Research Update:

Rumo S.A. Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable Following Same Action On Parent Cosan; 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed

February 12, 2026

‌Rating Action Overview

  • We believe Cosan S.A., Rumo S.A.'s parent company, is facing risks associated with a potential debt restructuring at its joint venture Raizen, especially in terms of market perception and confidence. We revised the outlook on Cosan to negative from stable and affirmed our 'BB' ratings.

  • We limit the ratings on Rumo at the level of those on Cosan because the parent controls Rumo with a majority on the board of directors for the past several years and an economic stake of 30.3%.

  • We revised the outlook on Rumo to negative from stable and affirmed our 'BB/B' issuer credit ratings. We also affirmed our 'BB' issue rating on the company's senior unsecured notes, and the '3' recovery rating remains unchanged.

  • The negative outlook reflects our expectation that the ratings on Cosan will continue limiting those on Rumo.

    ‌Rating Action Rationale

    The outlook revision for Rumo mirrors that on the parent. We revised the outlook on Cosan to negative from stable owing to uncertainties about Raizen's capital structure and how they could affect Cosan, especially in terms of market perception and confidence. Although Raizen is a joint venture, its proximity, track record, and historical relevance to Cosan could impair the parent's financial flexibility and market access (see "Cosan Outlook Revised To Negative On Adverse Effects Of Joint Venture's Potential Debt Restructuring; Ratings Affirmed," Feb. 12, 2026).

    We cap the ratings on Rumo at the level of those on Cosan because Cosan controls Rumo with a majority on the board of directors for the past several years and an economic stake of 30.3%.

    Primary Contacts

    Debora Bernardo

    Sao Paulo

    55-11-3818-4141

    Luisa Vilhena

    Sao Paulo

    55-11-3039-9727

    We believe the immediate impact for Cosan (and, consequently, Rumo) of a potential debt restructuring at Raizen is limited. Cosan is not a guarantor of any of Raizen's debts and recently announced the early redemption of its senior unsecured notes, which included cross-default clauses related to Raizen. The remaining debt does not have any cross-default clause, so we believe the chances of a debt acceleration at Cosan's level are remote.

    We understand that existing BNDES (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social) financing allows the bank to rediscuss the debt at all Cosan subsidiaries if a default occurs at Raízen based on the bank's economic group definition. But Cosan benefits from ample liquidity to potentially pay down BNDES debt if needed. Rumo had close to R$1.5 billion of BNDES debt as of September 2025, compared with more than R$7 billion in cash, which provides sufficient liquidity in case of cross-default risks.

    We continue to expect Rumo to deliver consistent operating performance and controlled leverage. We forecast volume growth of 6%-7% in 2026 and 2027 underpinned by ongoing expansion of the rail network and anticipated increases in agribusiness production and exports. Despite large capital expenditure (capex) of about R$6 billion, our forecast of increasing EBITDA generation, with margins closer to 50% over the next two years, indicates the company would maintain stable leverage of around 2.5x (see "Rumo S.A.," Dec. 18, 2025).

    ‌Outlook

    The negative outlook reflects our expectation that the ratings on the parent, Cosan, will continue limiting those on Rumo.

    ‌Downside scenario

    We would lower the ratings on Rumo if we lowered the ratings on Cosan.

    We could also lower the ratings and revise down Rumo's stand-alone credit profile (SACP) to 'bb-' if operating performance weakens owing to tougher competition and higher-than-projected capex. In this scenario, we would see debt to EBITDA approaching 3.5x, funds from operations (FFO) to debt close to 20%, and consistently negative free operating cash flow (FOCF).

    ‌Upside scenario

    We could revise the outlook to stable if we take the same action on Cosan. This could occur if a solution for Raizen's capital structure develops without signs of a more material impact on Cosan's expected cash outflows or market risk perception.

    We could revise up Rumo's SACP if the company achieves greater scale and broader business diversification. An improved SACP could also stem from leverage remaining consistently below our projections, with net debt to EBITDA under 2.0x, FFO to debt above 30%, and FOCF to debt exceeding 25% on a sustained basis.

    ‌Company Description

    Rumo was established in 2016 through Rumo Logistica's incorporation of America Latina Logistica, offering rail transportation services and warehousing. With approximately 13,500 kilometers of railway lines, 1,200 locomotives, and 33,000 railcars, Rumo operates in the midwestern, southern, southeastern, and northern regions of Brazil, where four of the country's

    main ports are located and through which most of the grain production is exported. Cosan controls Rumo with a 30.3% economic stake in the company and a majority presence on the board of directors.

    ‌Rating Component Scores

    Rating Component Scores

    Component

    Foreign currency issuer credit rating BB/Negative/B

    Local currency issuer credit rating BB/Negative/B

    Business risk Fair

    Country risk Moderately high risk

    Industry risk Low risk

    Competitive position Fair

    Financial risk Significant

    Cash flow/leverage Significant

    Anchor bb

    Modifiers

    Diversification/portfolio effect Neutral/Undiversified

    Capital structure Neutral

    Financial policy Neutral

    Liquidity Adequate

    Management and governance Neutral

    Comparable rating analysis Neutral

    Stand-alone credit profile bb

    ‌Related Criteria

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Sector-Specific Corporate Methodology, July 7, 2025

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities, Jan. 7, 2024

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Jan. 7, 2024

  • General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021

  • General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, April 1, 2019

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Recovery Rating Criteria For Speculative-Grade Corporate Issuers, Dec. 7, 2016

  • Criteria | Corporates | Recovery: Methodology: Jurisdiction Ranking Assessments, Jan. 20, 2016

  • Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014

  • General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013

  • General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013

  • General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011

    ‌Related Research

  • Cosan Outlook Revised To Negative On Adverse Effects Of Joint Venture's Potential Debt Restructuring; Ratings Affirmed, Feb. 12, 2026

  • Rumo S.A., Dec. 18, 2025

‌Ratings List

Ratings List

Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Action

To

From

Rumo S.A.

Issuer Credit Rating

BB/Negative/B

BB/Stable/B

Ratings Affirmed; Ratings Affirmed

To

From

Rumo Luxembourg S.a.r.l.

Senior Unsecured

BB

BB

Recovery Rating

4(40%)

4(35%)

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/ratings-criteria for further information. A description of each of S&P Global Ratings' rating categories is contained in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions" at https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/504352. Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings referenced herein can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.spglobal.com/ratings.

Copyright © 2026 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In

no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Some of the Content may have been created with the assistance of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool. Published Content created or processed using AI is composed, reviewed, edited, and approved by S&P personnel.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and https://www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors.

Additional information about our ratings fees is available at https://www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

Rumo SA published this content on February 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on February 12, 2026 at 23:08 UTC.