Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Ford Motor Company    F


News SummaryMost relevantAll newsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsAnalyst Recommendations
The feature you requested does not exist. However, we suggest the following feature:

AAA: Partially automated driving systems don't always work

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
08/06/2020 | 12:16am EDT

DETROIT (AP) — Two tests by AAA during the past two years show that partially automated driving systems don’t always function properly, so the auto club is recommending that car companies limit their use.

Researchers with AAA recently tested systems from five manufacturers over a distance of 4,000 miles (6,400 kilometers), and said they encountered problems every eight miles (13 kilometers).

Most of the issues involved systems designed to keep vehicles in their lane, but the tests discovered that many had trouble spotting simulated broken-down vehicles in their path. About two-thirds of the time the test vehicles hit the broken-down car, at an average speed of 25 mph (40 kph), according to the study.

It was AAA’s second round of tests on the systems. Researchers said little had changed from a test of four other vehicles in 2018, prompting the recommendation that automakers stop including the technology on more models.

“AAA has repeatedly found that active driving assistance systems do not perform consistently, especially in real-world scenarios,” said Greg Brannon, AAA’s director of automotive engineering. “Automakers need to work toward more dependable technology including improving lane keeping assistance.”

Also the systems, which combine control of acceleration, braking and steering, often quit working with little notice to drivers, AAA found. That could cause a dangerous situation if the driver isn’t fully engaged and has to make an emergency decision.

AAA tested five vehicles at several research centers, with drivers and instruments monitoring their performance. Included this year were a 2019 BMW X7 SUV, a 2019 Cadillac CT6 sedan, a 2019 Ford Edge SUV, a 2020 Kia Telluride SUV and a 2020 Subaru Outback SUV. Their systems have names like Kia’s “Highway Driving Assist,” Subaru’s “EyeSight,” Ford’s “Co-Pilot 360,” Cadillac’s “Super Cruise,” and BMW’s “Active Driving Assistant Professional.”

The results were similar to those found in 2018 testing by AAA of four other vehicles including a 2017 Tesla Model S with the company’s “Autopilot” system.

Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from the five automakers in this year’s test. Automakers generally say they tell drivers that their cars aren’t fully self-driving and that they should always be alert and ready to intervene.

AAA said most owners manuals explain that the systems have trouble spotting stationary objects.

The most recent tests show that the systems aren’t improving much, even as automakers move them into more mainstream models. Brannon said that can be a problem.

People who bought systems when they first came out generally were early adopters who know more about technology, Brannon said. But as the systems make their way into more mainstream models, people who are less tech-savvy will be driving them, he said.

“People are really less familiar and less likely to really engage in understanding how the systems work,” he said. “That just assume they do work. That could be a really dangerous assumption.”

Also, research has shown that people become overly reliant on the technology, which could be dangerous when the systems don’t work, he said. Also, there’s no standardized way for the vehicles to notify drivers that the systems are disengaging. Some just have a green light on the dash, while the Cadillac’s steering wheel vibrates and a green light goes to flashing red, he said.

In real-road tests, all of the systems had trouble keeping the vehicles in their lanes, and they came too close to other vehicles and guardrails, AAA said. Test track examinations of three vehicles, the Kia Telluride, BMW X7 and Subaru Outback, found that all had trouble spotting a simulated broken-down vehicle in their lane most of the time, Brannon said.

The Cadillac system couldn’t be tested on the track because General Motors limits use to divided highways, while the Ford system also wouldn’t work on the track. But both systems had problems on real roads, Brannon said.

He said that problems with the system could slow the adoption of fully autonomous vehicles because owners who experience the driver-assist technology may not trust it.

Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission., source Associated Press News

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
12:16aAAA : Partially automated driving systems don't always work
08/05GLOBAL MARKETS LIVE: Walt Disney, CVS Health, Match Group…
08/05Ford Selects 'Car Guy' as CEO To Revive Profit, Chart Future -- WSJ
08/04Ad industry forms group to create standards for targeted ads
08/04Industrials Flat As Investors Await Stimulus Bill Updates -- Industrials Roun..
08/04Mosaic, Take-Two Interactive rise; Ralph Lauren falls
08/04NEWS HIGHLIGHTS : Top Company News of the Day
08/04Ford Names Jim Farley as New CEO, Succeeding Jim Hackett -- 3rd Update
08/04Pandemic revs up race for U.S. online car sales
08/04NEWS HIGHLIGHTS : Top Company News of the Day
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2020 116 B - -
Net income 2020 -2 300 M - -
Net cash 2020 270 M - -
P/E ratio 2020 -12,7x
Yield 2020 2,16%
Capitalization 27 690 M 27 690 M -
EV / Sales 2020 0,24x
EV / Sales 2021 0,18x
Nbr of Employees 190 000
Free-Float 98,0%
Duration : Period :
Ford Motor Company Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 21
Average target price 6,86 $
Last Close Price 6,96 $
Spread / Highest target 14,9%
Spread / Average Target -1,37%
Spread / Lowest Target -49,7%
EPS Revisions
James P. Hackett President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
William Clay Ford Executive Chairman
James D. Farley Chief Operating Officer
Timothy Stone Chief Financial Officer
Jeff Lemmer Chief Information Officer & Vice President
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
VOLKSWAGEN AG-23.43%82 729
DAIMLER AG-17.34%50 564
HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.-8.78%45 120
BMW AG-23.26%44 218