Environmental group Earthjustice has filed a petition with Louisiana regulators calling for an investigation into the financing of Meta's planned data center in Richland Parish, a project estimated to cost $27bn. The project, which includes the construction of three gas-fired power plants and new transmission lines, could, the group says, shift a significant share of the expenses onto local consumers, particularly if Meta exits the site early.
Meta initially agreed to backstop the financing, but a subsequent deal with Blue Owl Capital changed the project's structure: an entity called Beignet Investors now owns the data center and its developer, while Meta becomes a tenant. This new contractual setup, reported by the Wall Street Journal , would enable the company to terminate its lease after just four years, down from the original 15, raising concerns about its true contribution to infrastructure costs.
Earthjustice is warning about the potential consequences of an early pullout by Meta, which could leave local households and businesses to shoulder the cost of energy investments that have not been paid off. The request for an investigation, which the organization says is unprecedented nationwide, reflects growing tensions over the economic and environmental impact of energy-intensive data centers. The Richland Parish project, with capacity of more than 2 gigawatts, is to date the most ambitious ever launched by Meta.
Meta Platforms, Inc. specializes in online social networking services. Net sales break down by activity as follows:
- operation of social networking, messaging, photo and video sharing platforms (98.9%): operation of the Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Threads and WhatsApp platforms (3.58 billion daily active users in 2025);
- sale of virtual and augmented reality products, software and devices (1.1%): virtual reality headsets (Meta Quest), connected screens (Facebook Portal), wearable devices, etc.
Net sales break down by source of income into advertising spaces (98.7%) and other (1.3%).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: the United States and Canada (39.2%), Asia/Pacific (26.8%), Europe (23.2%) and other (10.8%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite), and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Capital Efficiency (Composite), Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.