(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised | • Samples of high purity alumina were taken as ~20g splits of | |
techniques | industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such | homogonised, crystalline powder | |
as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should | |||
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | |||
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate | |||
calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | |||
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. | |||
• In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg | |||
'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised | |||
to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, | |||
such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of | |||
detailed information. | |||
Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | • | Not Applicable. The samples were generated from a |
techniques | sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, | feedstock of industrial chemicals. | |
face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | |||
Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | • | Not Applicable |
recovery | • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the | ||
samples. | |||
• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias | |||
may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | |||
Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level | • | Not Applicable |
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and | |||
metallurgical studies. | |||
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) | |||
photography. | |||
• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | |||
Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. | • Samples were presented as a homogonised, crystalline | |
techniques and | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. | aluminium salt generated from a crystallisation and centrifuge | |
Sample | • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation | process | |
Preparation | technique. | ||
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of | |||
samples. | |||
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material | |||
collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. | |||
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. | |||
Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used | • The purity analysis of the high-purity alumina (HPA) pre-cursor | |
assay data and | and whether the technique is considered partial or total. | was determined by dissolution of ~7g of pre-cursor in 16% HCl | |
laboratory tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used | and analysis by ALS Brisbane using ICP-MS. HPA pre-cursor | |
in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations | assays are converted to indicative HPA assays using the | ||
factors applied and their derivation, etc. | process mass balance. | ||
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external | |||
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision | |||
have been established. | |||
Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company | • | Not Applicable |
sampling and | personnel. | ||
assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | ||
• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage | |||
(physical and electronic) protocols. | |||
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | |||
Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), | • | Not Applicable |
data points | trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
• Specification of the grid system used. | |||
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | |||
Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • | Not Applicable |
and distribution | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological | ||
and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | |||
procedure(s) and classifications applied. | |||
• Whether sample compositing has been applied. | |||
Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and | • | Not Applicable |
data in relation | the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. | ||
to geological | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised | ||
structure | structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and | ||
reported if material. | |||
Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • Duplicates of all samples submitted were retained at the | |
security | Company's Brisbane laboratories to insure against any sample | ||
loss | ||
Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • Not applicable |
reviews | ||
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material | • | Not Applicable |
tenement and | issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title | ||
land tenure | interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. | ||
status | • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to | ||
obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | |||
Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | • | Not Applicable |
done by other | |||
parties | |||
Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • | Not Applicable |
Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results | • | Not Applicable |
Information | including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: | ||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar | |||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole | |||
collar | |||
o dip and azimuth of the hole | |||
o down hole length and interception depth | |||
o hole length. | |||
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material | |||
and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent | |||
Person should clearly explain why this is the case. | |||
Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum | • | Not Applicable |
aggregation | grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and | ||
methods | should be stated. | ||
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer | |||
lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and | |||
some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. | |||
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. | • | Not Applicable |
between | • | If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature | ||
mineralisation | should be reported. | |||
widths and | • | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear | ||
intercept | statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known'). | |||
lengths | ||||
Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be | • | Not Applicable |
included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited | ||||
to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||||
Balanced | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative | • | Not Applicable |
reporting | reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading | |||
reporting of Exploration Results. | ||||
Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not | • | Not Applicable |
substantive | limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; | |||
exploration | bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |||
data | groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating | |||
substances. | ||||
Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth | • From July-December 2019 the Company completed pilot plant | |
extensions or large-scalestep-out drilling). | operations validating the process flow sheet on a semi- | |||
• | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological | continuous, end-to-end basis | ||
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially | • Minor additional testwork is planned during CY2020 to refine | |||
sensitive. | the process flow sheet | |||
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Alpha HPA Limited published this content on 23 December 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 23 December 2019 15:25:01 UTC