Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nasdaq  >  Facebook    FB

FACEBOOK (FB)
My previous session
Most popular
  Report  
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsAnalysisCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsOfficial PublicationsSector newsTweets
OFFRE

Facebook : Europe's Top Court to Review Privacy -- WSJ

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
10/04/2017 | 08:48am CEST
By Sam Schechner 

This article is being republished as part of our daily reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S. print edition of The Wall Street Journal (October 4, 2017).

Europe's top court will decide whether to ban a widespread legal tool that companies employ when they store data about Europeans on U.S. soil -- the latest legal skirmish over what firms can do with the vast trove of information they are collecting on users.

Two years ago, the European Union's Court of Justice struck down a popular data-transfer mechanism that allowed information on individuals to be shifted relatively easily between the U.S. and Europe. That decision sent companies scrambling to rewrite legal contracts that would keep them in compliance with the ruling, without jeopardizing revenue that relied on that data flow.

Now, the same court will hear whether the standardized language in those contracts goes far enough to protect Europeans' privacy. An Irish court Tuesday asked the high court to make the call. The referral sets up the broadest challenge yet to the practice -- common especially among big U.S. firms like Facebook Inc., Alphabet Inc. and Apple Inc. -- of storing data collected on Europeans back in the U.S. Such data includes things like web-browsing habits and geolocation records.

Privacy activists argue the U.S. government's ability to obtain legal access to personal information held by some companies in the U.S. amounts to mass surveillance that is prohibited under EU treaties. The U.S. argues its laws are proportionate and targeted.

The high court may not hear the case for more than a year, and the European Union could in the meantime beef up requirements for the contractual language, or the court could give it time to do so after a ruling. That language is now baked into data-collection contracts across a large swath of businesses, including those related to online advertising and cloud storage.

Businesses and corporate lawyers argue that invalidating the standardized contractual clauses would create huge costs for companies. BSA, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group representing the software industry, says this type of contractual language provides legal backing "for millions of daily data transfers" out of Europe. Lawyers say invalidating the current language would force companies to spend heavily to rewrite contracts. It could also stop some from transferring data altogether.

"Losing that mechanism would leave an impossibly huge black hole in the legality of international data flows," said Eduardo Ustaran, a privacy lawyer at Hogan Lovells.

Such uncertainty could also force firms to build new infrastructure in Europe, or to totally separate their businesses on either side of the Atlantic. Companies that process personal information to sell online advertising based on online behavior could be particularly hard hit. Behavioral advertising is a EUR10.6 billion ($12.5 billion) business in Europe, according to research sponsored IAB Europe, an advertiser trade group.

Facebook, whose use of the standard clauses was the basis of the case referred to the Court of Justice on Tuesday, said the clauses "are essential to companies of all sizes, and upholding them is critical to ensuring the economy can continue to grow without disruption."

Concerns over U.S. surveillance were what led the high court in 2015 to strike down a former EU-U.S. agreement dubbed "Safe Harbor," that allowed companies to send European data to the U.S. provided the companies adhered to a set of privacy principles. After that decision, the EU and U.S. negotiated the "Privacy Shield" agreement. So far some 2,500 companies have signed up to the new pact, compared to about 4,500 for Safe Harbor. The EU is currently reviewing that agreement as part of a yearly process that allows it to be suspended, making the contractual clauses at issue in the current court case an important fallback for companies, corporate lawyers say.

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
ALPHABET 1.47% 1191.57 Delayed Quote.13.12%
FACEBOOK 1.82% 166.02 Delayed Quote.-5.92%
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on FACEBOOK
07:36aFacebook to drop on-site support for political campaigns
RE
09/20FACEBOOK : Twitter should uphold EU consumer law, or face sanctions
AQ
09/20Google defends Gmail data sharing, gives few details on violations
RE
09/20S&P sector reshuffle may do little for telecom stocks
RE
09/20FACEBOOK : and Twitter must comply with EU consumer rules or face sanctions
AQ
09/20FACEBOOK : EU Demands Facebook Update 'Misleading' Fine Print -- Update
DJ
09/20FACEBOOK : EU Demands Facebook Update 'Misleading' Fine Print
DJ
09/20FACEBOOK : and Twitter must comply with EU consumer rules or face sanctions
RE
09/20FACEBOOK : accused of discrimination with job ad
AQ
09/20FACEBOOK : building a 'war room' to battle election meddling
AQ
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
09/20ETFS WILL NEED TO TRADE MORE THAN $2 : Wsj 
09/20THE ESSENCE OF THE 'NEW' MODERN CORP : Free Cash Flow 
09/20The Telecom Sector Is About To Get A New Name - And A Whole Lot Bigger 
09/20Midstreams Going C-Corp, Should SEC Disallow The Measure Distributable Cash F.. 
09/20Sky Takeover Settled By Rare Auction (Wall Street Breakfast Podcast) 
Financials ($)
Sales 2018 55 650 M
EBIT 2018 24 809 M
Net income 2018 21 237 M
Finance 2018 41 659 M
Yield 2018 -
P/E ratio 2018 23,01
P/E ratio 2019 20,06
EV / Sales 2018 7,86x
EV / Sales 2019 6,11x
Capitalization 479 B
Chart FACEBOOK
Duration : Period :
Facebook Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends FACEBOOK
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 46
Average target price 209 $
Spread / Average Target 26%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Sheryl Kara Sandberg Chief Operating Officer & Director
David M. Wehner Chief Financial Officer
Michael Todd Schroepfer Chief Technology Officer
Atish Banerjea Chief Information Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
FACEBOOK-5.92%479 336
TWITTER INC24.32%22 372
MATCH GROUP INC83.10%16 406
LINE CORP4.82%10 550
SINA CORP-29.62%4 877
DENA CO LTD-17.91%2 579