Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
7.77 USD | +0.91% | -13.09% | -29.04% |
Apr. 12 | Midea, Nio Join Forces for Electric Car Parts Manufacturing | MT |
Apr. 12 | XPeng Cuts Price of SUV G6 After Xiaomi's EV Launch | MT |
Summary
- The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
Strengths
- The earnings growth currently anticipated by analysts for the coming years is particularly strong.
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The company returns high margins, thereby supporting business profitability.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 5.38 and 5.56 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2024 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.
- The stock, which is currently worth 2023 to 0.58 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last few months, analysts have been revising downwards their earnings forecast.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Internet Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-29.04% | 1.89B | C | ||
-13.13% | 25.27B | C+ | ||
+25.08% | 17.57B | D+ | ||
-11.56% | 8.65B | C- | ||
-31.48% | 1.31B | - | ||
+2.12% | 760M | - | ||
-18.25% | 509M | C- | ||
-20.05% | 370M | B- | ||
+3.39% | 364M | - | ||
-.--% | 204M | - | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- WB Stock
- Ratings Weibo Corporation