RNS Number : 8827G
Intertek Group PLC
20 March 2020
INTERTEK GROUP PLC
(the 'Company')
20 March 2020
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2019 AND NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
In accordance with Listing Rule 9.6.1R and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule ('DTR') 4.1.3R, the Company announces that the following documents have been posted to shareholders and submitted to the UK Listing Authority via the National Storage Mechanism:
- Intertek Group plc 2019 Annual Report and Accounts;
- Notice of 2020 Annual General Meeting; and
- Proxy Form for the 2020 Annual General Meeting.
The above mentioned documents (except for the Proxy Form) are available on our website atwww.intertek.comand will shortly be available for inspection at www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/nsm. The 2020 Annual General Meeting is due to be held on Thursday,21 May 2020 at 9.00 a.m. in the Marlborough Theatre, No.11 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0AN.
In compliance with DTR 6.3.5R, the information contained in the Appendix below is extracted from the 2019 Annual Report and Accounts and should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2019 Full Year Results Announcement for the year ended 31 December 2019 issued on 3 March 2020. Both documents are available atwww.intertek.comand together constitute the material required by DTR 6.3.5R to be communicated to the media in unedited full text through a Regulatory Information Service. This material is not a substitute for reading the 2019 Annual Report and Accounts in full. Page numbers and cross references in the extracted information refer to page numbers and cross references in the 2019 Annual Report and Accounts.
Appendix
1. PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
This section sets out a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on the Group's strategy, performance, results, financial condition and reputation.
Risk framework
The Board has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group's risk management framework. This work is complemented by the Group Risk Committee, whose purpose is to manage, assess and promote the continuous improvement of the Group's risk management, controls and assurance systems.
This risk governance framework is described in more detail in the Directors' report on pages 76 to 80.
The Group Audit Director and the Group General Counsel, who report to the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer respectively, have accountability for reporting the key risks that the Group faces, the controls and assurance processes in place and any mitigating actions or controls. Both roles report to the Audit Committee, attend its meetings and meet with individual members each year as required.
Risks are formally identified and recorded in a risk register which is owned by each of the Group's divisional, regional and functional risk committees. Risk registers are updated throughout the year by these risk committees and are used to plan the Group's internal audit and risk strategy.
In addition to the risk registers, all senior executives and their direct reports are required to complete an annual return to confirm that management controls have been effectively applied during the year. The return covers Sales, Operations, IT, Finance and People.
Principal risks
The Group is affected by a number of risk factors, some of which, including macroeconomic and industry-specific cyclical risks, are outside the Group's control. Some risks are particular to Intertek's operations. The principal risks of which the Group is aware are detailed on pages 51 to 55, including a commentary on how the Group mitigates these risks. These risks and uncertainties do not appear in any particular order of potential materiality or probability of occurrence.
There may be other risks that are currently unknown or regarded as immaterial which could turn out to be material. Any of these risks could have the potential to impact the performance of the Group, its assets, liquidity, capital resources and its reputation.
Changes to principal risks
Our principal risks continue to evolve in response to our changing risk environment. We added Brexit as a risk last year and have retained it because of the continuing political uncertainty. Although we are keeping Brexit developments under review, we do not at this stage perceive any material risk to the Company's viability arising from Brexit.
We have added two risks this year. The first is third-party relationships, which relates to how we manage the way in which we work with third parties (including landlords, suppliers, sub-contractors or agents) optimally from a financial, commercial, risk, governance, security or sustainability perspective. We have added this risk to reflect our increased focus on sustainability, including in our supply chains.
The second is Coronavirus (Covid-19), which relates to the outbreak of coronavirus which started inWuhan in December 2019 and has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organisation. It is too early to assess what impact the developing situation in China and other countries will have on our clients' resumption of production activities. We are working closely with our clients to mitigate the risks caused by the virus and maximise business continuity in our and their operations.
Operational
PRINCIPAL RISK | POSSIBLE | MITIGATION | 2019 UPDATE |
IMPACT | |||
Reputation | • Failure to meet | • Quality Management | This risk remains stable |
Reputation is key to | financial | Systems; adherence to | compared with 2018. |
the Group | performance | these is regularly audited | The Group continues to |
maintaining and | expectations. | and reviewed by external | |
invest in staff | |||
growing its business. | • Exposure to | parties, including | |
development, quality | |||
Reputation risk can | material legal | accreditation bodies. | |
systems and standard | |||
occur in a number of | claims, associated | • Risk Management | |
processes to prevent | |||
ways: directly as the | costs and wasted | Framework and | |
operational failures. | |||
result of the actions | management time. | associated controls and | |
of the Group or a | • Destruction of | assurance processes, | |
Group company | shareholder value. | including contractual | |
itself; indirectly due | • Loss of existing or | review and liability caps | |
to the actions of an | new business. | where appropriate. | |
Page 1 of 7
employee or | • Loss of key staff. | • Code of Ethics which is | |
employees; or | communicated to all staff, | ||
through the actions | who undergo regular | ||
of other parties, | training. | ||
such as joint venture | • Zero-tolerance approach | ||
partners, suppliers, | with regard to any | ||
customers or other | inappropriate behaviour | ||
industry participants. | by any individual | ||
employed by the Group, | |||
or acting on the Group's | |||
behalf. | |||
• Whistle-blowing | |||
programme, monitored by | |||
the Audit Committee, | |||
where staff are | |||
encouraged to report, | |||
without risk, any | |||
fraudulent or other | |||
activity likely to adversely | |||
affect the reputation of | |||
the Group. | |||
• Relationship | |||
management and | |||
communication with | |||
external stakeholders. | |||
Customer | • May lead to | • Net Promoter Score | This risk remains stable |
Service | customer | ('NPS') customer | compared with 2018. |
A failure to focus on | dissatisfaction and | satisfaction, customer | |
customer needs, to | customer loss. | sales trends and | |
provide customer | • Gradual erosion of | turnaround time tracking. | |
innovation or to | market share and | • Global and Local Key | |
deliver our services | reputation if | Account Management | |
in accordance with | competitors are | ('GKAM'/'LKAM') initiatives | |
our customers' | perceived to have | in place. | |
expectations and our | better, more | • Customer feedback | |
customer promise. | responsive or more | meetings. | |
consistent service | • Customer | ||
offerings. | claims/complaints | ||
reporting. | |||
People Retention | • Poor management | • HR strategy policies and | This risk remains stable |
The Group operates | succession. | systems. | compared with 2018. |
in specialised sectors | • Lack of continuity. | • Development and | |
and | • Failure to optimise | reward programme to | |
needs to attract and | growth. | retain and motivate | |
retain employees | • Impact on quality, | employees. | |
with relevant | reputation and | • Succession planning to | |
experience and | customer | ensure effective | |
knowledge in order | confidence. | continuation of leadership | |
to take advantage of | • Loss of talent to | and expertise. | |
all growth | competitors and lost | ||
opportunities. | market share. | ||
Operational | • Individual or | • Quality management | This risk remains stable |
Health, | multiple injuries to | and associated controls, | compared with 2018. |
Safety and | employees | including safety training, | |
Security | and others. | appropriate PPE (Personal | |
Any health and | • Litigation or | Protective Equipment), | |
safety incident | legal/regulatory | Health & Safety policies | |
arising from our | enforcement action | (including due diligence | |
activities. This could | (including | on sub-contractors), | |
result in injury to | prosecution) leading | meetings and | |
Intertek's | to reputational | communication. | |
employees, sub- | damage. | • Avoiding fatalities, | |
contractors, | • Loss of | accidents and hazardous | |
customers and/or | accreditation. | situations is paramount. It | |
any other | • Erosion of | is expected that Intertek | |
stakeholders | customer | employees will operate to | |
affected. | confidence. | the highest standards of | |
health and safety at all | |||
times and there are | |||
controls in place to | |||
reduce incidents. | |||
Industry and | • Failure to | • GKAM and LKAM | This risk remains stable |
Competitive | maximise revenue | initiatives in place. | compared with 2018.The |
Landscape | opportunities. | • Diversification of | Group's results have been |
A failure to identify, | • Failure to take | customer base. | impacted by the lower |
manage and take | advantage of new | • Focus on new services | levels of capital |
advantage of | opportunities. | and acquisitions. | expenditure in the |
emerging and future | • Lack of ability to | • Tracking new laws and | energy sector, driven by |
risks. Examples | respond flexibly. | regulations. | lower oil prices, but more |
include the | • Erosion of market | • Regular strategic and | than offset by the diverse |
opportunities | share. | business line reviews. | nature of the Group and |
provided by new | • Impact on share | • Development of ATIC- | its ability to grow |
markets and | price. | selling initiatives. | revenue and manage the |
customers, a failure | • Failure to respond | • NPS customer research | cost base. |
to innovate in terms | to macroeconomic | to understand customer | |
of service offering | factors. | satisfaction. | |
and delivery, the | • Sanctions and | ||
challenge of radically | fines for non- | ||
new and different | compliance with | ||
business models, | new laws, etc. | ||
and the failure to | |||
foresee the impact | |||
of, or adequately | |||
respond to and | |||
comply with, | |||
changing or new | |||
Page 2 of 7
laws and regulations. | |||
Macroeconomic | |||
factors such as a | |||
global/market | |||
downturn and | |||
contraction/changing | |||
requirements in | |||
certain sectors. | |||
Third-party | • Poor quality work. | • Third-party appointment | This has been added as a |
Relationships | • Ethical issues. | and due diligence | new risk for 2019 to |
A failure to optimally | • Lack of control | processes. | capture risks relating to |
manage the way in | over services being | • Standard third-party | Intertek's relationships |
which we work with | provided via third | contracts. | with all third parties. |
third parties | parties. | • Third-party lease | The mitigating controls in |
(including | • Failing to agree | reviews. | |
place should address the | |||
landlords, suppliers, | optional terms, | • Vendor/supplier financial | |
risks faced and we | |||
subcontractors or | including pricing | diligence. | continue to monitor these |
agents) from a | with suppliers. | • Supplier Code of | |
relationships on an | |||
financial, | • Contracting with | Conduct. | |
ongoing basis. | |||
commercial, risk, | suppliers whose | • Annual reviews of | |
governance, security | sustainability, | quality and pricing. | |
or sustainability | ethical, cyber or | • Training on Code of | |
perspective. | other standards | Ethics for key third | |
Poorly established | cause a risk to | parties. | |
and | Intertek, its | • Supply chain risk review | |
maintained | reputation or its | as part of compliance with | |
relationships could | operations. | Modern Slavery Act. | |
increase the | |||
chances of poor | |||
quality work, ethical | |||
issues and | |||
a lack of control over | |||
the | |||
services Intertek is | |||
providing via third | |||
parties. | |||
UK Withdrawal | • Reduced work | • Monitoring of | This risk remains the |
from the EU | volumes or delays in | legal/regulatory/political | same as in 2018, and |
(Brexit) | anticipated | developments affecting | uncertainty remains. |
Flow of goods and | customer orders. | Group | Brexit has a direct impact |
services: increased | • Longer-term | companies and our ability | |
on our UK Notified Bodies | |||
friction at customs | changes in global | to operate. | |
and we have taken steps | |||
points could disrupt | supply chains could | • Engagement with | |
to relocate these | |||
our customers' 'just | lead to a need to | customers to monitor | |
businesses to address | |||
in time' supply | refocus our service | developments, views and | |
that risk. | |||
chains in the short- | offering or delivery | feedback. | |
We continue to monitor | |||
term or lead to | locations to align | • Monitoring of media and | |
changes in global | optimally with | public statements by | developments. |
supply chains in the | customer | customers/regulatory | |
mid- to longer-term. | requirements and to | bodies/ | |
People: restrictions | remain competitive. | other stakeholders. | |
• A failure to attract | • Liaising with UK | ||
on the free | |||
and retain talent | Government departments | ||
movement of people | |||
could lead to a | to gather intelligence and | ||
between the UK and | |||
failure to optimise | explore opportunities to | ||
EU could make it | |||
growth. | support. | ||
more difficult to | |||
• A failure to | • Brexit planning to | ||
attract and retain | |||
identify, understand | mitigate impacts on | ||
talent in those | |||
and align our | Notified Bodies, people | ||
markets. | |||
service offering and | and customer service | ||
Regulatory | |||
delivery with | delivery. | ||
environment: de- | additional or | • Access to market sector | |
harmonisation | diverging regulatory | analysis from advisers. | |
relating to product | barriers could lead | • Prioritised investment in | |
or manufacturing | to a loss of revenue/ | growth/strategic areas. | |
standards could | profitability/market | ||
increase the | share. | ||
regulatory burden on | |||
our customers and | |||
have an impact their | |||
investment | |||
decisions. | |||
IT Systems and | • Loss of revenue | • Information systems | We believe this risk has |
Data Security | due to down time. | policy and governance | increased in 2019 as |
Systems integrity: | • Potential loss of | structure. | cyber-attacks are |
major IT systems | sensitive data with | • Regular system | becoming increasingly |
integrity issue, or | associated legal | maintenance. | sophisticated. |
data security breach, | implications, | • Backup systems in | In 2019, we implemented |
either due to internal | including regulatory | place. | |
mandatory IT awareness | |||
or external factors | sanctions and | • Disaster recovery plans | |
training for all | |||
such as deliberate | potential fines. | that are constantly tested | |
employees. A key focus | |||
interference or | • Potential costs of | and | |
of our mitigation | |||
power | IT systems' | improved to minimise the | |
activities was on identity | |||
shortages/cuts etc. | replacement | impact if a failure does | |
and access management | |||
and repair. | occur. | ||
Systems | to ensure end-user | ||
• Loss of customer | • Global Information | ||
functionality: a | security and data | ||
confidence. | Security policies in place | ||
failure to define the | management. | ||
• Damage to | (IT, Data Protection, Cyber | ||
right IT strategies, | reputation. | Security). | |
maintain existing IT | |||
• Loss of | • Adherence to IT finance | ||
systems or | |||
revenue/profitability | systems controls (part of | ||
implement new IT | |||
if we fail to adopt an | Core Mandatory Controls | ||
systems with the | |||
IT investment | ('CMCs')). | ||
required | |||
strategy which | • Adherence to IT general | ||
functionality and | |||
supports the | controls. | ||
which are fit for | |||
Group's growth, | • Internal and external | ||
Page 3 of 7
purpose, in each | innovation and | audit testing. |
case to support the | customer offering. | • Processes to ensure |
Group's growth, | compliance with GDPR. | |
innovation and | ||
competitive | ||
customer offering. |
Data security: a failure to adequately protect the Group's confidential information, customer confidential information or the personal data of the Group's employees, customers or other stakeholders.
Coronavirus | • There is a health | • We are closely | This has been added as a |
(COVID-19)The risk | and safety risk to | monitoring our people's | new risk for 2019 to |
caused by the | our people who | health, safety and security | capture the risks of this |
outbreak of | come into contact | and relevant | developing situation in |
coronavirus, which | with confirmed | regulatory requirements. | China and other |
started in Wuhan in | cases. | • We have implemented | countries. |
December 2019 and | • In affected areas, | extensive hygiene control | We are working closely |
has been declared a | there is a risk that | and prevention measures | with our clients to |
Public Health | the ability of our | for our | prioritise the health and |
Emergency of | people to work as | office and field-based | safety of our and their |
International | normal is impacted | people. | people and to maximise |
Concern by the | by mandatory | • We have made changes | business continuity. |
World Health | health and safety | to operational procedures | |
Organisation. The | restrictions, | to redirect work to | |
virus is a potential | including quarantine | Intertek | |
risk to: (1) the health | and travel | facilities in unaffected | |
and safety of our | restrictions in | locations. | |
people; (2) the | certain cases. | • We are engaging closely | |
ability of our and | • There is a risk that | with our customers to | |
our customers' | the ability of our | support their needs. | |
businesses to | people to perform | • We have put in place | |
operate normally; | field-based work | temporary travel | |
and (3) global | (audits and | restrictions into and out of | |
supply chains and | inspections) is | China and Hong Kong. | |
the flow of goods | further affected by | • We have working groups | |
and services. | control and | at the Group, regional and | |
prevention | local levels to monitor the | ||
measures that we | situation and put | ||
and our clients | appropriate mitigation | ||
are taking. | action and continuity | ||
• In affected areas, | plans in place. | ||
there is risk of | |||
disruption to our | |||
normal operations | |||
both as a | |||
consequence of the | |||
issues | |||
faced by our people | |||
and of the impact to | |||
our clients' | |||
operations and | |||
production levels. | |||
•There is a risk that | |||
an ongoing situation | |||
could disrupt the | |||
China | |||
and/or global supply | |||
chains, which could | |||
lead to a need to | |||
refocus our | |||
service offering or | |||
delivery locations to | |||
align optimally with | |||
customer | |||
requirements and to | |||
remain competitive. | |||
• There is a risk that | |||
our 2020 | |||
performance will be | |||
affected by the | |||
temporary | |||
disruption to the | |||
supply chains of our | |||
clients and any | |||
impact it may have | |||
on global trade | |||
activities. |
Legal and Regulatory
Regulatory and | • Loss of revenue, | • Monitoring of regulatory | This risk remains stable |
Political | profitability and/or | environment and political | compared with 2018. |
Landscape | market share. | developments. | |
A failure to identify | • Increase to costs | • Analysis of impact of | |
and respond | of operations, | regulatory and political | |
appropriately to a | reduction in | changes on operational | |
change in law and/or | profitability. | SOPs | |
regulation, or to a | • Reduction in the | and Group policies. | |
political decision, | attractiveness of | • Membership of relevant | |
Page 4 of 7
event or condition | investment in | associations, e.g. IFIA with | |
which could impact | specific | related advocacy and | |
demand for the | business, sectors or | liaison activities. | |
Group's services or | markets and/or | ||
the Group's ability to | adverse change the | ||
grow, innovate | competitive | ||
and/or provide a | landscape. | ||
competitive | |||
customer offering in | |||
any existing or new | |||
industry sector or | |||
market. | |||
Business Ethics | • Litigation, | • Annual Code of Ethics | This risk remains stable |
Non-compliance with | including significant | training and sign-off | compared with 2018. |
Intertek's Code of | fines and debarment | requirement. | Ongoing annual |
Ethics ('Code') | from certain | • Whistleblowing | |
confirmations ensure that | |||
and/or related laws | territories/activities. | programme, monitored by | |
staff verify compliance | |||
such as anti-bribery, | • Reputational | the Group Risk | with the Code of Ethics. |
anti-money | damage. | Committee, where | |
Local compliance officers | |||
laundering, and fair | • Loss of | staff are encouraged to | |
competition | accreditation. | report, without risk, any | perform due diligence on |
legislation. Non- | • Erosion of | fraudulent or other | sub-contractors to check |
compliance could be | customer | activity likely to adversely | that they have signed the |
either accidental or | confidence. | affect the reputation of | Group's Code. |
deliberate, and | • Impact on share | the Group. | During 2019, 168 (2018: |
committed either by | price. | • Enhanced processes for | 158) non-compliance |
our people or sub- | engagement with | issues were reported | |
contractors who | suppliers and third | through the | |
must also abide by | parties. | whistleblowing hotline | |
the Code. | • Zero-tolerance approach | and other routes. All were | |
with regard to any | investigated, with 40 | ||
inappropriate behaviour | (2018: 45) substantiated | ||
by any individual | and corrective action | ||
employed by the Group, | taken. | ||
or acting on the Group's | |||
behalf. | |||
• The Group employs local | |||
people in each country | |||
who are aware of local | |||
legal and | |||
regulatory requirements. | |||
There are also extensive | |||
internal compliance and | |||
audit systems to facilitate | |||
compliance. Expert advice | |||
is taken in areas where | |||
regulations are uncertain. | |||
• The Group continues to | |||
dedicate resources to | |||
ensure compliance with | |||
the UK | |||
Bribery Act and all other | |||
anti-bribery legislation, | |||
and internal policy. |
Financial
Financial Risk | • Financial losses | • The Group has financial, | This risk remains stable |
Risk of theft, fraud | with a direct impact | management and systems | compared with 2018. |
or financial | on the bottom line. | controls in place to ensure | Review and update of |
misstatement by | • Large-scale losses | that the Group's assets | core mandatory controls |
employees. On | can affect financial | are protected from major | |
for year-end compliance | |||
acquisitions or | results. | financial risks. | |
certification. | |||
investments, the | • Potential legal | • Adherence to Authorities | |
financial risk or | proceedings leading | Grid (which sets approval | |
exposure arising | to costs and | limits for financial | |
from due diligence, | management time. | transactions). | |
integration or | • Corresponding loss | • Legal, financial and | |
performance | of value and | other due diligence on | |
delivery failures. | reputation could | M&A and other | |
result in funding | investments. | ||
being withdrawn or | • A detailed system of | ||
provided at higher | financial reporting is in | ||
interest rates. | place to ensure that | ||
• Possible adverse | monthly financial results | ||
publicity. | are thoroughly reviewed. | ||
The Group also operates a | |||
rigorous programme of | |||
internal audits and | |||
management reviews. | |||
Independent external | |||
auditors review the | |||
Group's half-year results | |||
and audit the Group's | |||
annual financial | |||
statements. | |||
2. RELATED PARTIES
Identity of related parties
The Group has a related party relationship with its key management. Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries and between subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not discussed in note 21.
Transactions with key management personnel
Key management personnel compensation, including the Group's Directors, is shown in the table below:
Page 5 of 7
2019 | 2018 | |
£m | £m | |
Short-term benefits | 11.4 | 10.6 |
Post-employment benefits | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Equity-settled transactions | 9.7 | 8.5 |
Total | 22.0 | 19.8 |
More detailed information concerning Directors' remuneration, shareholdings, pension entitlements and other long-term incentive plans is shown in the audited part of the Remuneration report. Apart from the above, no member of key management had a personal interest in any business transactions of the Group.
3. STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the Financial Statements
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulation.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors have prepared the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRSs') as adopted by the European Union and Company financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 'Reduced Disclosure Framework', and applicable law). Under company law, the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group and Company for that period. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are required to:
- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
- state whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by theEuropean Union have been followed for the Group financial statements and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, have been followed for the Company financial statements, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
- make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and
- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and Company will continue in business.
The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group and Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' Remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's website. Legislation in theUnited Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Responsibility Statement of the Directors in respect of the Annual Financial Report
The Directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group and Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Directors' report confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
- the Company financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 'Reduced Disclosure Framework', and applicable law), give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Company;
- the Group financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group; and
- the Directors' report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Group and Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
The Directors' report comprising pages 58 to 103 and the Group Strategic report comprising pages 1 to 57 have been approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by the Chief Executive Officer.
The Company's 2019 Annual Report and Accounts will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies in due course and copies of all of these documents may also be obtained from:
Fiona Evans
Group Company Secretary
33 Cavendish Square
London
W1G 0PS
Registered Number: 4267576 | |
Telephone: | +44 (0)20 7396 3400 |
Contacts
For further information, please contact:
Denis Moreau, Investor Relations | investor@intertek.com |
Telephone: | +44 (0) 20 7396 3415 |
Jonathon Brill, FTI Consulting | intertek@fticonsulting.com |
Telephone: | +44 (0) 20 3727 1000 |
Intertek is a leading Total Quality Assurance provider to industries worldwide.
Page 6 of 7
Our network of more than 1,000 laboratories and offices and 46,000 people in more than 100 countries, delivers innovative and bespoke Assurance, Testing, Inspection and Certification solutions for our customers' operations and supply chains.
Intertek Total Quality Assurance expertise, delivered consistently, with precision, pace and passion, enabling our customers to power ahead safely.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contactrns@lseg.comor visit www.rns.com.
END
ACSUKUBRRUUOAAR
Page 7 of 7
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Intertek Group plc published this content on 20 March 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 20 March 2020 09:07:01 UTC