Log in
Show password
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 
News: Latest News
Latest NewsCompaniesMarketsEconomy & ForexCommoditiesInterest RatesBusiness LeadersFinance Pro.CalendarSectors

Written reply to PQ on review of the CECA

08/04/2021 | 06:26am EDT


Ms Hazel Poa: To ask the Minister for Trade and Industry (a) what are the reasons behind the second review of the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) taking eight years to complete; (b) what are the main contentious issues in the second review of CECA; and (c) what are the issues under review in the current third review of CECA.

Written Answer by Minister for Trade and Industry Mr Gan Kim Yong

1. MTI periodically reviews our trade agreements to keep them updated and relevant given that economic interests, business models, regulations and trade flows between Singapore and its trade partners will change over time. All our Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), including the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), have provisions to review and amend the agreements.

2. There is no prescribed timeline for negotiating or reviewing FTAs. During the Second Review of CECA, both parties carefully studied the proposed changes, conducted consultations, exchanged views and discussed counter-proposals before reaching an agreement on a mutually beneficial package of amendments. The Second Review expanded tariff concessions for an additional 30 products and updated the rules of origin. These provide more flexibility for Singapore exports into India to qualify for preferential tariffs under the agreement. Singapore exporters benefit as their products become more price-competitive in India, while Indian consumers gain from lower-priced goods.

3. Details of past and on-going FTA negotiations between both parties are confidential. Revealing details, such as issues that are covered, would constitute a breach of confidentiality and erode trust in Singapore as a partner, making future negotiations more difficult. However, the outcome of the review is publicly available and the concluded text is published online.


Ministry of Trade and Industry of the Republic of Singapore published this content on 02 August 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 04 August 2021 10:25:25 UTC.

ę Publicnow 2021
Latest news "Companies"
05:09pGETSWIFT TECHNOLOGIES : Discloses Details of Proposed Settlement of Australian Class Action
05:08pBRILLIANT EARTH GROUP, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities, Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Amendments to Articles of Inc. or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
05:08pHealth Care Slips On Rotation Into Rate-Sensitive Sectors - Health Care Roundup
05:07pBP : UK puts military on standby as panic buying hits fuel supplies
05:07pWEYERHAEUSER CO : Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
05:07pCENTURY BANCORP INC : Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
05:06pU.S. to open program to replace Huawei equipment in U.S. networks
05:06pARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. : Other Events (form 8-K)
05:06pELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
05:06pSILVERCORP METALS : to Highlight Innovative Waste Reduction Initiatives in Upcoming Annual Sustainability Report
Latest news "Companies"