Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
3.67 HKD | +4.56% | +3.09% | -35.39% |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The group's high margin levels account for strong profits.
- Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 6.37 and 6.43 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2024 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- This company will be of major interest to investors in search of a high dividend stock.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- One of the major weak points of the company is its financial situation.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Water Utilities
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-35.21% | 2.84B | B- | ||
-8.05% | 23.35B | A | ||
+12.64% | 2.44B | B- | ||
-.--% | 2.11B | - | - | |
-15.64% | 1.77B | C+ | ||
+5.08% | 1.58B | D | ||
-10.53% | 1.53B | C | ||
+30.11% | 1.2B | A- | ||
-13.19% | 1.13B | - | - | |
+13.99% | 985M | C+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- 270 Stock
- Ratings Guangdong Investment Limited