Summary

● From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation

● According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.


Strengths

● Its core activity has a significant growth potential and sales are expected to surge, according to Standard & Poor's' forecast. Indeed, those may increase by 103% by 2024.

● The earnings growth currently anticipated by analysts for the coming years is particularly strong.

● The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.

● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.

● Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.


Weaknesses

● As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.

● With a 2022 P/E ratio at 41.18 times the estimated earnings, the company operates at rather significant levels of earnings multiples.

● The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.

● For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.

● For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.

● Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.

● Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.