Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dominion Energy    D

DOMINION ENERGY (D)
My previous session
Most popular
  Report  
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsAnalysisCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsofficial PublicationsSector newsTweets

Dominion: Pipeline isn’t bound for SC Dominion denies plans for pipeline to extend to SC

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
09/30/2017 | 10:46pm CEST

PEMBROKE — Opponents of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline are charging that pipeline developers are planning to extend the pipeline into South Carolina instead of ending the line in Pembroke.

Pipeline developers, however, say that is not true.

Dan Weekley, a senior executive of Dominion Energy, the lead developer and eventual operator of the proposed 600-mile natural gas pipeline that would run from West Virginia, through Virginia and North Carolina and end in Pembroke, was secretly recorded recently during a presentation to industry representatives saying that the pipeline would extend into South Carolina.

“Everyone knows it’s not going to end in Lumberton … . We could deliver gas into South Carolina whichever way the pipeline turns — because it will turn … .We’ll turn one way or the other,” Weekley said.

The statements by Weekley are the first time that there has been any mention of an “undisclosed plan” to extend the pipeline south of its proposed ending point in Pembroke, pipeline opponents say. That revelation is adding to their discontent over what they contend has been the developers refusal to be transparent with the project since it was first announced in May 2014.

Pipeline opponents also are questioning whether the pipeline is really needed to supply natural gas to businesses and industries that could potentially boost local economies along its planned route, or whether the long-term plan of the developer centers around getting gas to areas where it can be easily transported to overseas markets.

Dominion in a strong response to the allegations contends it has no specific plans to expand the pipeline.

“From the very beginning we have been clear and consistent that the infrastructure could be expanded in the future, while continuing to meet the needs already identified in Virginia and North Carolina,” according to the statement. “Dan Weekley’s remarks were made in response to a comment from the panel moderator, noting that South Carolina also desperately needs more natural gas and natural gas infrastructure … . Dan responded that the focus is on completing the project as proposed, but it could be expanded in the future. As Dan noted, the nature and timing of any future project would depend on market needs that have not yet been specified.

“Absolutely no decision has been made about a potential expansion beyond what has been filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,” the statement continued. “And, any expansion would have to go through a full regulatory review process. If the ACP were expanded at some point in the future to reach new markets, that would have absolutely no impact on our public utility customers in Virginia and North Carolina. We have 20-year contracts with those utilities, and those contracts are binding.”

Robeson County opponents to the pipeline said that they are not surprised that the proposal would be extended.

“We couldn’t understand why Dominion would choose a route through the most vulnerable environment and vulnerable populations, including over 30,000 Native Americans along the proposed route,” said the Rev. Mac Legerton, the executive director of the Center for Community Action in Lumberton. “But the information today makes full sense of this route. It’s just passing through. It’s not coming here for us at all. The environment and people of rural counties are being used as sacrifice zones for gas pipelines.”

The proposed pipeline has been controversial since its announcement. Opposition has come from property owners and others in all three states where it is proposed to pass through.

Robie Goins, whose family owns property where the pipeline is proposed to end in Pembroke, said it appears the developers of the pipeline have “misled the public.”

“If they try to extend the pipeline and change their application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, I hope they have to start the whole process over again,” Goins said.

So far, the pipeline has not been given the green light by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission nor has it received the necessary state permits that will allow it to be constructed and operated.

In addition to Dominion Energy, developers of the pipeline includeDuke Energy and Southern Company Gas.

In addition to providing natural gas that proponents say is needed to entice industry and new jobs, the owners of the pipeline would pay property taxes on infrastructure.

© © 2017 Champion Media Carolinas., source Newspapers

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on DOMINION ENERGY
08/12DOMINION ENERGY : Federal officials halt ACP construction
AQ
08/11DOMINION ENERGY : rsted signs with Siemens Gamesa for Dominion`s Offshore Wind P..
AQ
08/11DOMINION ENERGY : Federal officials halt Atlantic Coast pipeline construction
AQ
08/10DOMINION ENERGY OHIO : Reminds Public That State Law Requires Calling 8-1-1 Two ..
PR
08/10DOMINION ENERGY : Siemens Gamesa, Orsted partner for US offshore project
AQ
08/09SCANA : S&P Cuts Scana After Judge's Decision on Rates
DJ
08/09ØRSTED AND SIEMENS GAMESA : Sign First U.S. Offshore Turbine Supplier Contract
BU
08/07DOMINION ENERGY : and rsted seek approval for Virginia offshore wind demo
AQ
08/07DOMINION ENERGY : Ørsted advance offshore wind development
AQ
08/06DOMINION ENERGY : Proposed SCANA merger expected to close by December
AQ
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
08/13MERGER ARBITRAGE MONDAYS : August 13, 2018 
08/13U.S. Likely To Follow Global Stocks Lower As Turkish Lira Tumbles (Wall Stree.. 
08/13DIVIDEND SENSEI'S PORTFOLIO UPDATE 4 : Overcoming Adversity And Soaring To New H.. 
08/13WALL STREET BREAKFAST : U.S. Likely To Follow Global Stocks Lower As Turkish Lir.. 
08/13All work stops on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline following FERC ruling 
Financials ($)
Sales 2018 13 396 M
EBIT 2018 4 709 M
Net income 2018 2 722 M
Debt 2018 37 612 M
Yield 2018 4,78%
P/E ratio 2018 18,44
P/E ratio 2019 16,51
EV / Sales 2018 6,26x
EV / Sales 2019 5,96x
Capitalization 46 215 M
Chart DOMINION ENERGY
Duration : Period :
Dominion Energy Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends DOMINION ENERGY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralNeutralBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 14
Average target price 72,5 $
Spread / Average Target 3,8%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Thomas F. Farrell Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mark F. McGettrick Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
P. Rodney Blevins Chief Information Officer & Senior Vice President
John W. Harris Lead Independent Director
Mark J. Kington Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DOMINION ENERGY-12.79%46 215
DUKE ENERGY CORP-3.83%57 622
IBERDROLA0.81%47 560
SOUTHERN COMPANY-4.08%46 666
EXELON CORPORATION9.44%41 660
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER-3.70%34 924