Who stands to gain from an expanded defense budget?
France is considering 36 billion euros in additional defense spending by 2030, an increase that marks an acceleration from the 3 billion euro annual rise in military expenditure already enacted. This new strategy reflects growing security pressures linked to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as mounting doubts regarding U.S. support for European defense. According to analysts, Thales would be at the forefront to benefit from these new budgetary allocations.
If adopted, this budget extension would bring defense spending to 2.5% of GDP by the end of the decade, up from approximately 2% currently. The annual budget would thus reach 76.3 billion euros in 2030, nearly double its 2017 level, bringing total defense expenditure to approximately 436 billion euros over the 2024-2030 period.
"Programming our defense model means making choices," Fabien Mandon, the Chief of the Defense Staff, reminded the Defense Committee this morning. The General indicated that this new funding envelope would notably allow the military to bolster its equipment, logistics, and critical capabilities, particularly at a time when American support for European defense is being questioned more than ever.
In concrete terms, "this is clearly not a modernization cycle. The budget is instead being redirected toward intensification and the strengthening of operational capacity," noted Saïma Hussain, defense analyst at AlphaValue, this morning.
Breaking down the figures, a total of some 26 billion euros over the 2024-2030 period is expected to be dedicated to the purchase of ammunition, representing an additional 8.5 billion euros.
Air defense and anti-drone systems should see their budget increase by 1.5 to 2 billion euros, while drone spending is expected to rise by 2 billion euros (reaching over 8 billion euros in total). Finally, Space and ISR (infrared satellites + ground radars) should benefit from a total budget of 10 billion euros.
AlphaValue believes that Thales is set to capitalize on this new strategy thanks to its strong presence in air defense, radars, sensors, and protection systems. This view is shared by Chloé Lemarie at Jefferies, who points out that nearly 20% of Thales's revenue is exposed to the state defense budget.
Safran should also benefit from its strong presence in modular air-to-ground weaponry (AASM), specifically guided bombs, for which volumes have more than tripled. AlphaValue highlights the additional growth potential of this technology through guidance and propulsion.
The MBDA ecosystem (via Airbus/BAE/Leonardo) is expected to profit from the general increase in missile volumes (Aster, MICA, SCALP). Airbus could also benefit from new A400M orders (a figure of six units is occasionally mentioned) and possesses growth potential related to the space sector.
In contrast, no additional Rafale orders are expected to be booked by Dassault Aviation. However, Saïma Hussain reports that this outsized budget should allow for an acceleration of the development schedule for the Rafale F5 standard.
Thales is one of the European leaders in manufacturing and marketing of electronic equipment and systems for the aerospace, defense and security sectors. Net sales break down by product group as follows:
- defense and security systems (55.3%): C4I defense and security systems (control and monitoring systems, communication, protection, cyber-security, and other systems), defense mission systems, naval systems, electronic war systems, drones, air operation systems (air defense, air surveillance), ground defense systems and missiles;
- aerospace systems (26.7%): avionics equipment (cockpit, cabin multimedia, and simulation equipment), space systems (satellites, payloads, etc.);
- digital identification and security solutions (17.4%);
- other (0.6%).
Besides, the group owns a 35% stake in Naval Group (manufacture of naval equipment for defense and nuclear energy sectors).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: France (27.7%), the United Kingdom (6.5%), Europe (28.1%), North America (12.4%), Asia (9.9%), Australia and New Zealand (4.1%) and other (11.3%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.