Rosneft Oil Company
IFRS Results
Q1 2020
May 15, 2020
Important Notice
Information herein has been prepared by the Company. The presented conclusions are based on the general information collected as of the date hereof and can be amended without any additional notice. The Company relies on the information obtained from the sources which it deems credible; however, it does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
These materials contain statements about future events and explanations representing a forecast of such events. Any assertion in these materials that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We assume no obligations to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting such statements.
This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any securities. It is understood that nothing in this report / presentation provides grounds for any contract or commitment whatsoever. The information herein should not for any purpose be deemed complete, accurate or impartial. The information herein in subject to verification, final formatting and modification. The contents hereof has not been verified by the Company. Accordingly, we did not and do not give on behalf of the Company, its shareholders, directors, officers or employees or any other person, any representations or warranties, either explicitly expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or objectivity of information or opinions contained in it. None of the directors of the Company, its shareholders, officers or employees or any other persons accepts any liability for any loss of any kind that may arise from any use of this presentation or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.
2
Inclusive Approach* to Combat COVID-19
Concern for people's well-being is the
Company's top priority
Health and safety
- Regular testing
- 5.6 mlnpersonal protective equipment, 2.9 mln litersof disinfectant, over 455,000 litersof hand sanitizer, constantly replenished
- 89% of the central office employees, more than 50 th. Group's subsidiaries' employees work remotely
- Rotation period is increasedto 90 days
- 94observation, 260isolation rooms, with qualified health treatment
- Constantly informing employees about safety measures
- Psychological support hotline
- Antiseptic components production (15 th. tons per month)
Stability
- Preservation of jobs and payment of salaries in due course
- Distance learning and professional development resumed
* The approach embraces the best Russian and international practices of combating COVID-19, including those recommended by Rospotrebnadzor | 3 |
COVID-19 Impact | |||||||||
on Crude Oil and Petroleum Products Demand | |||||||||
Oil demand in Europe | Main petroleum products demand in Europe | ||||||||
15 | 50 | gasoline | |||||||
mmbd | mmt | ||||||||
jet fuel | |||||||||
40 | |||||||||
2019 | diesel | ||||||||
fuel oil | |||||||||
30 | |||||||||
10 | -28% | -22% | |||||||
20 | |||||||||
10 | |||||||||
5 | 0 | ||||||||
Jan-20 | Feb-20 | Mar-20 | Apr-20 | May-20 | Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20 | Apr-20May-20 | |||
Oil demand in Asia-Pacific region | Domestic demand for main petroleum products | ||||||||
35 | 9 | gasoline and diesel | |||||||
mmbd | mmt | ||||||||
jet fuel | |||||||||
fuel oil | |||||||||
30 | 2019 | 6 | |||||||
-18% | -12% | ||||||||
25 | 3 | ||||||||
20 | 0 | ||||||||
Jan-20 | Feb-20 | Mar-20 | Apr-20May-20 | Jan-20 | Feb-20 | Mar-20 | Apr-20 | May-20 | |
Source: Wood Mackenzie, Petromarket Research Group, Company estimates | 4 |
Record Low Oil Prices | |||||||
Oil prices and differentials1 | Gross Upstream margin2 | ||||||
90 | $/bbl | Brent | 12 | '000 Rub/bbl | Monthly avarage | ||
Urals | FY average | ||||||
ESPO | |||||||
70 | 9 | ||||||
50 | 6 | ||||||
30 | Urals-Brent | $/bbl | 10 | 3 | |||
ESPO-Brent | 5 | ||||||
0 | |||||||
-5 | |||||||
10 | -10 | 0 | |||||
Note: (1) Monthly averages, (2) Calculated as Urals price less MET, export customs duty and transportation costs at the Yugansk-Primorsk route | 5 |
Key Events
1 | Rosneft BOD recommended record high dividends |
for 2019 | |
2 | Positive free cash flow generation amid sharp oil |
price drop | |
3 | Successful launch of the open market share |
buyback program | |
4 | OPEC+ agreement on record high crude oil |
production cuts | |
Company's operations in Venezuela have been
5completely discontinued, including production JVs, oilfield service companies and trading operations
6
Best-positioned to New Realities
Operations | Financials |
- Leadership in lifting costs
- Technological capabilities for managing production
- Successful experience of rapid production buildup
- Diversified distribution channels
- Long-termsupply contracts
- Efficient gas business
- Flexible CAPEX program
- Cost control
- Ability to generate cash in stressful scenarios
- Solid liquidity cushion
- Comfortable debt level with smooth repayment schedule
7
Operating Results
8
Key Operating Indicators
Oil production,
kbd
Gas production,
mmcmd
Petroleum product and petrochemical output, mmt
4,674 | 4,640 |
Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
187.2 | 182.7 |
Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
2.99 | 2.93 |
24.72 25.07
Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
in Russia | abroad | 9 | |||
Navigating OPEC+ Environment
Crude oil production in Russia (2020) | Main terms of the OPEC+ Agreement: |
6 | mmbd | |
Stage 2 | ||
5 | Stage 1 | |
4 | ||
3 | ||
2 | ||
Rosneft (LHS) | Russia total (RHS) |
11Oil production in Russia with limitations (mmbd):
- stage 1(May-Jun. 2020) - 8.5
- stage 2(Jul.-Dec. 2020) - 9.0
9stage 3 (Jan. 2021 - Apr. 2022) - 9.5
- Production cuts on a pro rata basis
- Gas condensate production excluded from quotas
7 | Rosneft's approach to production cuts: |
Asset selection (to cut production) based on economic | |
efficiency | |
5 | Continued development of new fields |
Efficient long-cycle wellworks to be continued according | |
to schedule | |
Efficient well stock management: |
3Limitation of flow rates without shut-ins
- Recurring well operation
- Optimization of wellworks program on the existing well stock
10
Rosneft's Advantages in Managing Production
Average operating well stock1(2019)
56.0
28.3
22.9 18.8
7.6
Share of wells equipped with ESP units*
72%
* electrical submersible pump
Company's own capacities
56 th. wells - average operating well stock
267drilling rigs
20frac fleet
704well servicing and workover crews
Substantial well | Wide range of well | Availability of | High-quality portfolio | |
stock with wide | Efficient in-house | |||
operation | necessary electric | of high-margin | ||
regional | service | |||
parameters | equipment | projects | ||
diversification | ||||
Ability to flexibly manage production at minimal costs
Note: (1) on 100% and proportionally consolidated assets | 11 |
Successful Experience of Rapid Production Buildup
Production recovery after easing OPEC+ restrictions | Yugansk reaching record high daily production after | |
in 2018 | lifting restrictions on oil intake in 2019 | |
4.9 | mmbd | 6.8 | 2.0 | mmbd | |||||||||||
Rosneft (LHS) | 1,466 kbd | ||||||||||||||
other companies (RHS) | |||||||||||||||
new production record | |||||||||||||||
4.7 | 6.4 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||
4.5 | 6.0 | 1.0 | +800 kbd | ||||||||||||
within 3 weeks | |||||||||||||||
May-October oil production growth in | |||||||||||||||
Russia: | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | +4.5% | - Rosneft | 5.6 | 0.5 | |||||||||||
+2.4% | - competitor 1 | ||||||||||||||
+1.9% | - competitor 2 | ||||||||||||||
+2.7% | - competitor 3 | ||||||||||||||
4.1 | 5.2 | 0.0 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr May Jun | Jul | Aug Sep Oct | Nov | ||||||
Jan | Feb Mar | Apr May Jun | Jul | Aug Sep | Oct | Nov |
12
Ensuring Timely Launch of New Large Projects
Rospan
Kharampur
Erginskiy LA
Sev. Komsomolskoye
Lodochnoye
Sev. Danilovskoye
Current status
Construction of key facilities is at the final stage: installation of core process equipment of the Vostochno-Urengoiskiy LA gas and gas condensate treatment unit completed, assembly of equipment at the railroad terminal (Korotchaevo station) is in active phase
Construction and installation activities at the gas treatment unit and gas pipeline are underway, development of cluster pads and power facilities continues
Development drilling at 11 cluster pads continues, construction of a 70 km pipeline from Priobskoye field to Transneft and infrastructure facilities is underway
Pilot project program at PK-1 horizon, drilling and operation of wells with horizontal section of up to 2 km, preparatory works at full-scale development facilities are underway
Test production stage with a hook-up to Vankor site facilities continues, development drilling and infrastructure construction is underway
Development drilling with 2 rigs started, construction of a road and a pipeline to the Verkhnechonskoye field and other key infrastructure facilities continues
2020 - 2021+
Gas projects Crude oil projects
Note: (1) Circle area corresponds to field's plateau production | 13 |
Gas Business
Gas production | The share of gas - the most environmental friendly | |||
(OPEC+ impact is limited by the amount of associated gas) | ||||
fuel - in total hydrocarbon production of the Company | ||||
200 | mmcmd | is c.19% (flat YoY). Its further growth up to >20% is | ||
180 | planned | |||
160 | The main driver of growth is the Rospan project, which | |||
provides the largest incremental production increase | ||||
140 | for both gas and liquids. The project is planned to be | |||
launched in 2020 | ||||
2018 | 2019 | Q1 2020 |
Average price and sales volumes
4.214.23
16.05 | 14.91 |
3.06 | |
2.89 | |
Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
Gas sales revenues
Rub bn
Average price
('000 Rub/mcm)
Volume (bcm), including.:
gas procured
- Projects development at Sibneftegaz and Kharampurneftegaz fields is in active phase
- Amid a 6% decrease in gas production1in Russia YoY, the Company's gas production in Q1 2020 declined slightly - c. 2%
- Revenues decrease caused by end consumers' demand reduction following warm weather conditions
67.5 | 63.1 |
Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
Note: (1) Gas extracted less gas flared | 14 |
Gas Business is Resistant to
Volatile Prices at Global Markets
Domestic and export netback from Novy Urengoy | Starting 2020 domestic gas netbacks have been | |||||||||||||
more efficient compared to export deliveries at | ||||||||||||||
Rub/mcm | spot prices. Forward prices imply domestic market | |||||||||||||
8,000 | premiums throughout the year | |||||||||||||
Netback, export (TTF) | Netback, Russia (Moscow) | The Company's long-term domestic gas supply | ||||||||||||
6,000 | ||||||||||||||
portfolio is up to 70 bcm per annum | ||||||||||||||
4,000 | Power producers subject to the smallest demand | |||||||||||||
2,000 | reduction under restrictive measures comprise | |||||||||||||
60% of the supply portfolio | ||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||
-2,000 | ||||||||||||||
01 | 02 03 | 04 05 | 06 07 | 08 | 09 10 | 11 12 | 01 | 02 03 | 04 05 | 06 07 | 08 | 09 10 | 11 12 | |
2019 | 2020 |
Competitive advantages of Rosneft's gas business:
- Low risk profile of gas projects focused on the domestic market
- Stable and predicted cash flow, unaffected by the external environment
- No need to subsidize gas exports at the expense of the domestic market
- Gas condensate production is excluded from OPEC+ restrictions
15
Refining
Refining margins | Refining economics in Q1 2020 | |||||||||||||||
$/bbl | Significant refining margin increase in Russia | |||||||||||||||
Russia1 | Europe | |||||||||||||||
9.23 | during Q1 2020 was mainly caused by positive | |||||||||||||||
8.56 | impact of macro environment: sharp crude oil price | |||||||||||||||
7.62 | 7.78 | |||||||||||||||
7.52 | 6.31 | reduction compared to a slower decline in | ||||||||||||||
5.63 | 5.27 | 5.13 | petroleum product prices | |||||||||||||
5.06 | Refining margin growth in Germany QoQ was | |||||||||||||||
2.62 | 1.89 | driven by crude oil price drop in the second half of | ||||||||||||||
the reporting period | ||||||||||||||||
-0.63 | 0.38 | -0.10 | ||||||||||||||
-1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
-1.30 | -1.58 | |||||||||||||||
Q1'18 | Q2'18 | Q3'18 | Q4'18 | Q1'19 | Q2'19 | Q3'19 | Q4'19 | Q1'20 | Q1 2020 results and achievements | |||||||
Key refining indicators | ||
Refining in Russia | Refining abroad | Light product yield |
58.2 | 56.7 | 56.9 |
2.37 | 2.82 | 2.77 |
24.5 | 25.51 | 25.95 |
Q1 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
- Achinsk refineryinitiated production of RMLS low sulphur marine fuel that complies with IMO 2020 requirements
- Ryazan refineryput into commercial use an automated petrol quantity and quality measurement system
- Angarsk refinerystarted to produce high-tech mineral hydrocarbon base for drilling liquids production which will improve drilling efficiency and reduce environmental impact
Note: (1) Including the reverse excise tax on crude and dampfer for motor fuels | 16 |
Focus on Distribution Channels Development
Netbacks of the main crude oil marketing channels
Export, Asia | Export, Europe | |||||||
Refining in Russia | Domestic market | |||||||
450 | $/t | |||||||
400 | ||||||||
350 | ||||||||
300 | ||||||||
250 | ||||||||
200 | ||||||||
Q1'18 | Q2'18 | Q3'18 | Q4'18 | Q1'19 | Q2'19 | Q3'19 | Q4'19 | Q1'20 |
- In Q1 2020 36.0 mmt were sold tonon-CIS countries (+12.8% YoY). The share of supplies eastwards amounted to 57.2% (+7.4 p.p. YoY)
- Motor fuel sales via the exchange exceeded the required levels by over 2x times
- As part of cooperation development with the Republic of Belarus, the Company signed agreements with Naftan OJSC, BNK CJSC and Mozyr Oil Refinery OJSC to supply 9 mmt of oil from April to December 2020
Crude oil marketing breakdown
mmt
60.0 | 67.1 | 63.4 | |
Export, West | 27% | 22% | 24% |
Export, Asia | 26% | 35% | 33% |
Export, CIS | 4% | ||
Domestic market | 2% | 3% | 2% |
2% | |||
41% | 38% | 41% | |
Refining in Russia | |||
Q1 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
17
Beneficial Petroleum Products Export Structure
Petroleum products export to non-CIS countries
mmt | |||||
15 | |||||
10 | 28% | 28% | 30% | ||
33% | |||||
30% | |||||
5 | 57% | ||||
52% | 57% | 56% | 54% | ||
0 | |||||
Q1'19 | Q2'19 | Q3'19 | Q4'19 | Q1'20 | |
Fuel oil | Diesel | Naphta | High-octane gasoline | Other |
Q1 2020 demand for main petroleum products1
10% | |||
3% | Diesel oil | Motor gasoline | Kerosene |
0% | |||
Fuel oil | |||
-10% | |||
-20% | |||
-30% | |||
-40% |
OECD Europe | Asia Pacific (excl. China) | China | Total | |
- Petroleum products export tonon-CIS countries from Russia amounted to 12.9 mmt in Q1 2020 (+6.6% YoY). While the share of 1+ years term contracts exceeded 90% creating additional support for deliveries during the demand stagnation period
- Demand for fuel oil (the Company's main export product) remains relatively resilient because of its industrial consumption (rather than households). The average export price of fuel oil sold innon-CIS countries in Q1 2020 amounted to 18,000 Rub/t, which is only 3% below the average price in Q4 2019
Note: (1) IHS Markit data compared with Q4 2019 | 18 |
Financial Results
19
Key Financial Indicators
219Free cash flow Rub bn
-9.1 | $ bn | liabilities |
Reduction of debt and trading | ||
354Rub bn | 2019 |
Record high dividends for | |
20
EBITDA and Net Income Dynamics
EBITDA Q4 2019 vs. Q1 2020
Rub bn | ||||||
Q4 2019 | 488 | |||||
Exchange rate | 29 | |||||
Tax maneuver completion | (54) | |||||
EPT effect | 47 | |||||
Crude oil price | (89) | |||||
Share in profits of | (14) | |||||
associates and JVs | ||||||
Export duty lag | (98) | External | ||||
Transport tariffs indexation | (4) | factors : | ||||
-175 Rub bn | ||||||
Number of days | (3) | -35.9% | ||||
MET and excise duty rates | 11 | |||||
Change in volumes | (19) | Internal | ||||
Intragroup balances | (13) | and seasonal | ||||
factors : | ||||||
28 | -4 Rub bn | |||||
General costs | -0.8% | |||||
Q1 2020 | ||||||
309 | ||||||
Net income Q4 2019 vs. Q1 2020
Net income | |||||
attr. to shareholders Q4 2019 | |||||
Minorities | |||||
Q4 2019 | |||||
EBITDA | |||||
DDA | 1 | ||||
Financial expenses (net) | (35) | ||||
Other income | (2) | ||||
Other costs | (28) | ||||
Income tax | 92 | ||||
FX gains/losses | (171) | ||||
Q1 2020 | (143) | ||||
Minorities | 13 | ||||
Net income | |||||
(156) | |||||
attr. to shareholders Q1 2020 | |||||
158Rub bn
21
179
(179)
Efficient Cost Control
Lifting costs | ||||
Rub/boe | Quarter | 12M average | % YoY | |
198 | ||||
195 | 203 | 201 | 196 | 191 |
5.4% | 5.7% | 4.1% | ||
-4.4% | -2.1% | |||
Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
General and administrative costs1
Rub/boe | Quarter | 12M average | % YoY | ||
Refining costs in Russia | |||||
Rub/bbl | Quarter | 12M average | % YoY | ||
213 | 201 | 220 | |||
183 | 191 | 181 | |||
23.8% | |||||
8.9% | 6.1% | ||||
2.3% | |||||
-1.1% | |||||
Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
Producer Price Index (annual basis)
88 | 79 | ||||||||
90 | |||||||||
76 | |||||||||
73 | |||||||||
11.4% | 64 | 10.0% | |||||||
5.6% | |||||||||
-8.2% | -3.9% | 6.6% | |||||||
-0.6% | |||||||||
-21.0% | -1.7% | ||||||||
-5.6% | |||||||||
Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 | Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 | Q4 2019 | Q1 2020 |
Note: (1) excl. provisions | 22 |
CAPEX
CAPEX evolution | ||||
Rub trln | Following negative macro environment | |||
previous | and production cuts the CAPEX | |||
0.92 | 0.94 | 0.85 | range | program was optimized by 20% |
reviesed | The program still allows for fast project | |||
development recovery and | ||||
production buildup whenever the | ||||
market conditions change | ||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Plan | Key areas for optimization | |||
Revision of CAPEX | ||||
Reduction of maintenance costs while ensuring | ||||
Rub trln | ||||
industrial safety and eliminating environmental risks | ||||
~1
Postponing short-term less economically viable projects
Rising hurdle rates for certain groups of projects | ||||||||||||
CAPEX | Slowing down new development and high-risk | |||||||||||
optimization in | long-term projects, including joint ventures | |||||||||||
Russia c. 0.2 | Maintaining active pre-investment work on high-margin | |||||||||||
perspective projects | ||||||||||||
2020 | Upstream Downstream | Other | 2020 | |||||||||
Plan | Revised |
Projects in Russia | International projects | 23 | |
Strong Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow calculation | Crude oil price and free cash flow dynamics, LTM | |||
Net cash provided | 341 | Rub bn | ||
by operating activities |
4.50 | 4.47 | |||||
Reimbursement of | 79 | 4.25 | 4.11 | |||
prepayments received | ||||||
(historical FX rate) | 3.85 | |||||
Reimbursement of | 47 | |||||
other financial obligations | ||||||
FX rate change effect | 32 | |||||
Interest on prepayments | 12 | 1,220 | ||||
1,119 | ||||||
Net change in operations | (98) | 920 | 941 | 931 | ||
of subsidiary banks | ||||||
Reimbursement of | (9) | |||||
prepayments granted | ||||||
Adj. operating cash flow | 404 | |||||
Q1'19 | Q2'19 | Q3'19 | Q4'19 | Q1'20 |
CAPEX | 185 | |||||
Free cash flow, Rub bn | Urals price, '000 Rub/bbl | |||||
Free cash flow | 219 | |||||
24
Appendix
25
Key Operational Highlights
Indicator | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | % | Q1 2020 | Q1 2019 | % |
Hydrocarbon production, incl.
kboed
Liquids
kbpd
Gas
kboed
Oil refining
mmt
Product output in Russia
mmt
5,753 | 5,814 | (1.0)% | 5,753 | 5,902 | (2.5)% |
4,640 | 4,674 | (0.7)% | 4,640 | 4,744 | (2.2)% |
1,113 | 1,140 | (2.4)% | 1,113 | 1,158 | (3.9)% |
28.72 | 28.33 | 1.4% | 28.72 | 26.87 | 6.9% |
25.07 | 24.72 | 1.4% | 25.07 | 23.67 | 5.9% |
26
Key Financial Highlights
Indicator | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | % | Q1 2020 | Q1 2019 | % |
EBITDA, Rub bn | 309 | 488 | (36.7)% | 309 | 548 | (43.6)% |
Net Income, Rub bn
attributable to Rosneft shareholders
Adjusted net income1, Rub bn
attributable to Rosneft shareholders
Adjusted operating cashflow2, Rub bn CAPEX, Rub bn
Free Cash Flow, Rub bn
EBITDA, $ bn
Net Income, $ bn
attributable to Rosneft shareholders
Adjusted net income1, $ bn
attributable to Rosneft shareholders
Adjusted operating cashflow2, $ bn
CAPEX, $ bn
Free Cash Flow, $ bn
Urals price, '000 Rub/bbl
(156) | 158 | - | (156) | 131 | - |
34 | 184 | (81.5)% | 34 | 242 | (86.0)% |
404 | 502 | (19.2)% | 404 | 443 | (8.8)% |
185 | 220 | (15.9)% | 185 | 214 | (13.6)% |
219 | 282 | (22.3)% | 219 | 229 | (4.4)% |
4.9 | 7.7 | (36.4)% | 4.9 | 8.3 | (41.0)% |
(2.0) | 2.4 | - | (2.0) | 1.9 | - |
0.5 | 2.9 | (82.8)% | 0.5 | 3.7 | (86.5)% |
6.3 | 8.0 | (21.3)% | 6.3 | 6.7 | (6.0)% |
2.8 | 3.5 | (20.0)% | 2.8 | 3.2 | (12.5)% |
3.5 | 4.5 | (22.2)% | 3.5 | 3.5 | - |
3.19 | 3.92 | (18.5)% | 3.19 | 4.18 | (23.6)% |
Note: (1) Adjusted for FX gains/losses and other one-off effects; (2) Adjusted for prepayments under long-term crude oil supply contracts (including accrued interest), net change in | 27 |
operations of subsidiary banks and operations with trading securities (RUB equivalent) |
EBITDA and Net Income Dynamics
EBITDA Q1 2019 vs. Q1 2020
Net income Q1 2019 vs. Q1 2020
Rub bn | ||||
Q1 2019 | 548 | |||
Exchange rate | (1) | |||
Tax maneuver completion | (42) | |||
EPT effect | 27 | |||
Crude oil price | (123) | |||
Share in profits of | (14) | |||
associates and JVs | ||||
Export duty lag | (97) | |||
Transport tariffs indexation | (5) | External | ||
factors: | ||||
MET and excise duty rates | (2) | -262 Rub bn | ||
-47,8% | ||||
Other taxes | (4) | |||
Number of days | (1) | |||
Change in volumes | 19 | |||
Internal | ||||
Intragroup balances | (31) | and seasonal | ||
factors: | ||||
OPEX | (1) | +23 Rub bn | ||
4,2% | ||||
General costs | 36 | |||
Q1 2020 | 309 | |||
Net income
attr. to shareholders Q1 2019
Minorities
Q1 2019
EBITDA
DDA
Financial expenses
(net)
Other income
Other costs
Income tax
FX gains/losses
Q1 2020
Minorities
Net income
attr. to shareholders Q1 2020
Rub bn | ||
131 | ||
25 | ||
156 | ||
(239)
(2)
(32)
(1)
60
70
(155)
(143)
13
(156)
Calculation of Adjusted OCF
Profit and Loss Statement
№ | Indicator | Q1 2020, | |
$ bn | |||
1 | Revenue, incl. | 27.6 | |
Reimbursement of prepayments and | 2.4 | ||
other financial obligations received | |||
2 | Costs and expenses, incl. | (25.4) | |
Reimbursement of prepayments | (0.1) | ||
granted | |||
3 | Operating profit (1+2) | 2.2 | |
4 | Expenses before income tax | (4.4) | |
5 | Income before income tax (3+4) | (2.2) | |
6 | Income tax | 0.4 | |
7 | Net income (5+6) | (1.8) |
Cash Flow Statement
Q1 2020, | Indicator | № |
$ bn | ||
(1.8) | Net income | 1 |
5.3 | Adjustments to reconcile net income to | 2 |
cash flow from operations, incl. | ||
Reimbursement of prepayments | ||
(1.7) | received under crude oil and | |
petroleum products supply contracts |
(0.7) | Reimbursement of other financial |
obligations received | |
Reimbursement of prepayments |
0.1granted under crude oil and petroleum products supply contracts
3.5 | Changes in operating assets and | 3 |
liabilities, incl. | ||
(0.2) | Interest on prepayments under long- | |
term crude oil supply contracts | ||
(1.6) | Income tax payments, interest and | 4 |
dividends received | ||
5.4 | Net cash from operating activities | 5 |
(1+2+3+4) | ||
(1.6) | Net change in operations of subsidiary | 6 |
banks | ||
2.5 | Effect from prepayments | 7 |
6.3 | Adjusted operational cash flow | 8 |
(5+6+7) | ||
29
Finance Expenses, Rub bn
Indicator | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | % | Q1 2020 | Q1 2019 | % |
- Interest accrued1
- Interest paid and offset2
- Change in interest payable(1-2)
- Interest capitalized3
- Net loss from operations with financial derivatives4
- Increase in provision due to the unwinding of a discount
- Interest on prepayments underlong-term oil and petroleum products supply contracts
- Change in fair value of financial assets
- Increase in loss allowance for expected credit losses on debt financial assets
10. Other finance expenses
Total finance expenses (1-4+5+6+7+8+9+10)
65 | 67 | (3.0)% | 65 | 74 | (12.2)% |
66 | 72 | (8.3)% | 66 | 73 | (9.6)% |
(1) | (5) | (80.0)% | (1) | 1 | - |
36 | 37 | (2.7)% | 36 | 41 | (12.2)% |
7 | - | - | 7 | - | - |
6 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 5 | 20.0% |
12 | 14 | (14.3)% | 12 | 21 | (42.9)% |
22 | - | - | 22 | - | - |
1 | 2 | (50.0)% | 1 | 1 | - |
3 | - | - | 3 | 4 | (25.0)% |
80 | 51 | 56.9% | 80 | 64 | 25.0% |
Note: (1) Interest accrued on credits and loans and other financial obligations, (2) Interest is paid according to the schedule, (3) Interests paid shall be capitalized in accordance with IAS | |
23 standard Borrowing Costs. Capitalization rate is calculated by dividing the interest costs for borrowings related to capital expenditures by the average balance of loans. Capitalized | |
interest shall be calculated by multiplying average balance of construction in progress by capitalization rate, (4) Net effect on operations with financial derivatives was related to FX | 30 |
component fluctuations of cross-currency interest rate swaps. |
Fiscal Support During Crude Oil Price Fall
Main rental payments in the price of a barrel of oil produced in Russia
$/bbl
13.8 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 16.2 | |
9.2
10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 |
Oil price
Export duty
MET
Gross Upstream margin (excluding costs)
Source: Company data | 31 |
Variance Analysis
Q1 2020 EBITDA and net income sensitivity to +/- 10% | Q1 2020 EBITDA and net income sensitivity to +/- | |||||||||||||
change in Urals price | 10% change in Rub/$ exchange rate | |||||||||||||
Rub bn | Rub bn | |||||||||||||
EBITDA | EBITDA | |||||||||||||
(70) | 70 | (64) | 64 | |||||||||||
Net income | Net income | |||||||||||||
(56) | 56 | (51) | 51 | |||||||||||
-10% | 48.2 | +10% | -10% | 66.3 | +10% |
$/bbl | Rub/$ | ||||
Source: Company data | 32 |
Questions & Answers
33
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
OAO Neftyanaya Companiya ROSNEFT published this content on 15 May 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 15 May 2020 12:44:03 UTC