Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Tokyo  >  Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.    7201   JP3672400003


News SummaryMost relevantAll newsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

Trump can no longer impose 'Section 232' auto tariffs after missing deadline - experts

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
11/19/2019 | 05:21pm EST
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on honesty and transparency in healthcare prices inside the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington

The clock has run out on President Donald Trump's "Section 232" tariffs on imports of foreign-made cars and auto parts, after he failed to announce a decision by a self-imposed deadline, trade law experts say.

The U.S. administration may have to find other means if Trump wants to tax European or Japanese car imports, a key part of the U.S. president's pledge to make America's trade relationships more fair, the experts say.

Their argument centres on the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, a U.S. law aimed at protecting America's Cold War-era defence industrial base. Section 232 of that act lays out how a U.S. president can tax specific imports if the Department of Commerce deems them a threat to national security.

The Trump administration launched its Section 232 probe of foreign autos in May 2018. Six months ago Trump agreed with an administration study that some imported vehicles and components are "weakening our internal economy" and could harm national security. He has threatened to tax them by as much as 25%.

But he took no action on Nov. 14, the deadline established by the act to take action, puzzling automakers.

Bolstering the contention by trade experts that the president's hands are now tied is a new U.S. trade court ruling, published on Monday, that Trump previously exceeded the time limit on his Section 232 authority when he tried to double the tariff on steel imports from Turkey last year.


Trump has hailed the threat of car tariffs as a strong negotiating tool to gain leverage over his opponents.

But an initial trade deal with Japan reached in September did not address auto trade, while trade talks with the EU have not formally started as the two sides remain at odds over the scope of the negotiations.

The 1962 act is clear about the time limits that a president has for invoking tariffs to protect U.S. national security.

"I don’t see the law as giving the president any options other than take action against imports or determine to take no action and the case is closed," said Jennifer Hillman, a Georgetown University law professor and a former World Trade Organization judge.

By not acting by the deadline, Trump has forfeited his authority to impose the Section 232 tariffs, added Clark Packard, trade policy counsel with libertarian advocacy group RStreet.org.

In a decision published on Monday, the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump ran out of time on a Section 232 investigation of steel imports, when he tried to double the tariffs on Turkish steel to 50% in August 2018.

The attempt to double tariffs was challenged by an importer of Turkish steel, which claimed that, among other things, the move came too late to follow proper procedures in the law.

The New York-based federal court, which handles appeals of U.S. duty determinations, ruled in Transpacific Steel LLC's favour and said Trump's "expansive view" of his Section 232 powers was "mistaken" and is confined.

"Although the statute grants the President great discretion in deciding what action to take, it cabins the President’s power both substantively, by requiring the action to eliminate threats to national security caused by imports, and procedurally, by setting the time in which to act," wrote judges Claire Kelly and Jane Restani in the decision dated Nov. 15.

Devin Sikes, a trade lawyer with Akin Gump in Washington, wrote in a note to clients that the case lays the groundwork for future challenges to Section 232 cases.

A White House official, asked to comment on whether time has run out for Trump's 232 decision, said only that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer "has updated the President on the progress of trade negotiations to address concerns related to the threatened impairment of national security with respect to imported automobiles and certain automobile parts."


A clause in the 1962 law may offer an escape hatch for Trump. If an agreement is not reached within 180 days or proves ineffective, "the President shall take such other actions as the President deems necessary to adjust the imports of such article so that such imports will not threaten to impair the national security."

It adds that Trump would be required to publish these actions in the Federal Register, but does not specify a time frame.

Hillman, currently a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that even if courts ultimately deny Trump authority to impose auto tariffs for national security reasons, the president could use other statutes to impose them, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act widely used to impose sanctions and fight terrorist financing.

Known as IEEPA, the statute "does not have much of an investigatory prerequisite to it, so it is something the president could do quickly," Hillman said. "Ditto for the Trading with the Enemy Act, and he seems predisposed to deem the EU as an 'enemy,' at least with respect to autos trade."

By David Lawder

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
BMW AG 1.38% 74.21 Delayed Quote.3.54%
FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES -1.53% 12.876 End-of-day quote.3.11%
HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. 0.45% 3149 End-of-day quote.12.46%
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. -1.41% 670 End-of-day quote.-21.74%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION 0.17% 7663 End-of-day quote.24.00%
VOLKSWAGEN AG 1.45% 178.24 Delayed Quote.26.48%
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
10:40aVT : Nissan GT-R50 by Italdesign deliveries to begin in late 2020; First custome..
01:11aNISSAN MOTOR : Japanese car maker Nissan faces £17m fine in Carlos Ghosn scandal
12/10NISSAN MOTOR : Turo-based test drive is a new way to 'try before you buy'
12/10NISSAN MOTOR : Regulator recommends 2.4 bil. yen fine on Nissan over Ghosn scand..
12/10NISSAN MOTOR : Japanese watchdog suggests over $22-million fine against Nissan
12/10TOSHIBA : Japan's markets watchdog recommends $22 million fine for Nissan over G..
12/10TOSHIBA : Japan's markets watchdog recommends $22 million fine for Nissan over G..
12/10NISSAN MOTOR : Japanese regulators recommend $22 million fine on Nissan
12/10NISSAN MOTOR : Statement on recommendation for administrative penalty payment or..
12/09General Motors pulls out of Russian car assembly business with Avtovaz deal
More news
Financials (JPY)
Sales 2020 10 629 B
EBIT 2020 154 B
Net income 2020 131 B
Debt 2020 6 593 B
Yield 2020 3,12%
P/E ratio 2020 19,4x
P/E ratio 2021 9,56x
EV / Sales2020 0,87x
EV / Sales2021 0,84x
Capitalization 2 620 B
Technical analysis trends NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 23
Average target price 738,95  JPY
Last Close Price 669,60  JPY
Spread / Highest target 121%
Spread / Average Target 10,4%
Spread / Lowest Target -14,9%
EPS Revisions
Makoto Uchida President & Chief Executive Officer
Yasushi Kimura Chairman
Ashwani Gupta Chief Operating & Production Officer
Stephen Ma Chief Financial Officer & Executive Officer
Anthony Thomas Chief Information Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.-21.74%24 463
VOLKSWAGEN AG26.48%97 494
DAIMLER AG6.20%57 872
BMW AG3.54%52 438
HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.11.96%50 491