Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nasdaq  >  SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.    SSNC

SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.

(SSNC)
  Report  
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsOfficial PublicationsSector newsAnalyst Recommendations

SS&C Technologies : Why passive investment strategies demand active performance attribution

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
06/06/2019 | 01:43am EDT

In an environment where passive strategies look set to dominate the future investment landscape, are vendors providing technology solutions that meet the needs of today's asset managers?

According to a recent Forbes article, investors have withdrawn an estimated $1.2 trillion from active U.S. equity mutual funds and invested more than $1.4 trillion into U.S. equity index funds and ETFs since the end of 2006. Estimates from Morningstar suggest that passive funds and ETFs investing in U.S. equity stocks now hold approximately 48% of market assets. Bloomberg recently reported that if current trends continue, it expects this to rise to above 50% by the end of 2019. While this trend has not been mirrored as strongly across all markets globally, a 2018 report by the Investment Association (IA) shows that the proportion of assets invested in index tracking funds and ETFs continues to rise among UK-based investors, with more than a quarter of all assets now invested in passive strategies. What does this switch to passive investment mean for the world of performance attribution?

Impact on performance attribution

Traditionally, active managers have used performance attribution to explain their investment skill by breaking down the excess return over a market index into the various decision-making steps of their investment process. Active managers make specific allocations to asset classes, countries or sectors, specific stocks, or fixed-income portfolios to optimize the impact of decisions made regarding duration, yield, currency, or credit exposure. Various models, intended to help managers explain their outcomes, have been developed, tested, and adopted over the past few decades. So how can performance attribution help the passive fund manager when a portfolio's investment strategy is intended to replicate the performance of the underlying index or market in which they are invested?

Many underlying variables are hard to predict

While not typically an issue for U.S. mutual funds and ETFs, in European markets it is often necessary to adjust for the difference in timing from when a NAV is struck at the close of the market. Similarly, if not adjusted for, fair value pricing policies can have an impact on relative performance. At a more granular level, there is a range of other factors that can commonly cause a fund to diverge from the index being tracked. High on the list are the impact of manager fees and expenses, and the explicit costs and timing impact of trading the portfolio to maintain alignment with the underlying index. The use of futures or other derivatives to facilitate index replication can also lead to a divergence in investment outcomes. 'Cash drag,' where a fund is forced to hold cash or cash equivalents that are not present in the index, can be either a negative or positive contributor, depending on the direction of market returns. What does this mean for the typical performance attribution solutions currently offered by technology providers (e.g. Brinson-Fachler and Brinson-Hood- Beebower)?

Traditional models may now need to be customized

Where the requirements are more granular and there is a need to capture factors beyond allocation and stock selection effects, greater customization is required. SS&C's market-leading Sylvan™ performance & attribution software addresses this challenge. Sylvan's proprietary User Defined Attribution (UDA) provides a comprehensive and flexible framework that enables users to easily define and implement their own custom attribution models. In combination with Sylvan's highly configurable class scheme models, and the ability to carve out segments of portfolios as well as define and maintain an unlimited number of security and portfolio properties, Sylvan's UDA is fully capable of supporting the detail required by a 'passive strategy' approach to analyzing performance attribution. Sylvan supports these custom class schemes and properties across all asset classes and for all equity, fixed income, and multi-asset class attribution models. Whether a manager wishes to measure the impact of holding cash, isolate and analyze the cost of trading, or break down the impact of different fees and expenses, Sylvan's flexible, data-driven approach and highly configurable analytical tools can help today's passive managers understand the drivers behind their portfolio tracking errors and the underlying market.


Asset Management, Research, Analytics, and Consulting, Wealth Management

analytics , investing , ETF , Passive Investing , Index

Disclaimer

SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc. published this content on 06 June 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 06 June 2019 05:42:05 UTC

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS
05:01aSS&C GLOBEOP FORWARD REDEMPTION INDI : July notifications 2.69%
PR
04:50aSS&C TECHNOLOGIES : 4 considerations for selecting property management software
PU
07/19SS&C TECHNOLOGIES : IMN West Real Estate CFO & COO Forum
PU
07/18SS&C TECHNOLOGIES : Assessing and addressing fraud - An SS&C Deliver Conference ..
PU
07/17SS&C TECHNOLOGIES : Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago Selects SS&C to Enhance Au..
PR
07/16SS&C TECHNOLOGIES : Is blue sky compliance like the SEC or the IRS?
PU
07/12SS&C : to Release Second Quarter 2019 Earnings
PR
07/12SS&C TECHNOLOGIES : GlobeOp Hedge Fund Performance Index and Capital Movement In..
PR
07/12CHALLENGES FACING FAMILY OFFICES : what is holding you back?
PU
07/11BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT : A journey in 3 stages
PU
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2019 4 708 M
EBIT 2019 1 759 M
Net income 2019 419 M
Debt 2019 7 105 M
Yield 2019 0,69%
P/E ratio 2019 39,5x
P/E ratio 2020 29,9x
EV / Sales2019 4,64x
EV / Sales2020 4,26x
Capitalization 14 719 M
Chart SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Duration : Period :
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishNeutralBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 14
Average target price 72,85  $
Last Close Price 58,18  $
Spread / Highest target 34,1%
Spread / Average Target 25,2%
Spread / Lowest Target 10,0%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
William Charles Stone Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Rahul Kanwar President & Chief Operating Officer
Patrick John Louis Pedonti Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
C. V. Channagiri Chief Information Officer
Anthony Caiafa Chief Technology Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.28.97%14 719
MICROSOFT CORPORATION34.51%1 044 187
ATLASSIAN CORPORATION PLC50.78%32 341
SPLUNK INC31.75%20 745
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC.67.71%20 493
SYNOPSYS60.24%20 235