Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  London Stock Exchange  >  National Grid plc    NG.   GB00BDR05C01


News SummaryMost relevantAll newsOfficial PublicationsSector newsAnalyst Recommendations

National Grid : What was behind Friday's National Grid outage? Network theory, not conspiracy

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
08/14/2019 | 01:22am EDT

NATIONAL Grid is getting a kicking in the aftermath of last Friday's electricity blackout. Potential explanations swirl around both social and mainstream media. The system cannot cope with too much wind-generated electricity. The Russians hacked into the computers. A puzzling aspect is that the initial shock to the National Grid was a very small one. The gas-fired station at Little Barford in Bedfordshire went down. Within minutes, a massive power outage had taken place. Rebecca Long-Bailey, Labour's energy secretary, has honed in on this. The fact that a small outage had such huge consequences is, to her, clear evidence of under-investment, and makes the case for public ownership. But scientific advances over the past 20 years provide a quite different perspective.

The National Grid is, by definition, a network. Power stations receive supplies from various sources, and then the energy is transmitted from them to businesses and households via power lines.

A key discovery in the maths of how things spread across networks is that in any networked system, any shock, no matter how small, has the potential to create a cascade across the system as a whole. Duncan Watts was at Columbia University when he published a groundbreaking paper on this in 2002 with the austere title "A simple model of global cascades on random networks". He was subsequently snapped up by first Yahoo, then Microsoft.

Watts set up a highly abstract model of nodes, all of equal importance, connected on a network. Initially, all of these were, putting it into the Grid context, working well. He investigated the consequences of what happens when a very small number of them malfunctioned.

The results were surprising. Most of the time, the shocks - made deliberately small by assumption - were contained and the network continued to function well. But occasionally, a small shock triggered a system-wide collapse.

Watts coined the phrase "robust yet fragile" to describe this phenomenon. Most of the time, a network is robust when it is given a small shock. But a shock of the same size can, from time to time, percolate through the system.

In the mid-2000s, the academic Rich Colbaugh was commissioned by the Department of Defense to look into the US power grid.

The physical connectivity of the network had increased substantially due to advances in communication and control technology.

The total number of outages had fallen - when one plant failed, it was easier to activate a back-up. But the frequency of very large outages, while still rare, had increased.

I collaborated with Colbaugh on this seeming paradox. We showed that it is in fact an inherent property of networked systems. Increasing the number of connections causes an improvement in the performance of the system, yet at the same time, it makes it more vulnerable to catastrophic failures on a system-wide scale.

There may still prove to be a simple explanation of the sort loved by decision-makers the world over. But the science of networks may shed more light than theories based on conspiracy and incompetence.

£ Paul Ormerod is an economist at Volterra Partners LLP, a visiting professor in the Department of Computer Science at UCL, and author of Against the Grain: Insights of an Economic Contrarian, published by the IEA.

(c) 2019 City A.M., source Newspaper

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on NATIONAL GRID PLC
08/15NATIONAL GRID : Government sets out the scope for its probe into National Grid o..
08/14NATIONAL GRID : Business Secretary sets out scope of investigation into power cu..
08/14NATIONAL GRID : What was behind Friday's National Grid outage? Network theory, n..
08/13NATIONAL GRID : Scrip Dividend
08/13NATIONAL GRID : Power cut report due friday
08/12NATIONAL GRID : UK energy regulator asks National Grid for urgent report into po..
08/12NATIONAL GRID : Probe launched into massive power cut
08/10NATIONAL GRID : UK energy firm says power cut was not caused by cyberattack
08/09NATIONAL GRID : Celebrates Hands-On Skills with Trades Summer Camp
08/09NATIONAL GRID : UK power cut snarls trains and road traffic
More news
Financials (GBP)
Sales 2020 15 806 M
EBIT 2020 3 582 M
Net income 2020 1 985 M
Debt 2020 27 711 M
Yield 2020 5,68%
P/E ratio 2020 14,8x
P/E ratio 2021 14,0x
EV / Sales2020 3,64x
EV / Sales2021 3,70x
Capitalization 29 852 M
Duration : Period :
National Grid plc Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends NATIONAL GRID PLC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 21
Average target price 915,10  GBp
Last Close Price 857,70  GBp
Spread / Highest target 20,1%
Spread / Average Target 6,69%
Spread / Lowest Target -6,73%
EPS Revisions
John Mark Pettigrew Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director
Peter Oliver Gershon Non-Executive Chairman
Andrew Jonathan Agg Chief Financial Officer & Executive Director
Adriana Karaboutis Chief Information & Digital Officer
Paul Golby Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
ORSTED AS55.38%41 453
SEMPRA ENERGY28.05%38 036
ENGIE7.51%35 692