Overview
Hecla Mining Company and our subsidiaries have provided precious and base metals to theU.S. and worldwide since 1891. We discover, acquire and develop mines and other mineral interests and produce and market concentrates, carbon material and doré containing silver, gold, lead and zinc. We produce lead, zinc and bulk concentrates and carbon material, which we sell to custom smelters, brokers and third-party processors, and unrefined doré containing gold and silver, which is sold to refiners or further refined before sale of the metals to traders. We are organized into five segments that encompass our operating and development units:Greens Creek ,Lucky Friday ,Casa Berardi ,San Sebastian and Nevada Operations. The map below shows the locations of our operating units, our exploration and pre-development projects, as well as our corporate offices located inCoeur d'Alene, Idaho andVancouver, British Columbia . [[Image Removed]] 33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Our current business strategy is to focus our financial and human resources in the following areas:
• rapidly responding to the threats from the COVID-19 pandemic to protect our
workforce, operations and communities while maintaining liquidity;
• operating our properties safely, in an environmentally responsible manner, and
cost-effectively;
• improving operations at our units, which includes incurring costs for new
technologies and equipment that may not result in measurable benefits;
• expanding our proven and probable reserves and production capacity at our
units;
• conducting our business with financial stewardship to preserve our financial
position in varying metals price and operational environments; • advancing permitting of theRock Creek and Montanore projects;
• maintaining and investing in exploration and pre-development projects in the
vicinities of seven mining districts and projects we believe to be
under-explored and under-invested:
Coeur d'Alene Mining District; our
Island located nearJuneau ; the silver-producing district nearDurango, Mexico ; the Abitibi region of northwesternQuebec, Canada ; our projects in northernNevada ; theRock Creek and Montanore projects in northwesternMontana ; and theCreede district of southwesternColorado ; and
• continuing to seek opportunities to acquire or invest in mining properties and
companies. The COVID-19 outbreak impacted our operations in the first half of 2020, including curtailing our expected production of gold at Casa Berardi. In addition, we have incurred additional costs of approximately$0.2 million per week related to quarantining employees atGreens Creek , which started in lateMarch 2020 . See each segment section below for information on how those operations have been impacted by COVID-19. To mitigate the impacts of COVID-19, we have taken precautionary measures, including implementing operational plans and practices and increasing our cash reserves through a draw-down of our revolving credit facility. As long as they are required, the operational practices implemented could continue to have an adverse impact on our operating results due to deferred production and revenues or additional costs. There is uncertainty related to the potential additional impacts COVID-19 could have on our operations and financial results for the year. See Part II, Item IA. Risk Factors - Natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, and other catastrophic events or other events outside of our control may materially and adversely affect our business or financial results in our Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2020 for information on how restrictions related to COVID-19 have recently affected some of our operations. A number of key factors may impact the execution of our strategy, including regulatory issues and metals prices. Metals prices can be very volatile. As discussed in the Critical Accounting Estimates section below, metals prices are influenced by a number of factors beyond our control. The average realized prices of silver and gold were higher, and the average prices for lead and zinc lower, in the first six months of 2020 than their levels from the comparable period last year, as illustrated by the table in Results of Operations below. While we believe longer-term global economic and industrial trends could result in continued demand for the metals we produce, prices have been volatile and there can be no assurance that current prices will continue. The total principal amount of our Senior Notes dueFebruary 15, 2028 ("Senior Notes") is$475 million , and they bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per year. The$469.5 million in net proceeds from the Senior Notes were used, along with cash on hand, to redeem, inMarch 2020 , our previously-outstanding 6.875% Senior Notes that were due in 2021 and had a principal balance of$506.5 million ("2021 Notes"). Also, as a precaution due to uncertainties of the duration, severity and scope of the COVID-19 outbreak, we drew$210 million under our revolving credit facility during the first quarter of 2020; however, we repaid$160 million of that amount in the second quarter of 2020, with the remaining$50 million outstanding as of the end of the quarter. Amounts drawn on the revolving credit facility are subject to a variable rate of interest. In addition, inJuly 2020 we agreed to issueCAD$50 million (approximatelyUSD$36.8 million at the time of the transaction) in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes to Investissment Québec, a financing arm of theQuébec government ("IQ Notes"). The IQ Notes mature inJuly 2025 and bear interest at a rate of 6.515% per year. The IQ Notes will be issued at a premium of 103.65%, implying an effective annual yield of 5.74% and an aggregate principal amount to be repaid ofCAD$48.2 million . The IQ Notes will be issued in four equal installments ofCAD$12.5 million in July, August, September andOctober 2020 , with the first installment issued net ofCAD$0.6 million in fees. The net proceeds from the IQ Notes will be available for general corporate purposes, including for open market purchases of a portion of the Senior Notes and to pay capital expenditures at ourCasa Berardi unit. Under the note purchase agreement for the IQ Notes and subject to a force majeure event, we are required to invest in the aggregateCAD$100 million at the Casa Berardi unit and other exploration and development projects inQuebec over the four-year period commencing onJuly 9, 2020 . See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information on our debt arrangements. As discussed in the Financial Liquidity and Capital Resources section below, we believe that we will be able to meet the obligations associated with the Senior Notes, IQ Notes and amounts drawn on our revolving credit facility; however, a number of factors could impact our ability to meet our debt obligations and fund our other projects. 34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We generated positive cash flows atSan Sebastian each year from 2016 through the first half of 2020. However, that mine currently is expected to end production in the fourth quarter of 2020, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and operateSan Sebastian beyond the known mine life as anticipated. As further discussed in The Lucky Friday Segment section below, the union employees at Lucky Friday were on strike fromMarch 13, 2017 until the strike ended onJanuary 7, 2020 . Re-staffing of the mine has been substantially completed, with a return to full production expected by the end of 2020. However, the ramp-up to full production could take longer or be more costly than anticipated, so there can be no assurance we will operate as currently anticipated. We strive to achieve excellent mine safety and health performance. We seek to implement this goal by: training employees in safe work practices; establishing, following and improving safety standards; investigating accidents, incidents and losses to avoid recurrence; involving employees in the establishment of safety standards; and participating in theNational Mining Association's CORESafety program. We attempt to implement reasonable best practices with respect to mine safety and emergency preparedness. We work with MSHA, theCommission of Labor Standards ,Pay Equity and Occupational Health and Safety inQuebec , and theMexico Ministry of Economy and Mining to address issues outlined in its investigations and inspections and continue to evaluate our safety practices. Achieving and maintaining compliance with regulations will be challenging and may increase our operating costs. See Item 1A. Risk Factors - We face substantial governmental regulation, including the Mine Safety and Health Act, various environmental laws and regulations and the 1872 Mining Law in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 . Another challenge for us is the risk associated with environmental litigation and ongoing reclamation activities. As described in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 and in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), it is possible that our estimate of these liabilities (and our ability to estimate liabilities in general) may change in the future, affecting our strategic plans. We are involved in various environmental legal matters and the estimate of our environmental liabilities and liquidity needs, as well as our strategic plans, may be significantly impacted as a result of these matters or new matters that may arise. We strive to ensure that our activities are conducted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and attempt to resolve environmental litigation on terms as favorable to us as possible. Results of Operations
Sales of products by metal for the three- and six-month periods ended
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in thousands) 2020 2019 2020 2019 Silver$ 61,756 $ 36,298 $ 99,328 $ 81,804 Gold 89,212 78,166 179,906 157,845 Lead 12,454 6,670 18,874 15,695 Zinc 21,455 22,948 38,762 47,703 Less: smelter charges (18,522 ) (9,910 ) (33,590 ) (16,258 ) Sales of products$ 166,355 $ 134,172 $ 303,280 $ 286,789
The fluctuations in sales for the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 were primarily due to:
• Higher average realized prices for silver and gold, partially offset by lower
realized prices for lead and zinc, in the second quarter and first half of
2020 compared to the same periods of 2019. These price variances are illustrated in the following table: 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Three Months Ended Six Months EndedJune 30 ,June 30, 2020 2019
2020 2019
Silver - London PM Fix ($/ounce)
Realized price per ounce
Realized price per ounce
Realized price per pound
Realized price per pound
Average realized prices typically differ from average market prices primarily because concentrate sales are generally recorded as revenues at the time of shipment at forward prices for the estimated month of settlement, which differ from average market prices. Due to the time elapsed between shipment of concentrates and final settlement with the customers, we must estimate the prices at which sales of our metals will be settled. Previously recorded sales are adjusted to estimated settlement metals prices each period through final settlement. For the second quarter and first six months of 2020, we recorded net positive price adjustments to provisional settlements of$7.0 million and$9.6 million , respectively, compared to net negative price adjustments to provisional settlements of$1.2 million and$0.7 million , respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2019. The price adjustments related to silver, gold, zinc and lead contained in our concentrate shipments were partially offset in the 2020 periods, and largely offset in the 2019 periods, by gains and losses on forward contracts for those metals. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information. The gains and losses on these contracts are included in revenues and impact the realized prices for silver, gold, lead and zinc. Realized prices are calculated by dividing gross revenues for each metal (which include the price adjustments and gains and losses on the forward contracts discussed above) by the payable quantities of each metal included in concentrate, doré and carbon material shipped during the period. The average realized silver price for the second quarter of 2020 was higher than the average market price for the same period, as silver sales atGreens Creek occurring in March were exposed to changes in prices from the end of the first quarter until their final settlement in the second quarter; the silver price increased during that time, resulting in gains recognized in the second quarter of 2020.
• Higher quantities of silver, lead and zinc sold as a result of higher
production of those metals, partially offset by lower gold volume, in the
second quarter and first half of 2020. See The Greens Creek Segment, The Lucky
Friday Segment, The Casa Berardi Segment, The San Sebastian Segment and The
Nevada Operations Segment sections below for more information on metal
production and sales volumes at each of our operating segments. Total metals
production and sales volumes for each period are shown in the following table: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Silver - Ounces produced 3,403,781 3,018,765 6,649,250 5,941,896 Payable ounces sold 3,348,639 2,418,586 5,930,918 5,316,669 Gold - Ounces produced 59,982 60,768 118,774 120,789 Payable ounces sold 51,398 59,127 108,501 120,063 Lead - Tons produced 8,977 5,515 14,870 11,299 Payable tons sold 8,026 3,963 12,156 8,811 Zinc - Tons produced 17,855 13,315 30,702 27,259 Payable tons sold 11,989 9,823 21,825 19,356 36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The difference between what we report as "ounces/tons produced" and "payable ounces/tons sold" is attributable to the difference between the quantities of metals contained in the concentrates we produce versus the portion of those metals actually paid for by our customers according to the terms of our sales contracts. Differences can also arise from inventory changes incidental to shipping schedules, or variances in ore grades which impact the amount of metals contained in concentrates produced and sold.
• In addition, treatment costs at
and first half of 2020 by approximately
respectively, compared to the same periods of 2019, primarily as a result of
unfavorable changes in smelter terms. We recorded losses applicable to common shareholders of$14.2 million ($0.03 per basic common share) for the second quarter of 2020 and$31.5 million ($0.06 per basic common share) for the first six months of 2020, compared to losses applicable to common shareholders of$46.7 million ($0.10 per basic common share) and$72.3 million ($0.15 per basic common share) for the second quarter and first six months of 2019, respectively. The following factors contributed to the results for the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019:
• Higher gross profit at our
million, respectively, in the second quarter and first half of 2020. Gross
profit at our
respectively, in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the
same periods of 2019. Gross profit at our
half of 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019. Gross profit at our Greens
Creek unit was higher in the second quarter of 2020 by
lower in the first half of 2020 by
in 2019. Gross profit was substantially unchanged at our
See The Greens Creek Segment, The Lucky Friday Segment, The Casa Berardi
Segment, The San Sebastian Segment and The Nevada Operations Segment sections
below.
• Exploration and pre-development expense decreased by
million in the second quarter and first half of 2020, respectively, compared
to the same periods in 2019. In the first half of 2020, exploration was primarily at ourSan Sebastian andCasa Berardi units.
• Higher costs related to ramp-up at Lucky Friday and suspension of other
operations by
quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019. The
increase was due to (i) higher costs at Lucky Friday due to the transition of
production between salary and hourly personnel and the recall, hire and
training of the returning hourly workforce there, (ii) placement of the Midas
and
(iii) the temporary suspension of operations at Casa Berardi and
in response to COVID-19, which lead to lower production at those operations.
See The Lucky Friday Segment, The Nevada Operations Segment, The Casa Berardi
Segment and The San Sebastian Segment sections below.
• Losses on base metal derivatives contracts of
quarter of 2020 and
of
2019. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for more information.
• Net foreign exchange loss of
variances are primarily related to the impact of changes in the CAD-to-USD
exchange rate on the remeasurement of our net monetary liabilities in
During the first half of 2020, the applicable CAD-to-USD exchange rate
increased from 1.2989 to 1.3628, compared to a decrease in the rate from
1.3643 to 1.3087 during the first half of 2019.
• General and administrative expense decreased by
respectively, in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the
same periods of 2019 primarily due to lower incentive compensation and timing
of issuance of shares to directors.
• A
of equipment at Nevada Operations determined to be held-for-sale compared to a
of exploration interests in
• In
million at the time of the gift to the
"Foundation"), and recognized expense for that amount in the second quarter of
2020. The Foundation is a 501(c)(3) entity established in 2007 to provide
grants and disburse funds for educational and charitable purposes to
qualifying organizations in order to promote the social, environmental and
economic sustainability and development of the communities where we have
operations and activities.
• Higher interest expense by
the first half of 2019, with the increase resulting from (i) interest
recognized on both the Senior Notes and 2021 Notes for an overlapping period
of almost one month, as the Senior Notes were issued on
the 2021 Notes were redeemed on
unamortized initial purchaser discount on the 2021 Notes recognized as expense
upon their redemption and (iii) higher interest related to amounts drawn on
our revolving credit facility. • Unrealized gains on investments of$6.4 million and$5.4 million ,
respectively, in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to losses
of
due to changes in the prices of shares in other mining companies held.
• Income tax provision of
benefit of
to income tax benefits of
the same periods in 2019. The benefits in the first half of 2020 and both
periods of 2019 are primarily the result of losses in
provision in the second quarter of 2020 is due to income in
losses inNevada . 37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents The Greens Creek Segment Dollars are in thousands (except per Three Months Ended Six Months Ended ounce and per ton amounts) June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Sales$ 84,890 $ 55,398 $ 138,724 $ 135,527 Cost of sales and other direct production costs (44,684 ) (34,800 ) (81,436 ) (76,542 ) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (12,988 ) (10,850 ) (25,417 ) (23,220 ) Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (57,672 ) (45,650 ) (106,853 ) (99,762 ) Gross profit$ 27,218 $ 9,748 $ 31,871 $ 35,765 Tons of ore milled 215,275 209,370 414,079 416,195 Production: Silver (ounces) 2,753,919 2,372,270 5,529,626 4,605,017 Gold (ounces) 13,104 13,257 25,377 27,585 Zinc (tons) 16,184 12,739 28,671 26,257 Lead (tons) 5,889 4,628 11,087 9,410 Payable metal quantities sold: Silver (ounces) 2,753,736 1,738,377 4,847,456 3,979,549 Gold (ounces) 12,355 8,739 22,676 22,603 Zinc (tons) 10,650 9,462 20,302 18,995 Lead (tons) 5,233 2,810 8,693 7,154 Ore grades: Silver ounces per ton 15.56 14.36 16.19 13.91 Gold ounces per ton 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.10 Zinc percent 8.2 % 6.8 % 7.6 % 7.1 % Lead percent 3.3 % 2.8 % 3.2 % 2.8 % Mining cost per ton$ 81.16 $ 80.41 $ 82.40 $ 79.62 Milling cost per ton$ 34.90 $ 35.10 $ 38.61 $ 35.48 Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, Per Silver Ounce (1)$ 5.19 $ 2.38 $ 5.41 $ 1.46 All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC"), After By-Product Credits, per Silver Ounce (1)$ 7.11 $ 6.37 $ 7.51 $ 4.85
(1) A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to cost of sales and other
direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the
most comparable GAAP measure, can be found below in Reconciliation of Cost
of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization (GAAP) to Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost,
After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) and All-In Sustaining Cost, Before
By-product Credits and All-In Sustaining Cost, After By-product Credits
(non-GAAP). Restrictions imposed by theState of Alaska beginning in late March in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the requirement for employees returning toAlaska to self-quarantine for 14 days, changed in June to 7 days, has caused us to revise the normal operating procedures and incur additional costs for staffing operations atGreens Creek . Restrictions could have a material impact if they continue longer than anticipated or become broader. 38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The$17.5 million increase in gross profit for the second quarter of 2020 compared to the second quarter of 2019 was due to higher metal sales volumes due to the timing of shipments, and also higher grades for silver, zinc and lead, and higher average realized silver and gold prices, partially offset by higher treatment costs and lower zinc and lead prices. The$3.9 million decrease in gross profit for the first six months of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was primarily the result of higher treatment costs and lower average realized zinc and lead prices, partially offset by higher metal sales volumes and higher silver and gold prices. Treatment costs were higher by$6.3 million and$14.9 million , respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 primarily due to unfavorable changes in smelter terms. Treatment costs for the first quarter of 2020 were also impacted by failure by a metals trader customer to perform its obligation to purchase a spot sale of concentrate, for which we are seeking remedy, although there can be no assurance we will be successful.
The chart below illustrates the factors contributing to the variances in Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, Per Silver Ounce for the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019.
[[Image Removed]] The following table summarizes the components of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 22.06 $ 20.83 $ 21.07 $ 21.11 By-product credits (16.87 ) (18.45 ) (15.66 ) (19.65 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 5.19 $ 2.38 $ 5.41 $ 1.46 The following table summarizes the components of AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 23.98 $ 24.82 $ 23.17 $ 24.50 By-product credits (16.87 ) (18.45 ) (15.66 ) (19.65 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 7.11 $ 6.37 $ 7.51 $ 4.85 39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The increase in Cash Costs and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce for the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to 2019 was the result of higher treatment costs and lower by-product credits per ounce, partially offset by lower mining, milling and other costs on a per-ounce basis. For AISC, After By-Product Credits, per Silver Ounce, these factors were partially offset by lower capital spending.
Mining and milling costs per ounce decreased in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to 2019 on a per-ounce basis primarily due to higher silver production as a result of higher silver grades.
Other cash costs per ounce for the first six months of 2020 were lower compared to 2019 due to higher silver production, partially offset by higher expense forAlaska mine license tax. Treatment costs per ounce were higher in the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to 2019 as a result of unfavorable changes in terms and higher silver prices, partially offset by higher silver production, with costs in the first quarter of 2020 also impacted by failure by a metals trader customer to perform its obligation to purchase a spot sale of concentrate, as discussed above. Treatment costs include the value of silver not payable to us through the smelting process. The silver not payable to us is either recovered by the smelters through further processing or ultimately not recovered and included in the smelters' waste material. By-product credits per ounce were lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to 2019 due to lower zinc and lead prices and the impact of higher silver production, which causes the by-product credits to be less on a per-silver ounce basis. For the six month period, by-product credits were also impacted by lower gold production in 2020 compared to 2019. The difference between what we report as "production" and "payable metal quantities sold" is attributable to the difference between the quantities of metals contained in the concentrates we produce versus the portion of those metals actually paid for by our customers according to the terms of our sales contracts. Differences can also arise from inventory changes incidental to shipping schedules, or variances in ore grades which impact the amount of metals contained in concentrates produced and sold. While revenue from zinc, lead and gold by-products is significant, we believe that identification of silver as the primary product of theGreens Creek unit is appropriate because:
• silver has historically accounted for a higher proportion of revenue than any
other metal and is expected to do so in the future;
• we have historically presented
based on the original analysis that justified putting the project into
production, and believe that consistency in disclosure is important to our
investors regardless of the relationships of metals prices and production from
year to year; • metallurgical treatment maximizes silver recovery;
• the
high proportion of silver; and
• in most of its working areas,
in which silver is the metal targeted for highest recovery. Likewise, we believe the identification of gold, lead and zinc as by-product credits is appropriate because of their lower economic value compared to silver and due to the fact that silver is the primary product we intend to produce. In addition, we have not consistently received sufficient revenue from any single by-product metal to warrant classification of such as a co-product. We periodically review our revenues to ensure that reporting of primary products and by-products is appropriate. Because we consider zinc, lead and gold to be by-products of our silver production, the values of these metals offset operating costs within our calculations of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce. 40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents The Lucky Friday Segment Dollars are in thousands (except per Three Months Ended Six Months Ended ounce and per ton amounts) June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Sales$ 11,455 $ 4,951 $ 14,285 $ 7,133 Cost of sales and other direct production costs (9,561 ) (4,529 ) (12,091 ) (6,541 ) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (1,894 ) (422 ) (2,196 ) (591 ) Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (11,455 ) (4,951 ) (14,287 ) (7,132 ) Gross profit $ - $ -$ (2 ) $ 1 Tons of ore milled 44,682 13,697 54,901 27,500 Production: Silver (ounces) 469,537 127,147 565,285 300,774 Lead (tons) 3,088 887 3,783 1,889 Zinc (tons) 1,671 576 2,031 1,002 Payable metal quantities sold: Silver (ounces) 424,348 177,266 525,449 264,111 Lead (tons) 2,793 1,153 3,463 1,657 Zinc (tons) 1,339 361 1,523 361 Ore grades: Silver ounces per ton 10.99 10.12 10.78 11.73 Lead percent 7.33 % 7.19 % 7.31 % 7.58 % Zinc percent 4.07 % 5.03 % 4.03 % 4.28 % The increases in ore tonnage and metals production in the second quarter and first six months of 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019 are the result of a ramp-up in production following the strike that ended inJanuary 2020 (discussed further below). Many of the employees at ourLucky Friday unit are represented by a union, and the previous collective bargaining agreement with the union expired onApril 30, 2016 . The unionized employees were on strike fromMarch 13, 2017 untilJanuary 7, 2020 , when the union ratified a new collective bargaining agreement. Salaried personnel performed limited production and capital improvements fromJuly 2017 until the end of the strike. Re-staffing of the mine commenced in the first quarter of 2020, and we have substantially completed the re-staffing process. We anticipate a return to full production by the end of 2020; however, the ramp-up to full production could take longer or be more costly than anticipated. Costs related to ramp-up activities totaled$2.9 million and$9.3 million in the second quarter and first half of 2020, respectively, and suspension-related costs during the strike in the second quarter and first half of 2019 totaled$1.1 million and$3.0 million , respectively. These costs are combined with non-cash depreciation expense of$2.3 million and$4.1 million for the second quarter of first half of 2020, respectively, and$1.2 million and$2.1 million for the second quarter and first half of 2019, respectively, in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations. These restart and suspension costs are excluded from the calculation of gross profit, Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce, when presented. See Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for a contingency related to groundwater monitoring at the Lucky Friday mine in prior periods. 41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents The Casa Berardi Segment Dollars are in thousands (except per Three Months Ended Six Months Ended ounce and per ton amounts) June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Sales$ 50,005 $ 45,500 $ 96,177 $ 85,562 Cost of sales and other direct production costs (28,301 ) (36,591 ) (60,229 ) (69,517 ) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (17,281 ) (18,561 ) (33,678 ) (34,716 ) Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (45,582 ) (55,152 ) (93,907 ) (104,233 ) Gross profit (loss)$ 4,423 $ (9,652 ) $ 2,270 $ (18,671 ) Tons of ore milled 280,420 347,596 612,038 677,347 Production: Gold (ounces) 30,756 31,270 57,508 63,069 Silver (ounces) 5,495 6,164 11,429 14,404 Payable metal quantities sold: Gold (ounces) 28,754 34,647 57,836 65,260 Silver (ounces) 4,383 4,900 12,806 13,362 Ore grades: Gold ounces per ton 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.12 Silver ounces per ton 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 Mining cost per ton$ 71.68 $ 76.35 $ 74.21 $ 81.11 Milling cost per ton$ 21.11 $ 18.28 $ 21.57 $ 17.06 Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce (1)$ 919 $ 1,101 $ 1,081 $ 1,107 AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce (1)$ 1,077 $ 1,437 $ 1,327 $ 1,387
(1) A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to cost of sales and other
direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the
most comparable GAAP measure, can be found below in Reconciliation of Cost
of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization (GAAP) to Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost,
After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) and All-In Sustaining Cost, Before
By-product Credits and All-In Sustaining Cost, After By-product Credits
(non-GAAP). Gross profit increased by$14.1 million and$20.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2020, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2019, primarily due to higher average realized prices, partially offset by lower gold volume resulting from reduced mill throughput. The lower mill throughput was due to a government COVID-19-related order. In late March, the Government ofQuebec ordered the mining industry to reduce to minimum operations as part of the fight against COVID-19, causing us to suspend ourCasa Berardi operations fromMarch 24 untilApril 15 , when mining operations resumed. As a result of the suspension of operations, gold production was approximately 5,200 ounces lower inMarch 2020 and approximately 6,500 ounces lower inApril 2020 than previously-forecasted full production levels. Production may continue to be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 mitigation practices in place until they are no longer required. Suspension-related costs totaling$1.6 million for the first half of 2020 are reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, mining and milling cost per ton, and Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. Mining costs per ton were lower by 6% and 9%, respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of last year primarily due to reduced contractor costs, partially offset by lower ore production. Milling costs per ton were higher by 15% and 26%, respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of last year due primarily to lower ore production and higher contractor costs. 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The chart below illustrates the factors contributing to Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, Per Gold Ounce for the second quarter and first half of 2020 and 2019:
[[Image Removed]] The following table summarizes the components of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 922 $ 1,104 $ 1,084 $ 1,110 By-product credits (3 ) (3 ) (3 ) (3 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 919 $ 1,101 $ 1,081 $ 1,107 The following table summarizes the components of AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 1,080 $ 1,440 $ 1,330 $ 1,390 By-product credits (3 ) (3 ) (3 ) (3 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 1,077 $ 1,437 $ 1,327 $ 1,387 The decrease in Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019 was primarily due to lower mining costs, partially offset by lower gold production. The decrease in AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce was attributed to lower capital and exploration spending.
The difference between what we report as "production" and "payable metal quantities sold" is mainly attributable to inventory changes incidental to the timing of sales of refined metals and shipping schedules.
We believe the identification of silver as a by-product credit is appropriate at Casa Berardi because of its lower economic value compared to gold and due to the fact that gold is the primary product we intend to produce there. In addition, we do not receive sufficient revenue from silver at Casa Berardi to warrant classification of such as a co-product. Because we consider silver to be a by-product of our gold production at Casa Berardi, the value of silver offsets operating costs within our calculations of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. 43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents The San Sebastian Segment Dollars are in thousands (except per Three Months Ended Six Months Ended ounce and per ton amounts) June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Sales$ 4,934 $ 10,993 $ 14,860 $ 23,593 Cost of sales and other direct production costs (3,115 ) (9,295 ) (9,943 ) (19,887 ) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (895 ) (1,848 ) (2,368 ) (3,608 ) Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (4,010 ) (11,143 ) (12,311 ) (23,495 ) Gross profit (loss)$ 924 $ (150 ) $ 2,549 $ 98 Tons of ore milled 21,647 45,869 57,123 90,344 Production: Silver (ounces) 158,842 463,735 505,467 904,814 Gold (ounces) 1,331 3,547 4,133 7,077 Payable metal quantities sold: Silver (ounces) 162,780 441,710 516,476 938,260 Gold (ounces) 1,220 3,410 4,044 7,140 Ore grades: Silver ounces per ton 7.96 11.03 9.63 10.99 Gold ounces per ton 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 Mining cost per ton$ 31.01 $ 108.25 $ 67.59 $ 116.79 Milling cost per ton$ 51.68 $ 61.43 $ 58.95 $ 61.81 Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce (1)$ 1.14 $ 9.22 $ 5.09 $ 10.20 AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce (1)$ 1.85 $ 15.50 $ 5.65 $ 16.02
(1) A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to cost of sales and other direct
production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the most
comparable GAAP measure, can be found below in Reconciliation of Cost of
Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization (GAAP) to Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost,
After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) and All-In Sustaining Cost, Before
By-product Credits and All-In Sustaining Cost, After By-product Credits
(non-GAAP). The$1.1 million and$2.5 million increases in gross profit (loss) for the second quarter and first half of 2020, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2019 are primarily due to higher average silver and gold prices and lower costs, partially offset by lower metal volumes due to lower ore grades and mill throughput. Mining and milling cost per ton were lower by 71% and 16%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2020 and lower by 42% and 5%, respectively, for the first half of 2020, compared to the same periods of 2019. The decreases were mainly due to lower contractor costs, partially offset by lower ore tonnage. 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The chart below illustrates the factors contributing to Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, Per Silver Ounce for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019:
[[Image Removed]] The following table summarizes the components of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 15.61 $ 19.23 $ 18.39 $ 20.42 By-product credits (14.47 ) (10.01 ) (13.30 ) (10.22 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 1.14 $ 9.22 $ 5.09 $ 10.20 The following table summarizes the components of AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 16.32 $ 25.51 $ 18.95 $ 26.24 By-product credits (14.47 ) (10.01 ) (13.30 ) (10.22 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$ 1.85 $ 15.50 $ 5.65 $ 16.02 The decrease in Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 was primarily the result of higher by-product credits per ounce due to higher gold prices, partially offset by lower silver production. The decrease in AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 is also a result of lower capital and exploration spending.
The difference between what we report as "production" and "payable metal quantities sold" is mainly attributable to inventory changes incidental to the timing of sales of refined metals and shipping schedules.
We periodically review our revenues to ensure that reporting of primary products and by-products is appropriate. We believe the identification of gold as a by-product credit is appropriate atSan Sebastian because of its anticipated lower economic value compared to silver over the life of the mine. In addition, we do not receive sufficient revenue from gold atSan Sebastian to warrant classification of such as a co-product. Because we consider gold to be a by-product of our silver production atSan Sebastian , the value of gold offsets operating costs within our calculations of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce. 45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In earlyApril 2020 , the Government ofMexico issued an order to the mining industry to reduce operations to a minimum level untilApril 30 in response to COVID-19, and the order was subsequently extended untilMay 30 . Our operations atSan Sebastian were suspended during that time. The closure is not expected to have a material impact on full-year production. Suspension-related costs totaling$1.0 million for the first half of 2020 are reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, mining and milling cost per ton, and Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. We continue to study theHugh Zone andEl Toro opportunities atSan Sebastian .The Hugh Zone was discovered in 2005 and is the deeper sulfide extension of the past-producing Francine vein, andEl Toro is a near-surface oxide deposit discovered in 2019. The remaining work on theHugh Zone is focused on the ability to generate a third salable concentrate (copper) from the ore, which has a significant impact on the potential return of the project and how the two deposits should be sequenced. The mine currently is expected to end production in the fourth quarter of 2020. We believe the ability to produce a third concentrate, if achieved, could result in a restart of production in 2021 or 2022. The Nevada Operations Segment Dollars are in thousands (except per Three Months Ended Six Months Ended ounce and per ton amounts) June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Sales$ 15,071 $ 17,330 $ 39,234 $ 34,974 Cost of sales and other direct production costs (7,192 ) (19,723 ) (15,041 ) (42,837 ) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (6,365 ) (17,796 ) (15,430 ) (26,129 ) Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (13,557 ) (37,519 ) (30,471 ) (68,966 ) Gross profit (loss)$ 1,514 $ (20,189 ) $ 8,763 $ (33,992 ) Tons of ore milled 10,686 58,417 27,984 99,782 Production: Gold (ounces) 14,791 12,694 31,756 23,058 Silver (ounces) 15,988 49,449 37,443 116,887 Payable metal quantities sold: Gold (ounces) 9,068 12,331 23,944 25,060 Silver (ounces) 3,392 56,333 28,731 121,387 Ore grades: Gold ounces per ton 1.519 0.259 1.232 0.276 Silver ounces per ton 2.07 1.63 1.7 1.99 Mining cost per ton$ 403.38 $ 129.75 $ 402.94 $ 164.08 Milling cost per ton$ 219.32 $ 75.44 $ 176.63 $ 90.74 Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce (1)$ 694 $ 1,274 $ 716 $ 1,502 AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce (1)$ 769 $ 2,347 $ 787 $ 2,666
(1) A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to cost of sales and other
direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the
most comparable GAAP measure, can be found below in Reconciliation of Cost
of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization (GAAP) to Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost,
After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) and All-In Sustaining Cost, Before
By-product Credits and All-In Sustaining Cost, After By-product Credits
(non-GAAP). The increases in gross profit for the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 were primarily the result of higher average gold prices and higher gold production, due to higher grades. In addition, cost of sales and other direct production costs for the first half of 2020 included write-downs totaling approximately$1.5 million of the values of stockpile, in-process and finished goods inventory to their net realizable value, with no portion of that amount recognized in the second quarter of 2020, compared to$18.6 million and$28.3 million , respectively, in such write-downs for the second quarter and first half of 2019. The write-downs in the 2019 periods were primarily attributed to development costs incurred at theFire Creek mine, which were ceased in the second quarter of 2019 when the decision was made to limit near-term production to areas of the mine where development was already completed. 46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Mining and milling costs per ton were higher by 384% and 191%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2020 and by 184% and 95%, respectively, for the first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019. The increases were primarily the result of lower mill throughput.
The chart below illustrates the factors contributing to Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, Per Gold Ounce for the second quarter and first half of 2020:
[[Image Removed]] The following table summarizes the components of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 713 1,332$ 736 1,580 By-product credits (19 ) (58 ) (20 ) (78 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 694 $ 1,274 $ 716 $ 1,502 The following table summarizes the components of AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 788 $ 2,405 $ 807 $ 2,744 By-product credits (19 ) (58 ) (20 ) (78 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$ 769 $ 2,347 $ 787 $ 2,666 47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The decreases in Cash Costs and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold ounce in the second quarter and first half of 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019 were due to higher gold production resulting from increased grades, with the decreases in AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce also attributed to lower exploration and capital spending. We believe the identification of silver as a by-product credit is appropriate at Nevada Operations because of its lower economic value compared to gold and due to the fact that gold is the primary product we intend to produce there. In addition, we do not receive sufficient revenue from silver at Nevada Operations to warrant classification of such as a co-product. Because we consider silver to be a by-product of our gold production at Nevada Operations, the value of silver offsets operating costs within our calculations of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. Because total production and capital costs had exceeded sales since acquisition, we conducted a review of ourNevada operations during the second quarter of 2019. The review resulted in (i) a plan to limit near-term mining atFire Creek to areas where development has already been completed and (ii) suspension of production and development of the Hatter Graben project atHollister , resulting in lower anticipated near-term production and capitalized development costs. Production at the Midas mine and Aurora mill was suspended in late 2019. Suspension-related costs totaling$6.7 million for the first half of 2020 atHollister , Midas and Aurora, which are currently on care-and-maintenance, are reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, mining and milling cost per ton, and Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. We determined this review and the resulting plans represented a triggering event requiring an assessment of recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets ("carrying value assessment") inNevada as ofJune 30, 2019 . In our carrying value assessment, our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows and the estimated value of mineral interests exceeded the carrying value of theNevada assets, and we concluded impairment was not indicated. There were no subsequent events or changes in circumstances during the remainder of 2019 or the first half of 2020 that indicated the carrying value of our long-term assets inNevada was not recoverable. We have entered into a third-party ore processing arrangement for a bulk sample of ore, with the potential of establishing a long-term arrangement which could reduce transportation and milling costs. Mining of the bulk sample material commenced in the second quarter of 2020, with costs for mining the material totaling$4.3 million included in stockpiled ore inventory as ofJune 30, 2020 . Additionally, we have commenced studies of the assets in order to determine how to mine them at lower costs. Recoverability of carrying value will be contingent upon the favorable resolution of operational issues, including, but not limited to: (i) ore grade control, (ii) mill recoveries and reconciliation, (iii) the potential availability of third-party processing of ore produced at theFire Creek mine, (iv) availability of sufficient resources (including funding) to resume and complete necessary development work and drilling on a timely basis, (v) hydrological studies and (vi) permitting. Based on the current mine plan, mining atFire Creek in areas where development has already been performed is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2020. Our estimates of undiscounted future cash flows for ourNevada assets are most sensitive to (i) changes in metal prices and (ii) estimates of metals to be extracted and recovered. If events or changes occur that adversely affect our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows from ourNevada assets, including (i) an increase in expected costs, (ii) a sustained decline in gold prices, or (iii) suspension of production and placement of ourNevada operations on care-and-maintenance due to the inability to resolve the operational issues identified in the preceding paragraph in a timely manner, or other factors, we may be required to again perform a carrying value assessment for ourNevada assets. If a future assessment indicates the carrying value of the assets exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss, which could be material, would be recognized for the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the assets. The estimate of potential impairment involves significant judgment and assumptions, and no assurance can be given as to whether we will recognize an impairment in the future or the amount of a potential impairment. The carrying value of our properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests inNevada as ofJune 30, 2020 was$483.9 million , consisting of the following (in millions):
Value beyond proven and probable reserves
41.5 Buildings and equipment 24.7 Development 19.0 Mineral properties 10.4 Asset retirement obligation asset 3.1 Land 3.0 Total$ 483.9 48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
See Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operation, Development, Exploration and Acquisition Risks in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 for a discussion of certain risks relating to our recent and ongoing analysis of the carrying value of theNevada assets. Corporate Matters Employee Benefit Plans Our defined benefit pension plans provide a significant benefit to our employees, but represent a significant liability to us. The liability recorded for the underfunded status of our plans was$59.5 million and$56.8 million as ofJune 30, 2020 andDecember 31, 2019 , respectively. InApril 2020 , we contributed$0.4 million in shares of our common stock to our defined benefit plans, and expect to contribute an additional approximately$10.0 million in cash or shares of our common stock in 2020, including$4.8 million to satisfy the remaining minimum funding requirement for the year. While the economic variables which will determine future funding requirements are uncertain, we expect contributions to continue to be required in future years under current plan provisions, and we periodically examine the plans for affordability and competitiveness. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information. Income Taxes Each reporting period we assess our deferred tax balance based on a review of long-range forecasts and quarterly activity. In 2018, through the acquisition ofKlondex Mines Ltd. , we acquired aU.S. consolidated tax group (the "Nevada U.S. Group ") that did not join the existing consolidatedU.S. tax group ofHecla Mining Company and subsidiaries ("HeclaU.S. "). We recognized a full valuation allowance on our HeclaU.S. net deferred tax assets at the end of 2017 based on results of tax law changes and maintain a full valuation allowance on HeclaU.S. net deferred tax assets atJune 30, 2020 . Our netU.S. deferred tax liability for theNevada U.S. Group atJune 30, 2020 was$35.1 million compared to the$38.3 million net deferred tax liability atDecember 31, 2019 . The$3.2 million decrease is for current period activity inNevada . The deferred tax liability is primarily related to the excess of the carrying value of the mineral resource assets over the tax bases of those assets forU.S. tax reporting. Our net Canadian deferred tax liability atJune 30, 2020 was$93.6 million , a decrease of$6.3 million from the$99.9 million net deferred tax liability atDecember 31, 2019 . The decrease was primarily due to the impact of weakening of the CAD relative to the USD on remeasurement of the deferred tax liability balance. The deferred tax liability is primarily related to the excess of the carrying value of the mineral resource assets over the tax bases of those assets for Canadian tax reporting. Our Mexican net deferred tax asset atJune 30, 2020 was$3.2 million , a decrease of$0.3 million from the net deferred tax asset of$3.5 million atDecember 31, 2019 . The decrease was primarily due to the impact of weakening of the MXN relative to the USD on remeasurement of the deferred tax asset balance. A$2.2 million partial valuation allowance remains on deferred tax assets inMexico . As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted inDecember 2017 , our remaining Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") credit carryforward of$10.7 million became partially refundable through 2020 and fully refundable in 2021. An Alaska AMT refund of$0.5 million was received in the first half of 2020, leaving a net AMT credit receivable of$10.2 million as ofJune 30, 2020 . InMarch 2020 , theU.S. government issued the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, which allowed companies to claim immediate refunds of AMT credits. As a result, the remaining$10.2 million AMT credit is classified as a current receivable as ofJune 30, 2020 . Reconciliation of Cost of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (GAAP) to Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost, After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) and All-In Sustaining Cost, Before By-product Credits and All-In Sustaining Cost, After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) The tables below present reconciliations between the most comparable GAAP measure of cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization to the non-GAAP measures of (i) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, (ii) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, (iii) AISC, Before By-product Credits and (iv) AISC, After By-product Credits for our operations at theGreens Creek ,Lucky Friday ,San Sebastian ,Casa Berardi andNevada Operations units and for the Company for the three- and six-month periods endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019. 49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce are measures developed by precious metals companies (including theSilver Institute and theWorld Gold Council ) in an effort to provide a uniform standard for comparison purposes. There can be no assurance, however, that these non-GAAP measures as we report them are the same as those reported by other mining companies. Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce is an important operating statistic that we utilize to measure each mine's operating performance. We use AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce as a measure of our mines' net cash flow after costs for exploration, pre-development, reclamation, and sustaining capital. This is similar to the Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce non-GAAP measure we report, but also includes on-site exploration, reclamation, and sustaining capital costs. Current GAAP measures used in the mining industry, such as cost of goods sold, do not capture all the expenditures incurred to discover, develop and sustain silver and gold production. Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce also allow us to benchmark the performance of each of our mines versus those of our competitors. As a silver and gold mining company, we also use these statistics on an aggregate basis - aggregating theGreens Creek ,Lucky Friday andSan Sebastian mines - to compare our performance with that of other silver mining companies, and aggregatingCasa Berardi and Nevada Operations for comparison with other gold mining companies. Similarly, these statistics are useful in identifying acquisition and investment opportunities as they provide a common tool for measuring the financial performance of other mines with varying geologic, metallurgical and operating characteristics. Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and AISC, Before By-product Credits include all direct and indirect operating cash costs related directly to the physical activities of producing metals, including mining, processing and other plant costs, third-party refining expense, on-site general and administrative costs, royalties and mining production taxes. AISC, Before By-product Credits for each mine also includes on-site exploration, reclamation, and sustaining capital costs. AISC, Before By-product Credits for our consolidated silver properties also includes corporate costs for general and administrative expense, exploration and sustaining capital projects. By-product credits include revenues earned from all metals other than the primary metal produced at each unit. As depicted in the tables below, by-product credits comprise an essential element of our silver unit cost structure, distinguishing our silver operations due to the polymetallic nature of their orebodies. In addition to the uses described above, Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce provide management and investors an indication of operating cash flow, after consideration of the average price received from production. We also use these measurements for the comparative monitoring of performance of our mining operations period-to-period from a cash flow perspective. The Casa Berardi, Nevada Operations and combined gold properties information below reports Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce for the production of gold, their primary product, and by-product revenues earned from silver, which is a by-product at Casa Berardi and Nevada Operations. Only costs and ounces produced relating to units with the same primary product are combined to represent Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce. Thus, the gold produced at ourCasa Berardi and Nevada Operations units is not included as a by-product credit when calculating Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce for the total ofGreens Creek ,Lucky Friday andSan Sebastian , our combined silver properties. Similarly, the silver produced at our other three units is not included as a by-product credit when calculating the gold metrics forCasa Berardi and Nevada Operations. 50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Greens Lucky San Total Creek Friday(2) Sebastian (3) Corporate(4) Silver Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 57,672 11,455 $ 4,010$ 73,137 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (12,988 ) (1,894 ) (895 ) (15,777 ) Treatment costs 20,016 3,032 47 23,095 Change in product inventory (4,020 ) (118 ) (398 ) (4,536 ) Reclamation and other costs 93 - (296 ) (203 ) Exclusion ofLucky Friday costs - (12,475 ) - (12,475 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 60,773 - 2,468 63,241 Reclamation and other costs 789 114 903 Exploration - - 314 314 Sustaining capital 4,501 (1 ) - 4,500 General and administrative
6,979 6,979 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 66,063 - 2,581 75,937 By-product credits: Zinc (19,913 ) - (19,913 ) Gold (19,427 ) - (2,287 ) (21,714 ) Lead (7,133 ) - (7,133 ) Total By-product credits (46,473 ) - (2,287 ) (48,760 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 14,300 $ - $ 181$ 14,481 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 19,590 $ - $ 294$ 27,177 Divided by ounces produced 2,754 - 158 2,912 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 22.06 $ - $ 15.61$ 21.71 By-product credits per ounce (16.87 ) - (14.47 ) (16.74 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 5.19 $ - $ 1.14$ 4.97 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 23.98 $ - $ 16.32$ 26.07 By-product credits per ounce (16.87 ) - (14.47 ) (16.74 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 7.11 $ - $ 1.85$ 9.33 51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three months ended June 30, 2020 Casa Nevada Total Berardi (5) Operations (6) Gold Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 45,582 $ 13,557 $ 59,139 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (17,281 ) (6,365 ) (23,646 ) Treatment costs 558 19 577 Change in product inventory (400 ) 3,669 3,269 Reclamation and other costs (92 ) (328 ) (420 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 28,367 10,552 38,919 Reclamation and other costs 94 327 421 Exploration 467 - 467 Sustaining capital 4,278 774 5,052 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 33,206 11,653 44,859 By-product credits: Silver (92 ) (282 ) (374 ) Total By-product credits (92 ) (282 ) (374 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 28,275 $ 10,270 $ 38,545 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 33,114 $ 11,371 $ 44,485 Divided by ounces produced 31 15 46 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 922 $ 713 $ 854 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (19 ) (8 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 919 $ 694 $ 846 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,080 $ 788 $ 985 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (19 ) (8 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,077 $ 769 $ 977 52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three months ended June 30, 2020 Total Total Silver Gold Total Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 73,137 $ 59,139 $ 132,276 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (15,777 ) (23,646 ) (39,423 ) Treatment costs 23,095 577 23,672 Change in product inventory (4,536 ) 3,269 (1,267 ) Reclamation and other costs (203 ) (420 ) (623 ) Exclusion of Lucky Friday costs (12,475 ) - (12,475 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 63,241 38,919 102,160 Reclamation and other costs 903 421 1,324 Exploration 314 467 781 Sustaining capital 4,500 5,052 9,552 General and administrative 6,979 - 6,979 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 75,937 44,859 120,796 By-product credits: Zinc (19,913 ) - (19,913 ) Gold (21,714 ) - (21,714 ) Lead (7,133 ) - (7,133 ) Silver (374 ) (374 ) Total By-product credits (48,760 ) (374 ) (49,134 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 14,481 $ 38,545 $ 53,026 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 27,177 $ 44,485 $ 71,662 Divided by ounces produced 2,912 46 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 21.71 $ 854 By-product credits per ounce (16.74 ) (8 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 4.97 $ 846 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 26.07 $ 985 By-product credits per ounce (16.74 ) (8 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 9.33 $ 977 53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Greens Lucky San Total Creek Friday(2) Sebastian Corporate(4) Silver Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 45,650 $ 4,951 $ 11,143 $ 61,744 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (10,850 ) (422 ) (1,848 ) (13,120 ) Treatment costs 10,964 524 238 11,726 Change in product inventory 4,577 (641 ) (190 ) 3,746 Reclamation and other costs (933 ) - (422 ) (1,355 ) Exclusion of Lucky Friday cash costs - (4,412 ) - (4,412 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 49,408 - 8,921 58,329 Reclamation and other costs 738 - 123 861 Exploration 79 - 1,483 497 2,059 Sustaining capital 8,665 - 1,308 12 9,985 General and administrative 8,918 8,918 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 58,890 - 11,835 80,152 By-product credits: Zinc (22,221 ) - - (22,221 ) Gold (15,350 ) - (4,645 ) (19,995 ) Lead (6,198 ) - - (6,198 ) Total By-product credits (43,769 ) - (4,645 ) (48,414 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 5,639 $ -$ 4,276 $ 9,915 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 15,121 $ -$ 7,190 $ 31,738 Divided by ounces produced 2,372 - 464 2,836 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 20.83 $ -$ 19.23 $ 20.57 By-product credits per ounce (18.45 ) - (10.01 ) (17.07 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 2.38 $ -$ 9.22 $ 3.50 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 24.82 $ -$ 25.51 $ 28.23 By-product credits per ounce (18.45 ) - (10.01 ) (17.07 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 6.37 $ -$ 15.50 $ 11.16 54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Casa Nevada Total Berardi Operations Gold Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 55,152 $ 37,519 $ 92,671 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (18,561 ) (17,796 ) (36,357 ) Treatment costs 427 36 463 Change in product inventory (2,367 ) (1,969 ) (4,336 ) Reclamation and other costs (128 ) (885 ) (1,013 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 34,523 16,905 51,428 Reclamation and other costs 127 378 505 Exploration 941 698 1,639 Sustaining capital 9,431 12,553 21,984 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 45,022 30,534 75,556 By-product credits: Silver (91 ) (739 ) (830 ) Total By-product credits (91 ) (739 ) (830 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 34,432 $ 16,166 $ 50,598 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 44,931 $ 29,795 $ 74,726 Divided by ounces produced 31 13 44 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,104 $ 1,332$ 1,170 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (58 ) (19 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,101 $ 1,274$ 1,151 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,440 $ 2,405$ 1,719 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (58 ) (19 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,437 $ 2,347$ 1,700 55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Total Total Silver Gold Total Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 61,744 $ 92,671 $ 154,415 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (13,120 ) (36,357 ) (49,477 ) Treatment costs 11,726 463 12,189 Change in product inventory 3,746 (4,336 ) (590 ) Reclamation and other costs (1,355 ) (1,013 ) (2,368 ) Exclusion ofLucky Friday cash costs (4,412 ) - (4,412 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 58,329 51,428 109,757 Reclamation and other costs 861 505 1,366 Exploration 2,059 1,639 3,698 Sustaining capital 9,985 21,984 31,969 General and administrative 8,918 - 8,918 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 80,152 75,556 155,708 By-product credits: Zinc (22,221 ) - (22,221 ) Gold (19,995 ) - (19,995 ) Lead (6,198 ) - (6,198 ) Silver (830 ) (830 ) Total By-product credits (48,414 ) (830 ) (49,244 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits $ 9,915$ 50,598 $ 60,513 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 31,738 $ 74,726 $ 106,464 Divided by ounces produced 2,836 44 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 20.57$ 1,170 By-product credits per ounce (17.07 ) (19 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 3.50$ 1,151 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 28.23$ 1,719 By-product credits per ounce (17.07 ) (19 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 11.16$ 1,700 56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Greens Lucky San Total Creek Friday(2) Sebastian (3) Corporate(4) Silver
Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 106,853 $ 14,287 $ 12,311 $ 133,451 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (25,417 ) (2,196 ) (2,368 ) (29,981 ) Treatment costs 35,842 3,464 151 39,457 Change in product inventory (1,150 ) 796 (145 ) (499 ) Reclamation and other costs 413 - (658 ) (245 ) Exclusion of Lucky Friday costs - (16,351 ) - (16,351 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 116,541 - 9,291 125,832 Reclamation and other costs 1,577 - 228 1,805 Exploration 4 - - 664 668 Sustaining capital 10,011 - 55 - 10,066 General and administrative 15,918 15,918 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 128,133 - 9,574 154,289 By-product credits: Zinc (35,939 ) - (35,939 ) Gold (36,624 ) (6,716 ) (43,340 ) Lead (14,059 ) - (14,059 ) Total By-product credits (86,622 ) - (6,716 ) (93,338 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 29,919 $ - $ 2,575$ 32,494 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 41,511 $ - $ 2,858$ 60,951 Divided by ounces produced 5,530 - 505 6,035 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 21.07 $ - $ 18.39$ 20.85 By-product credits per ounce (15.66 ) - (13.30 ) (15.47 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 5.41 $ - $ 5.09$ 5.38 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 23.17 $ - $ 18.95$ 25.57 By-product credits per ounce (15.66 ) - (13.30 ) (15.47 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 7.51 $ - $ 5.65$ 10.10 57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Casa Nevada Total Berardi (5) Operations (6) Gold Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 93,907 $ 30,471$ 124,378 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (33,678 ) (15,430 ) (49,108 ) Treatment costs 1,132 45 1,177 Change in product inventory 1,208 8,949 10,157 Reclamation and other costs (189 ) (654 ) (843 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 62,380 23,381 85,761 Reclamation and other costs 190 654 844 Exploration 1,158 - 1,158 Sustaining capital 12,784 1,600 14,384 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 76,512 25,635 102,147 By-product credits: Silver (192 ) (635 ) (827 ) Total By-product credits (192 ) (635 ) (827 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits $ 62,188 $ 22,746$ 84,934 AISC, After By-product Credits $ 76,320 $ 25,000$ 101,320 Divided by ounces produced 58 32 90 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,084 $ 736 $ 961 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (20 ) (9 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,081 $ 716 $ 952 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,330 $ 807$ 1,144 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (20 ) (9 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,327 $ 787$ 1,135 58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Total Total Silver Gold Total Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 133,451 $ 124,378 $ 257,829 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (29,981 ) (49,108 ) (79,089 ) Treatment costs 39,457 1,177 40,634 Change in product inventory (499 ) 10,157 9,658 Reclamation and other costs (245 ) (843 ) (1,088 ) Exclusion of Lucky Friday costs (16,351 ) - (16,351 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 125,832 85,761 211,593 Reclamation and other costs 1,805 844 2,649 Exploration 668 1,158 1,826 Sustaining capital 10,066 14,384 24,450 General and administrative 15,918 - 15,918 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 154,289 102,147 256,436 By-product credits: Zinc (35,939 ) - (35,939 ) Gold (43,340 ) - (43,340 ) Lead (14,059 ) - (14,059 ) Silver (827 ) (827 ) Total By-product credits (93,338 ) (827 ) (94,165 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 32,494 $ 84,934 $ 117,428 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 60,951 $ 101,320 $ 162,271 Divided by ounces produced 6,035 90 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 20.85 $ 961 By-product credits per ounce (15.47 ) (9 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 5.38 $ 952 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 25.57$ 1,144 By-product credits per ounce (15.47 ) (9 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 10.10$ 1,135 59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Greens Lucky San Total Creek Friday(2) Sebastian Corporate(4) Silver Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 99,762 $ 7,132 $ 23,495 $ 130,389 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (23,220 ) (591 ) (3,608 ) (27,419 ) Treatment costs 21,316 1,334 369 23,019 Change in product inventory 712 842 (1,043 ) 511 Reclamation and other costs (1,347 ) - (735 ) (2,082 ) Exclusion of Lucky Friday cash costs - (8,717 ) - (8,717 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 97,223 - 18,478 115,701 Reclamation and other costs 1,475 - 246 1,721 Exploration 160 - 3,200 938 4,298 Sustaining capital 13,977 - 1,814 73 15,864 General and administrative 18,877 18,877 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 112,835 - 23,738 156,461 By-product credits: Zinc (45,506 ) - - (45,506 ) Gold (31,868 ) (9,247 ) (41,115 ) Lead (13,115 ) - - (13,115 ) Total By-product credits (90,489 ) - (9,247 ) (99,736 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 6,734 $ -$ 9,231 $ 15,965 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 22,346 $ -$ 14,491 $ 56,725 Divided by ounces produced 4,605 - 905 5,510 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 21.11 $ -$ 20.42 $ 21.00 By-product credits per ounce (19.65 ) - (10.22 ) (18.10 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 1.46 $ -$ 10.20 $ 2.90 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 24.50 $ -$ 26.24 $ 28.39 By-product credits per ounce (19.65 ) - (10.22 ) (18.10 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce$ 4.85 $ -$ 16.02 $ 10.29 60
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Casa Nevada Total Berardi Operations Gold Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 104,233 $ 68,966 $ 173,199 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (34,716 ) (26,129 ) (60,845 ) Treatment costs 869 74 943 Change in product inventory (99 ) (5,215 ) (5,314 ) Reclamation and other costs (257 ) (1,264 ) (1,521 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 70,030 36,432 106,462 Reclamation and other costs 256 756 1,012 Exploration 2,287 816 3,103 Sustaining capital 15,123 25,260 40,383 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 87,696 63,264 150,960 By-product credits: Silver (217 ) (1,796 ) (2,013 ) Total By-product credits (217 ) (1,796 ) (2,013 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 69,813 $ 34,636 $ 104,449 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 87,479 $ 61,468 $ 148,947 Divided by ounces produced 63 23 86 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,110 $ 1,580$ 1,236 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (78 ) (23 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,107 $ 1,502$ 1,213 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,390 $ 2,744$ 1,752 By-product credits per ounce (3 ) (78 ) (23 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 1,387 $ 2,666$ 1,729 61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In thousands (except per ounce amounts) Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Total Total Silver Gold Total Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization$ 130,389 $ 173,199 $ 303,588 Depreciation, depletion and amortization (27,419 ) (60,845 ) (88,264 ) Treatment costs 23,019 943 23,962 Change in product inventory 511 (5,314 ) (4,803 ) Reclamation and other costs (2,082 ) (1,521 ) (3,603 ) Exclusion ofLucky Friday cash costs (8,717 ) - (8,717 ) Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits (1) 115,701 106,462 222,163 Reclamation and other costs 1,721 1,012 2,733 Exploration 4,298 3,103 7,401 Sustaining capital 15,864 40,383 56,247 General and administrative 18,877 - 18,877 AISC, Before By-product Credits (1) 156,461 150,960 307,421 By-product credits: Zinc (45,506 ) - (45,506 ) Gold (41,115 ) - (41,115 ) Lead (13,115 ) - (13,115 ) Silver (2,013 ) (2,013 ) Total By-product credits (99,736 ) (2,013 ) (101,749 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$ 15,965 $ 104,449 $ 120,414 AISC, After By-product Credits$ 56,725 $ 148,947 $ 205,672 Divided by ounces produced 5,510 86 Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 21.00$ 1,236 By-product credits per ounce (18.10 ) (23 ) Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 2.90$ 1,213 AISC, Before By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 28.39$ 1,752 By-product credits per ounce (18.10 ) (23 ) AISC, After By-product Credits, per Ounce $ 10.29$ 1,729
(1) Includes all direct and indirect operating costs related to the physical
activities of producing metals, including mining, processing and other plant
costs, third-party refining and marketing expense, on-site general and
administrative costs, royalties and mining production taxes, before
by-product revenues earned from all metals other than the primary metal
produced at each unit. AISC, Before By-product Credits also includes on-site
exploration, reclamation, and sustaining capital costs.
(2) The unionized employees at Lucky Friday were on strike from
of the strike. Costs related to ramp-up activities totaling
the first half of 2020, and suspension-related costs totaling
during the strike in the first half of 2019, along with
million, respectively, in non-cash depreciation expense for those periods,
have been excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct
production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, Cash Cost,
Before By-product Credits, Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, AISC, Before
By-product Credits, and AISC, After By-product Credits.
(3) In early
industry to reduce operations to a minimum level until
to COVID-19, and the order was subsequently extended until
operations at
Suspension-related costs totaling
reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations
and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct
production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, mining and
milling cost per ton, and Cash Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per
Gold Ounce.
(4) AISC, Before By-product Credits for our consolidated silver properties
includes corporate costs for general and administrative expense, exploration
and sustaining capital.
(5) In late
reduce to minimum operations as part of the fight against COVID-19, causing
us to suspend our
mining operations resumed, resulting in reduced mill throughput.
Suspension-related costs totaling
reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of operations
and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other direct
production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization and Cash Cost
and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce.
(6) Production was suspended at the
and at the Midas mine and Aurora mill in late-2019. Suspension-related costs
at
2020 are reported in a separate line item on our consolidated statements of
operations and excluded from the calculations of cost of sales and other
direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization and Cash
Cost and AISC, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce. 62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Financial Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquid assets include (in millions):
June 30 ,December 31, 2020 2019
Cash and cash equivalents held in
50.3
Cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currency 23.7
12.2
Total cash and cash equivalents 75.9
62.5
Marketable equity securities - non-current 12.2
6.2
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
68.7 Cash and cash equivalents increased by$13.4 million in the first six months of 2020. Cash held in foreign currencies represents balances in Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos, with the$11.5 million increase in the first half of 2020 resulting from increases in both currencies held. The value of non-current marketable equity securities increased by$6.0 million (see Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information). OnFebruary 19, 2020 , we completed an offering of Senior Notes in the total principal amount ofUS$475 million . The Senior Notes are dueFebruary 15, 2028 and bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per year from the most recent payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for. The net proceeds from the Senior Notes were used, along with cash on hand, to redeem, inMarch 2020 , our previously-outstanding 2021 Notes having a principal balance of$506.5 million . Also, inJuly 2018 we entered into a new$250 million revolving credit facility. Interest is payable on amounts drawn from the revolving credit facility at a rate of between 2.25% and 4.00% over the London Interbank Offered Rate, or between 1.25% and 3.00% over an alternative base rate, with interest payable onMarch 31 ,June 30 ,September 30 , andDecember 31 of each year. As a precaution due to uncertainties of the duration, severity and scope of the COVID-19 outbreak, we drew$210.0 million on the facility in the first quarter of 2020. In the second quarter of 2020, we repaid$160.0 million of the amount drawn on the facility, with the remaining$50 million outstanding as of the end of the quarter. In addition, inJuly 2020 we agreed to issueCAD$50 million (approximatelyUSD$36.8 million at the time of the transaction) in aggregate principal amount of our IQ Notes, which mature inJuly 2025 and bear interest at a rate of 6.515% per year. The IQ Notes will be issued at a premium of 103.65%, implying an effective annual yield of 5.74% and an aggregate principal amount to be repaid ofCAD$48.2 million . The IQ Notes will be issued in four equal installments ofCAD$12.5 million in July, August, September andOctober 2020 , with the first installment issued net ofCAD$0.6 million in fees. The net proceeds from the IQ Notes will be available for general corporate purposes, including for open market purchases of a portion of the Senior Notes and to pay for capital expenditures at ourCasa Berardi unit. Under the note purchase agreement for the IQ Notes and subject to a force majeure event, we are required to invest in the aggregateCAD$100 million at the Casa Berardi unit and other exploration and development projects inQuebec over the four-year period commencing onJuly 9, 2020 . See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information on our debt arrangements. We continue to address the COVID-19 outbreak and face uncertainty related to the potential additional impacts it could have on our operations. It is possible that future restrictions at Casa Berardi,San Sebastian orGreens Creek (or at any other operation) could have an adverse impact on operations or 2020 financial results, including materially so, beyond the second quarter of 2020. We have taken precautionary measures to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19, including implementing operational plans and practices and increasing our cash reserves through a draw-down of our revolving credit facility. As long as they are required, the operational practices implemented could continue to have an adverse impact on our operating results due to deferred production and revenues or additional costs. If required, increasing or prolonged restrictions on our operations could require access to additional sources of liquidity, which may not be available to us. See Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, and other catastrophic events or other events outside of our control may materially and adversely affect our business or financial results in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2020 for information on how restrictions related to COVID-19 have recently affected some of our operations. As further discussed in the Lucky Friday Segment section above, the union employees at Lucky Friday were on strike fromMarch 13, 2017 until the strike ended onJanuary 7, 2020 , and production at Lucky Friday has been limited since the start of the strike. Re-staffing of the mine has been substantially completed, with a return to full production anticipated by the end of 2020. However, the ramp-up to full production could take longer or be more costly than anticipated. Pursuant to our common stock dividend policy described in Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), our board of directors declared and paid dividends on common stock totaling$2.6 million in the first half of 2020 and$2.4 million in the first half of 2019. Our dividend policy has a silver-price-linked component which ties the amount of declared common stock dividends to our realized silver price for the preceding quarter. Another component of our common stock dividend policy anticipates paying an annual minimum dividend. The declaration and payment of dividends on common stock is at the sole discretion of our board of directors, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to declare and pay common stock dividends in the future. 63
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnMay 8, 2012 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase up to 20 million shares of our outstanding common stock from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be modified, suspended or discontinued by us at any time. Whether or not we engage in repurchases from time to time may depend on a variety of factors, including not only price and cash resources, but customary black-out restrictions, whether we have any material inside information, limitations on share repurchases or cash usage that may be imposed by our credit agreement or in connection with issuances of securities, alternative uses for cash, applicable law, and other investment opportunities from time to time. As ofJune 30, 2020 , 934,100 shares had been purchased in prior periods at an average price of$3.99 per share, leaving 19.1 million shares that may yet be purchased under the program. The closing price of our common stock atAugust 4, 2020 , was$6.05 per share. No shares were purchased under the program during the first half of 2020. We may defer some capital investment and/or exploration and pre-development activities, engage in asset sales or secure additional capital if necessary to maintain liquidity. We also may pursue additional acquisition opportunities, which could require additional equity issuances or other forms of financing. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available to us. As a result of our current cash balances, the performance of our current and expected operations, current metals prices, proceeds from potential at-the-market sales of common stock, and availability of our revolving credit facility, we believe we will be able to meet our obligations and other potential cash requirements during the next 12 months from the date of this report. Our obligations and other uses of cash may include, but are not limited to: debt service obligations related to the Senior Notes and IQ Notes; principal and interest payments under our revolving credit facility; deferral of revenues, care-and-maintenance and other costs related to addressing the impacts of COVID-19 on our operations; capital expenditures at our operations; potential acquisitions of other mining companies or properties; regulatory matters; litigation; potential repurchases of our common stock under the program described above; and payment of dividends on common stock, if declared by our board of directors. We currently estimate a total of approximately$90 million will be spent on capital expenditures, primarily for equipment, infrastructure, and development at our mines, in 2020, including$33.8 million incurred in the first half of 2020. We also estimate exploration and pre-development expenditures will total approximately$13.2 million in 2020, including$5.6 million already incurred in the first half of 2020. Our expenditures for these items and our related plans for 2020 may change based upon our financial position, metals prices, and other considerations. Our ability to fund the activities described above will depend on our operating performance, metals prices, our ability to estimate revenues and costs, sources of liquidity available to us, including the revolving credit facility, and other factors. A sustained downturn in metals prices, significant increase in operational or capital costs or other uses of cash, our inability to access the credit facility or the sources of liquidity discussed above, or other factors beyond our control could impact our plans. Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 Cash provided by operating activities (in millions) $ 42.5 $ 8.7 Cash provided by operating activities in the first half of 2020 of$42.5 million represented a$33.8 million increase compared to the$8.7 million provided by operating activities in the first half of 2019. The variance was the result of higher net income, as adjusted for non-cash items, reductions to accounts receivable, and increases to accrued payroll and taxes, partially offset by increases to inventory and decreases to accounts payable. Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 Cash used in investing activities (in millions) $ (31.1 ) $ (71.3 ) 64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
During the first half of 2020, we invested$30.7 million in capital expenditures, not including$3.1 million in non-cash finance lease additions, a decrease of$40.6 million compared to the same period in 2019. The variance is due to reduced expenditures at all of our operations exceptLucky Friday , where we have been preparing for a return to production after the end of the strike inJanuary 2020 . Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 Cash provided by financing activities (in millions) $ 4.0 $ 44.2 In the first half of 2020, we received$469.5 million in net proceeds from the issuance of our Senior Notes and drew$210.0 million on our revolving credit facility, and had debt repayments of$506.5 million for redemption of our 2021 Notes and$160.0 million for our revolving credit facility. In the first half of 2019, we drew$170.0 million and had repayments of$118.0 million on our revolving credit facility. We made repayments on our finance leases of$2.8 million and$3.4 million in the six-month periods endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. During the first six months of 2020 and 2019, we paid cash dividends on our common stock totaling$2.6 million and$2.4 million , respectively, and cash dividends of$0.3 million on our Series B Preferred Stock during each of those periods. We acquired treasury shares for$2.7 million and$1.6 million in the first half of 2020 and 2019, respectively, as a result of employees' elections to utilize net share settlement to satisfy their tax withholding obligations related to incentive compensation paid in stock and vesting of restricted stock units. See Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information. The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates resulted in a$1.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents in the first half of 2020 compared to an increase of$0.4 million in the first half of 2019, with the variance due to weakening of the CAD and MXN relative to the USD in the 2020 period.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The table below presents our fixed, non-cancelable contractual obligations and commitments primarily related to our Senior Notes, credit facility, outstanding purchase orders, certain capital expenditures and lease arrangements as ofJune 30, 2020 (in thousands): Payments Due By Period Less than More than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years 5 years Total Purchase obligations (1)$ 10,722 - - $ -$ 10,722 Credit facility(2) - 50,000 - - 50,000 Contractual obligations (3) 1,302 - - - 1,302 Finance lease commitments (4) 6,123 6,592 960 - 13,675 Operating lease commitments (5) 3,946 6,001 2,052 2,601 14,600 Supplemental executive retirement plan (6) 622 1,509 2,107 6,440 10,678 Defined benefit pension plans (6) 4,800 - - - 4,800 Senior notes (7) 34,438 68,875 68,875 565,398 737,586 Total contractual cash obligations$ 61,953 $ 132,977 $ 73,994 $ 574,439 $ 843,363
(1) Consists of open purchase orders of approximately
Creek unit,
Friday unit and$2.8 million at the Nevada Operations unit. (2) We have a$250 million revolving credit agreement under which we are
required to pay a standby fee of between 0.5625% and 1.00% per annum on
undrawn amounts and interest of between 2.25% and 4.00% over the
Interbank Offered Rate or between 1.25% and 3.00% over an alternative base
rate on drawn amounts under the revolving credit agreement. We had
million drawn and
balance drawn, and not an estimate of interest to be paid or the standby fee
on potentially undrawn amounts, as the timing of repayment of the principal
balance and future draws is unknown at this time. For more information on
our credit facility, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited). (3) As ofJune 30, 2020 , we were committed to approximately$1.3 million for various items atGreens Creek . 65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
(4) Includes scheduled finance lease payments of
equipment at our
Operations units. These leases have fixed payment terms and contain bargain
purchase options at the end of the lease periods (see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information). (5) We enter into operating leases in the normal course of
business. Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms based
on the passage of time. Some lease agreements provide us with the option to
renew the lease or purchase the leased property. Our future operating lease
obligations would change if we exercised these renewal options and if we entered into additional operating lease arrangements.
(6) We sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all
employees and provide certain post-retirement benefits for qualifying
retired employees, along with a supplemental executive retirement plan.
These amounts represent our estimate of the future funding requirements for
these plans. We believe we will have funding requirements related to our defined benefit plans beyond one year; however, such obligations are not
fixed in nature and are difficult to estimate, as they involve significant
assumptions. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information.
(7) On
principal amount of our Senior Notes due
bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per year from the original date of issuance
or the most recent payment date to which interest has been paid or provided
for. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on
each year, commencing
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for more information. We record liabilities for costs associated with mine closure, reclamation of land and other environmental matters. AtJune 30, 2020 , our liabilities for these matters totaled$104.6 million . Future expenditures related to closure, reclamation and environmental expenditures at our sites are difficult to estimate, although we anticipate we will incur expenditures relating to these obligations over the next 30 years. For additional information relating to our environmental obligations, see Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
AtJune 30, 2020 , we had no existing off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined underSEC regulations, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV of our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 . As described in such Note 1, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Our estimates are based on our experience and our interpretation of economic, political, regulatory, and other factors that affect our business prospects. Actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. We believe that our most critical accounting estimates are related to future metals prices; obligations for environmental, reclamation, and closure matters; mineral reserves; and accounting for business combinations, as they require us to make assumptions that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made and changes in them are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our board of directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosures presented below. In addition, there are other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed to be critical. However, changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our financial statements. 66
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Future Metals Prices Metals prices are key components in estimates that determine the valuation of some of our significant assets and liabilities, including properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests, deferred tax assets, and certain accounts receivable. Metals prices are also an important component in the estimation of reserves. As shown under Part I, Item 1. - Business in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , metals prices have historically been volatile. Silver demand arises from investment demand, particularly in exchange-traded funds, industrial demand, and consumer demand. Gold demand arises primarily from investment and consumer demand. Investment demand for silver and gold can be influenced by several factors, including: the value of theU.S. dollar and other currencies, changingU.S. budget deficits, widening availability of exchange-traded funds, interest rate levels, the health of credit markets, and inflationary expectations. Uncertainty related to the political environment in theU.S. ,Britain's exit from theEuropean Union ,U.S. and global trading policies (including tariffs), and a global economic recovery, including recent uncertainty inChina and from the current downturn and continued uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak, could result in continued investment demand for precious metals. Industrial demand for silver is closely linked to world Gross Domestic Product growth and industrial fabrication levels, as it is difficult to substitute for silver in industrial fabrication. Consumer demand is driven significantly by demand for jewelry and other retail products. We believe that long-term industrial and economic trends, including urbanization and growth of the middle class in countries such asChina andIndia , will result in continued consumer demand for silver and gold and industrial demand for silver. However, the global economy has been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak, with the ultimate severity and duration of the downtown unknown, andChina has recently experienced economic contraction which could resume in the future. There can be no assurance whether these trends will continue or how they will impact prices of the metals we produce. In the past, we have recorded impairments to our asset carrying value because of low prices, and we can offer no assurance that prices will either remain at their current levels or increase. Processes supporting valuation of our assets and liabilities that are most significantly affected by prices include analysis of asset carrying values, depreciation, reserves, and deferred income taxes. On at least an annual basis - and more frequently if circumstances warrant - we examine our depreciation rates, reserve estimates, and the valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets. We examine the carrying values of our assets as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. In our evaluation of carrying values and deferred taxes, we apply several pricing views to our forecasting model, including current prices, analyst price estimates, forward-curve prices, and historical prices (see Mineral Reserves, below, regarding prices used for reserve estimates). Using applicable accounting guidance and our view of metals markets, we use the probability-weighted average of the various methods to determine whether the values of our assets are fairly stated, and to determine the level of valuation allowances, if any, on our deferred tax assets. In addition, estimates of future metals prices are used in the valuation of certain assets in the determination of the purchase price allocations for our acquisitions (see Business Combinations below). Sales of concentrates sold directly to customers are recorded as revenues upon completion of the performance obligation and transfer of control of the product to the customer (generally at the time of shipment) using estimated forward metals prices for the estimated month of settlement. Due to the time elapsed between shipment of concentrates to the customer and final settlement with the customer, we must estimate the prices at which sales of our metals will be settled. Previously recorded sales and trade accounts receivable are adjusted to estimated settlement prices until final settlement by the customer. Changes in metals prices between shipment and final settlement result in changes to revenues and accounts receivable previously recorded upon shipment. As a result, our trade accounts receivable balances related to concentrate sales are subject to changes in metals prices until final settlement occurs. For more information, see Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited). We utilize financially-settled forward and put option contracts to manage our exposure to changes in prices for silver, gold, zinc and lead. See Item 3. - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Commodity-Price Risk Management below for more information on our contract programs. These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and are therefore marked-to-market through earnings each period. Changes in silver, gold, zinc and lead prices between the dates that the contracts are entered into and their settlements will result in changes to the fair value asset or liability associated with the contracts, with a corresponding gain or loss recognized in earnings.
Obligations for Environmental, Reclamation and Closure Matters
Accrued reclamation and closure costs can represent a significant and variable liability on our balance sheet. We have estimated our liabilities under appropriate accounting guidance, and on at least an annual basis - and more frequently if warranted - management reviews our liabilities with our Audit Committee. However, the ranges of liability could exceed the liabilities recognized. If substantial damages were awarded, claims were settled, or remediation costs incurred in excess of our accruals, our financial results or condition could be materially adversely affected. Mineral Reserves Critical estimates are inherent in the process of determining our reserves. Our reserves are affected largely by our assessment of future metals prices, as well as by engineering and geological estimates of ore grade, accessibility and production cost. Metals prices are estimated at long-term averages, as described in Part I, Item 2. - Properties in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 . Our assessment of reserves occurs at least annually, and periodically utilizes external audits. 67
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Reserves are a key component in the valuation of our properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests. Reserve estimates are used in determining appropriate rates of units-of-production depreciation, with net book value of many assets depreciated over remaining estimated reserves. Reserves are also a key component in forecasts, with which we compare future cash flows to current asset values in an effort to ensure that carrying values are reported appropriately. Our forecasts are also used in determining the level of valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets. Reserves also play a key role in the valuation of certain assets in the determination of the purchase price allocations for acquisitions. Annual reserve estimates are also used to determine conversions of mineral assets beyond the known reserve resulting from business combinations to depreciable reserves, in periods subsequent to the business combinations (see Business Combinations below). Reserves are a culmination of many estimates and are not guarantees that we will recover the indicated quantities of metals or that we will do so at a profitable level. Business Combinations We are required to allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to long-lived assets (including mineral assets beyond the known reserve). These estimates include future metals prices and mineral reserves, as discussed above. Management may also be required to make estimates related to the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities as part of the purchase price allocation for business combinations. In some cases, we use third-party appraisers to determine the fair values of property and other identifiable assets. In addition, costs related to business combinations are included in earnings as incurred, and our financial results for periods in which business combinations are pursued could be adversely affected as a result.
© Edgar Online, source