.com 2019
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
06:50aCOLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : Launches the SH/FT Collection, an Urban Footwear Line Desi..
09/06COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY : to Support Dorian Relief Efforts
08/26COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY : Announces Global Headquarters Expansion
08/21COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY : Announces Global Headquarters Expansion
08/14COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY : Ex-dividend day for
08/12COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : Launches the SH/FT Collection, an Urban Footwear Line Desi..
08/12COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : Statement from Tim Boyle, President & CEO, Columbia Sports..
08/05COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : Launches the SH/FT Collection, an Urban Footwear Line Desi..
08/02COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : How Trump's latest China tariffs could squeeze US consumer..
08/01COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR : Statement from Tim Boyle, President & CEO, Columbia Sports..
More news
Surperformance© ratings
Fundamental ratings
Overall rating
Trading Rating
Investor Rating
Growth (Revenue)
Earnings quality
Business Predictability
P/E ratio
7 days EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months Revenue revision
1 year Revenue revision
Technical ratings
Short Term Timing
Middle Term Timing
Long Term Timing
Bollinger Spread
Unusual Volumes
Financial Ratios

Size 2019e 2020e
Capitalization 6 441 M $ -
Entreprise Value (EV) 5 702 M $ 5 532 M $
Valuation 2019e 2020e
P/E ratio (Price / EPS) 20,0x 18,3x
Capitalization / Revenue 2,12x 1,99x
EV / Revenue 1,88x 1,76x
EV / EBITDA 11,5x 10,7x
Yield (DPS / Price) 1,02% 1,09%
Price to book (Price / BVPS) 3,50x 3,04x
Profitability 2019e 2020e
Operating Margin (EBIT / Sales) 13,1% 13,6%
Operating Leverage (Delta EBIT / Delta Sales) 1,17x 1,65x
Net Margin (Net Profit / Revenue) 10,7% 10,9%
ROA (Net Profit / Asset) 12,3% 12,1%
ROE (Net Profit / Equities) 18,5% 18,1%
Rate of Dividend 20,5% 20,0%
Balance Sheet Analysis 2019e 2020e
CAPEX / Sales   4,56% 2,90%
Cash Flow / Sales 10,9% 12,5%
Capital Intensity (Assets / Sales) 0,88x 0,90x
Financial Leverage (Net Debt / EBITDA) - -
Income Statement Evolution
EPS & Dividend
EPS Revisions
Revenue Revisions
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 15
Average target price 121,31  $
Last Close Price 95,34  $
Spread / Highest target 36,4%
Spread / Average Target 27,2%
Spread / Lowest Target 10,1%
Consensus revision (last 18 months)