Preliminary Results Presentation
For the year ended 31 March 2019
Olav Hellebø - Chief Executive Officer
Michael Hunt - Chief Financial Officer
Disclaimer
2
Global Leader in Cell-Based Therapeutics
Leading clinical stage stem cell company
Proprietary allogeneic stem cell technology
platforms
Two clinical stage therapeutic candidates
targeting unmet medical needs
Significant clinical validation milestones over the
next 18 months
3
Proprietary Platform Technology
hRPC
CTX
Cells
CTX-
Derived
Exosomes
- Human retinal progenitor stem cell line
- Cryopreserved formulation allows globalship-and-store
- Positive early Phase 2a data in retinitis pigmentosa
- Partnered with Fosun Pharma for China
- Immortalised neural progenitor stem cell line
- 12 month shelf life (cryopreserved)
- Positive Phase 2a results in stroke disability
- Partnered with Fosun Pharma for China
- Nano-sizedvesicles from CTX cells
- Potential as drug load/delivery vehicle and as a therapeutic
4
Pipeline with Near Term Catalysts
Programme | Indication | Pre-clinical Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Next Milestone |
hRPC | Retinitis | Top line Phase 1/2a data | ||
Pigmentosa | read out expected Q4 2019 | |||
PISCES III, pivotal, multi-centre
CTX cellsStroke DisabilityU.S. Phase 2b study, data read out expected Q4 2020Exosomes | Drug Delivery | Collaboration / Partnering |
deals targeted | ||
5
Prelim Results - Operational Highlights
hRPC
CTX
Cells
CTX-Derived
Exosomes
Business
Development
- Positive preliminary efficacy data from first three Phase 2a patients in ongoing US Phase 1/2a clinical trial in retinitis pigmentosa
- Top line data from all treated Phase 2a patients to be presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting in October 2019
- Patient dosing commenced inplacebo-controlled US Phase 2b clinical trial
- Top line data from Phase 2b study expected in late 2020
- Programme primarily focused on use of exosome technology as a drug delivery vehicle
- First collaboration agreement signed with US company to explore use of exosome technology as a delivery vehicle in gene therapy
- Exclusiveout-licence agreement signed post-year end with Fosun Pharma to commercialise hRPC and CTX programmes in China
- ReNeuron to receive upfront, future near term and estimatedsuccess-based milestone payments of £80.0 million plus double-digit royalties on sales
- Discussions ongoing with other commercial third parties regarding potentialout-licence deals
6
Prelim Results - Financial Highlights
Year ended 31 | Year ended 31 | |
March 2019 | March 2018 | |
(£'m) | (Audited) | (Audited) |
Revenues and other income | 2.7 | 0.9 |
Research and development costs | (16.3) | (16.7) |
General and administrative costs | (4.7) | (4.6) |
(18.3) | (20.4) | |
Net finance income/(costs) | 1.1 | (0.6) |
Tax credit | 2.9 | 3.4 |
Loss for the year | (14.3) | (17.6) |
Net decrease in cash and deposits | (11.0) | (15.7) |
Cash and deposits at start of period | 37.4 | 53.1 |
Cash and deposits at period end | 26.4 | 37.4 |
7
Human
Retinal
Progenitor
Cells
(hRPC)
Human Retinal Progenitor Cell Therapy
hRPC: unique, allogeneic cell-based therapeutic approach to retinal disease
- hRPCs differentiate into functional photoreceptors and integrate into retinal layers inpre-clinical models; integration may also enable durable trophic support
- Broad therapeutic potential across a range of retinal diseases
- Initially targeting inherited retinal degenerative diseases
Proprietary manufacturing process and controls allow for stable and high quantity GMP production
- Collaborations with Schepens Eye Research Institute and University College London
- Proprietary technology enabled development of GMP manufacturing process to support clinical application
- Cryopreserved formulation provides for commercially viable shelf life and allows for worldwide shipment on demand
9
Retinitis Pigmentosa: An Unmet Need
- RP is an inherited, degenerative eye disease1,2,3
- Primary loss of rod photoreceptors; secondary loss of cones
- Onset varies from early childhood to 20s/30s
- Early stage main symptom is night blindness
- Progressive loss of peripheral vision, then central vision
- Incidence of 1:4,000 in U.S. and worldwide
- >100 genes identified containing mutations leading to RP4
- Orphan Drug Designation in EU and U.S.
- FDA Fast Track Designation
Therapeutic benefit of hRPC approach not dependent on
genetic causes of IRD
No approved treatment for the vast majority of patients with RP
1Hamel (2006) Orphanet J Rare Disease 1, 40;
2https://nei.nih.gov/health/pigmentosa/pigmentosa_facts;
3NORD | 10 |
4https://www.genome.gov/13514348/learning-about-retinitis-pigmentosa/ |
Pre-clinical Studies Support RPC Potential in Degenerative Retinal Disease
hRPC in RCS Dystrophic Rats
12 Weeks Post-Injection
hRPC Survival | Vision (via OKR) |
hRPC (red)/photoreceptors (blue); white arrows indicate hRPC cells within retinal layers
OKR = optokinetic response; OS = oculus sinister (left eye); OD = oculus dextrus (right eye)
pRPC in Pigs
4 Weeks Post-Injection
IS
ONL
INL
Transplanted donor cells (green); transplanted donor cells becoming
photoreceptor cells (yellow) in the host retina (blue)
IS = inner segments; ONL = outer nuclear layer; INL = inner nuclear layer
- Evidence that hRPC:
- Integrated into host retina
- Provided trophic support of host cells
- Preserved vision based on OKR
- Evidence that pRPC:
- Differentiated into retinal cells
- Integrated into host retina
- Required no immunosuppression
11
Pre-Clinical Data Support a Durable Response
Time after
Species | Treatment | Incidence of Survival |
Dystrophic RCS & | 28 weeks | 77%; 23/30 dystrophic RCS rats |
Normal Rats | 70%; 7/10 normal control rats | |
NIH-III Nude Mice | 39 weeks | 33%; 15/45 |
Mini Pigs | 12 weeks | 81%; 21/26 |
(allogeneic study mimicking | At 12 weeks a number of surviving pRPCs appeared to have | |
the clinical scenario) | ||
migrated into the photoreceptor layer up to a depth of 2-3 | ||
layers, indicating cell integration. | ||
RPC cells survive for long periods in all species and survival is
unaffected by the presence of disease
12
Clinical Development - Phase 1 / 2a
Phase 1
- FIH, single ascending dose in subjects with established RP
- Subjects with very poor visual potential
- Four cohorts, three subjects each
- Cohorts1-2: 250K, 500K fresh cells
- Cohort3-4: 1 MM cryopreserved cells
- Reformulation into commercial, cryopreserved formula with 6+ month shelf life
Phase 2a
- 6-12additional subjects with established RP
- Subjects with better visual potential
- Cohort 5: three subjects, 1 MM commercial, cryopreserved cells
- Primary endpoint: safety
- Secondary safety/efficacy measures: visual acuity, visual field, retinal sensitivity and retinal structure
U.S. Clinical Sites
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Jason Comander, MD, PhD
- Retinal Research Institute, Phoenix, Pravin Dugel, MD
13
Cohort 5 Efficacy Results*
Changes in Letters Read (ETDRS chart)
Subject 1 treated at Mass Eye & Ear (OS), Subjects 2 and 3 treated at Retinal Consultants of Arizona (OD)
+23 from BL
+25 from BL
+21 from BL
Subject 1 | Subject 2 | Subject 3 | |
* Sixth annual Retinal Cell and Gene Therapy Innovation Summit, Vancouver, Canada - April 2019 | 14 |
Cohort 5 Efficacy Results
- Strongly positive visual acuity data
- 4-linegain on ETDRS chart
- FDA guidance considers a3-line improvement as clinically significant (responder)
15
hRPC Platform Next Steps
- Build further safety data in RP using commercial formulation
- Treating patients with more intact retinas in order to further assess efficacy potential -
- further Phase 1/2a readout at AAO meeting in Oct 2019
- Conduct controlledmulti-centre Phase 2b trial in RP
- Assess other indications
16
CTX
Cells
CTX Cell Therapy
CTX: allogeneic, cryopreserved, human neural stem cell product
- Promotes anatomical plasticity in the brain
- Excellent safety profile - no immunogenicity issuespost-administration
- Manufactured under cGMP with a 12 month shelf life
Commercially Attractive
- Product to be readily ordered, shipped and stored at the hospital
- Delivered incryo-shipper, controlled thawing at hospital site
- Administer to patient 'on demand'
- Commercial scale manufacturing at attractive COGs
18
CTX Promotes Anatomical Plasticity in the Brain
Cells
stereotaxically implanted in the putamen - modulate immune response to promote repair
Potential Mechanism(s) of Action1,2
Stimulate | Cell trans- | ||
differentiation | |||
neurogenesis | |||
Stimulate/ | |||
restore | Modulate | ||
synaptic | |||
inflammation | Release of | ||
activity | |||
paracrine | |||
Stimulate | factors |
angiogenesis
Symptomatic
relief of
disability
Tissue
restoration
and/or repair
1Pollock et al (2006) Exp Neurol 199, 143-155; | |
2Sinden et al.(2017) Stem Cells Dev 26, 1078-1085 | 19 |
CTX for Stroke Disability: Unmet Medical Need
- Stroke is the leading cause of morbidity andlong-term disability in the U.S.1
- 1 in 6 people will have a stroke in their lifetime
- Financial burden
- $34 billion annually instroke-related costs in the U.S1
- Direct medicalstroke-related costs projected to triple from 2012 to 20301
- Limited treatment options
- Only one drug available, for use within 4.5 hours of stroke onset2
- Rehabilitation provides most benefit in first month, very little beyond six months3
CTX administration promotes repair in the damaged brain
1Benjamin et al (2017) Circulation 135, e146-e603; | 20 |
2Otwell et al (2010) Am J Health Pharm 67, 1070-1074; |
3Hatem et al (2016) Front Hum Neurosci 10, 442
Severity of Functional Disability Measured by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 5: Bedridden, requires constant help from others
mRS 4: Needing help to walk, use toilet, bathe
mRS 3: Can walk with appliance, needs some help at home
mRS 0-2: Slight to no disability
Reductions in disability result in substantial reductions in patient care costs
21
CTX in Stroke Disability: PISCES II Study Results
Phase 2a, single arm, open label study
-
23 disabled, stable stroke patients,
2 to 12 mos post-stroke - 20 MM CTX cell dose
- Clinically meaningful improvements in disability scales measured out to 12 monthspost-implantation
- Nocell-related safety issues identified
Very promising results for chronic stroke disability, supportive of a larger, randomised, placebo- controlled Phase 2b study
Patients with NIHSS | ||||||||
Time | Total subjects | upper limb score < 4 at | ||||||
baseline | ||||||||
Month | N | Responders* (%) | N | Responders* (%) | ||||
Baseline | 23 | - | 14 | - | ||||
3 | 23 | 7 | (30.4%) | 14 | 6 | (42.9%) | ||
6 | 22 | 6 | (27.3%) | 13 | 5 | (38.5%) | ||
12 | 20 | 7 | (35.0%) | 12 | 6 | (50.0%) | ||
*number of subjects with >1 point improvement in mRS (% of N observed at day of visit)
Greatest mRS improvements in subjects with residual
movement of the affected arm (NIHSS UL <4)
22
PISCES III Study Design and Status
Phase 2b, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study
110 subjects - 1:1 randomization to placebo (sham) surgery
- Age35-75 inclusive
- Ischemic stroke that includes supratentorial region (CT/MRI confirmed)
-
6-12mos post-strokeomRS 3 and 4
oSome residual arm movement
Primary Endpoint*
- >1 pt improvement from baseline in mRS at 6 mospost-treatment
Secondary Endpoints* (1, 3, 6, 9, 12 mos post-tx)
- Barthel Index (ADL independence)
- Timed Up and Go test (lower limb and trunk function)
- Chedoke Arm/Hand Activity Inventory (upper limb function)
- NIHSS (impairment scale - neurological outcome and recovery)oFugl-Meyer Assessment (performance-based impairment index) oEQ-5D-5L (QoL)
❍15 surgical sites and 22 patient assessment sites identified and approved | |
Current Status | ❍Initial sites activated and patient dosing in progress |
❍CTX Drug Product batches in stock or scheduled for manufacture | |
❍Top-line readout expected in Q4 2020 |
23
CTX-
Derived
Exosomes
CTX-Derived Exosomes: Biological Nanoparticles
- Nano-scalevesicles released by most cell types as a means of intercellular communication
- Naturally-occurringliposomal delivery system
- Contain and transport bio- active lipids, proteins and nucleic acids
Lipid bilayer
Surface proteins (tetraspanins CD63, CD81)
Internal proteins (Hsp70, Tsg101)
Specific nucleic acids (miRNAs)
ExoPr0 | ❍First CTX-derived exosome candidate |
❍Potential as a drug delivery vehicle and as a therapeutic | |
25
ReNeuron's CTX-Derived Exosome Technology
Advantages of exosomes as a
delivery vehicle
- Natural carrier of nucleic acids and proteins, amenable for loading complex,hard-to- deliver therapeutic agents
- Ease of bioengineering
- Low immunogenicity
- Intrinsically durable, membrane texture order of magnitude harder than synthetic liposomes
Advantages of ReNeuron's ExoPr0 exosome technology
- Stable, consistent,high-yield,clinical-grade product
- Fully qualifiedxeno-free, optimised, scalable GMP process
- Established analytics
- Proven ability to load miRNA and proteins
- Modifiable to carry siRNA/mRNA, CRISPR/Cas9 proteins,small-molecule inhibitors
- Favourable distribution across the blood brain barrier
- Engineered to target particular tissues
26
Summary
Summary
- Global leader incell-based therapeutics - sites in UK and Boston, US
- Allogeneic stem cell technology platforms - patented, scalable & cost effective
- Targeting diseases with large unmet medical needs
- Significant clinical milestones in stroke and retinal programmes over the next 18 months
- Near/medium term opportunities forvalue-generating partnering/collaboration deals
28
Pencoed Business Park │ Pencoed │ Bridgend │ CF35 5HY │ UK
T +44 (0) 203 819 8400 │E info@reneuron.com
www.reneuron.com
Ticker: RENE.L
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
ReNeuron Group plc published this content on 11 July 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 11 July 2019 12:42:02 UTC