US Court Rejects Elon Musk's Claims Against OpenAI
A US federal jury has ruled in favor of OpenAI in the lawsuit brought by Elon Musk, finding that the company was not liable for allegations that it abandoned its original mission to serve humanity. The decision, handed down in Oakland, California, concluded that Musk had filed his legal action too late. Jurors deliberated for less than two hours before returning a unanimous verdict. Musk's attorney said that an appeal is under consideration.
In his complaint filed in 2024, Elon Musk accused OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman of inducing him to invest $38m before quietly transforming the non-profit organization into a for-profit enterprise backed by Microsoft and other investors. Musk denounced a "theft of a charitable work" and criticized the group for prioritizing profits over artificial intelligence safety. OpenAI countered that Musk was aware of the company's transformation plans prior to his departure from the board in 2018 and that he was acting out of his own financial interests.
The trial highlighted growing tensions surrounding the development of artificial intelligence and the economic stakes tied to the sector. During the hearings, each side attacked the other's credibility, with Musk's lawyers notably seeking to portray Sam Altman as an unreliable executive. OpenAI, which is preparing for a potential IPO that could value the company at a trillion dollars, currently competes with groups such as Anthropic and xAI, the latter now integrated into SpaceX.
Tesla, Inc. designs, builds, and sells electric vehicles. Net sales break down by activity as follows:
- sale of automotive vehicles (69.4%);
- sale of energy generation and storage systems (13.5%);
- services (13.2%): primarily maintenance and repair services. The group also develops sale of power train assembly components for electric vehicles activity;
- automotive credits (2.1%);
- automotive leasing (1.8%).
At the end of 2025, the group had 8 manufacturing sites located in the United States (5), China (2) and Germany.
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: the United States (50.2%), China (22.1%) and other (27.7%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.
