Investor Presentation
July 2020
Forward-Looking Statements & Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This presentation includes forward‐looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward‐looking statements can be identified by words such as "anticipates," "believes," "forecasts," "plans," "estimates," "expects," "should," "will" or other similar expressions. Such statements are based on management's current expectations, estimates and projections, which are subject to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. These forward‐looking statements include statements regarding: free cash flow generation; our strong balance sheet and liquidity; creation of long-term shareholder value; expectations regarding utilization of multi-well pads in 2020; expectations regarding drilling, completion and development in the Permian and Williston Basins; updated 2020 guidance and the underlying assumptions; our [2021] economic breakeven point per barrel in the Permian; expected rate of return based on commodity price levels; expected refrac candidates in the Williston Basin; and estimated 2021 capital budget and production and certain assumptions related thereto.
Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward‐looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the length and severity of the recent outbreak of COVID- 19 and its impact on QEP's business; changes in oil, gas and NGL prices; liquidity constraints, including those resulting from the cost or unavailability of financing due to debt and equity capital and credit market conditions, changes in QEP's credit rating, QEP's compliance with loan covenants, the increasing credit pressure on QEP's industry or demands for cash collateral by counterparties to derivative and other contracts; market conditions; global geopolitical and macroeconomic factors; the activities of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil producing countries such as Russia; general economic conditions, including interest rates; changes in local, regional, national and global demand for natural oil, gas and NGL; impact of new laws and regulations, including the use of hydraulic fracture stimulation; impact of U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil, gas and NGL prices; elimination of federal income tax deductions for oil and gas exploration and development; guidance for implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; actual proceeds from asset sales; actions of Elliott Management Corporation or other activist shareholders; tariffs on products QEP uses in its operations or on the products QEP sells; drilling results; shortages of oilfield equipment, services and personnel; the availability of storage and refining capacity; operating risks such as unexpected drilling conditions; transportation constraints, including gas and crude oil pipeline takeaway capacity in the Permian Basin; weather conditions; changes in maintenance, service and construction costs; permitting delays; outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings; inadequate supplies of water and/or lack of water disposal sources; credit worthiness of counterparties to agreements; and the other risks discussed in the Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Risk Factors section of QEP's Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and in the Company's quarterly and current reports filed with the SEC subsequent to the Annual Report on Form 10-K. QEP undertakes no obligation to publicly correct or update the forward‐looking statements in this presentation, in other documents, or on its website to reflect future events or circumstances. All such statements are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
The SEC requires oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or through reliable technology to be economically and legally producible at specific prices and existing economic and operating conditions. The SEC permits optional disclosure of probable and possible reserves calculated in accordance with SEC guidelines; however, QEP has made no such disclosures in its filings with the SEC. "EURs" or "estimated ultimate recoveries" refer to QEP's internal estimates of hydrocarbon quantities that may be potentially recovered and are not proved, probable or possible reserves within the meaning of the rules of the SEC. Probable and possible reserves and EURs are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and, accordingly, are subject to substantially more risks of actually being realized. Actual quantities of natural gas, oil and NGL that may be ultimately recovered from QEP's interests may differ substantially from the estimates contained in this presentation. Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of QEP's drilling program; the availability of capital; oil, gas and NGL prices; drilling and production costs; availability of drilling services and equipment; drilling results; geological and mechanical factors affecting recovery rates; lease expirations; actions of lessors and surface owners; transportation constraints, including gas and crude oil pipeline takeaway capacity; changes in local, regional, national and global demand for natural gas, oil and NGL; changes in, adoption of and compliance with laws and regulations; regulatory approvals; and other factors. Investors are urged to consider carefully the disclosures and risk factors about QEP's reserves in the Form 10-K.
QEP refers to Free Cash Flow, a non‐GAAP financial measure that management believes is a useful tool to assess QEP's operating results. For a definition of this term and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, see the recent earnings press release and SEC filings at the Company's website at www.qepres.com under "Investor Relations."
2
QEP's World Class Assets
Williston Basin | ||||
7,973 Mboe | Net Acres: 94,610 | |||
2Q20 Production: 2,515.0 Mboe | ||||
Q2 2020 Total Production (1) | ||||
68% Oil | QEP Production Mix | |||
15% NGL | Permian Basin | 2Q20 | ||
17% Gas | Permian Basin Williston Basin | |||
Net Acres: 49,054 | ||||
2Q20 Production Mix | 2Q20 Production: 5,453.2 Mboe | |||
145,837
Total Net Acres (2)
Oil | NGL | Gas | ||
(1) | Includes Other Northern and Other Southern production of 4.7 Mboe. | 3 |
(2) | Includes Other Northern and Other Southern acreage of 2,173 net acres. |
A Leading North American Independent E&P Company
World Class | • | Focused asset footprint |
• | High-quality, contiguous acreage | |
Assets | ||
• | 382.3 MMboe of proved reserves(1) |
Differentiated | • | Efficient, low-cost pad development |
Well | • Peer leading D&C costs | |
Development | • | Capital program discipline & flexibility |
Creating | • Free cash flow generation | |
Shareholder | • | Strong balance sheet & liquidity |
Value | • | Reducing outstanding debt levels |
Well positioned to develop
its portfolio of low-cost,
high-quality resource plays while creating long-term shareholder value
(1) As of December 31, 2019. | 4 |
Committed to Environmental, Social & Governance Performance
We strive to minimize our impact to the environment where we operate, and we focus on the protection of the
health, safety and well-being of our employees, contractors, families, friends and neighbors.
Water | Air |
QEP recognizes water is a valuable resource. We have pioneered water | QEP is committed to minimizing its impact on air quality, while |
conservation practices in our operating areas, utilizing the latest | continuing to meet the energy demands of our nation. We report |
technology and following industry best practices for the responsible use | emissions through the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program and air |
and protection of water sources. From 2017 through 2019, we recycled | emissions from production activities are carefully monitored, managed, |
over 1.1 billion gallons of flow-back and produced water through our | and reported so they remain within prescribed state and federal limits. |
company owned water recycling facilities, which have the capacity to | |
recycle between 180,000 and 200,000 barrels of water per day. |
Land | Spill Prevention |
QEP has a history of utilizing multi-well pads dating back to 2003, | QEP recognizes that prevention of spills is vital to protection of water, |
creating significant reductions in our surface footprint. 100% of our wells | land resources and wildlife. We design, construct, and operate our |
will be drilled on multi-well pads in 2020. We are also a pioneer in | facilities in a manner that reduces the potential for spills, and we have |
horizontal hydraulic re-fracturing, which allows us to increase production | procedures in place to quickly respond in order to minimize impacts to |
from existing wells by utilizing the existing wellbore, pad and production | the environment from releases or spills that may occur. |
facility without causing additional surface disturbance. |
Governance Highlights
• | ISS Corporate Governance Score is 1 (highest score possible) | • | Recent Board refreshment with less than five year tenure for over half the Board |
• | Two female directors with leadership positions (Independent Chair of | • | Increased oversight of ESG matters by the Board through the Governance and |
the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee) | Social Responsibility Committee |
5
Second Quarter Results Driven by Strong Execution
Generated Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of $72.5 million and reported a $184.4 million Net Loss for the second quarter 2020
$95.3MM |
Free Cash Flow (1) |
$157.3 MM | $36.6 MM |
Adjusted EBITDA (2) | Capital Expenditures (accrued) |
5,458.5 Mbbl | $3.62 per Boe | $26.3 MM |
Oil Production | Lease Operating Expense | G&A (3) |
(1) | Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure. See slide 26 for a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow. | |
(2) | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. See slide 25 for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA. | 6 |
(3) | Includes share-based compensation and deferred compensation expense of $8.2 MM. See slide 24 for additional detail. |
Updated 2020 Business Plan
In response to the continued market volatility, QEP has adjusted activity across its operations to improve cash flow and preserve liquidity
Updated
2020
Plan
Permian Basin (1)
- Plan to increase rig count from one to two rigs in September
- Plan to resume completion operations in November
Williston Basin
- All operated development activity completed for the year
Expected
2020
Outcomes
- Capital spend of $360 million
- Produce 19.3 million barrels of oil
- Generate more than $150 million of Free Cash Flow (2) at strip prices
- Permian LOE of $3.48/Boe, a 16% decrease compared with 2019
- G&A expense of $87.5 million, a 44% decrease compared with 2019
(1) Current plans to increase and resume activity based upon the recent improvement in commodity prices.
(2) Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure. See slide 26 for a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow.
7
Updated 2020 Guidance
Original 2020 Guidance (1) | Updated 2020 Guidance | |||
Oil & Condensate Production (MMbbl) | 21.35 | - 22.45 | 19.0 | - 19.5 |
Gas Production (Bcf) | 31.0 | - 34.0 | 30.0 | - 33.0 |
NGL Production (MMbbl) | 5.0 | - 5.6 | 4.1 | - 4.6 |
Total oil equivalent production (MMboe) | 31.5 | - 33.7 | 28.1 | - 29.6 |
Lease operating expense (per Boe) | $5.20 | - $5.80 | $5.00 | - $5.30 |
Adjusted Transportation and Processing Costs (per Boe) (2) | $3.30 | - $3.60 | $3.60 | - $3.90 |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization (per Boe) | $17.75 | - $18.75 | $17.75 | - $18.75 |
Production and property taxes (% of field-level revenue) | 7.5% | 8.5% | ||
(in millions) | ||||
G&A expense (3) | $85.0 -$95.0 | $85.0 -$90.0 | ||
Capital investment (excluding property acquisitions) | ||||
Drilling, Completion and Equip (4) | $520.0 | - $565.0 | $325.0 | - $360.0 |
Midstream Infrastructure (5) | $20.0 | - $25.0 | $12.0 | - $15.0 |
Corporate | $5.0 | $3.0 | - $5.0 | |
Total Capital Investment (excluding property acquisitions) | $545.0 | - $595.0 | $340.0 | - $380.0 |
Wells put on production (net) | 69 | 44 | ||
Refracs put on production (net) | 8 | 5 |
As of July 29, 2020 - QEP's updated 2020 guidance assumes: (i) a WTI NYMEX oil price of $40 per barrel and a natural gas price of $2.00 per MMBtu at Henry Hub, both adjusted for applicable commodity and location differentials, (ii) that QEP | ||
will elect to reject ethane from its produced gas in the Permian Basin where processing economics support it, and (iii) no property acquisitions or divestitures, other than those already disclosed. | ||
(1) | Original guidance as of February 26, 2020. | |
(2) | Adjusted Transportation and Processing Costs (per Boe) is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to the definitions and reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures in our press release dated July 29, 2020. | |
(3) | The mid-point of G&A expense includes approximately $12.0 million of expenses related to cash and non-cashshare-based compensation and our deferred compensation plan mark-to-market. Because our cash share-based | |
compensation and our deferred compensation plan liabilities fluctuate with stock price changes, the amount of actual expense may vary from the forecasted amount. | ||
(4) | Drilling, Completion and Equipment includes approximately $30.0 million of non-operated well costs. | 8 |
(5) | Includes capital expenditures in the Permian Basin associated with (i) water sourcing, gathering, recycling and disposal and (ii) crude oil and natural gas gathering system. |
2020 Capital & Production Guidance
Capital Program
- Reduced capital program in response to market conditions
- Plan to resume completion activity in the Permian in 4Q20
- Only non-op spending remaining in the Williston in 2020
Capital
$200 | |
$180 | |
$160 | |
millions | $140 |
$120 | |
$ in | $100 |
$80 | |
$60 | |
$40 |
$20 $0
1Q20 | 2Q20 | 3Q20F | 4Q20F | ||
Permian | Williston | ||||
Production
- Peaked in 2Q20 as plan was adjusted in response to market conditions
- Exit Rate expected to be approximately 45 MBopd
Oil Production
6,000
4,000
MBbls
2,000
0
1Q20 | 2Q20 | 3Q20F | 4Q20F | ||
Permian | Williston | ||||
9
Permian Basin - University 0312E/W
0312W | 0312E |
½ mile | ½ mile |
-- Middle Spraberry | |
-- Lower Spraberry | |
-- Jo Mill | |
-- Spraberry Shale A | |
-- Spraberry Shale B | |
-- Spraberry Shale C | |
-- Dean | |
-- Wolfcamp A | |
-- Wolfcamp B |
UL 0312 Production Performance
35,000 | ||||||
(BOPD) | 30,000 | |||||
25,000 | ||||||
Oil Rate | 20,000 | |||||
15,000 | ||||||
10kNorm | 5,000 | |||||
10,000 | ||||||
0 | ||||||
MS | LS | SB | SC | WA | 0312 Budget TC |
Performance Observations
- Wolfcamp A and Spraberry Shale C-bench wells outperforming expectations
- Spraberry Shale B-bench & Lower Spraberry wells performing as expected
- Middle Spraberry wells outperforming after initial cleanup
- Deployed continuous tank development resulting in supercharge conditions with positive impacts on frac network complexity and initial production
UL 0312 Cumulative Production Performance
(MBO) | 3,500 | |
3,000 | ||
Oil | 2,500 | |
Cum | 2,000 | |
Norm | 1,500 | |
10k | ||
1,000 | ||
DSU | ||
500 | ||
0 | ||
0312 Total | 0312 Budget TC |
10
DSU 0312 Outperforming Average Peer Production
Peer Comparison- Middle Spraberry, Lower Spraberry, Spraberry Shale and Dean/Wolfcamp A
10,000' Norm Oil Production
1,500 | 150,000 |
1,250 | 125,000 |
1,000 | 100,000 |
750 | 75,000 |
500 | 50,000 |
250 | 25,000 |
0 | 0 |
0 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | |||
Days | |||||||
0312 Prod | Peer Avg | 0312 Cum | Peer Avg Cum | ||||
Cum 10,000' Norm Oil Production
Well Count
QEP - UL 0312 | 25 |
Peer Average | 755 |
(1) Peer data from IHS, All Martin/Andrews County wells POP'd 2018 and later. | 11 |
Permian Basin - University 1125E
1125E
½ mile | ||
-- Middle Spraberry | ||
-- Lower Spraberry | ||
-- Jo Mill | ||
-- Spraberry Shale A | ||
-- Spraberry Shale B | ||
-- Spraberry Shale C | ||
-- Dean | ||
-- Wolfcamp A | ||
10,000' | 12,500' | -- Wolfcamp B |
UL 1125E Production Performance
15000 | |||||||
(BOPD) | 12500 | ||||||
10000 | |||||||
RateOil | |||||||
7500 | |||||||
DSU | 5000 | ||||||
2500 | |||||||
0 | |||||||
MS | LS | SA | SB | SC | WA | Rolling 1125E Budget TCs |
Performance Observations
- Wells completed in March 2020; POP dates were delayed until oil prices improved
- Cut oil sooner with lower water ratios
- Cumulative oil performance ahead of expectations
- Decline rates trending with pre-drill expectations
- Lower DSU density due to offset wells located to the East
UL 1125E Cumulative Production Performance
900 | |
800 | |
(MBO) | 700 |
600 | |
Oil | 500 |
Cum | 400 |
300 | |
DSU | |
200 | |
100
0
1125E Total | Rolling 1125E Budget TCs | |
12
Strong Performance vs. Peers Across All Benches
Cum 10,000' Norm Oil Production
Cum 10,000' Norm Oil Production
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
0
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
0
Middle Spraberry | Performance Observations | |||||||||||
• Recent County Line development outperforming peers in the | ||||||||||||
Basin | ||||||||||||
• Middle Spraberry wells experienced longer clean up times due | ||||||||||||
to tank development, but are now performing above average | ||||||||||||
• Validates benefits of tank-style development and | ||||||||||||
advancements in completion design | ||||||||||||
2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | |||||||
QEP 0312 | Months | QEP 1125 | ||||||||||
Wolfcamp A | ProductionOil | 250,000 | Spraberry Shale | |||||||||
150,000 | ||||||||||||
200,000 | ||||||||||||
Norm | 100,000 | |||||||||||
Cum10,000' | 0 | |||||||||||
50,000 | ||||||||||||
2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
QEP 0312 MonthsQEP 1125 | QEP 0312 | Months | QEP 1125 |
13
Peer Leading Permian Efficiency
QEP has dramatically
lowered D&C costs and is
the most efficient
on a $/ Ft. basis
QEP has the most
efficient frac operation
Delivering peer
leading LOE
metrics
D&C Costs Per Lateral Foot | |||||||||
$1,000 | 2018/2019 Peer Avg. $832 | ||||||||
$750 | $641 | $443 | |||||||
$500 | |||||||||
$250 | |||||||||
$0 | |||||||||
A | B | E | D | C | F | QEP 18/19 Avg. QEP 2020 Avg. | |||
Completed Lateral Feet Per Day
4,000 | 2018/2019 Peer Avg. 854 feet per day | 3,867 | |||||||
2,583 | |||||||||
3,000 | |||||||||
2,000 | |||||||||
1,000 | |||||||||
0 | |||||||||
E | D | A | B | C | F | QEP 18/19 Avg. | QEP 2020 Avg. | ||
LOE per Boe (1Q20) | ||||||||||
$6.00 | 1Q20 Peer Avg.: $4.70 | |||||||||
$3.97 | ||||||||||
$4.00 | $3.12 | |||||||||
$2.00 | ||||||||||
$0.00 | ||||||||||
A | B | F | C | D | E | QEP 1Q20 | QEP 2020 Avg. | |||
(1) | Data sourced from Rystad Energy ShaleWellCube & company filings. | 14 |
(2) | Peer group includes: Callon, Concho, Diamondback, Parsley, Pioneer and SM Energy. |
Williston Basin Refrac Performance
Refrac Initial Performance
(Bopd) | 10,000 |
RateOil | 1,000 |
Incremental | |
100 | |
10 |
0 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 120 | |
Days Post Refrac | |||||||
Type Curve | HEMI 1-27-34BH | HEMI 2-27-34BH | |||||
SEVERIN 1-16-17BH | SEVERIN 2-16-17BH | SEVERIN 9-8-16-17LL | |||||
Average Refrac Cost by Year
millions | $6.0 | ||||
$5.2 | |||||
$4.0 | $4.1 | $3.9 | |||
$ In | |||||
$2.0 | |||||
$0.0 | |||||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |||
Hemi Refracs (2 wells)
Five refracs completed in 2020
• Wells performing as expected
• Up to 100 remaining refrac candidates
Improving capital efficiency | |||
over time | |||
• 5% improvement in costs in | |||
2020 | |||
Severin Refracs (3 wells) | • 2020 refracs delivering | ||
competitive ROR at $40 WTI |
15
Corporate Overhead Continuing to Decline
Significantly reduced G&A over last two years
- Lowered employee headcount by 60%
- Decreased officer headcount by more than half
- Retained technical, operating and business expertise
- Significantly reduced non-employee expense
Continued focus on reducing costs
- Streamline IT systems
- Reduce corporate office footprint
- Optimize use of outside services
- Apply continuous improvement mindset
Cash G&A and stock based compensation have
both decreased over 60% since 2018
$ in millions
$250.0
$200.0
$150.0
$100.0
$50.0
$0.0
Annual G&A
$33.0
$28.0
$189.0
$12.0
$128.0
$75.5
2018A | 2019A | 2020F | ||
G&A (excl. Stock Comp) | Stock Comp. | |||
16
2021 Capital & Production Outlook
Capital Program
- Permian receiving majority of capital budget allocation with a two rig program
- Plan to complete the remaining four wells on the Disco pad in the Williston
- Approximately 70% of capital expenditures in first six months
- Completion activity reduced in second half of the year
Production
- Expected to peak in second half of year
- Expect 5% year-over-year oil production growth
- Flexibility to adjust full year activity according to market conditions
Improvements to capital efficiency in the Permian delivering stable production at significantly lower capital spend
significantly lower capital spend
$ in millions
MMboe
$1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Capital
2018A | 2019A | 2020F | 2021F | |||
Permian | Williston | Forecast (Feb. 2020) | ||||
Equivalent Production
2018A | 2019A | 2020F | 2021F | |||
Permian | Williston | Forecast (Feb. 2020) | ||||
17
High-Quality Permian Acreage Economic at $40 Oil
1 mile
-- Middle Spraberry (5/mi)
-- Lower Spraberry (5/mi)
-- Spraberry Shale A
-- Spraberry Shale B 16/mi -- Spraberry Shale C
-- Dean/Wolfcamp A (5/mi)
2021 DSU Example
Activity through 2021 solely concentrated on County Line development(1)
Formation | 2021 Well Counts | ||
Middle Spraberry | 11 | ||
Lower Spraberry | 12 | ||
Spraberry Shale | 38 | ||
Dean/Wolfcamp A | 11 | ||
TOTAL WELLS | 72 |
- DSU level economics achieve >30% BFIT ROR at $40/$2.00 flat
- Significant ROR gains with relatively small increases to commodity price
$40/$2.00 | $45/$2.00 | $50/$2.00 | ||||
Area | Target | BFIT ROR % | BFIT ROR % | BFIT ROR % | ||
County Line | Middle Spraberry | 21% | 30% | 41% | ||
County Line | Lower Spraberry | 41% | 58% | 77% | ||
County Line | Spraberry Shale | 33% | 48% | 65% | ||
County Line | Dean/Wolfcamp A | 36% | 52% | 72% | ||
DSU TOTAL | 32% | 47% | 63% |
(1) Assumes UL 1125W through UL 1933E. | 18 |
Note: ROR calculation includes direct well costs and initial artificial lift installation. |
Credit Facility & Liquidity Overview
- Commitment: $850 million
- Maturity: 9/1/2022
- NOT a Reserve Based Loan (RBL)
- No semi-annual borrowing base redetermination
- Material subsidiaries guarantee credit facility (CF)
- Not secured
- Financial covenants
- Leverage Ratio: <2.50x using CF borrowings only
- PV9 Ratio: >1.50x Calculated using CF borrowings only
- Minimum Liquidity: $100 million at all times
- Senior Note Repurchases
- Able to borrow up to $500 million on CF to repurchase notes
- Junior Guaranteed Indebtedness
- Able to issue subordinated subsidiary guarantees for up to $500 million of unsecured debt
- Indebtedness would be subordinate to CF and structurally senior to existing senior unsecured notes
QEP believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet all financial
commitments and navigate the current market cycle
Credit Facility Availability (1)
$ in millions
Leverage Ratio | 842.5 |
PV9 Ratio | 842.5 |
Minimum Liquidity | 742.5 | |||||
$0 | $170 | $340 | $510 | $680 | $850 |
Available Capacity | Unavailable Capacity |
Most Restrictive Covenant at 6/30/2020
Calculated in accordance with the 8th Amendment of Credit Agreement. Available Capacity calculated as: total credit facility aggregate commitments ($850 million) less any outstanding credit facility borrowings and letters of credit, net of any cash and cash equivalents.
$100 million of Minimum Liquidity potentially available pursuant to lender approval. | 19 |
Debt Maturity Schedule
Senior Notes (Unsecured)
- Outstanding: $1.877 billion
- Average coupon: 5.6%
- Average duration: 3.1 years
- Key covenant: Limitation on Liens
Credit Facility (Unsecured)
- Commitment: $850 million
- Maturity: 9/1/2022
- Material subsidiary guarantees
As of June 30, 2020
$1,250
$1,000 | Unsecured | ||||||||||
$850 million | |||||||||||
Credit Facility | |||||||||||
$750 | |||||||||||
in millions | $636.8 | ||||||||||
$500 | $465.1 | $500.0 | |||||||||
$ | Coupon | Coupon | |||||||||
$275.3 | Coupon | 5.250% | |||||||||
5.625% | |||||||||||
$250 | 5.375% | Maturity | |||||||||
Coupon | Maturity | ||||||||||
6.875% | Maturity | May 1, | |||||||||
Maturity | October 1, | 2023 | March 1, | ||||||||
2022 | 2026 | ||||||||||
March 1, | |||||||||||
$0 | 2021 | ||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
20
Creating Value for Shareholders
World Class Assets
Differentiated Well Development
Capital Discipline and Cost Improvement
QEP's commitment to
execution excellence and capital discipline maximizes value for shareholders
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation
Improving Balance Sheet and Liquidity
21
Appendix
Derivative Positions - As of July 22, 2020
Production Commodity Derivative Swaps
Year | Index | Total Volumes | Avg. Swap Price per Unit | |
Oil Sales | (MMBbls) | ($/Bbl) | ||
2020 | NYMEX WTI | 7.9 | $57.29 | |
2020 | Argus WTI Midland | 0.7 | $57.30 | |
2021 | NYMEX WTI | 8.6 | $43.47 | |
Gas Sales | (in Millions MMBtu) | ($/MMbtu) | ||
2020 | IF Waha | 7.4 | $0.97 | |
2020 | NYMEX HH | 5.5 | $2.20 | |
2021 | IF Waha | 14.6 | $1.75 | |
2021 | NYMEX HH | 9.1 | $2.44 | |
Production Commodity Derivate Basis Swaps | ||||
Year | Index | Basis | Total volumes | Weighted Avg. Differential |
Oil Sales | (MMBbls) | ($/Bbl) | ||
2020 | NYMEX WTI | Argus WTI Midland | 3.7 | $0.22 |
2021 | NYMEX WTI | Argus WTI Midland | 4.4 | $0.99 |
Note: Positions in 2020 are for the time period July- Dec 2020. | 23 |
General and Administrative (G&A) Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | Change | 2020 | 2019 | Change | |||||||||
General and administrative (excluding share-based | $ | 18.1 | $ | 26.0 | $ | (7.9) | $ | 38.3 | $ | 74.2 | $ | (35.9) | ||
compensation and deferred compensation) | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative (share-based compensation and | ||||||||||||||
deferred compensation): | ||||||||||||||
Cash share-based compensation (1) | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.4 | $ | (0.3) | $ | 0.7 | $ | 5.7 | $ | (5.0) | ||
Non-cashshare-based compensation (1) | $ | 3.1 | $ | 4.8 | $ | (1.7) | $ | 6.4 | $ | 11.2 | $ | (4.8) | ||
Deferred compensation mark-to-market adjustments (2) | $ | 5.0 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 4.7 | $ | (3.2) | $ | 3.7 | $ | (6.9) | ||
Total General and administrative | $ | 26.3 | $ | 31.5 | $ | (5.2) | $ | 42.2 | $ | 94.8 | $ | (52.6) | ||
(1) | Cash share-based compensation represents restricted cash awards, performance share units and restricted share units recorded under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan and Cash Incentive Plan. Non-cashshare-based | |
compensation represents stock options and restricted share awards recorded under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan. Refer to Note 12 - Share-Based and Long-Term Incentive Compensation, in Item I of Part I of this Quarterly | ||
Report on Form 10-Q for more information on share-based compensation. | ||
(2) | Deferred compensation mark-to-market adjustments represents mark-to-market adjustments of the Company's nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan (Wrap Plan). Refer to Note 1 - Basis of Presentation, in Item I of Part I | 24 |
of June 20, 2020 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information on the Wrap Plan. |
Adjusted EBITDA
Management defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (EBITDA), adjusted to exclude changes in fair value of derivative contracts, exploration expenses, gains and losses from asset sales, impairment, loss from early extinguishment of debt and certain other items. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate QEP's financial performance and trends, make operating decisions, and allocate resources. Management believes the measure is useful supplemental information for investors because it eliminates the impact of certain nonrecurring, non-cash and/or other items that management does not consider as indicative of QEP's performance from period to period. QEP's Adjusted EBITDA may be determined or calculated differently than similarly titled measures of other companies in our industry, which would reduce the usefulness of this non-GAAP financial measure when comparing our performance to that of other companies.
Below is a reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (a GAAP measure) to Adjusted EBITDA. This non-GAAP measure should be considered by the reader in addition to, but not instead of, the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (184.4) | $ | 48.8 | $ | 183.0 | $ | (67.9) | |
Interest Expense | 29.8 | 33.2 | 61.4 | 67.2 | |||||
Interest and other (income) expense | (2.6) | (0.9) | - | (3.7) | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (53.6) | 29.7 | 12.7 | (82.3) | |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 149.4 | 128.0 | 291.6 | 251.3 | |||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative contracts | 219.1 | (54.5) | (188.2) | 121.3 | |||||
Gain from early extinguishment of debt | (0.4) | - | (25.6) | - | |||||
Net (gain) loss from asset sales, inclusive of restructuring costs | - | (17.8) | (3.7) | (4.6) | |||||
Impairment | - | - | - | 5.0 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 157.3 | $ | 166.5 | $ | 331.2 | $ | 286.3 | |
25
Free Cash Flow
The Company defines Free Cash Flow as Adjusted EBITDA plus non-cashshare-based compensation less interest expense, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, and accrued property, plant and equipment capital expenditures. Management believes that this measure is useful to management and investors for analysis of the Company's ability to repay debt, fund acquisitions or repurchase stock.
Below is a reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities (the most comparable GAAP measure) to Free Cash Flow. This non-GAAP measure should be considered by the reader in addition to, but not instead of, the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2020 | June 30, 2020 | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Cash Flow Information | |||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities | $ | 72.5 | $ | 117.4 | $ | 224.4 | $ | 195.7 | |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities | (82.0) | (104.1) | (237.0) | 348.1 | |||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | (57.2) | (5.5) | (149.6) | (445.6) | |||||
Free Cash Flow | |||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities | $ | 72.5 | $ | 117.4 | $ | 224.4 | $ | 195.7 | |
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts | (1.3) | (1.4) | (2.6) | (2.7) | |||||
Interest expense | 29.8 | 33.2 | 61.4 | 67.2 | |||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities | 3.3 | 0.8 | - | 2.7 | |||||
Interest and other (income) expense | (2.6) | (0.9) | - | (3.7) | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 53.6 | (30.2) | (141.4) | 87.7 | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (53.6) | 29.7 | 12.7 | (82.3) | |||||
Non-cashshare-based compensation | (3.1) | (3.2) | (6.4) | (11.2) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | 58.7 | 21.1 | 183.1 | 32.9 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 157.3 | 166.5 | 331.2 | 286.3 | |||||
Non-cashshare-based compensation | 3.1 | 3.2 | 6.4 | 11.2 | |||||
Interest expense, excluding amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts | (28.5) | (31.8) | (58.8) | (64.5) | |||||
Accrued property, plant and equipment capital expenditures | (36.6) | (169.9) | (215.1) | (337.1) | 26 | ||||
Free Cash Flow | $ | 95.3 | $ | (32.0) | $ | 63.7 | $ | (104.1) |
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
QEP Resources Inc. published this content on 29 July 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 01 August 2020 17:21:18 UTC