A report submitted to French authorities details Alstom's structural shortcomings and SNCF's "siloed" organization to explain the derailment of rail delivery schedules. Between industrial failures and unrealistic political demands, the delivery of a train now takes up to 12 years.
This is a report that could make waves. Submitted at the end of the year to the DGITM (General Directorate for Infrastructure, Transport, and the Sea) and the DGE (General Directorate for Enterprises), the document seeks to identify responsibilities in the delays plaguing train deliveries in France.
Revealed by our colleagues at VRT (www.ville-rail-transports.com), this "scathing" report, according to the site, points the finger at both Alstom and SNCF.
"This report assigns major responsibility to Alstom, highlighting serious weaknesses in the management of its supply chain, its organization, and its overall management, despite the continuous acquisition of new contracts," notes Louis Billon, who covers the case for AlphaValue. SNCF, meanwhile, is also criticized for its siloed operations and the excessive complexity of its technical specifications.
Specifically, "the report emphasizes the role of the State, transport authorities, and political decision-makers in creating unrealistic timelines and increasingly complex requirements. As a result, the delivery time for a new train has reached between 8 and 12 years, while costs have risen significantly," adds AlphaValue.
Nevertheless, the broker offers an encouraging conclusion, estimating that even though Alstom is identified as the main party at fault, the report represents "a positive development."
According to AlphaValue, Alstom should continue to win orders due to the very limited competition in the domestic market and the complexity of requirements and years of lobbying.
"More importantly, this report could help drive changes in French regulations and certification procedures, which should allow Alstom to deliver trains more quickly. The expected regulatory and organizational improvements could materialize within the next three years," it concludes.
Contacted by Zonebourse, Alstom had not responded at the time of writing. At mid-session, the stock was down 0.5% in Paris.
Alstom is one of the world leading manufacturers of infrastructures for rail transport sector. Net sales break down by family of products and services as follows:
- rolling stocks (51.1%): trains, tramways and locomotives;
- railway services (24.3%): maintenance, modernization, management of spare parts, support and technical assistance services;
- signaling, information and control systems (14.3%);
- railway infrastructures (10.3%): infrastructures for the track laying, lines electrical power systems, electromechanical equipment, telecommunication devices and traveler information in station, terminals for automatic purchase of tickets, access to escalators, lifts for disabled, automatic landing doors on platforms, ventilation, air conditioning and lighting systems).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: France (17.1%), Europe (39.6%), Americas (19.8%), Asia/Pacific (14.5%) and Middle East/Africa/Central Asia (9%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite), and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
-
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Capital Efficiency (Composite), Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
-
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.