This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") contains certain financial measures, in particular the presentation of Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Book Value, which are not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inthe United States ("GAAP"). We are presenting these non-GAAP financial measures because they provide greater transparency and enhanced visibility into the underlying drivers of our business. We do not intend for these non-GAAP financial measures to be a substitute for any GAAP financial measures and they may differ from similar reporting provided by other companies. Readers of this Form 10-K should use these non-GAAP financial measures only in conjunction with the comparable GAAP financial measures. Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Book Value are non-GAAP financial measures that adjust for the impact of certain non-recurring or non-economic GAAP accounting requirements and include the addition of certain items that the Company has or expects to realize in the future, but that are not reported under GAAP. We provide reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures; Adjusted Earnings to Net income attributable to common stockholders and Adjusted Book Value toTotal Ambac Financial Group, Inc. stockholders' equity. COMPANY OVERVIEW
See Note 1. Background and Business Description for a description of the Company and our key strategies to achieve our primary goal to maximize shareholder value.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAmbac Assurance and Subsidiaries A key strategy for AFG is to increase the value of its investment inAmbac Assurance by actively managing its assets and liabilities. Asset management primarily entails maximizing the risk adjusted return on non-VIE invested assets and managing liquidity to help ensure resources are available to meet operational and strategic cash needs. These strategic cash needs include activities associated withAmbac's liability management and loss mitigation programs. Asset Management Investment portfolios are subject to internal investment guidelines, as well as limits on types and quality of investments imposed by applicable insurance laws and regulations. As part of its investment strategy, and in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines,Ambac Assurance andAmbac Assurance UK Limited ("AmbacUK "), purchase distressedAmbac -insured securities based on their relative risk/reward characteristics. The investment portfolios ofAmbac Assurance and AmbacUK also hold fixed income securities and various pooled investment funds. Refer to Note 10. Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for further details of fixed income investments by asset category and pooled investment funds by investment type. During the year endedDecember 31, 2019 ,Ambac did not acquire a significant amount of distressedAmbac -insured securities. AtDecember 31, 2019 ,Ambac owned$436 million of distressed |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 26 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Ambac -insured bonds, including$158 million ofPuerto Rico bonds and excludingAmbac's holdings of secured notes issued by Ambac LSNI (the "Secured Notes") in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions (as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Subject to applicable internal and regulatory guidelines and other constraints,Ambac may opportunistically purchase and sellAmbac -insured securities and Secured Notes in the future. In the event thatAmbac Assurance sells any of the Secured Notes it owns, it must use the proceeds of such sale to redeem a like amount of Secured Notes at par in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and related security and collateral documents. The price at whichAmbac Assurance sells the Secured Notes may differ from the price at which it redeems the Secured Notes. Liability and Insured Exposure ManagementAmbac Assurance's Risk Management Group ("RMG") focuses on the analysis, implementation and execution of risk reduction, loss mitigation and loss recovery strategies. Analysts evaluate the estimated timing and severity of projected policy claims as well as the potential impact of such strategies in order to target and prioritize policies, or portions thereof, for commutation, reinsurance, refinancing, restructuring or other risk reduction and loss mitigation outcomes. For targeted policies, analysts will engage with bondholders, issuers and other economic stakeholders to negotiate, structure and execute such strategies. During 2019, successful risk reduction transactions included: • The COFINA Plan of Adjustment ("POA"). OnFebruary 12, 2019 , the POA,
including certain related commutation transactions, and subsequent
distributions, became effective, resulting in a reduction of
Assurance's insured net par exposure to COFINA by approximately 77% or
million. Subsequent redemptions of obligations of the COFINA Class 2 Trust
(as further described in the Financial Guarantees in Force section included
in Part II, Item 7 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended
million as of
• An Irish scheme of arrangement (the "Arrangement") on
restructuring of
for the commutation of
below under Financial Guarantees in Force for further details of the
Arrangement;
• Purchasing quota share reinsurance in
profile of the insured portfolio. This included ceding certain public finance
exposures totaling
million par), general obligation (
million par) and higher education (
• Purchasing quota share reinsurance in
exposure, including
• Completing work in
asset-backed lease securitizations with net par outstanding of
December 31, 2018 ;
• A commutation in
public finance transaction with net par outstanding of
• Working with an issuer and noteholders to negotiate the removal of the
guarantee from a tranche of notes on a
with net par of
• Working closely with servicers and owners of Master Servicing Rights to
exercise their clean-up call rights on several watch list and adversely
classified RMBS transactions with total net par outstanding of
at
• The final paydown, refunding, or partial commutation of various watch list
exposures and adversely classified exposures that were subject to risk
remediation efforts with total net par outstanding at
The following table provides a comparison of total, adversely classified credits ("ACC") and watch list net par outstanding in the insured portfolio atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018. (See Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for a description of adversely classified and watch list credits.) Net par exposures within theU.S. public finance market includes capital appreciation bonds which are reported at the par amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed to the current accreted value of the bonds. ($ in billions) December 31, 2019 2018 Variance Total$ 38,018 $ 46,927 $ (8,909 ) (19 )% ACC 7,535 10,871 (3,336 ) (31 )% Watch List 6,752 9,036 (2,284 ) (25 )% The overall reduction in total net par outstanding was significantly impacted by active de-risking initiatives atAmbac Assurance and AmbacUK , including the transactions noted above, as well as scheduled maturities, amortizations, refundings and calls. The decrease inWatch List and ACC exposures is primarily due to active de-risking and paydowns or calls by issuers, mostly related toPuerto Rico , Ballantyne, international asset-backed, public finance, aircraft asset-backed and residential mortgage-backed securities. Although our insured portfolio generally performed satisfactorily in 2019, we continue to experience stress in certain insured exposures, particularly within our approximately$1,123 million of exposure toPuerto Rico , consisting of several different issuing entities (all below investment grade). Each issuing entity has its own credit risk profile attributable to, as applicable, discrete revenue sources, direct general obligation pledges and/or general obligation guarantees. During 2019,Ambac made partial paydowns of the Ambac Note (as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K) by$178 million . | Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 27 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
AFG
As ofDecember 31, 2019 net assets of AFG were$483 million . ($ in millions) Cash and short-term investments$ 327 Other investments (1) 116 Other net assets (2) 40 Total$ 483
(1) Includes surplus notes (fair value of
eliminated in consolidation.
(2) Includes accruals for tolling payments from
with the intercompany Tax Sharing Agreement of
As a result of positive taxable income atAmbac Assurance in 2017, AFG has accrued approximately$28 million in tax tolling payments. InMay 2018 , AFG executed a waiver under the intercompany Tax Sharing Agreement pursuant to whichAmbac Assurance was relieved of the requirement to make this payment byJune 1, 2018 . AFG also agreed to continue to defer the tolling payment for the use of net operating losses in 2017 byAmbac Assurance until such time as OCI (as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K) consents to the payment.Ambac Assurance accrued$16 million of tolling payments for year endedDecember 31, 2018 , which were paid to AFG in July of 2019. As a result of filing it's 2018 tax return,Ambac Assurance accrued an additional$2 million of tolling payments during the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , for 2018, which were paid to AFG inDecember 2019 . Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order,Ambac's tax positions are subject to review by the OCI, which may lead to the adoption of positions that reduce the amount of tolling payments otherwise available to AFG. Financial Statement Impacts of Foreign Currency The impact of foreign currency as reported inAmbac's Consolidated Statement of Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 included the following: ($ in millions) Net income (1) $ 12 Changes in other comprehensive income(loss): Gain (losses) on foreign currency translation
26
Unrealized gains (losses) on non-functional currency available-for-sale securities
(27 ) Total changes in other comprehensive income (loss) (1 ) Impact on total comprehensive income (loss) $
11
(1) A portion of Ambac
liabilities are denominated in currencies other than its functional currency
and accordingly, we recognized net foreign currency transaction
gains/(losses) as a result of changes to foreign currency rates through our
Consolidated Statement of Total Comprehensive Income (Loss). Refer to Note 2.
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for further details on transaction gains and losses. Future changes to currency rates, including as a result of a no deal Brexit, may adversely affect our financial results. Refer to Part II, Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" for further information on the impact of future currency rate changes onAmbac's financial instruments. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATESAmbac's Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. This section highlights accounting estimates management views as critical because they are most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition; and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments regarding matters that are inherently uncertain and subject to change. These estimates are evaluated on an on-going basis based on historical developments, market conditions, industry trends and other information that is reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform to estimates and that reported results of operations will not be materially adversely affected by the need to make future accounting adjustments to reflect changes in these estimates from time to time. Management has identified the following critical accounting policies and estimates: (i) valuation of loss and loss expense reserves, (ii) valuation of certain financial instruments and (iii) valuation of deferred tax assets. Management has discussed each of these critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee, including the reasons why they are considered critical and how current and anticipated future events impact those determinations. Additional information about these policies can be found in Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K. Valuation of Losses and Loss Expense Reserves (including Subrogation Recoverables) The loss and loss expense reserves and subrogation recoverable assets (collectively defined as "loss reserves") discussed in this section relate only toAmbac's non-derivative insurance policies issued to beneficiaries, including unconsolidated VIEs. A loss reserve is recorded on the balance sheet on a policy-by-policy basis based upon the present value ("PV") of expected net claim cash outflows or expected net recovery cash inflows, discounted at risk-free rates. The estimate for future net cash flows consider the likelihood of all possible outcomes that may occur from missed principal and/or interest payments on the insured obligation. This estimate also considers future recoveries related to breaches of contractual representations and warranties by RMBS transaction sponsors, remediation strategies, excess spread and other contractual cash flows on public finance and structured finance transactions (including RMBS).Ambac's approach to resolving disputes involving contractual breaches by transaction sponsors or other third parties has included negotiations and/or pursuing litigation.Ambac does not estimate recoveries for litigations where its sole claim is for fraudulent inducement, since any remedies under such claims would be non-contractual. The evaluation process for expected future net cash flows is subject to certain estimates and judgments regarding the probability of default by the issuer of the insured security, probability of remediation and settlement outcomes (which may include |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 28 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
commutation, litigation settlements, refinancings and/or other settlement outcomes), probability of a restructuring outcome (which may include payment moratoriums, debt haircuts and/or subsequent recoveries) and the expected loss severity of credits for each insurance contract. As the probability of default for an individual credit increases and/or the severity of loss given a default increases, our loss reserve for that insured obligation will also increase. Political, economic, credit or other unforeseen events could have an adverse impact on default probabilities and loss severities. The loss reserves for many transactions are derived from the issuer's creditworthiness. For public finance issuers, loss reserves will consider not only creditworthiness but also political dynamics and economic status and prospects. The loss reserves for transactions which have no direct issuer support, such as most structured finance exposures, including RMBS and student loan exposures, are derived from the default activity and loss given default of underlying collateral supporting the transactions. In addition, many transactions have a combination of issuer/entity and collateral support. Loss reserves reflect our assessment of the transaction's overall structure, support and expected performance. Loss reserve volatility will be a direct result of the credit performance of our insured portfolio, including the number, size, bond types and quality of credits included in our loss reserves; our ability to execute workout strategies and commutations; economic and market conditions; and management's judgments with regards to the current performance and future developments within the insured portfolio. The number and severity of credits included in our loss reserves depend to a large extent on transaction specific attributes, but will generally increase during periods of economic stress and decline during periods of economic prosperity. Reinsurance contracts mitigate our loss reserves but sinceAmbac currently has minimal exposure ceded to reinsurers on credits with loss reserves, the existing reinsurance contracts are unlikely to have a significant effect on loss reserve volatility. Loss reserve volatility will also be materially impacted by changes in interest rates from period to period.
The table below indicates the gross par outstanding and gross loss reserves
(including loss expenses) related to policies in
2019 2018 Gross Loss and Loss Gross Loss and Loss Gross Par Expense Gross Par Expense ($ in millions) December 31 Outstanding(1)(2) Reserves(1)(3)(4) Outstanding(1)(2) Reserves(1)(3)(4) RMBS $ 3,027 $ (1,392 ) $ 3,716 $ (1,313 ) Domestic Public Finance 2,398 627 3,987 639 Student Loans 472 208 530 228 Ambac UK and Other Credits 271 3 1,170 273 Loss expenses - 73 - 66 Totals $ 6,168 $ (482 ) $ 9,403 $ (107 )
(1) Ceded par outstanding on policies with loss reserves and ceded loss and loss
expense reserves are
and
reserves are included in Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses.
(2) Gross Par Outstanding includes capital appreciation bonds, which are reported
at the par amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed
to the current accreted value of the bond.
(3) Loss and Loss Expense reserves at
the balance sheet in the following line items: Loss and loss expense
reserves:
reserves at
the following line items: Loss and loss expense reserves:
Subrogation recoverable:
(4)
recoveries related to securitized loans in RMBS transactions that breached
certain representations and warranties.
recoveries of
See Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for a description of the cash flow and statistical methodologies used to develop loss reserves. Most of our reserved credits with large loss reserves utilize the cash flow method of reserving. Alternative cash flow scenarios are developed to represent the range of possible outcomes and resultant future claim payments and timing. Scenarios and probabilities of each are adjusted regularly to reflect changes in status, outlook and our analysis and views. Significant judgment is used to develop the cash flow assumptions and related probabilities, and there can be no certainty that the scenarios or probabilities will not deviate materially from ultimate outcomes. In some cases, such as RMBS and student loans, cash flow projections include the modeling of an issuer or transaction's future revenues and expenses to determine the resources available to pay debt service on our insured obligations. With respect to RMBS, a component of our loss reserve estimate includes subrogation recoveries related to securitized loans in such transactions that breached certain representations and warranties ("R&W"). In other cases, such as many public finance exposures including ourPuerto Rico exposures, we consider the issuers' overall ability and willingness to pay, as it relates to the existing fiscal, economic, legal, restructuring and/or political framework relevant to a particular exposure or group of exposures. We then develop multiple scenarios where issuer debt service is paid, missed and/or haircut with claims paid then modeled for any recovery amount and timing. There is no certainty our assumptions as to scenarios or probabilities will not be subject to material changes as developments occur. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 29 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
In estimating loss reserves, we also incorporate scenarios which represent the potential outcome of remediation strategies. Remediation scenarios may include (i) a potential refinancing of the transaction by the issuer; (ii) the issuer's ability to redeem outstanding securities at a discount, thereby increasing the structure's ability to absorb future losses; and (iii) our ability to terminate, restructure or commute the policy in whole or in part. The remediation scenarios and the related probabilities of occurrence vary by policy depending on ongoing and expected discussions and negotiations with issuers and/or investors. In addition to commutation negotiations that are underway with various counterparties in various forms, our reserve estimates may also include scenarios which incorporate our ability and/or expectation to commute additional exposure with other counterparties. Valuation of Certain Financial Instruments The Fair Value Measurement Topic of the ASC requires financial instruments to be classified within a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy, the financial instruments classified within each level, our valuation methods, inputs, assumptions and the review and validation procedures over quoted and modeled pricing are further detailed in Note 9. Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K. The level of judgment in estimating fair value is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to fair value a financial instrument, which is also determinative of where the financial instrument is classified in the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 instruments are valued using models which use one or more significant inputs or value drivers that are unobservable and therefore require significant judgment. Level 3 financial instruments which are material include certain invested assets, uncollateralized interest rate swaps and investments and loan receivables of consolidated VIEs. Model-derived valuations of Level 3 financial instruments incorporate estimates of the effects ofAmbac's own credit risk and/or counterparty credit risk, which can be complex and judgmental. Furthermore, Level 3 loan receivables of consolidated VIEs incorporate estimates ofAmbac's financial guarantee cash flows, including future premiums and losses. Such cash flow estimates require judgments regarding prepayments of VIE debt, loss probabilities and loss severities, all of which are inherently uncertain. All models and related assumptions are continuously re-evaluated by management and enhanced, as appropriate, based on improvements in information and modeling techniques. The re-evaluation process includes a quarterly meeting of senior Finance and Risk personnel to review and approve changes to models and key assumptions. As a result of the significant judgment for the above-described instruments, the actual trade value of the financial instrument in the market, or exit value of the financial instrument owned byAmbac , may be significantly different from its recorded fair value. Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets Our provision for taxes is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions. We review our tax positions quarterly and adjust the balances as new information becomes available. Deferred tax assets arise because of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as well as from net operating loss ("NOL") and tax credit carry forwards. More specifically, deferred tax assets represent a future tax benefit (or receivable) that results from losses recorded under GAAP in a current period which are only deductible for tax purposes in future periods and NOL carry forwards. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that "more likely than not" will be realized. On a quarterly basis, management identifies and considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, in making the determination with significant weight given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Negative evidence includes the potential for unrecognized future insurance tax losses; cumulative pre-tax losses in recent years; uncertainty regarding timing and magnitude of RMBS R&W litigation recoveries; no new financial guarantee business and execution risk of any new business venture. The level of deferred tax asset recognition is influenced by management's assessment of future expected taxable income, which depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry forward periods available under the tax law. As a result of the above-described risks and uncertainties associated with future operating results, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not generate sufficient taxable income to recover theU.S. deferred tax asset and therefore has a full valuation allowance. To the extent such risks and uncertainties are resolved,Ambac may have the ability to establish a history of making reliable estimates of future income which could ultimately result in a reduction to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. See Note 14. Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for additional information on the Company's deferred income taxes. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES IN FORCE The following table provides a breakdown of guaranteed net par outstanding by market sector atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018. Net par exposures within theU.S. public finance market include capital appreciation bonds which are reported at the par amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed to the current accreted value of the bonds. Guaranteed net par outstanding includes the exposures of policies that insure variable interest entities ("VIEs") consolidated byAmbac in accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the ASC, Consolidation. Guaranteed net par outstanding excludes the exposures of policies that insure bonds which have been refunded or pre-refunded and excludes exposure of the policy that insures the notes issued by Ambac LSNI as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K. ($ in millions) December 31, 2019 2018 Public Finance (1)(2)$ 17,653 $ 23,442 Structured Finance 7,508 9,947 International Finance 12,857 13,538 Total net par outstanding$ 38,018 $ 46,927
|Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 30 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
(1) Includes
(2) Includes
2019 and 2018, respectively. Components of Puerto
Rico net par outstanding include capital appreciation bonds which are reported at the par amount at the time of issuance of the related insurance policy as opposed to the current accreted value of the bonds. The table below showsAmbac's ten largest exposures, by repayment source, as a percentage of total financial guarantee net par outstanding atDecember 31, 2019 (in millions): % of Total Ambac Net Par Net Par ($ in millions) Risk Name Bond Type Ratings (1) Outstanding (2) Outstanding IF AUK Mitchells & Butlers Finance plc-UK UK-Asset A+ $ 1,017 2.7 % Pub Securitisation Securitizations IF AUK Capital Hospitals plc (3) UK-Infrastructure A- 896 2.4 % IF AUK Aspire Defence Finance plc UK-Infrastructure BBB+ 865 2.3 % IF AUK Anglian Water UK-Utility A- 819 2.2 % PF AAC New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Lease and Tax-backed A- 778 2.0 % Authority - Transportation System Revenue IF AUK National Grid Gas UK-Utility A- 757 2.0 % IF AUK Posillipo Finance II S.r.l Italy-Sub-Sovereign BIG 710 1.9 %
IF AUK Ostregion Investmentgesellschaft NR Austria-Infrastructure BIG
674 1.8 % 1 SA (3) IF AUK RMPA Services plc UK-Infrastructure BBB+ 575 1.5 % PF AAC Mets Queens Baseball Stadium General Obligation BBB 549 1.4 % Project, NY, Lease Revenue Total $ 7,640 20.1 %
PF = Public Finance, SF = Structured Finance, IF = International Finance
AAC =
(1) Internal credit ratings are provided solely to indicate the underlying credit
quality of guaranteed obligations based on the view of
ratings, or more than one obligation of an issuer with varying internal
ratings, a weighted average rating is used.
to revision at any time and do not constitute investment advice. BIG denotes
credits deemed below investment grade.
(2)
amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed to the
current accreted value of the bonds.
(3) A portion of this transaction is insured by an insurance policy issued by
that will only pay in the event that AmbacUK does not pay under its insurance policies ("second to pay policies"). Net par related to the top ten exposures reduced$862 million fromDecember 31, 2018 . Exposures are impacted by changes in foreign exchange rates, certain indexation rates and scheduled and unscheduled paydowns. The decrease from 2018 was primarily related to the Ballantyne commutation, the COFINA Plan of Adjustment, and refundings, partially offset by the addition ofRMPA Services plc andMets Queens Baseball Stadium Project . The concentration of net par amongst the top ten (as a percentage of net par outstanding) has increased to 20% from 18% atDecember 31, 2018 . The remaining insured portfolio of financial guarantees has an average net par outstanding of$32 million per single risk, with insured exposures ranging up to$536 million and a median net par outstanding of$6 million . Given thatAmbac has not written any new insurance policies since 2008, the risk exists that the insured portfolio becomes increasingly concentrated to large and/or below investment grade exposures.U.S. Public Finance Insured PortfolioAmbac's portfolio ofU.S. public finance exposures is$17,653 million , representing 46% ofAmbac's net par outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2019 and a 25% reduction from the amount outstanding atDecember 31, 2018 . This reduction in exposure was due to additional reinsurance acquired, the COFINA Plan of Adjustment, restructuring and related commutation transactions, commutations, exposure runoff, and early terminations (calls, refundings and pre-refundings). WhileAmbac's U.S. public finance portfolio consists predominantly of municipal bonds such as general obligation, revenue, and lease and tax-backed obligations of state and local government entities, the portfolio also comprises a wide array of non-municipal types of bonds, including financings for not-for-profit entities and transactions with public and private elements, which generally finance infrastructure, housing and other public interests. See Note 6. Financial Guarantees in Force to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for exposures by bond type. Municipal bonds are generally supported directly or indirectly by the issuer's taxing authority or by public sector fees and assessments which may or may not be specifically pledged. Risk factors in these transactions derive from the municipal issuer, including its fiscal management, politics, and economic position, as well as its ability and willingness to continue to pay its debt |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 31 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
service. Municipal bankruptcies and similar proceedings, while still relatively uncommon, have occurred, exposingAmbac to the risk of liquidity claims and ultimate losses if issuers cannot successfully adjust their liabilities without impairing creditors. Not-for-profit transactions are generally supported by the not-for-profit entities' net revenues and may also include specific pledges, liens and/or mortgages. The entity typically serves a well-defined market and promulgates a public purpose mission. These transactions may affordAmbac contractual protections such as financial covenants and control rights in the event of issuer breaches and defaults. Risk factors in these transactions derive from the creditworthiness of the issuer, including but not limited to, its financial condition, leverage, management, business mix, competitive position, industry and socioeconomic trends, government programs and other factors. Examples of these types of transactions include not-for-profit hospitals, universities, associations and charities. Public/private transactions are generally structured to achieve their targeted public interest objective without direct support from the public sector. Some examples of this type of financing include affordable housing, private education, privatized military housing and student housing. Protections within these financings provided toAmbac usually include the strength of the financed asset's essentiality and public purpose and may include financial covenants, collateral and control rights. Risk factors include financial underperformance, event risk and a shift in the asset's mission or essentiality. One example of this type of financing isU.S. military housing. •Ambac insures approximately$5,654 million net par of privatized military
housing debt. The debt was issued to finance the construction and/or
renovation of housing units for military personnel and their families on
domestic
by the
generated in most cases by rental payments deposited by the military directly
into lockbox accounts as part of each service personnel's Basic Allowance for
Housing (BAH). In a small number of cases rental payments also come from
civilians, including retired service personnel, living on a particular base.
Collateral for these transactions includes the BAH payments as well as an
interest in the ground lease. Risk factors affecting these transactions
include ongoing base essentiality, military deployments, the
government's commitment to fund the BAH, marketability/attractiveness of the
on-base housing units versus off-base housing, construction completion,
environmental remediation, utility and other operating costs and housing
management.
concentration given the long-dated maturity profile of the exposure relative
to faster run-off of other parts of
31, 2019, privatized military housing represented approximately 15% of net
par outstanding.Puerto Rico Ambac has exposure to theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico (the "Commonwealth") and its instrumentalities across several different issuing entities with total net par exposure of$1,123 million as ofDecember 31, 2019 . Each has its own credit risk profile attributable to, as applicable, discrete revenue sources, direct general obligation pledges and/or general obligation guarantees. Fiscal Plans OnMay 9, 2019 , the Oversight Board certified its own version of a new Commonwealth Fiscal Plan ("Revised Fiscal Plan"), which superseded the previous Commonwealth Fiscal Plan certified onOctober 23, 2018 . In the Commonwealth Revised Fiscal Plan, the annual Commonwealth budget surpluses are lower in the short term but larger in the long term because of a longer than previously expected roll-out of federal disaster spending. The new surplus through fiscal 2024 is just under$14 billion , whereas the previous plan was almost$18 billion . The plan projects a 30-year surplus of$19.7 billion , but$5.4 billion of that money may not be available to the Commonwealth because it is being generated by public corporations. This compares to a 30-year surplus of just under$13 billion under the previous fiscal plan. As was the case with prior fiscal plans for theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico , the Commonwealth Revised Fiscal Plan lacks a high degree of transparency regarding the underlying data, assumptions and rationales supporting those assumptions, making reconciliation and due diligence difficult. As a result, it is difficult to assess the possible impact that Commonwealth Revised Fiscal Plan changes may have on creditor outcomes orAmbac's financial condition, including liquidity, loss reserves and capital resources. OnJune 7, 2019 , the Oversight Board certified its own version of the Fiscal Plan for thePuerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority ("PRHTA"). Without considering PRHTA Fiscal Plan measures, the PRHTA's total financial surplus over the six-year plan period is projected to be$31 million . However, after taking into account the measures set forth in the PRHTA Fiscal Plan, the Oversight Board states that the cumulative surplus over that six-year period would grow to$493 million . It is unknown if and when a PRHTA Plan of Adjustment will be filed by the Oversight Board or confirmed by the court overseeing the Title III proceedings of PRHTA. It is also unknown if and when otherPuerto Rico instrumentalities, which have debt outstanding insured byAmbac Assurance , will be filed under Title III and what effect their fiscal plans and/or plans of adjustment may have onAmbac's financial position. No assurances can be given thatAmbac's financial condition will not suffer a materially negative impact as an ultimate result of the Commonwealth Revised Fiscal Plan, the Commonwealth Plan of Adjustment, or any future changes or revisions to Commonwealth fiscal plans or fiscal plans and/or plans of adjustment for PRHTA or otherPuerto Rico instrumentalities. Commonwealth Plan of Adjustment OnSeptember 27, 2019 , the Oversight Board filed a disclosure statement and plan of adjustment (the "Initial POA") to restructure$35 billion of debt and other claims against theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico , PBA, and the Employee Retirement System ("ERS"), as well as more than$50 billion of pension liabilities. (On the same day, PBA filed a petition for a Title III restructuring.) OnOctober 21, 2019 ,Puerto Rico's House of Representatives unanimously passed Concurrent Resolution 114 (which was subsequently passed by thePuerto Rico Senate onNovember 7 , |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 32 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
2019) which rejected the Initial POA due to its proposed 8.5% cut to the pensions of retired public workers. The resolution states that thePuerto Rico legislature will not approve any legislation that may be required to implement the Initial POA and authorizes the Speaker of the House and theSenate President to take the actions they deem pertinent, as well as the use of the resources of theLegislative Assembly , to defend against those actions of the Oversight Board that are detrimental to the best interests of Puerto Ricans. OnFebruary 28, 2020 , the Oversight Board filed an amended disclosure statement and amended plan of adjustment (the "Amended POA") to restructure$35 billion of debt and other claims against theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico , PBA, and ERS, as well as more than$50 billion in pension liabilities. The Amended POA would reduce Commonwealth debt and other claims from$35 billion to less than$11 billion , a 70% cut. The Amended POA would reduce the Commonwealth's annual debt service by 56%. Treatment for pension claims is the same as contained in the Initial POA, which is a reduction in pension payments by as much as 8.5% for retirees who currently receive at least$1,200 a month, such that 60% of retirees would not face any cuts, and the establishment of a pension reserve fund to help support retirement payments in future years. The Amended POA, as is, disproportionately disadvantages claims related to the Commonwealth revenue bonds, including those insured byAmbac Assurance . The Amended POA provides for estimated recovery of 3.9% on claims against the Commonwealth related to PRHTA bonds,Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority (PRIFA) Special Tax Revenue (Rum Tax) bonds, andPuerto Rico Convention Center District Authority (PRCCDA) bonds. It is unknown if and how the Amended POA may be modified or what the final adjustments will be to the obligations of Commonwealth instrumentalities addressed in the Amended POA. However, if the Amended POA were confirmed in its current form,Ambac's financial condition would suffer a material negative impact. Refer to Note 7. Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, in this Form 10-K located in Part II. Item 8 for the possible increase in loss reserves under stress or other adverse conditions, including the impact of the Amended POA. There can be no assurance that losses may not exceed such estimates. Mediation OnNovember 27, 2019 , the court-appointed mediation team (the "Mediation Team") filed an interim report and set of recommendations regarding the scheduling and sequencing of litigation matters. In the report, the Mediation Team provided an update on the status of mediation stating the Oversight Board, "...the Government ofPuerto Rico , and various creditor parties...have been and remain engaged in substantive, and delicately poised, negotiations facilitated by the Mediation Team regarding the terms of a possible amended Plan of Adjustment that would be acceptable to those creditors. If successful, these negotiations could result in the filing of an amended Plan of Adjustment that differs from, and has materially more creditor support than, the current Plan [of Adjustment]." OnFebruary 9, 2020 , the Oversight Board announced it reached an agreement in principle ("Plan Support Agreement") with certain creditors supporting the restructuring of the Commonwealth's General Obligation and PBA debt, and intended to file the Amended POA reflecting the terms of this agreement. OnFebruary 10, 2020 , following the Oversight Board's announcement regarding the Plan Support Agreement, the Mediation Team filed a report with the Title III court recommending a schedule for continuation of certain litigation matters and recommending that other litigation matters be stayed while the Oversight Board pursued confirmation of the Amended POA. The court has not yet ruled on these recommendations. The status, timing and subject of any subsequent or future mediation discussion has not yet been publicly disclosed. No assurances can be given that negotiations will be successfully concluded, that Commonwealth, Oversight Board and creditor parties will reach definitive agreements on debt restructurings, that any additional negotiated transaction, debt restructuring, definitive agreement or Plan of Adjustment will be approved by the court and completed, or that any transaction or Plan of Adjustment will not have an adverse impact onAmbac's financial conditions or results. Federal Aid TheCommonwealth of Puerto Rico is projected to benefit from over$45 billion of federal disaster aid for infrastructure improvement initiatives or recovery efforts, as a result of the damage cause by hurricanes Irma and Maria as well as the earthquakes that began in lateDecember 2019 . More than$20 billion of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) was appropriated byCongress forPuerto Rico for reconstruction following Hurricane Maria, but to date very little has been drawn down.The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which administers the CDBG program, recently approved release of a second tranche of CDBG funds totaling$8.2 billion , which brings the total amount available for drawdown to nearly$10 billion (an additional roughly$10 billion has not yet been approved by HUD for release). In order to ensure federal taxpayer dollars are spent effectively and efficiently, HUD has conditioned release of the$8.2 billion on various requirements thatPuerto Rico must meet. GovernorWanda Vasquez has agreed to these requirements, which includes a prohibition on any of the funds from being used to rebuild the electric grid until (and unless) HUD publishes additional requirements on such spending; overturns an executive order establishing a$15 minimum wage for government construction projects using CDBG; requires greaterPuerto Rico to provide greater transparency and implement enhanced financial controls; and requires CDFBG spending plans to be submitted to theOversight Board for determination that they are in accordance with its certified budgets and fiscal plans. Consequently, it is anticipated that drawdown of funds will begin soon. HUD has also appointed a federal monitor to oversee use of CDBG funds. In addition to CDBG and several billion in additional federal Medicaid money forPuerto Rico that was recently approved,Puerto Rico is receiving additional federal assistance in the wake of the earthquakes that have occurred on parts of the island throughFEMA . In addition, it is possible thatCongress will appropriate more federal funds toPuerto Rico . TheHouse of Representatives has passed legislation providing$4.7 billion (most of which is CDBG as well as highway funds) but theSenate has not taken that |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 33 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
legislation up yet, and theWhite House has threatened to veto the legislation in its current form. While these federal funds are expected to support economic recovery and growth inPuerto Rico , there can be no assurances as to the certainty, timing, usage, efficacy or magnitude of benefits to creditor outcomes related to disaster aid and ensuing economic growth, if any. COFINA Debt Restructuring OnJanuary 16-17, 2019 , hearings for the confirmation of the COFINA Plan of Adjustment (the "COFINA POA") and the Commonwealth 9019 motion (to approve the settlement of the Commonwealth-COFINA dispute) were held. OnFebruary 4, 2019 , the COFINA POA was confirmed and the Commonwealth 9019 motion was approved by JudgeLaura Taylor Swain of theU.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico . OnFebruary 12, 2019 , the COFINA POA went effective, concurrent with the completion of the commutation described above in the "Executive Summary" section of this Management Discussion and Analysis. As a result,Ambac Assurance's insured COFINA bond exposure decreased by$620 million net par to approximately$185 million net par. Subsequent redemptions of obligations of the COFINA Class 2 Trust brought COFINA net par outstanding down to$101 million as ofDecember 31, 2019 .Ambac Assurance's remaining policy obligation of$101 million net par is an asset of the COFINA Class 2 Trust, which holds a ratable distribution of cash and new COFINA bonds, which can be used to partially offsetAmbac's remaining insurance liability. Several parties are presently appealing the confirmation of the POA and no assurances can be given regarding the results of such appeals. At this time, it is unclear what impact the COFINA restructuring will have on the prospective recoveries ofAmbac Assurance's other insuredPuerto Rico instrumentalities. Other Developments OnFebruary 15, 2019 , theUnited States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in the consolidated appeals brought by certain parties who argued that the members of the Financial Oversight andManagement Board for Puerto Rico (the "Oversight Board") were appointed in violation of theU.S. Constitution's Appointments Clause. The First Circuit ruled that the Oversight Board members (other than the ex-officio Member) must be, and were not, appointed in compliance with the Appointments Clause. The First Circuit declined to dismiss the Oversight Board's Title III petitions, did not render ineffective any otherwise valid actions of the Oversight Board prior to the issuance of the ruling and stayed its ruling until theSupreme Court rendered a decision in the case. OnJune 18, 2019 ,President Trump sent to theU.S. Senate for confirmation the nominations of the seven members of theOversight Board for the remainder of their term. It is unclear if and whenPresident Trump will send new nominations to theU.S. Senate following the Oversight Board term expiration onAugust 30, 2019 . TheSupreme Court heard argument onOctober 15, 2019 . It is unclear how theSupreme Court will rule and how the ruling will impact the restructuring process, mediation discussions and relevant litigation with respect toAmbac -insuredPuerto Rico exposures. Ambac Title III Litigation UpdateAmbac Assurance is party to a number of litigations related to itsPuerto Rico exposures, and actively participates in the Commonwealth's Title III proceedings before theUnited States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico . The Oversight Board has filed five adversary proceedings related toAmbac Assurance's Puerto Rico exposures within the Title III cases.Ambac Assurance has several active matters before the District Court within the Commonwealth's Title III case, including motions seeking a determination that the automatic stay does not apply to certain actionsAmbac Assurance contemplates taking with respect to the pledged revenues from PRIFA, PRHTA, and PRCCDA, or that any such stay should be lifted for cause. Four litigations are COFINA-related cases that have been, or will soon be, dismissed by operation of the COFINA POA that was confirmed onFebruary 4, 2019 , and became effective onFebruary 12, 2019 . Several parties are presently appealing the confirmation of the COFINA POA. A fifth is another COFINA-related case that had been stayed pending resolution of an interpleader action related to COFINA funds, but which will be permitted to proceed by operation of the POA now that the interpleader action has been resolved. A number of otherPuerto Rico -related litigations predating the Title III cases are stayed under Title III of PROMESA and certain other matters within the Title III cases are stayed as well.Ambac is unable to predict when and how the issues raised in these cases (other than those already dismissed by operation of the COFINA POA) will be resolved. IfAmbac Assurance is unsuccessful in any of these proceedings,Ambac's financial condition, including liquidity, loss reserves and capital resources may suffer a material negative impact. Refer to Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K, for further information aboutAmbac's litigation relating toPuerto Rico . SummaryAmbac has considered these developments and other factors in evaluating itsPuerto Rico loss reserves. During the year endedDecember 31, 2019 ,Ambac had incurred losses associated with its Domestic Public Finance insured portfolio of$250 million , which was significantly impacted by the continued uncertainty and volatility of the situation inPuerto Rico . While management believes its reserves are adequate to cover losses in its Public Finance insured portfolio, there can be no assurance thatAmbac may not incur additional losses in the future, particularly given the developing economic, political, and legal circumstances inPuerto Rico . Such additional losses may have a material adverse effect onAmbac's results of operations and financial condition. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 34 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table showsAmbac's insured exposure to each issuer segregated by whether such debt obligation is subject to the Priority Debt Provision or "clawback."Ambac has initiated litigation challenging the application of the "clawback" announced byGovernor Padilla ,Puerto Rico's former governor, onDecember 1, 2015 . A description ofAmbac's legal challenge is provided in Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies in the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K. Net Par Ever-to-Date Range of Ambac Net Par and Interest Net Claims ($ in millions) Maturity Ratings (1) Outstanding (2) Outstanding (3)(8) Paid(4) Exposures Subject to Priority Debt Provision (5) PR Highways and Transportation Authority (1968 Resolution - Highway Revenue) (6) 2021-2027 BIG $ 4 $ 10 $ 23 PR Highways and Transportation Authority (1998 Resolution - Senior Lien Transportation Revenue) (6) 2020-2042 BIG 405 677 106 PR Infrastructure Financing Authority (Special Tax Revenue) (7) 2020-2044 BIG 404 903 172PR Convention Center District Authority (Hotel Occupancy Tax) 2020-2031 BIG 100 146 49 Total 913 1,736 350 Exposures Not Subject to Priority Debt ProvisionCommonwealth of Puerto Rico - General Obligation Bonds 2020-2023 BIG 25 27 41 PR Public Buildings Authority - Guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 2020-2035 BIG 84 150 79 PR Sales Tax Financing Corporation - Senior Sales Tax Revenue (COFINA) 2047-2054 BIG 101 900 37 Total 210 1,077 157 Total Net Exposure to The Commonwealth ofPuerto Rico and Related Entities $ 1,123 $ 2,813 $ 507
(1) Internal credit ratings are provided solely to indicate the underlying credit
quality of guaranteed obligations based on the view of
ratings, or more than one obligation of an issuer with varying internal
ratings, a weighted average rating is used.
to revision at any time and do not constitute investment advice. BIG denotes
credits deemed below investment grade.
(2)
amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed to the
current accreted value of the bonds. Accretion of the capital appreciation
bonds would increase the related net par by
(3)
debt service remaining over the lifetime of the bonds. P&I for capital appreciation bonds does not represent the accreted amount as noted in footnote (2) but rather the amount due at respective maturity dates.
(4) In addition to ever-to-date net claims paid,
(5) Commonly known as "clawback," provision pursuant to Section 8 of Article VI
of the
in the event Commonwealth available revenues and any surplus for any fiscal
year are insufficient to meet the appropriations made for that year, interest
on the public debt and amortization thereof shall first be paid and other
disbursements, including debt service on the obligations subject to such
provision as described above (to the extent payable from such revenues),
shall thereafter be made in accordance with the order of priorities
established by law. These exposures are also subject to Act No. 5-2017, as
amended, also known as the Financial Emergency and Fiscal Responsibility Act
of 2017, which declares an emergency period that has been subsequently
re-extended until
Pursuant to Act 5-2017, all executive orders issued under Act No. 21-2016 (as
amended, known as the
Rehabilitation Act), shall continue in full force and effect until amended,
rescinded or superseded.
(6) Certain Pledged Revenues for Highways and Transportation Revenue Bonds such
as Toll Revenues and Investment Earnings are not subject to the Priority Debt
Provision.
(7) Payable from and secured by proceeds from a federal excise tax imposed on all
items produced in
Currently, rum is the only product from
excise tax.
(8)
interest rate on
with a maturity date of
remarketing. Should a remarketing not occur before the maturity of the bonds,
the Net Par
and Interest Outstanding for PBA exposure would increase by
U.S. Structured Finance PortfolioAmbac's portfolio ofU.S. structured finance exposures is$7,508 million , representing 20% ofAmbac's net par outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2019 , and a 25% reduction from the amount outstanding atDecember 31, 2018 . This reduction in exposure was primarily related to residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") policies, which continued to prepay; claims presented on insured RMBS bonds; commutations and clean-up calls of certain RMBS transactions, with less than 10% of their original mortgage pool balances remaining and the commutation of$900 million of AmbacUK's exposure toBallantyne Re Plc , as discussed further below. Current insured exposures include securitizations of mortgage loans, home equity loans, student loans, leases, operating assets, collateralized loan obligations ("CLO"), and other asset-backed financings, in each case where the majority of the underlying collateral risk is situated inthe United States . Additionally,Ambac's structured finance insured portfolio includes secured and |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 35 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
unsecured debt issued by investor-owned utilities. It also includes structured insurance transactions, including transactions providing insurance on the notes of trusts that were established in connection with the reinsurance of defined blocks of life insurance and that were used to fund regulatory reserves associated with level premium term life insurance policies (commonly referred to as Regulation XXX reserves). See Note 6. Financial Guarantees in Force to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 included in this Form 10-K, for exposures by bond type as ofDecember 31, 2019 . Structured finance securitization exposures generally entail three forms of risk: (i) asset risk, which relates to the amount and quality of the underlying assets; (ii) structural risk, which relates to the extent to which the transaction's legal structure and credit support provide protection from loss; and (iii) servicer risk, which is the risk that poor performance at the servicer or manager level contributes to a decline in cash flow available to the transaction.Ambac Assurance seeks to mitigate and manage these risks through its risk management practices. Securitized securities are usually designed to help protect the investors and, therefore, the guarantor from the bankruptcy or insolvency of the entity that originated the underlying assets as well as from the bankruptcy or insolvency of the servicer of those assets. The servicer of the assets is typically responsible for collecting cash payments on the underlying assets and forwarding such payments, net of servicing fees, to a trustee for the benefit of the issuer. One potential issue is whether the sale of the assets by the originator to the issuer would be upheld in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the originator and whether the servicer of the assets may be permitted or stayed from remitting to investors cash collections held by it or received by it after the servicer or the originator becomes subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. Another potential issue is whether the originator sold ineligible assets to the securitization transaction that subsequently deteriorated, and, if so, whether the originator has the willingness or financial wherewithal to meet its contractual obligations to repurchase those assets out of the transaction. Structural protection in a transaction, such as control rights that are typically held by the senior note holders, or guarantor in insured transactions, will determine the extent to which underlying asset performance can be influenced upon non-performance to improve the revenues available to cover debt service.Ambac has exposure to theU.S. mortgage market primarily through direct financial guarantees of RMBS, including transactions that contain risks to first and second lien mortgages.Ambac's total net par exposure to RMBS atDecember 31, 2019 , was approximately$4,423 million ($2,572 million ,$1,720 million ,$130 million are first lien, second lien and other respectively), a decrease of 20% during 2019. AtDecember 31, 2019 , 87% of RMBS net par exposure relates to securitizations issued during 2005 through 2007.Ballantyne Re Plc Following entry into a lock-up agreement withBallantyne Re plc ("Ballantyne"),Assured Guaranty Europe plc andAssured Guaranty Corp. , certainBallantyne Class A Noteholders,Security Life of Denver Insurance Company ("SLD") andSwiss Re Life and Health America Inc. ("SRLHA") Ballantyne commenced, under Irish law, a restructuring transaction ("Restructuring") in respect of its obligations under its Class A-1 Notes, Class A-2a Notes, Class A-2b Notes, Class A-3a Notes, Class A-3b Notes, Class A-3c Notes and Class A-3d Notes (together, the "Scheme Notes") (the "Restructuring"). The Class A-2a Notes, the Class A-3a Notes, the Class A-3b Notes, the Class A-3c Notes and the Class A-3d Notes had a guarantee from AmbacUK (the "AmbacUK Guaranteed Notes"). The Restructuring was commenced by Ballantyne onApril 25, 2019 and was implemented through an Irish scheme of arrangement (the "Arrangement") under Part 9 of the Irish Companies Act 2014 which required the consent of the requisite majorities of the relevant Class A Noteholders at each Arrangement meeting. The Arrangement was approved onJune 17, 2019 , and the Restructuring was implemented on the terms proposed. The key features of the Restructuring were as follows: • the novation of the indemnity reinsurance agreement between Ballantyne and
SLD dated
• the disbursement of the assets from Ballantyne's reinsurance trust account to
effectuate the Novation and make payment to the holders of Scheme Notes in
full and final satisfaction of their claims against Ballantyne; and
• the commutation of the obligations of Ambac
Guaranteed Notes.
With the successful implementation of the Restructuring, AmbacUK has ceased to have any exposure with respect to the obligations of Ballantyne. International Finance Insured PortfolioAmbac's portfolio of international finance insured exposures is$12,857 million , representing 34% ofAmbac's net par outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2019 , and a 5% reduction from the amount outstanding atDecember 31, 2018 . This reduction in exposure was primarily the result of policy terminations within asset-backed securities and investor-owned utilities partially offset by a weakening of the US dollar versus the British pound.Ambac's international finance insured exposures include a wide array of obligations in the international markets, including infrastructure financings, asset-securitizations, utility obligations, whole business securitizations (e.g., securitizations of substantially all of the operating assets of a corporation) and sub-sovereign credit.Ambac has no insured exposure related to emerging markets. See Note 6. Financial Guarantees in Force to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 included in this Form 10-K, for exposures by bond type as ofDecember 31, 2019 . When underwriting transactions in the international markets,Ambac considered the specific risks related to the particular country and region that could impact the credit of the issuer. These risks include the legal and political environment, capital markets dynamics, foreign exchange issues and the degree of governmental support.Ambac continues to assess these risks through its ongoing risk management. AmbacUK , which is regulated in theUnited Kingdom ("UK"), had beenAmbac Assurance's primary vehicle for directly issuing financial guarantee policies in theUK and theEuropean Union |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 36 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
with$11,862 million net par outstanding in those markets atDecember 31, 2019 . The portfolio of insured exposures underwritten by AmbacUK is financially supported exclusively by the assets of AmbacUK and no capital support arrangements are in place with any otherAmbac affiliate. Other European Union Exposures ("EU")Ambac's international net par exposures are principally in theUnited Kingdom ($10,593 million ); however, we also have exposures with credit risk based in various other EU member states, includingAustria ,France ,Germany andItaly ($1,756 million ).Italy , with net par exposure of$767 million , in particular has experienced economic, fiscal and political strains since the 2008 global financial crisis such that the likelihood of default on an insured sub-sovereign obligation in that country is higher than when the policy was underwritten.Ambac does not guarantee any sovereign bonds of the above EU countries. Brexit: InMarch 2017 theUK government gave theEuropean Union ("EU") formal notification of its intention to leave the EU ("Brexit"). InJanuary 2020 theUK Government and EU ratified the terms of a legal binding treaty ("Withdrawal Agreement") setting out the terms of a transition period to apply to theUK untilDecember 31, 2020 . The effect of the withdrawal agreement is to retain the rights and obligations between theUK and the EU from the date of theUK's exit from the EU onJanuary 31, 2020 ("Exit Day") to the end of this transition period. TheUK and EU are currently negotiating a free trade agreement which is expected to come into force at the end of the transition period. It is currently unclear what regulations may apply to the activities in the EEA of passporting insurers as part of this free trade agreement. They may lose their legal authorization to serve clients who benefit from policies issued by aUK incorporated insurer under freedom of services and freedom of establishment passporting rights (and thereby maybe unable to legally collect premiums or pay claims) and if they have branches in EEA Member States they may be legally obliged to close them down and no longer be legally represented in those jurisdictions. However onFebruary 19, 2019 , theEuropean Insurance andOccupational Pensions Authority ("EIOPA") made a series of recommendations to EU insurance regulators in light of Brexit. These recommendations include the recommendation that regulatory authorities apply legal frameworks that facilitate the orderly run off (without time limit) of branch operations and of insurance policies issued in EEA member states byUK insurers prior to Exit Day that terminate after this date. The recommendations will require to be incorporated into EEA member states legal and regulatory frameworks in an appropriate manner to bring them into effect. If introduced as expected, these measures will retain AmbacUK's right to collect premium and pay claims on policies issued under EU passporting rights. As ofDecember 31, 2019 AmbacUK's insured portfolio included 4 financial guarantee obligations with a gross par outstanding of$1,407 million issued under EU passporting rules. Additional Insured Portfolio Information Average Life of Insured PortfolioAmbac underwrote and priced financial guarantees based on the assumption that the guarantees would remain in force until the maturity of the underlying bonds.Ambac estimates that the average life of its guarantees on par in force atDecember 31, 2019 is approximately 10 years. The average life is determined by applying a weighted average calculation, using the remaining years to expected maturity of each guaranteed bond, and weighting them on the basis of the remaining net par guaranteed. Except for RMBS policies, no assumptions are made for non-contractual reductions, refundings or terminations of insured issues. RMBS policies incorporate assumptions on expected prepayments over the remaining life of the insured obligation. The following table depicts amortization of existing guaranteed net par outstanding: Net Par Outstanding Amortization (1) Estimated Net ($ in millions) Amortization 2020 $ 3,092 2021 2,857 2022 2,750 2023 1,749 2024 2,107 2020-2024$ 12,555 2025-2029 7,755 2030-2034 5,996 2035-2039 7,834 After 2039 3,878 Total$ 38,018
(1) Depicts amortization of existing guaranteed portfolio, assuming no advance
refundings, as of
contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
guaranteed obligations. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 37 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Geographic Area The following table sets forth the geographic distribution ofAmbac's existing guaranteed net par outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2019 : Net Par % of Total Geographic Area Amount Net Par Amount ($ in millions) Outstanding Outstanding
Domestic:
Mortgage and asset-backed (1)$ 4,531 11.9 % California 2,556 6.7 % Colorado 2,396 6.3 % New York 2,331 6.1 % New Jersey 1,487 3.9 % Texas 1,289 3.4 % Puerto Rico 1,123 3.0 % Pennsylvania 916 2.4 % Washington 833 2.2 % Florida 754 2.0 % Illinois 709 1.9 % Other domestic 6,236 16.4 % Total Domestic 25,161 66.2 % International: United Kingdom 10,593 27.9 % Italy 767 2.0 % Austria 674 1.8 % Australia 382 1.0 % France 303 0.8 % Other international (2) 138 0.4 % Total International Finance 12,857 33.8 % Total$ 38,018 100.0 %
(1) Mortgage and asset-backed obligations includes guarantees with multiple
locations of risk within
residential mortgage and commercial asset-backed securitizations.
(2) Other international may include components of
Exposure Currency
The table below shows the distribution by currency of
Net Par Net Par Amount Amount Percentage Outstanding Outstanding of Net Par Currency in Base in U.S. Amount ($ in millions) Currency Dollars Outstanding U.S. Dollars$ 25,559 $ 25,559 67.2 % British Pounds £ 7,813 10,344 27.2 % Euros € 1,545 1,733 4.6 % Australian DollarsA$ 545 382 1.0 % Total$ 38,018 100.0 % Ratings Distribution The following tables provide a rating distribution of existing net par outstanding based upon internalAmbac credit ratings atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 and a distribution by bond type ofAmbac's below investment grade ("BIG") net par exposures atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018. BIG is defined as those exposures with an internal credit rating below BBB-: [[Image Removed: chart-d0580bf9e35a5adbbc2.jpg]] [[Image Removed: chart-721c65e040b75130b00.jpg]] Note: AAA is less than 1% in both periods.
(1) Internal credit ratings are provided solely to indicate the underlying credit
quality of guaranteed obligations based on the view of
ratings, or more than one obligation of an issuer with varying internal
ratings, a weighted average rating is used.
to revision at any time and do not constitute investment advice. BIG denotes
credits deemed below investment grade. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 38 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Summary of Below Investment Grade Exposure:
Net Par Outstanding - December 31, Bond Type ($ in millions) 2019 2018 Public Finance: Lease and tax-backed (1) $ 1,109$ 2,025 General obligation (1) 525 434 Housing (2) 311 314 Transportation 27 378 Health care - 25 Other 42 146 Total Public Finance 2,014 3,322 Structured Finance: RMBS 3,362 4,205 Structured Insurance - 900 Student loans 620 714 Other 33 53 Total Structured Finance 4,015 5,872 International Finance: Other 1,455 924 Total International Finance 1,455 924 Total $ 7,484$ 10,118
(1) Lease and tax-backed includes
and
reported at the par amount at the time of issuance of the related insurance
policy as opposed to the current accreted value of the bonds.
(2) Includes
2018, respectively.
The decrease in below investment grade exposures is primarily due to (i) the commutation or restructuring of certain structured insurance, lease and tax-backed and transportation transactions (including the Ballantyne and COFINA commutations), (ii) paydowns or calls by issuers, mostly related to residential mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, and (iii) a termination of an international aircraft asset-backed transaction. This decrease is offset by the addition of an Italian sub-sovereign exposure. Despite the decrease in below investment grade exposures, such exposures could increase as a relative proportion of the guarantee portfolio given that stressed borrowers generally have less ability to prepay or refinance their debt and thereforeAmbac is subject to the risk that its insured portfolio will increasingly become concentrated in higher risk below investment grade exposures. This risk may result in greater volatility in our results from operations and have adverse effects on our financial condition. Ceded ReinsuranceAmbac Assurance has reinsurance in place pursuant to surplus share treaties and facultative agreements. As a primary financial guarantor,Ambac Assurance is required to honor its obligations to its policyholders whether or not its reinsurers perform their obligations under these reinsurance agreements. For exposures reinsured,Ambac Assurance generally withholds a ceding commission to defray its underwriting and operating expenses. To minimize its exposure to losses from reinsurers,Ambac Assurance (i) monitors the financial condition of its reinsurers; (ii) is entitled to receive collateral from its reinsurance counterparties in certain reinsurance contracts; and (iii) has certain cancellation rights that can be exercised byAmbac Assurance in the event of rating agency downgrades of a reinsurer (among other events and circumstances).Ambac Assurance held letters of credit and collateral amounting to$124 million from its reinsurers atDecember 31, 2019 . As ofDecember 31, 2019 , the aggregate amount of insured par ceded byAmbac Assurance to reinsurers under reinsurance agreements was$5,890 million , with the largest reinsurer accounting for$2,746 million or 6.3% of gross par outstanding atDecember 31, 2019 . The following table shows the distribution, by bond type, ofAmbac Assurance's ceded guaranteed portfolio atDecember 31, 2019 : Ceded Par Amount % of Gross Bond Type ($ in millions) Outstanding Par Ceded Public Finance: General obligation$ 1,571 34 % Lease and tax-backed revenue 1,422 22 % Housing revenue 945 14 % Transportation revenue 564 40 % Utility revenue 249 25 % Higher education 182 17 % Other 102 14 % Total Public Finance 5,035 22 % Structured Finance: Student loan 281 27 % Investor-owned utilities 225 12 % Structured insurance 147 27 % Asset-backed and other 106 49 % Mortgage-backed and home equity 49 1 % Total Structured Finance 808 10 % Total Domestic 5,843 19 % International Finance: Investor-owned and public utilities 24 1 % Transportation 22 1 % Asset-backed 1 - % Total International Finance 47 - % Total$ 5,890 13 % RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion should be read along with the financial statements included in this Form 10-K, as well as Part II, "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis's of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 , which provides additional information on comparisons of years 2018 and 2017. Certain amounts in the tables that follow may not add due to rounding. | Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 39 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Revenues: Net premiums earned$ 66 $ 111 $ 175 Net investment income 227 273 361 Net other-than-temporary impairment losses - (3 ) (20 ) Net realized investment gains (losses) 81 112
5
Net gains (losses) on derivative contracts (50 ) 7
76
Other income (expense) (2) 134 8
5
Income (loss) on variable interest entities 38 3
20
Expenses:
Losses and loss expenses (benefit) 13 (224 )
513
Insurance intangible amortization 295 107 151 Operating expenses 103 112 122 Interest expense 269 242 120 Provision for income taxes 32 5 44 Net income (loss) (216 ) 267 (329 ) Less: exchange of auction market preferred shares (1) - 82
-
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
(1) In connection with the AMPS Exchange, the difference between the fair value
of consideration provided to AMPS holders and the carrying amount of the AMPS
has been reflected as a reduction to Net income attributable to common
stockholders in 2018 for approximately
Business Description for a discussion of the AMPS Exchange.
(2) 2019 includes proceeds received in connection with an
include net realized gains on extinguishment of debt.
During 2018 and 2019,Ambac executed on a number of restructuring / commutation transactions that had significant impacts to the consolidated results of operations. As described further below, the completion of the these transactions, including the related changes to invested assets, loss reserves and debt of the Company, had a significant impact on the comparability of the results of operation for the years endedDecember 31,2019 and 2018. The most significant transactions, which are more fully discussed in the "Financial Guarantees in Force" section of this Form 10-K were: Rehabilitation Exit Transactions. OnFebruary 12, 2018 ,Ambac Assurance executed the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions under which Deferred Amounts (as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and a substantial portion ofAmbac Assurance senior surplus notes were settled at a discount, with holders (other thanAmbac ) receiving in exchange, a consideration package of cash and debt securities. Puerto Rico COFINA Plan of Adjustment ("POA"). OnFebruary 12, 2019 , the POA, including certain related commutation transactions, and subsequent distributions, became effective, resulting in a significant reduction ofAmbac Assurance's insured net par exposure to COFINA. Pursuant to the COFINA POA, approximately 75% of holders ofAmbac Assurance -insured senior COFINA bonds (includingAmbac ) elected to commute their insurance policy.Ballantyne Re plc ("Ballantyne") Restructuring. OnApril 25, 2019 , Ballantyne commenced, under Irish law, a restructuring transaction ("Restructuring") in respect of its obligations, including obligations that were guaranteed byAmbac UK . The Arrangement was approved onJune 17, 2019 . With the successful implementation of the Restructuring, AmbacUK has ceased to have any exposure with respect to the obligations of Ballantyne. The following paragraphs describe the consolidated results of operations ofAmbac for 2019 and 2018. Some tables may not add due to rounding. Net Premiums Earned. Net premiums earned primarily represent the amortization into income of insurance premiums. Net premiums earned for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , decreased by$45 million or 41% as compared to net premiums earned for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 . We present accelerated premiums, which result from calls and other accelerations of insured obligations separate from normal net premiums earned. When an insured bond has been retired, any remaining unearned premium revenue ("UPR") is recognized at that time to the extent the financial guarantee contract is legally extinguished, causing accelerated premium revenue. For installment premium paying transactions, we offset the recognition of any remaining UPR by the reduction of the related premium receivable to zero (as it will not be collected as a result of the retirement), which may cause negative accelerated premium revenue. Normal net premiums earned are impacted by the following: • The runoff of the insured portfolio occurring through transaction
terminations, calls and scheduled maturities, which reduce normal net
premiums earned.
• Pre-refundings of insured securities, primarily Public Finance transactions.
Since the maturity date of pre-refunded securities is shortened (to a
specified call date from its previous legal maturity), normal net premiums
earned will increase over the remaining period of the related policy.
• New ceded reinsurance of insurance risk which reduces normal net premiums
earned over the remaining period of the related policies.
• Changes to allowance for uncollectible premiums on premium receivable asset.
• The strengthening or weakening of the
Pound since
Normal net premiums earned and accelerated premiums are reconciled to total net premiums earned in the table below, including a breakdown of net premiums earned by market: |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 40 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Public finance$ 27 $ 37 $ 62 Structured finance 10 17 22 International finance 19 23 27
Total net normal premiums earned
$ 25 $ 29 $ 47 Structured Finance (7 ) 5 3 International Finance (8 ) 1 15
Total net accelerated earnings
Net Investment Income. Net investment income primarily consists of interest and net discount accretion on fixed income securities classified as available-for-sale, including investments inAmbac -insured securities. Investments inAmbac -insured securities are made opportunistically based on their risk/reward characteristics. As described further below, investment income from holdings ofAmbac -insured securities (including Secured Notes issued byAmbac LSNI, LLC ) for the periods presented have primarily been driven by restructuring transactions involving RMBS,Puerto Rico and Ballantyne bonds. Also, included in net investment income are net gains and (losses) on pooled investment funds and certain other investments that are either classified as trading securities with changes in fair value recognized in earnings or are reported under the equity method. These pooled investment funds and other investments are included in Other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist primarily of pooled fund investments in diversified asset classes. For further information about investment funds held, refer to Note 10. Investments to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Annual Report. Net investment income fromAmbac -insured securities, available for sale and short-term securities other thanAmbac -insured and Other investments is summarized the table below: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018
2017
Securities available-for-sale:Ambac -insured (including Secured Notes) $ 121 $ 220 $
262
Securities available-for-sale and short-term other than Ambac-insured 75 51 76 Other investments (includes trading securities) 32 2 23 Net investment income $ 227 $ 273 $ 361 Net investment income decreased$46 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 compared to 2018. The$99 million decrease in net investment income fromAmbac -insured securities for 2019 compared to 2018 is due primarily to the reduced amount ofAmbac -insured RMBS and COFINA bonds held following their restructuring transactions in February of 2018 and 2019, respectively. The impact of lower insured RMBS and COFINA bond holdings was partially offset by increased income from accelerated accretion on Ballantyne bonds in connection with the Ballantyne restructuring inJune 2019 . Net investment income from Secured Notes was slightly lower in 2019 than 2018 as a result of early redemptions and AFG's divestiture of its holdings completed in early 2019. Net investment income from available-for-sale securities other thanAmbac -insured increased$24 million in 2019, reflecting the effects of uninsured COFINA bonds received under the POA; higher allocations towards other non-insured bonds including investment grade corporates, CMBS and CLOs; and higher interest rates on short-term positions. Net investment income from Other investments increased$30 million from 2018, due to strong equity and credit market performance, including gains on investments in high-yield and an asset-backed focused hedge fund byAmbac Assurance as well as gains on investments in high yield funds held by AmbacUK . Additionally, 2018 included losses on hedge fund, equity and insurance linked-security fund investments of AmbacUK . Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses. Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recorded in earnings include only credit related impairment amounts on securities to the extent management does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell before recovery of the amortized cost basis. Non-credit related impairment amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Alternatively, non-credit related impairment is reported through earnings as part of net other-than-temporary impairment losses if management intends to sell securities or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost less any current period credit impairment. Net other-than-temporary impairments for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 related to management's intent to sell securities. Net other-than-temporary impairments for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 related to credit losses on certain securities and to management's intent to sell securities. Net Realized Investment Gains. The following table provides a breakdown of net realized gains, for the periods presented: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017
Net gains on securities sold or called
22 7 (5 ) Total net realized gains$ 81 $ 112 $ 5 Net realized gains on securities sold or called during the year endedDecember 31, 2019 included$50 million of net gains arising directly or indirectly from the COFINA restructuring, including sales ofAmbac -insured COFINA bonds and sales of new uninsured COFINA bonds received in the restructuring. Also included in realized gains for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 are$23 million of realized foreign exchange gains arising from the settlement of Ballantyne bonds held in the investment portfolio. Net gains during the year endedDecember 31, 2018 were primarily from sales ofAmbac -insured RMBS. Additionally, 2018 gains included a$27 million recovery from a class-action settlement | Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 41 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
relating to certain RMBS securities previously held in the investment portfolio.Net Gains (Losses) on Derivative Contracts. Net gains (losses) on derivative contracts includes results from the Company's interest rate derivatives portfolio and its legacy credit derivative positions as presented in the following table: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017
Net gains (losses) on interest rate derivatives
2 (1 ) 16 Total net gains (losses)$ (50 ) $ 7 $ 76 The interest rate derivatives portfolio is positioned to benefit from rising rates as a partial economic hedge against interest rate exposure in the financial guarantee and investment portfolios. Results in Net gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives generally reflect mark-to-market gains (losses) in the portfolio caused by increases (declines) in forward interest rates during the periods, the carrying cost of the net liability position of the portfolio, and the impact of counterparty credit adjustments as discussed below. Net losses on interest rate derivatives for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 were$51 million , compared to the net gain of$7 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 . The net loss for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , reflects declines in forward interest rates, partially offset by negative net carrying costs driven by the partially inverted yield curve in place for most of the year. Net gains for 2018 were primarily the result of rising forward interest rates offset by carrying costs. Counterparty credit adjustments are generally applicable for uncollateralized derivative assets that may not be offset by derivative liabilities under a master netting agreement. Inclusion of counterparty credit adjustments in the valuation of interest rate derivatives resulted in losses within Net gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives of$(2) million in both 2019 and 2018. The net gain/(loss) from change in fair value of credit derivatives for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 was a gain of$2 million , as compared to the loss of$(1) million for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 . Changes in fair value of credit derivatives are driven by price changes on the underlying reference obligations of remaining legacy positions plus continued accretion of fees. Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Extinguishment of Debt. Net realized gains on extinguishment of debt was$0 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , compared to gains of$3 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 . The gains for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 related to surplus notes received byAmbac Assurance in settlement of Deferred Amounts held in its investment portfolio in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions. Income (loss) on Variable Interest Entities. Included within Income (loss) on variable interest entities are income statement amounts relating to VIEs consolidated under the Consolidation Topic of the ASC as a result ofAmbac's variable interest arising from financial guarantees written byAmbac's subsidiaries, including gains or losses attributable to consolidating or deconsolidating VIEs during the periods reported. Generally, the Company's consolidated VIEs are entities for whichAmbac has provided financial guarantees on all of or a portion of its assets or liabilities. In consolidation, assets and liabilities of the VIEs are initially reported at fair value and the related insurance assets and liabilities are eliminated. However, the amount of VIE net assets (liabilities) that remain in consolidation generally result from the net positive (negative) present value of projected cash flows from (to) the VIEs which are attributable toAmbac's insurance subsidiaries in the form of financial guarantee insurance premiums, fees and losses. In the case of VIEs with net negative projected cash flows, the net liability is generally to be funded by AFG's insurance subsidiaries through insurance claim payments. Differences between the net carrying value of the insurance accounts under the Financial Services-Insurance Topic of the ASC and the carrying value of the consolidated VIE's net assets or liabilities are recorded through income at the time of consolidation or deconsolidation. Additionally, terminations or other changes toAmbac's financial guarantee insurance policies that impact projected cash flows between a consolidated VIE andAmbac could result in gains or losses, even if such policy changes do not result in deconsolidation of the VIE. Income (loss) on variable interest entities was$38 million and$3 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. • Income on variable interest entities for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 ,
was driven by the impact of a VIE created in connection with the
restructuring of Puerto Rico COFINA debt. Under the restructuring,
formed trust called the COFINA Class 2 Trust ("
has determined must be consolidated. Refer to Part II, Item 7, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis - Financial Guarantees in Force" in this report on
Form 10-K for further discussion of the COFINA Debt Restructuring. Income
from
including
investment gains on sales of assets from the trust used for early redemptions
of debt, partially offset by net interest expense and fees. Income for the
year ended
assets of a VIE arising from an increase in projected cash flows on the VIE's
assets related to higher financial guarantee insurance premiums. Results for
2019 also included a loss of
• Income on variable interest entities for the year ended
included gains of
financial guarantee policy terminations and discount accretion on remaining
VIE net assets.
Refer to Note 3. Variable Interest Entities to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for further information on the accounting for VIEs. Other income (expense). Other income (expense) includes various fees, primarily consent and waiver fees, as well as foreign exchange gains/(losses) unrelated to investments or loss reserves. Other income also includes proceeds received byAmbac Assurance inSeptember 2019 in connection with anSEC action againstCitigroup Global Markets Inc. in the amount of$142 million . For |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 42 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
the year endedDecember 31, 2018 , other income (expense) included foreign exchange gains and amortization of fee income. Losses and Loss Expenses (Benefit). Losses and loss expenses are based upon estimates of the aggregate losses inherent in the non-derivative financial guarantee portfolio for insurance policies issued to beneficiaries, including unconsolidated VIEs. Losses and loss expenses for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 , included interest on Deferred Amounts pursuant to the Segregated Account Rehabilitation Plan (as defined in Note 1. Background and Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) that were discharged onFebruary 12, 2018 .Ambac records as a component of its loss reserve estimate subrogation recoveries related to securitized loans in RMBS transactions with respect to whichAmbac Assurance is pursuing claims for breaches of representations and warranties described herein.Ambac does not estimate an RMBS R&W subrogation recovery where its sole claim is for fraudulent inducement. Generally, the sponsor of an RMBS transaction provided representations and warranties with respect to the securitized loans, including representations with respect to the loan characteristics, the absence of borrower fraud in the underlying loan pools or other misconduct in the origination process and attesting to the compliance of loans with the prevailing underwriting policies.Ambac has recorded RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries, net of reinsurance, of$1,702 million and$1,744 million atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Refer to Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for more information regarding the estimation process for RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries. Losses and loss expenses (benefit) for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 were$13 million and$(224) million , respectively. The following table provides details, by bond type, for losses and loss expenses (benefit) incurred for the periods presented: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 RMBS (1)$ (93 ) $ (8 ) $ (41 ) Domestic Public Finance 250 37 476 Student Loans (17 ) (4 ) 25 Ambac UK and Other Credits (127 ) 19 (125 ) Interest on Deferred Amounts - 21 178
Discount on Rehabilitation Exit Transaction - (288 ) - Totals (2)
$ 13 $ (224 ) $ 513
(1) The loss and loss expense (benefit) associated with changes in estimated
representation and warranties for the year ended
was
(2) Includes loss expenses incurred of
Losses and loss expenses for 2019 were driven by the following: • Higher projected losses in domestic public finance driven mostly by lower
discount rates and additions to
by;
• Favorable development within Ambac
Ballantyne commutation;
• Favorable RMBS development as a result of credit improvement, the impact on
excess spread from declines in interest rates and a trustee settlement related toLehman sponsored transactions, partially offset by RMBS R&W litigation loss expenses incurred and a reduction to estimated RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries.
Losses and loss expenses for 2018 were driven by the following: • Discount achieved pursuant to the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions, partially
offset by interest on Deferred Amounts through the Rehabilitation Exit
Transactions effective date;
• Higher projected losses in domestic public finance largely driven by Military
Housing loss expenses incurred and adverse development on a certain general
obligation and transportation risks;
• Favorable RMBS credit development, which was more than offset by a decrease
in RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries and loss expenses incurred;
•
denominated in currencies other than its functional currency of British Pounds, resulting in incurred losses (gains) when the British Pound depreciates (appreciates). Insurance Intangible Amortization. Insurance intangible amortization was$295 million and$107 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in intangible amortization for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , compared to 2018, is primarily due to accelerated amortization as a result of the Ballantyne commutation that occurred in 2019. Operating Expenses. Operating expenses consist of gross operating expenses plus reinsurance commissions. The following table provides details of operating expenses for the periods presented: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Compensation$ 58 $ 55 $ 54 Non-compensation 44 56 68
Gross operating expenses 103 111 122
Reinsurance commissions, net - 1 -
Total operating expenses
Gross operating expenses for the year ended
million, of which$5 million relates to |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 43 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
services provided for the benefit of OCI; partially offset by increased premises
costs of
(i) improvements in performance metrics, mostly related to Ambac
compensation and (ii) higher severance and post employment costs related to
staff right-sizing.
With the conclusion of the Segregated Account rehabilitation, the duties of the Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner as rehabilitator of the Segregated Account have been discharged. Legal and consulting services provided for the benefit of OCI amounted to$2 million and$7 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Subsequent to the Segregated Account's exit from rehabilitation, advisory services for the benefit of OCI continue, but at a reduced level. Interest Expense. Interest expense primarily includes accrued interest on the Ambac Note, Tier 2 Notes and surplus notes issued byAmbac Assurance . Additionally, interest expense includes discount accretion when the debt instrument carrying value is at a discount to par. The following table provides details by type of obligation for the periods presented: ($ in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Surplus notes (1)$ 99 $ 80 $ 113 Ambac note 143 139 - Tier 2 notes 26 22 2 Other - 1 4 Total interest expense$ 269 $ 242 $ 120
(1) Includes junior surplus notes.
• The increase in interest expense for the year ended
compared to 2018 primarily reflects the higher average balance of surplus
notes outstanding in 2019 and compounding of interest on surplus notes.
Although the amount of surplus notes outstanding decreased in connection with
the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions, the amount outstanding increased in the
third quarter of 2018 due to surplus notes issued by
connection with the AMPS Exchange (as defined in Note 1. Background and
Business Description to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K) and resales of notes by
market.
• Increased interest expense on the floating rate
higher reset rates in 2019 and the impact of the notes being outstanding for
the full year, partially offset by optional redemptions and full amortization
of deferred debt issuance costs through interest expense in 2018.
• Interest expense increased on the Tier 2 notes due primarily to interest
compounding. The increase in interest expense also reflects the impact of
applying the level yield method on surplus notes and Tier 2 notes as the
discount to the face value of the long-term debt accretes over time.
Surplus note principal and interest payments require the approval of OCI. Since the issuance of the surplus notes in 2010, OCI has
declined to approve regular payments of interest on surplus notes, although the OCI has permitted exceptional payments in connection with (a) increasing the percentage of deferred policy payments of the Segregated Account ofAmbac Assurance from 25% to 45% in 2014 and (b) a one-time payment of approximately six months of interest on the surplus notes (other than junior surplus notes) outstanding immediately after consummation of the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions in 2018.Ambac Assurance has not requested to pay interest on any junior surplus notes since their issuance.Ambac Assurance may not receive approval from OCI to make payments as and when scheduled, including the payment of the surplus notes on their scheduled maturity date ofJune 7, 2020 . If the OCI does not approve the making of any payment of principal of or interest on surplus notes on the scheduled payment date or scheduled maturity date thereof, the scheduled payment date or scheduled maturity date, as the case may be, shall be extended until OCI grants approval to make the payment. Interest will accrue, compounded on each anniversary of the original scheduled payment date or scheduled maturity date, on any unpaid principal or interest through the actual date of payment, at 5.1% per annum. Holders of surplus notes will have no rights to enforce the payment of the principal of, or interest on, surplus notes in the absence of OCI approval to pay such amount. The interest on the outstanding surplus notes and junior surplus notes were accrued for andAmbac Assurance is accruing interest on the interest amounts following each scheduled interest payment date. Total accrued and unpaid interest for surplus notes and junior surplus notes outstanding to third parties were$302 million and$146 million , respectively, atDecember 31, 2019 . Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, was$32 million and$5 million , respectively. The income tax for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, includes provisions for income tax due in respect of AmbacUK of$36 million and$5 million , respectively. AtDecember 31, 2019 the Company had approximately$3,535 million ofU.S. Federal net ordinary operating loss carryforwards, including approximately$1,250 million at AFG and$2,285 million atAmbac Assurance . LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES AFG Liquidity. AFG's liquidity is dependent on its cash, investments, and net receivables, totaling$483 million as ofDecember 31, 2019 , and expense sharing and other arrangements withAmbac Assurance . • Pursuant to the amended and restated tax sharing agreement among AFG,Ambac
Assurance and certain affiliates (the "Amended TSA"),
required to make payments ("tolling payments") to AFG with respect to the
utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards ("NOLs"). AFG has accrued
2017. In
agreement pursuant to which
to make this payment by
payment for the use of net operating losses by
such time as OCI consents to the payment. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 44 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
• Under an inter-company cost allocation agreement, AFG is reimbursed by
Assurance for a portion of certain operating costs and expenses and, if
approved by OCI, entitled to an additional payment of up to
year to cover expenses not otherwise reimbursed. AFG has not accrued any
receivable related to this payment as of
AFG's investments include securities directly and indirectly issued byAmbac Assurance some of which are eliminated in consolidation. Securities issued byAmbac Assurance are generally less liquid than investment grade and other traded investments. It is highly unlikely thatAmbac Assurance will be able to make dividend payments to AFG for the foreseeable future and therefore cash and investments and payments under the intercompany cost allocation agreement will be AFG's principal source of liquidity in the near term. Refer to Part I, Item 1, "Insurance Regulatory Matters - Dividend Restrictions, Including Contractual Restrictions" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 8. Insurance Regulatory Restrictions to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for more information on dividend payment restrictions. The principal uses of liquidity are the payment of operating expenses, including costs to explore opportunities to grow and diversifyAmbac , and the making of investments, including securities issued or insured byAmbac Assurance . Future uses of liquidity may include the acquisition or capitalization of new businesses. Contingencies could cause material liquidity strains. The following table includes aggregated information about contractual obligations for AFG and its subsidiaries atDecember 31, 2019 , excluding variable interest entities consolidated as a result ofAmbac Assurance's and AmbacUK's financial guarantee contracts. These obligations include payments due under specified contractual obligations, aggregated by type of contractual obligation, including claim payments, principal and interest payments underAmbac Assurance's surplus notes, the Ambac Note, Tier 2 Notes and AmbacUK debt, and payments due under operating leases. The table and commentary below reflect scheduled payments and maturities based on the original payment terms specified in the underlying agreements and contracts, or expected required payment dates if earlier. Payments Due by Period Less Than 1 More Than 5 ($ in millions) Total Year 1 - 3 Years 3 - 5 Years Years Surplus note obligations(1)$ 3,841 $ 851 $ - $ -$ 2,990 Ambac note obligations(2) 2,144 122 245 1,777 - Tier 2 note obligations(3) 5,394 - - - 5,394 Ambac UK debt obligations(4) 41 - - - 41 Operating lease obligations(5) 46 4 9 9 24 Purchase obligations(6) 9 8 - - - Postretirement benefits(7) 5 - 1 1 3 Loss and loss expenses(8) 2,434 159 139 172 1,964 Income taxes - - - - - Total$ 13,914 $ 1,144 $ 394$ 1,959 $ 10,416
(1) Amounts on surplus notes (excluding junior surplus notes) include principal
on their scheduled maturity date and interest on scheduled payment dates,
including payment of previously deferred interest totaling
the next scheduled payment date of
and interest on junior surplus notes on the date all future and existing
senior indebtedness of
against
years column). All payments of principal and interest on surplus notes are
subject to the prior approval of the OCI. Since the issuance of the surplus
notes in 2010, OCI has declined to approve regular payments of interest on
surplus notes annually from 2011 through 2019, although the OCI has permitted
exceptional payments in connection with (a) increasing the percentage of
deferred policy payments of the Segregated Account from 25% to 45% in 2014
and (b) a one-time payment of approximately six months of interest on the
surplus notes outstanding immediately after the Rehabilitation Exit
Transactions in 2018.
make payments as and when scheduled, including the payment of the surplus
notes on their scheduled maturity date of
approve the making of any payment of principal of or interest on surplus
notes on the scheduled payment date or scheduled maturity date thereof, the
scheduled payment date or scheduled maturity date, as the case may be, shall
be extended until OCI grants approval to make the payment. Interest will
accrue, compounded on each anniversary of the original scheduled payment date
or scheduled maturity date, on any unpaid principal or interest through the actual date of payment, at 5.1% per annum. (2) Includes principal on Ambac Note as ofDecember 31, 2019 to be paid on its
legal maturity date of
Interest amounts on this variable rate debt are projected at a rate of 6.95%
which is based on the index rate in effect at the balance sheet date. These
notes are subject to mandatory redemption provisions that could significantly
accelerate the timing of required payments, as described further in Note 13.
Long-Term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II,
Item 8 in this Form 10-K.
(3) Includes principal and compounded paid-in-kind interest on Tier 2 notes to be
paid on their legal maturity date of
subject to mandatory redemption provisions that could significantly
accelerate the timing of required payments, as described further in Note 13.
Long-Term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II,
Item 8 in this Form 10-K.
(4) Includes principal on the zero coupon note payable on its legal maturity date
of
(5) Amount represents future lease payments on lease agreements existing as of
variable costs, such as real estate taxes and electricity. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 45 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
(6) Purchase obligations represent future expenditures for contractually
scheduled fixed terms and amounts due for various technology-related
maintenance agreements and other outside services.
(7) Amount represents future payments relating to
postretirement medical reimbursements to current retirees over the next 10
years.
(8) The timing of expected claim payments is based on deal specific cash flows,
excluding expected recoveries. These deal specific cash flows are based on
the expected cash flows of the underlying transactions. The timing of
expected claim payments for credits with reserves that were established using
our statistical loss reserve method is determined based on the weighted
average expected life of the exposure. Refer to the Loss Reserves section in
Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form
10-K for further discussion of our statistical loss reserve method. The
timing of these payments may vary significantly from the amounts shown above,
especially for credits that are based on our statistical loss reserve method.
Ambac Assurance Liquidity.Ambac Assurance's liquidity is dependent on the balance of liquid investments and, over time, the net impact of sources and uses of funds. The principal sources ofAmbac Assurance's liquidity are gross installment premiums on insurance policies; principal and interest payments from investments; sales of investments; proceeds from repayment of affiliate loans; and recoveries on claim payments, including from litigation and reinsurance recoveries. Termination of installment premium policies on an accelerated basis may adversely impactAmbac Assurance's liquidity. The principal uses ofAmbac Assurance's liquidity are the payment of operating and loss adjustment expenses, claims, commutation and related expense payments on insurance policies, ceded reinsurance premiums, principal and interest payments on the Ambac Note, surplus note principal and interest payments, Tier 2 Note payments, additional loans to affiliates, tolling payments due to AFG under the Amended TSA, and purchases of securities and other investments that may not be immediately converted into cash. Interest and principal payments on surplus notes are subject to the approval of OCI, which has full discretion over payments regardless of the liquidity position ofAmbac Assurance . Any such payment on surplus notes would require either payment or collateralization of a portion of the Tier 2 Notes under the terms of the Tier 2 Note indenture. See Note 13. Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for further discussion of the payment terms and conditions of the Tier 2 Notes.Ambac Assurance's intercompany loans are withAmbac Financial Services ("AFS"). AFS uses interest rate derivatives (primarily interest rate swaps andUS Treasury futures) as an economic hedge against the effects of rising interest rates elsewhere in the Company, including onAmbac Assurance's financial guarantee exposures. AFS's derivatives include, interest rate swaps previously provided to asset-backed issuers and other entities in connection with their financings.Ambac Assurance loans cash and securities to AFS as needed to fund payments under these derivative contracts, collateral posting requirements and operating expenses. Intercompany loans are governed by an established lending agreement with defined borrowing limits that has received non-disapproval from OCI.Ambac Assurance manages its liquidity risk by maintaining comprehensive analyses of projected cash flows and maintaining specified levels of cash and short-term investments at all times.Ambac Assurance is limited in its ability to pay dividends pursuant to the terms of its Auction Market Preferred Shares ("AMPS"), which state that dividends may not be paid on the common stock ofAmbac Assurance unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the AMPS for the then current dividend period have been paid, provided that dividends on the common stock may be made at all times for the purpose of, and only in such amounts as are necessary for enabling AFG (i) to service its indebtedness for borrowed money as such payments become due or (ii) to pay its operating expenses. If dividends are paid on the common stock for such purposes, dividends on the AMPS become cumulative until the date that all accumulated and unpaid dividends have been paid on the AMPS.Ambac Assurance has not paid dividends on the AMPS since 2010. Refer to Part I, Item 1, "Insurance Regulatory Matters - Dividend Restrictions, Including Contractual Restrictions" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 8. Insurance Regulatory Restrictions to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for more information on dividend payment restrictions. Our ability to realize RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries is subject to significant uncertainty, including risks inherent in litigation, collectability of such amounts from counterparties (and/or their respective parents and affiliates), timing of receipt of any such recoveries, intervention by the OCI, which could impede our ability to take actions required to realize such recoveries, and uncertainty inherent in the assumptions used in estimating the amount of such recoveries. The amount of these subrogation recoveries is significant and if we are unable to recover any amounts or recover materially less than our estimated recoveries, our future available liquidity to pay claims and meet our other obligations would be reduced materially. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about risks relating to our RMBS R&W subrogation recoveries. Cash Flow Statement Discussion. The following table summarizes the net cash flows for the periods presented. ($ in million) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Cash provided by (used in): Operating activities$ (311 ) $ (1,543 ) $ (221 ) Investing activities 1,000 1,588 1,163 Financing activities (691 ) (585 ) (412 ) Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents - - (1 ) Net cash flow$ (2 ) $ (541 ) $ 529 Operating activities The following represents the significant operating cash activities during the years endedDecember 31, 2019 and 2018: • During the year endedDecember 31, 2019 ,Ambac Assurance received$142
million in connection with an
Inc.
• During the year ended
Ambac Note of$143 million . During |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 46 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
the year endedDecember 31, 2018 ,Ambac made interest payments on long-term debt of$143 million , including$11 million on surplus notes made in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions,$130 million on the Ambac Note and$2 million on the secured borrowing which was fully repaid inJune 2018 ; and • Cash outflow in 2018 from the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions to third
parties was
activities and
to payments for surplus note principal;
• Net loss and loss expenses paid, including commutation payments are detailed below: ($ in million) Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017
Net losses paid (1)
$ 318 $ 321 $ 134
(1) Net losses paid include commutation payments of
years ended
(2) For the year ended
settlement proceeds related to
related to the COFINA Plan of Adjustment.
• During the year ended
Ambac
Future operating cash flows will primarily be impacted by the level of premium collections, investment coupon receipts and claim or commutation payments. Financing Activities Financing activities for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 , included paydowns of Ambac Note of$178 million , paydowns of VIE debt obligations of$542 million , proceeds of$19 million from the re-issuance of 1,386 shares ofAmbac owned AMPS and proceeds of$12 million from the issuance of AmbacUK debt in connection with the Ballantyne restructuring. Financing activities for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 , included proceeds from the issuance of Tier 2 notes of$240 million , paydowns of Ambac Note of$214 million , repayments of the Secured Borrowing of$74 million , payments for the extinguishment of surplus notes of$191 million (in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions) and paydowns of VIE debt obligations of$349 million . Principal and interest due on the debt issued in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions as well as future payments on the remaining surplus notes will impactAmbac's future cash flows. Collateral AFS hedges a portion of the interest rate risk in the financial guarantee and investment portfolio, along with legacy customer interest rate swaps with standardized derivative contracts, including financial futures contracts, which contain collateral or margin requirements. Under these contracts, AFS is required to post collateral or margin to its counterparties and futures commission merchants to cover unrealized losses. In addition, AFS is required to post collateral or margin in excess of the amounts needed to cover unrealized losses. All AFS derivative contracts containing ratings-based downgrade triggers that could result in collateral or margin posting or a termination have been triggered. If terminations were to occur, AFS would be required to make termination payments but would also receive a return of collateral or margin in the form of cash orU.S. Treasury obligations with market values equal to or in excess of market values of the swaps and futures contracts. AFS may look to re-establish hedge positions that are terminated early, resulting in additional collateral or margin obligations. The amount of additional collateral or margin posted on derivatives contracts will depend on several variables including the degree to which counterparties exercise their termination rights (or agreements terminate automatically) and the terms on which hedges can be replaced. All collateral and margin obligations are currently met. Collateral and margin posted by AFS totaled$121 million (cash and securities), including independent amounts, under these contracts atDecember 31, 2019 .Ambac Credit Products LLC ("ACP") is not required to post collateral under any of its outstanding derivative contracts. BALANCE SHEET Total assets decreased by approximately$1,269 million fromDecember 31, 2018 to$13,320 million atDecember 31, 2019 , primarily due to lower VIE assets from the deconsolidation of a VIE during 2019 (causing a reduction in assets of$1,233 million ) partially offset by the consolidation of another VIE (causing an increase in assets of$167 million ) and increases from currency changes (strengthening of the British Pound). Other significant changes during 2019 were lower premium receivables and intangible assets from the continued runoff of the financial guarantee insurance portfolio, particularly the Ballantyne commutation, and lower invested assets due to claim payments and debt redemptions. Total liabilities decreased by approximately$1,172 million fromDecember 31, 2018 to$11,783 million as ofDecember 31, 2019 , primarily due to changes in VIEs consolidated as a result of financial guarantees provided byAmbac , as noted above. The net impact of these VIE changes to liabilities was a net decrease of$1,028 million . Other significant changes during 2019 were (i) lower unearned premiums from the runoff of the insured portfolio, (ii) lower loss reserves (from claim and commutation payments, including commutation payments on Ballantyne, and the elimination of loss reserves from the COFINA VIE consolidated), and (iii) lower long-term debt due to partial paydowns on the Ambac Note (net of of debt issued by AmbacUK of$12 million in connection with the Ballantyne commutation). Such declines are partially offset by an increases in accrued interest payable on long-term debt and increases in interest rate derivative obligations as a result of reductions in forward interest rates. As ofDecember 31, 2019 , total stockholders' equity was$1,536 million , compared with total stockholders' equity of$1,633 million atDecember 31, 2018 . This decrease was primarily driven by the net loss for 2019 partially offset by translation gains related to |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 47 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Ambac's foreign subsidiaries and unrealized gains on investment securities. Investment Portfolio.Ambac Assurance's investment objective is to achieve the highest risk-adjusted after-tax return on a diversified portfolio of primarily fixed income investments and pooled investment funds while employing asset/liability management practices to satisfy operating and strategic liquidity needs.Ambac Assurance's investment portfolio is subject to internal investment guidelines and is subject to limits on types and quality of investments imposed by the insurance laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which it is licensed, primarily the States ofWisconsin andNew York . Such guidelines set forth minimum credit rating requirements and credit risk concentration limits. Within these guidelines, which in certain instances may be exceeded with the approval of the applicable regulatory authority,Ambac Assurance opportunistically purchasesAmbac Assurance insured securities given their relative risk/reward characteristics.Ambac Assurance's investment policies are subject to oversight by OCI pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Stipulation and Order and the indenture for the Tier 2 Notes. The Board of Directors ofAmbac Assurance approves any changes toAmbac Assurance's investment policy. AmbacUK's investment policy is designed with the primary objective of ensuring that AmbacUK is able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due, in particular with respect to policyholder claims. AmbacUK's investment portfolio is primarily fixed income investments and diversified holdings of pooled investment funds. The portfolio is subject to internal investment guidelines and may be subject to limits on types and quality of investments imposed by the PRA as regulator of AmbacUK . AmbacUK's investment policy sets forth minimum credit rating requirements and concentration limits, among other restrictions. The Board of Directors of AmbacUK approves any changes or exceptions to AmbacUK's investment policy.Ambac Financial Group, Inc.'s investment portfolio's primary objective is to preserve capital and liquidity for strategic uses while maximizing income. Refer to Note 10. Investments in this Form 10-K located in Part II. Item 8 for information aboutAmbac's consolidated investment portfolio.Ambac's investment polices and objectives do not apply to the assets of VIEs consolidated as a result of financial guarantees written by its insurance subsidiaries. The following table summarizes the composition ofAmbac's investment portfolio, excluding VIE investments, at carrying value atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018: ($ in millions) December 31, 2019 2018 Fixed income securities$ 2,577 $ 3,116 Short-term 653 430 Other investments 478 391
Fixed income securities pledged as collateral 85 - Total investments (1)
$ 3,792 $ 3,937
(1) Includes investments denominated in non-US dollar currencies with a fair
value of £257 (
€14 (
Ambac invests in various asset classes in its fixed income securities portfolio, including securities covered by guarantees issued byAmbac Assurance andAmbac UK and other financial guarantors ("insured securities"). Other investments include diversified equity interests in pooled funds. Refer to Note 10. Investments in this 10-K located in Part II. Item 8 for information about insured securities by guarantor and fixed income and equity interests by asset class. The following table provides additional details of the composition of the fair value of other asset-backed securities atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 by classification: ($ in millions) December 31, 2019 2018 Other asset-backed securities Military Housing$ 237 $ 241 Structured Insurance - 145 Student Loans 32 32 Auto - 20 Credit Cards 18 5
Total other asset-backed securities
(1) Includes investments guaranteed by
Note 10. Investments in this 10-K located in Part II. Item 8 for further
details ofAmbac -insured securities held in the investment portfolio. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 48 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following tables provide the ratings(1) distribution of the fixed income investment portfolio based on fair value atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018. [[Image Removed: chart-3d446dc8c17451e1ae6.jpg]] [[Image Removed: chart-3af475be8f4e57eb910.jpg]] (1) Ratings are based on the lower of Moody's or S&P ratings. If ratings are unavailable from Moody's or S&P, Fitch ratings are used. If guaranteed, rating represents the higher of the underlying or guarantor's financial strength rating.
(2) Below investment grade and not rated bonds insured by
and 57% of the 2019 and 2018 combined investment portfolios, respectively.
The decrease in the percentage of below investment grade and increase in the
percentage of AAA-rated holdings since
COFINA restructuring where below investment grade
exchanged for new COFINA non-rated bonds and cash, with a majority of the new
non-rated bonds being sold prior to
restructuring and bond sales throughout the year were invested in, amongst
other things, AAA-rated short-term investments, commercial mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized debt obligations at
Premium Receivables.Ambac either received premium upfront at time of issuance of the insurance policy or in installments over the policy term. For installment premium transactions, a premium receivable asset is established equal to the (i) present value of future contractual premiums due or (ii) if the underlying insured obligation is a homogenous pool of assets which are contractually prepayable, the present value of premiums to be collected over the expected life of the transaction.Ambac's premium receivables decreased to$416 million atDecember 31, 2019 from$495 million atDecember 31, 2018 . As further discussed in Note 7. Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, in this Form 10-K located in Part II. Item 8, the decrease is due to premium receipts, adjustments for changes in expected and contractual cash flows and the impact of currency exchange rates, partially offset by accretion of premium receivable discount. Premium receivables by payment currency were as follows: Currency Premium Receivable in Premium Receivable in (Amounts in millions) Payment Currency U.S. dollars U.S. Dollars $ 261 $261 British Pounds £ 97129 Euros € 23 26 Total $ 416 Reinsurance Recoverable on Paid and Unpaid Losses.Ambac Assurance has reinsurance in place pursuant to surplus share treaty and facultative agreements. To minimize its exposure to losses from reinsurers,Ambac Assurance (i) monitors the financial condition of its reinsurers; (ii) is entitled to receive collateral from its reinsurance counterparties under certain reinsurance contracts; and (iii) has certain cancellation rights that can be exercised byAmbac Assurance in the event of rating agency downgrades of a reinsurer (among other events and circumstances).Ambac Assurance benefited from letters of credit and collateral amounting to approximately$124 million from its reinsurers atDecember 31, 2019 . Collateral is based on reinsurance contracts, but generally includes reinsurers share of loss and loss expense reserves and statutory unearned premiums and contingency reserves, amongst other considerations. As ofDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses were$26 million and$23 million , respectively. The increase was primarily a result of adverse development in public finance insured exposures. Insurance Intangible Asset. At the Fresh Start Reporting Date, an insurance intangible asset was recorded which represented the difference between the fair value and aggregate carrying value of the financial guarantee insurance and reinsurance assets and liabilities. The net intangible asset atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 was$427 million and$719 million , respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by amortization expense of$295 million . Loss and Loss Expense Reserves and Subrogation Recoverable. Loss and loss expense reserves are based upon estimates of the ultimate aggregate losses inherent in the non-derivative portfolio for insurance policies issued to beneficiaries, including unconsolidated VIEs. The loss and loss expense reserves net of subrogation recoverables and before reinsurance as ofDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 were$(482) million and$(107) million , respectively. Loss and loss expense reserves are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows: | Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 49 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Present Value of Expected Net Cash Flows Gross Loss Claims and Unearned and Loss ($ in millions) Loss Premium Expense Balance Sheet Line Item Expenses Recoveries (1) Revenue ReservesDecember 31, 2019 : Loss and loss expense reserves$ 1,835 $ (233 )$ (54 ) $ 1,548 Subrogation recoverable 131 (2,160 ) - (2,029 ) Totals$ 1,966 $ (2,394 ) $ (54 ) $ (482 ) December 31, 2018: Loss and loss expense reserves$ 2,246 $ (313 )$ (107 ) $ 1,826 Subrogation recoverable 176 (2,109 ) - (1,933 ) Totals$ 2,422 $ (2,422 ) $ (107 ) $ (107 )
(1) Present value of future recoveries include R&W subrogation recoveries of
The evaluation process for determining the level of reserves is subject to certain estimates and judgments. Please refer to the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" and "Results of Operations" sections of this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in addition to Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 7. Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, respectively of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for further information on loss and loss expenses.
Ambac has exposure to various bond types issued in the debt capital markets. Our experience has shown that, for the majority of bond types, we have not experienced significant claims. The bond types that have experienced significant claims, including through commutations, are residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), student loan securities and public finance bond types. These bond types represent 94% of our ever-to-date insurance claims recorded with RMBS comprising 77%. The table below indicates gross par outstanding and the components of gross loss and loss expense reserves related to policies inAmbac's gross loss and loss expense reserves atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018: Present Value of Expected Net Cash Flows Gross Loss Claims and Unearned and Loss Gross Par Loss Premium Expense ($ in millions) Outstanding (1)(2) Expenses Recoveries Revenue Reserves (1)(3)December 31, 2019 : RMBS $ 3,027$ 634 $ (2,013 ) $ (13 ) $ (1,392 ) Domestic Public Finance 2,398 1,007 (344 ) (36 ) 627 Student Loans 472 248 (36 ) (4 ) 208 Ambac UK and Other Credits 271 4 - (1 ) 3 Loss expenses - 73 - - 73 Totals $ 6,168$ 1,966 $ (2,394 ) $ (54 ) $ (482 ) December 31, 2018: RMBS $ 3,716$ 696 $ (1,995 ) $ (14 ) $ (1,313 ) Domestic Public Finance 3,987 1,095 (383 ) (73 ) 639 Student Loans 530 271 (39 ) (4 ) 228 Ambac UK and Other Credits 1,170 294 (5 ) (16 ) 273 Loss expenses - 66 - - 66 Totals $ 9,403$ 2,422 $ (2,422 ) $ (107 ) $ (107 )
(1) Ceded par outstanding on policies with loss reserves and ceded loss and loss
expense reserves are
and
reserves are included in Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses.
|Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 50 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
(2) Gross Par Outstanding includes capital appreciation bonds, which are reported
at the par amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed
to the current accreted value of the bond.
(3) Loss reserves are included in the balance sheet as Loss and loss expense
reserves or Subrogation recoverable dependent on if a policy is in a net
liability or net recoverable position.
Variability of Expected Losses and RecoveriesAmbac's management believes that the estimated future loss component of loss reserves (present value of expected net cash flows) are adequate to cover future claims presented, but there can be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not be higher than such estimates. It is possible that our estimated future losses for insurance policies discussed above could be understated or that our estimated future recoveries could be overstated. We have attempted to identify possible cash flows related to losses and recoveries using more stressful assumptions than the probability-weighted outcome recorded. The possible net cash flows consider the highest stress scenario that was utilized in the development of our probability-weighted expected loss atDecember 31, 2019 , and assumes an inability to execute any commutation transactions with issuers and/or investors. Such stress scenarios are developed based on management's view about all possible outcomes relating to losses and recoveries. In arriving at such view, management makes considerable judgments about the possibility of various future events. Although we do not believe it is possible to have stressed outcomes in all cases, it is possible that we could have stress case outcomes in some or even many cases. See "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A as well as the following descriptions of "RMBS Variability," "Public Finance Variability," "Student Loan Variability," and "Other Credits, including AmbacUK , Variability," for further discussion of the risks relating to future losses and recoveries that could result in more highly stressed outcomes. The occurrence of these stressed outcomes individually or collectively would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and may result in materially adverse consequence for the Company, including (without limitation) impairing the ability ofAmbac Assurance to honor its financial obligations; the initiation of rehabilitation proceedings againstAmbac Assurance ; decreased likelihood ofAmbac Assurance delivering value to AFG, through dividends or otherwise; and a significant drop in the value of securities issued or insured by AFG orAmbac Assurance . RMBS VariabilityAmbac has exposure to theU.S. mortgage market primarily through direct financial guarantees of RMBS, including transactions collateralized by first and second liens. Changes to assumptions that could make our reserves under-estimated include an increase in interest rates, deterioration in housing prices, poor servicing, the effect of a weakened economy characterized by growing unemployment and wage pressures. We utilize a model to project losses in our RMBS exposures and changes to reserves, either upward or downward, are not unlikely if we used a different model or methodology to project losses. We established a representation and warranty subrogation recovery as further discussed in Note 7. Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K. Our ability to realize RMBS representation and warranty recoveries is subject to significant uncertainty, including risks inherent in litigation, collectability of such amounts from counterparties (and/or their respective parents and affiliates), timing of receipt of any such recoveries, intervention by the OCI, which could impede our ability to take actions required to realize such recoveries and uncertainty inherent in the assumptions used in estimating such recoveries. Additionally, our R&W actual subrogation recoveries could be significantly lower than our estimate of$1,702 million , net of reinsurance, as ofDecember 31, 2019 , if the sponsors of these transactions: (i) fail to honor their obligations to repurchase the mortgage loans, (ii) successfully dispute our breach findings or claims for damages, (iii) no longer have the financial means to fully satisfy their obligations under the transaction documents, or (iv) our pursuit of recoveries is otherwise unsuccessful. Failure to realize R&W subrogation recoveries for any reason or the realization of R&W subrogation recoveries materially below the amount recorded onAmbac's consolidated balance sheet would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In the case of both first and second-lien exposures, the possible stress case assumes a lower housing price appreciation projection, which in turn drives higher defaults and severities. Using this approach, the possible increase in loss reserves for RMBS credits for which we have an estimate of expected loss atDecember 31, 2019 could be approximately$20 million . Combined with the absence of any R&W subrogation recoveries, a possible increase in loss reserves for RMBS could be approximately$1,722 million . Additionally, loss payments are sensitive to changes in interest rates, increasing as interest rates rise. For example an increase in interest rates of 0.50% could increase our estimate of expected losses by approximately$45 million . There can be no assurance that losses may not exceed such amounts. Public Finance VariabilityAmbac's U.S. public finance portfolio consists predominantly of municipal bonds such as general and revenue obligations and lease and tax-backed obligations of state and local government entities; however, the portfolio also comprises a wide array of non-municipal types of bonds, including financings for not-for-profit entities and transactions with public and private elements, which generally finance infrastructure, housing and other public purpose facilities and interests. The decline in public finance gross loss reserves atDecember 31, 2019 , as compared toDecember 31, 2018 , was primarily related to thePuerto Rico COFINA debt restructuring, payments of claims and commutations, substantially offset by increases in otherPuerto Rico loss reserves. Total public finance gross loss reserves and related gross par outstanding onAmbac insured obligations by bond type were as follows: |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 51 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents ($ in millions) 2019 2018 Issuer Type Gross Par Gross Loss Gross Par Gross Loss December 31, Outstanding (1) Reserves Outstanding (1) Reserves Lease and tax-backed $ 1,075$ 561 $ 2,062$ 528 General obligation 681 (16 ) 904 24 Housing 457 29 445 26 Transportation revenue 88 42 471 49 Other 97 11 105 12 Total $ 2,398$ 627 $ 3,987$ 639
(1) Gross Par Outstanding includes capital appreciation bonds, which are reported
at the par amount at the time of issuance of the insurance policy as opposed
to the current accreted value of the bond.
It is possible our loss reserves for public finance credits may be under-estimated if issuers are faced with prolonged exposure to adverse political, judicial, economic, fiscal or socioeconomic events or trends. Our experience with the city ofDetroit in 2013 in its bankruptcy proceeding was not favorable and renders future outcomes with other public finance issuers even more difficult to predict and may increase the risk that we may suffer losses that could be sizable. We agreed to settlements regarding our insuredDetroit general obligation bonds that provide better treatment of our exposures than the city planned to include in its plan of adjustment, but nevertheless required us to incur a loss for a significant portion of our exposure. An additional troubling precedent in theDetroit case, as well as other municipal bankruptcies, is the preferential treatment of certain creditor classes, especially the public pensions. The cost of pensions and the need to address frequently sizable unfunded or underfunded pensions is often a key driver of stress for many municipalities and their related authorities, including entities to whom we have significant exposure, such asChicago Public Schools , theState of New Jersey and many others. Less severe treatment of pension obligations in bankruptcy may lead to worse outcomes for traditional debt creditors. Variability of outcomes applies to even what is generally considered more secure municipal financings, such as dedicated sales tax revenue bonds that capture sales tax revenues for debt service ahead of any amounts being deposited into the general fund of an issuer. In the case of the Puerto Rico COFINA sales tax bonds that were part of theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico's Title III proceedings,Ambac Assurance and other creditors agreed to settle at a recovery rate equal to about 93% of pre-petition amounts owed on theAmbac insured senior COFINA bonds. In the COFINA case, the senior bonds still received a reduction or "haircut" despite the existence of junior COFINA bonds, which received a recovery rate equal to about 56% of pre-petition amounts owed. The amounts were confirmed as part of the COFINA Plan of Adjustment onFebruary 4, 2019 . In addition, municipal entities may be more inclined to use bankruptcy to resolve their financial stresses if they believe preferred outcomes for various creditor groups can be achieved. We expect municipal bankruptcies and defaults to continue to be challenging to project given the unique political, economic, fiscal, legal, governance and public policy differences among municipalities as well as the complexity, long duration and relative infrequency of the cases themselves in forums with a scarcity of legal precedent. Another potentially adverse development that could cause the loss reserves on our public finance credits to be underestimated is deterioration in the municipal bond market, resulting from reduced or limited access to alternative forms of credit (such as bank loans) or other exogenous factors, such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law onDecember 22, 2017 , which could reduce certain municipal investors' appetite for tax-exempt municipal bonds and over the longer term could potentially put additional pressure on issuers in states with high state and local taxes. These factors could deprive issuers access to funding at a level necessary to avoid defaulting on their obligations. In addition, a more recent judicial decision in connection with the PRHTA Title III proceedings could cause the loss reserves on our public finance credits to be underestimated. OnMarch 26, 2019 , theU.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit , affirming a decision by theU.S. District Court overseeing the PROMESA Title III proceedings for the PRHTA, found that under Sections 928(a) and 922(d) of theU.S. Bankruptcy Code, municipal issuers of revenue bonds secured by special revenues are permitted, but not required, to apply special revenues to pay debt service on such revenue bonds during the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings for such municipal issuers. The complainants had sought an order compelling PRHTA, as the debtor, to continue to make debt service payments on its revenue bonds from pledged special revenues during the pendency of its Title III case, but the First Circuit affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the complaint, holding that it could not compel the issuer to make such payments. The First Circuit's decision challenges what had been a commonly understood notion in the municipal finance marketplace that municipal revenues bondholders secured by special revenues (as defined in Chapter 9 of theU.S. Bankruptcy Code) would continue to receive payment during a bankruptcy of the municipal issuer. This decision introduces significant uncertainty into the public finance market and it may make it more difficult for municipal instrumentalities to procure revenue bond financings in the future and increases the credit risk to bondholders of existing special revenue bonds, particularly those from weaker issuers. In the wake of the decision, rating agencies have already taken ratings actions on, or announced their intention to review ratings given to, bonds issued across the country highlighting the potential contagion effect of the variousPuerto Rico proceedings under PROMESA. While our loss reserves consider our judgment regarding issuers' financial flexibility to adapt to adverse markets, they may not adequately capture sudden, unexpected or protracted uncertainty that adversely affects market conditions. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 52 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Our exposures to theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico are under stress arising from the Commonwealth's poor financial condition, uncertain willingness and ability to pay, weak economy, loss of capital markets access, weakened infrastructure and severe damage caused by hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017 as well as the earthquakes that began in lateDecember 2019 . These factors, taken together with the payment moratorium on debt payments of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities, ongoing PROMESA Title III proceedings, and certain other provisions under PROMESA, the potential for restructurings of debt insured byAmbac Assurance , either with or without its consent, and the possibility of protracted litigation as a result of which its rights may be materially impaired, may cause losses to exceed current reserves in a material manner. See Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 and "Financial Guarantees in Force" section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further updates relating toPuerto Rico and details on the legal, economic and fiscal developments that have impacted or may impactAmbac Assurance's insuredPuerto Rico bonds. Material additional losses caused by the above-described factors would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. For public finance credits, includingPuerto Rico as well as other issuers, for which we have an estimate of expected loss atDecember 31, 2019 , the possible increase in loss reserves could be approximately$1,000 million . Among other things, this estimate includes the possibility that the current Plan Support Agreement (as discussed above in the Financial Guarantees in Force section of this Management Discussion and Analysis) were to become effective. However, there can be no assurance that losses may not exceed such amount. Student Loan Variability Changes to assumptions that could make our reserves under-estimated include, but are not limited to, increases in interest rates, default rates and loss severities on the collateral due to economic or other factors. Such factors may include lower recoveries on defaulted loans or additional losses on collateral or trust assets, including as a result of any enforcement actions by theConsumer Finance Protection Bureau . For student loan credits for which we have an estimate of expected loss atDecember 31, 2019 , the possible increase in loss reserves could be approximately$15 million . Additionally, an increase in interest rates of 0.50% could increase our estimate of expected losses by approximately$20 million . However, there can be no assurance that losses may not exceed such amounts. Other Credits, including AmbacUK , Variability It is possible our loss reserves on other types of credits, including those insured by AmbacUK , may be under-estimated because of various risks that vary widely, including the risk that we may not be able to recover or mitigate losses through our remediation processes. For all other credits, including AmbacUK , for which we have an estimate of expected loss, the sum of all the highest stress case loss scenarios is approximately$50 million greater than the loss reserves atDecember 31, 2019 . However, there can be no assurance that losses may not exceed such amount. The highest stress case losses atDecember 31, 2019 , are$120 million lower than theDecember 31, 2018 , estimate primarily as a result of the Ballantyne commutation. Long-term Debt. Long-term debt consists of senior and junior surplus notes issued byAmbac Assurance , the Ambac Note and Tier 2 Notes issued in connection with the Rehabilitation Exit Transactions, and AmbacUK debt issued in connection with the Ballantyne commutation. The carrying value of each of these as ofDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 is below: December 31, ($ in millions) 2019 December 31, 2018 Surplus notes $ 769 $ 737 Ambac note 1,763 1,940 Tier 2 notes 278 252 Ambac UK debt 13 - Total Long-term Debt$ 2,822 $ 2,929 The decrease in long-term debt fromDecember 31, 2018 is primarily due to optional redemptions of the Ambac Note by$178 million , partially offset by increase in the Tier 2 notes balance due to paid-in-kind interest and discount accretion, together with issuance of AmbacUK debt. Increase in Surplus notes was due to the accretion on the carrying value of the notes. SPECIAL PURPOSE AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Please refer to Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3. Variable Interest Entities to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K, for information regarding special purpose and variable interest entities.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The following accounting standards have been issued but have not yet been adopted. We do not expect these accounting standards to have a consequential impact onAmbac's financial statements. VIE Related Party Guidance InOctober 2018 , the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 810) - Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities. To determine whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest, under the new guidance a reporting entity must consider indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportional basis rather than as a direct interest in its entirety (as currently required in GAAP). These amendments create alignment between determining whether a decision making fee is a variable interest and determining whether a reporting entity within a related party group is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASU 2018-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning afterDecember 15, 2019 , with early adoption permitted.Ambac will adopt this ASU onJanuary 1, 2020 . Cloud Computing Arrangement Service Contracts InAugust 2018 , the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill andOther- Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) - Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 53 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
new guidance requires a customer in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract to capitalize certain implementation costs as if the arrangement was an internal-use software project. The internal-use software guidance requires the capitalization of certain costs incurred only during the application development stage. That guidance also requires entities to expense costs during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages as they are incurred. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning afterDecember 15, 2019 , with early adoption permitted. The ASU may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption.Ambac will adopt this ASU onJanuary 1, 2020 to prospective costs. Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Plans Disclosures InAugust 2018 , the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20) - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The ASU modifies various disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Relevant disclosures that will be removed are: i) amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year and ii) the effects of a one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the (a) aggregate of the service and interest cost components of the net periodic pension cost and (b) benefit obligation for postretirement healthcare benefits. Relevant disclosures that will be added are an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligations for the period. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending afterDecember 15, 2020 , with early adoption permitted. The modified disclosures must be applied on a retrospective basis for all periods presented.Ambac will adopt this ASU onDecember 31, 2020 . Fair Value Measurement Disclosures InAugust 2018 , the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The ASU modifies various disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. Relevant disclosures that will be removed, modified and added are as follows: • Removals: 1) Amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy, 2) Policy for timing of transfers between
levels, and 3) Valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements.
• Modifications: 1) For investments in certain entities that calculate net
asset value, disclosures are only required for the timing of liquidation of
an investee's assets and the date when restrictions from redemption might
lapse, only if the investee has communicated the timing to the reporting
entity or publicly announced it and 2) Clarification that the measurement
uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in
measurement as of the reporting date and not possible future changes.
• Additions: 1) Changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included
in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements
held at the end of the reporting period and 2) Range and weighted average of
significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Alternatively, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) if it determines that it is a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning afterDecember 15, 2019 , with early adoption permitted. Disclosure amendments related to changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income (loss) for Level 3 instruments, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively only for the most recent interim or annual period presented. All other disclosure amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented.Ambac will adopt this ASU onJanuary 1, 2020 . Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments InJune 2016 , the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, subsequently amended by ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses; ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments; ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief ; and ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (collectively "the ASU"). The ASU significantly affects how reporting entities will measure credit losses for financial assets that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, which include loans, debt securities, premium receivables, reinsurance recoverables, net investments in leases and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. The ASU does not apply to recoveries of previously paid losses on financial guarantee insurance contracts accounted for under ASC 944 nor does it apply to equity method investments accounted for under ASC 323. • For financial assets measured at amortized cost, the ASU replaces the
"incurred loss" model, which generally delayed recognition of the full amount
of credit losses until the loss was probable of occurring, with an "expected
loss" model, which reflects an entity's current estimate of all expected
lifetime credit losses. Expected lifetime credit losses for amortized cost
assets will be recorded as a valuation allowance, with subsequent increases
or decreases in the allowance reflected in net income each period.
• For available-for-sale debt securities, credit losses under the ASU will be
measured similarly to current GAAP. However, under the ASU, credit losses for
available-for-sale debt securities will be recorded as a valuation allowance
(similar to the amortized cost assets approach described above), rather than
as a direct write-down of the security as is required under current GAAP. As
a result, improvements to estimated credit losses for available-for-sale debt
securities will be recognized immediately in net income rather than as interest income over time. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 54 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
For both amortized cost assets and available-for-sale debt securities, our implementation process included updates to our allowance documentation, reporting processes and related internal controls. Given the more significant changes to the amortized cost asset credit model, the implementation process further included identifying the inventory of assets impacted by this standard; design and selection of a credit loss model; and identification of new data requirements and data sources for model implementation. Depending on the asset type, either a discounted cash flow or probability of default/loss given default model will be used for estimating the effect of lifetime losses and will incorporate any necessary qualitative adjustments for model limitations. The ASU is effective forSEC filers that are not eligible to be smaller reporting companies for interim and annual periods beginning afterDecember 15, 2019 .Ambac will adopt this ASU effectiveJanuary 1, 2020 , using a modified retrospective approach. While we do not expect the ASU to have a consequential impact onAmbac's financial statements, we continue to assess all the effects of adoption. We currently believe the most significant effect will be increased disclosure requirements. AMBAC ASSURANCE STATUTORY BASIS FINANCIAL RESULTSAmbac Assurance and Everspan's statutory financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the OCI. OCI recognizes only statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by theState of Wisconsin ("SAP") for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company for determining its solvency under Wisconsin Insurance Law. TheNational Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") Accounting Practices and Procedures manual ("NAIC SAP") has been adopted as a component of prescribed practices by theState of Wisconsin . OCI has prescribed or permitted additional accounting practices forAmbac Assurance and Everspan which are described in Note 8. Insurance Regulatory Restrictions to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K. As a result of these prescribed and permitted practices,Ambac Assurance's policyholder surplus atDecember 31, 2019 and 2018 was less than NAIC SAP by$12 million and less than$42 million , respectively.Ambac Assurance's statutory policyholder surplus and qualified statutory capital (defined as the sum of policyholders surplus and mandatory contingency reserves) were$1,088 million and$1,618 million atDecember 31, 2019 , respectively, as compared to$1,152 million and$1,648 million atDecember 31, 2018 , respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2019 , statutory policyholder surplus and qualified statutory capital included$574 million principal balance of surplus notes outstanding,$365 million principal balance of junior surplus notes outstanding and$138 million liquidation preference of preferred stock outstanding. These surplus and junior surplus notes (including related accrued interest of$472 million that is not recorded under statutory basis accounting principles) and preferred stock issued byAmbac Assurance are obligations that have claims on the resources ofAmbac Assurance that are senior to AFG's equity and therefore impact AFG's ability to realize residual value or receive dividends fromAmbac Assurance .
The drivers to the net decrease in policyholder surplus were:
• Statutory net loss of
primarily due to loss and loss expenses from net adverse development on the
insured portfolio, operating expenses and impairment charges on loans to
subsidiaries, partially offset by net investment gains and premiums earned;
• Contributions to contingency reserves of$35 million ; partially offset by • Surplus benefits for (i)Ambac Assurance's receipt inSeptember 2019 , in
connection with an
million, (ii) the recognition of a previous deferred gain from the 2015 sale
of Ballantyne bonds to Ambac
million in the fair value of investment securities that are recorded at the
lower of amortized cost or fair value.
As further discussed in "Financial Guarantees in Force" above in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of this Form 10-K, pursuant to the COFINA Plan of Adjustment that was effective onFebruary 12 . 2019,Ambac Assurance commuted a significant portion of its COFINA insured exposure. The commutation transactions resulted in a reduction ofAmbac Assurance's insured exposure to COFINA by approximately 75% and an incurred loss of$37 million in 2019, which was offset by accelerated earned premiums of$31 million on the insured exposures being commuted.Ambac Assurance's statutory surplus is sensitive to multiple factors, including: (i) loss reserve development, (ii) approval by OCI of principal or interest payments on existing surplus notes, (iii) approval by OCI of principal or interest payments on existing junior surplus notes, (iv) deterioration in the financial position ofAmbac Assurance subsidiaries that have their obligations guaranteed byAmbac Assurance , (v) first time payment defaults of insured obligations, which increase statutory loss reserves, (vi) commutations of insurance policies or credit derivative contracts at amounts that differ from the amount of liabilities recorded, (vii) reinsurance contract terminations at amounts that differ from net assets recorded, (viii) changes to the fair value of investments carried at fair value, (ix) settlements or resolutions of representation and warranty breach claims at amounts that differ from amounts recorded, including failures to collect such amounts, (x) realized gains and losses, including losses arising from other than temporary impairments of investment securities, and (xi) future changes to prescribed SAP practices by the OCI. Under SAP, these amounts will be recorded as a liability once approval for payment has been granted by OCI. The significant differences between GAAP and SAP are that under SAP: • Loss reserves are only established for losses on guaranteed obligations that
have experienced a payment default in an amount that is sufficient to cover
the present value of the anticipated defaulted debt service payments over the
expected period of default, less estimated recoveries under subrogation rights (5.1% as prescribed by OCI). Under GAAP, in addition to the establishment of loss reserves for defaulted obligations, |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 55 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
loss reserves are established (net of GAAP basis unearned premium revenue) for obligations that have experienced credit deterioration, but have not yet defaulted using a weighted-average risk-free discount rate, currently at 2.1%. • Mandatory contingency reserves are required based upon the type of obligation
insured, whereas GAAP does not require such a reserve. Releases of the
contingency reserves are generally subject to OCI approval and relate to a
determination that the held reserves are deemed excessive.
• Investment grade fixed income investments are stated at amortized cost and
certain below investment grade fixed income investments are reported at the
lower of amortized cost or fair value. Under GAAP, all fixed income
investments are reported at fair value.
• Wholly owned subsidiaries are not consolidated; rather, the equity basis of
accounting is utilized and the carrying values of these investments are
subject to admissibility tests.
• Variable interest entities ("VIE") are not required to be assessed for
consolidation. Under GAAP, a reporting entity that has both the following
characteristics is required to consolidate the VIE: a) the power to direct
the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic
performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE.
that could potentially be significant to the VIE as the result of its
guarantee of insured obligations issued by VIEs. For certain VIEs Ambac
Assurance has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE
and accordingly consolidates the related VIEs under GAAP.
• All payments of principal and interest on the surplus notes are subject to
the approval of the OCI. Unpaid interest due on the surplus notes is expensed
when the approval for payment of interest has been granted by the OCI. Under
GAAP, interest on surplus notes is accrued regardless of OCI approval.
• Upfront premiums written are earned on a basis proportionate to the remaining
scheduled debt service to the original total principal and interest insured.
Installment premiums are reflected in income pro-rata over the period covered
by the premium payment. When an insurance policy has been legally defeased,
the related portion of unearned premium revenue is accelerated and recognized
as premiums earned. Under GAAP, premium revenues for both upfront and
installment premiums are earned over the life of the financial guarantee
contract in proportion to the insured principal amount outstanding at each
reporting date.
• Insurance intangibles that arose as a result of the implementation of Fresh
Start reporting is not a concept within SAP. This insurance intangible asset
is amortized as an expense on a level yield basis over the life of the related insurance risks. AMBACUK FINANCIAL RESULTS UNDERUK ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AmbacUK is required to prepare financial statements under FRS 102 "The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in theUK andRepublic of Ireland ." AmbacUK's shareholder funds underUK GAAP were £387 million atDecember 31, 2019 , as compared to £263 million atDecember 31, 2018 . The increase inAmbac UK's shareholders' funds was primarily due to the loss and loss expenses benefit in the period following the restructuring and commutation of Ballantyne coupled with the receipt of premiums and return on investments. AtDecember 31, 2019 , the carrying value of cash and investments was £470 million, a decrease from £498 million atDecember 31, 2018 . The decrease in cash and investments is due to the impact of the restructuring and commutation of Ballantyne as noted above, tax payments and operating expenses partially offset by continued receipt of premiums and net investment income in the period. The significant differences betweenU.S. GAAP andUK GAAP are that underUK GAAP: • Loss reserves are only established for losses on guaranteed obligations when,
in the judgment of management, a monetary default in the timely payment of
debt service is likely to occur, which would result in Ambac
loss. A loss provision is established in an amount that is sufficient to
cover the present value (currently using a discount rate of 5.23%) of the
anticipated defaulted debt service payments over the expected period of
default, less estimated recoveries under subrogation rights. The discount
rate is equal to the lower of the rate of return on invested assets for
either the current year or the period covering the current year plus the four
previous years. Under
GAAP basis unearned premium revenue) for obligations that have experienced
credit deterioration, but have not yet defaulted using a weighted-average
risk-free discount rate.
• Investments in fixed income securities are stated at amortized cost, subject
to an other-than-temporary impairment evaluation. Under
are reported at fair value, also subject to an other-than-temporary
impairment evaluation.
• Purchases of Ambac
an Ambac
investment whereas the Ambac
payment with an accompanying reduction in Ambac
GAAP, investments in Ambac
and do not reduce loss reserves.
• Variable interest entities ("VIE") are not required to be assessed for
consolidation. Under
following characteristics is required to consolidate the VIE: a) the power to
direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 56 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
performance; and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.Ambac generally has the obligation to absorb losses of VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIE as the result of its guarantee of insured obligations issued by VIEs. For certain VIEs AmbacUK has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and accordingly consolidates the related VIEs underU.S. GAAP. • Upfront premiums written are earned on a basis proportionate to the remaining
scheduled debt service to the total principal and interest insured.
Installment premiums are reflected in income pro-rata over the period covered
by the premium payment. Under
and installment premiums are earned over the life of the financial guarantee
contract in proportion to the insured principal amount outstanding at each
reporting date.
• Insurance intangibles that arose as a result of the implementation of Fresh
Start reporting is not a concept within
insurance intangible asset is amortized as an expense on a level yield basis
over the life of the related insurance risks.
AmbacUK is also required to prepare financial information in accordance with the Solvency II Directive. The basis of preparation of this information is significantly different from both US GAAP andUK GAAP. The calculation of capital resources, regulatory capital requirements and regulatory capital deficits under Solvency II atDecember 31, 2019 , will be be published onAmbac's website during March. Final annual Solvency II data and AmbacUK's annual Solvency and Financial Condition Report will be published onAmbac's website onApril 22, 2019 . Available capital resources under Solvency II were a surplus of £187.5 million atDecember 31, 2019 , (based on the quarterly Solvency II filing made onFebruary 11, 2019 , which may be subject to update in the final annual Solvency II filing noted above) an improvement from a surplus of £94.9 million atDecember 31, 2018 . Of these available capital resources the value eligible to meet solvency capital requirements atDecember 31, 2019 , was £178 million in comparison to £90 million as atDecember 31, 2018 . Eligible capital resources atDecember 31, 2019 andDecember 31, 2018 , are in comparison to regulatory capital requirements of £208 million and £357 million, respectively. AmbacUK is therefore deficient in terms of compliance with applicable regulatory capital requirements by £30 million and £267 million atDecember 31, 2019 andDecember 31, 2018 , respectively. The regulators are aware of the deficiency in capital resources as compared to capital requirements and dialogue betweenAmbac UK management and its regulators remains ongoing with respect to options for addressing the shortcoming, although such options remain few. NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES In addition to reporting the Company's quarterly financial results in accordance with GAAP, the Company reports two non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Book Value. The most directly comparable GAAP measures are net income attributable to common stockholders for Adjusted earnings andTotal Ambac Financial Group, Inc. stockholders' equity for Adjusted Book value. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of financial performance or financial position that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. We are presenting these non-GAAP financial measures because they provide greater transparency and enhanced visibility into the underlying drivers of our business. Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Book Value are not substitutes for the Company's GAAP reporting, should not be viewed in isolation and may differ from similar reporting provided by other companies, which may define non-GAAP measures differently.Ambac has a significantU.S. tax net operating loss ("NOL") that is offset by a full valuation allowance in the GAAP consolidated financial statements. As a result of this and other considerations, we utilized a 0% effective tax rate for non-GAAP adjustments; which is subject to change. The following paragraphs define each non-GAAP financial measure and describe why it is useful. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is also presented below. Adjusted Earnings (Loss). Adjusted Earnings (Loss) is defined as net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, as reported under GAAP, adjusted on an after-tax basis for the following: • Non-credit impairment fair value (gain) loss on credit derivatives:
Elimination of the non-credit impairment fair value gains (losses) on credit
derivatives, which is the amount in excess of the present value of the
expected estimated credit losses. Such fair value adjustments are affected
by, and in part fluctuate with, changes in market factors such as interest
rates and credit spreads, including the market's perception of
risk ("Ambac CVA"), and are not expected to result in an economic gain or
loss. These adjustments allow for all financial guarantee contracts to be
accounted for consistent with the Financial Services - Insurance Topic of
ASC, whether or not they are subject to derivative accounting rules.
• Insurance intangible amortization: Elimination of the amortization of the
financial guarantee insurance intangible asset that arose as a result of the
implementation of Fresh Start reporting. These adjustments ensure that all
financial guarantee contracts are accounted for consistent with the
provisions of the Financial Services - Insurance Topic of the ASC.
• Foreign exchange (gains) losses: Elimination of the foreign exchange gains
(losses) on the re-measurement of assets, liabilities and transactions in
non-functional currencies. This adjustment eliminates the foreign exchange
gains (losses) on all assets, liabilities and transactions in non-functional
currencies, which enables users of our financial statements to better view
the business results without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates and facilitates period-to-period comparisons of
operating performance.
• Fair value (gain) loss on interest rate derivative from Ambac CVA:
Elimination of the gains (losses) relating to
derivative contracts. Similar to credit derivatives, fair values include the
market's perception of |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 57 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles net income attributable to common stockholders to the non-GAAP measure, Adjusted Earnings on a total dollar amount and per diluted share basis, for all periods presented: 2019 2018 2017 ($ in millions, except per share data) Per Diluted Per Diluted Per Diluted Year Ended December 31, $ Amount Share $ Amount Share $ Amount Share Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$ (216 ) $ (4.69 ) $ 186 $ 3.99 $ (329 ) $ (7.25 ) Adjustments: Non-credit impairment fair value (gain) loss on credit derivatives (1 ) (0.03 ) 1 0.02 (11 ) (0.24 ) Insurance intangible amortization 295 6.43 107 2.30 151 3.33 Foreign exchange (gains) losses (12 ) (0.26 ) 7 0.15 (21 ) (0.47 ) Fair value (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives from Ambac CVA - - - - 45 0.99
Adjusted Earnings (Loss)
6.47
Adjusted Book Value. Adjusted Book Value is defined asTotal Ambac Financial Group, Inc. stockholders' equity as reported under GAAP, adjusted for after-tax impact of the following: • Non-credit impairment fair value losses on credit derivatives: Elimination of
the non-credit impairment fair value loss on credit derivatives, which is the
amount in excess of the present value of the expected estimated economic
credit loss. GAAP fair values are affected by, and in part fluctuate with,
changes in market factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, including
These adjustments allow for all financial guarantee contracts to be accounted
for within Adjusted Book Value consistent with the provisions of the Financial Services-Insurance Topic of the ASC, whether or not they are subject to derivative accounting rules.
• Insurance intangible asset: Elimination of the financial guarantee insurance
intangible asset that arose as a result of
and the implementation of Fresh Start reporting. This adjustment ensures that
all financial guarantee contracts are accounted for within Adjusted Book
Value consistent with the provisions of the
Topic of the ASC.
• Ambac CVA on interest rate derivative liabilities: Elimination of the gain
relating to
credit derivatives, fair values include the market's perception of
credit risk and this adjustment only allows for such gain when realized.
• Net unearned premiums and fees in excess of expected losses: Addition of the
value of the unearned premium revenue ("UPR") on financial guarantee
contracts, in excess of expected losses, net of reinsurance. This non-GAAP
adjustment presents the economics of UPR and expected losses for financial
guarantee contracts on a consistent basis. In accordance with GAAP,
stockholders' equity reflects a reduction for expected losses only to the
extent they exceed UPR. However, when expected losses are less than UPR for a
financial guarantee contract, neither expected losses nor UPR have an impact
on stockholders' equity. This non-GAAP adjustment adds UPR in excess of
expected losses, net of reinsurance, to stockholders' equity for financial
guarantee contracts where expected losses are less than UPR.
• Net unrealized investment (gains) losses in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income: Elimination of the unrealized gains and losses on the Company's
investments that are recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income ("AOCI"). The AOCI component of the fair value
adjustment on the investment portfolio may differ from realized gains and
losses ultimately recognized by the Company based on the Company's investment
strategy. This adjustment only allows for such gains and losses in Adjusted
Book Value when realized. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 58 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table reconcilesTotal Ambac Financial Group, Inc. stockholders' equity to the non-GAAP measure Adjusted Book Value on a total dollar amount and per share basis, for all periods presented: 2019
2018
($ in millions, except per share data) December 31, $ Amount Per Share $ Amount Per ShareTotal Ambac Financial Group, Inc. stockholders' equity$ 1,477 $ 32.41 $ 1,592 $ 35.12 Adjustments: Non-credit impairment fair value losses on credit derivatives - 0.01 1 0.03 Insurance intangible asset (427 ) (9.37 ) (719 ) (15.87 ) Net unearned premiums and fees in excess of expected losses 414 9.09 462 10.19 Net unrealized investment (gains) losses in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (151 ) (3.31 ) (86 ) (1.89 ) Adjusted Book Value$ 1,313 $ 28.83 $ 1,251 $ 27.58 Factors that impact changes to Adjusted Book Value include many of the same factors that impact Adjusted Earnings, including the majority of revenues and expenses, but generally exclude components of premium earnings since they are embedded in prior period's Adjusted Book Value through the net unearned premiums and fees in excess of expected losses adjustment. Net unearned premiums and fees in excess of expected losses will affect Adjusted Book Value for (i) changes to future premium assumptions (e.g. expected term, interest rates, foreign currency rates, time passage) and (ii) changes to expected losses for policies which do not exceed their related unearned premiums. The Adjusted Book Value increase fromDecember 31, 2018 toDecember 31, 2019 was primarily driven by Adjusted earnings. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Market risk represents the potential for losses that may result from changes in the value of a financial instrument as a result of changes in market conditions. The primary market risks that would impact the value ofAmbac's financial instruments are interest rate risk, credit spread risk and foreign currency risk. Below we discuss each of these risks and the specific types of financial instruments impacted. Senior managers are responsible for developing and applying methods to measure risk.Ambac utilizes various systems, models and sensitivity scenarios to monitor and manage market risk. These models include estimates, made by management, which utilize current and historical market information. The valuation results from these models could differ materially from amounts that would actually be realized in the market. Financial instruments of VIEs that are consolidated as a result ofAmbac's financial guarantees are excluded from the market risk measures below. Interest Rate Risk Financial instruments for which fair value may be affected by changes in interest rates consist primarily of fixed income investment securities, long-term debt and interest rate derivatives. Fixed income investment securities that are guaranteed byAmbac have interest rate risk characteristics that behave inversely to those associated with future financial guarantee claim payments. Accordingly, such securities are excluded from the interest rate sensitivity table below. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates are driven primarily by the impact of interest rate shifts on the investment portfolio (which produce net fair value losses as rates increase) and long-term debt and the interest rate derivatives portfolio (which produce net fair value gains as rates increase).Ambac performs scenario testing to measure the potential for losses in volatile markets. These scenario tests include parallel and non-parallel shifts in the benchmark interest rate curve. The interest rate derivatives portfolio is managed as an economic hedge against the effects of rising interest rates elsewhere in the Company, including onAmbac's financial guarantee exposures (the "macro-hedge"). The interest rate sensitivity of the interest rate derivatives portfolio attributable to the macro-hedge position would produce mark-to-market gains or losses of approximately$0.4 million for a 1 basis point parallel shift in USD benchmark interest rates up or down atDecember 31, 2019 . The following table summarizes the estimated change in fair value (based primarily on the valuation methodology discussed in Note 9. Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K) on these financial instruments, assuming immediate changes in interest rates at specified levels atDecember 31, 2019 : Estimated Change in Net ($ in millions) Fair Value Estimated Net Fair Value 300 Basis Point Rise $ 30 $ (380 ) 200 Basis Point Rise 17 (393 ) 100 Basis Point Rise 7 (403 ) Base Scenario - (410 ) 100 Basis Point Decline(1) (2 ) (412 ) 200 Basis Point Decline(1) 15 (395 )
(1) Incorporates an interest rate floor of 0%
Due to the low interest rate environment as ofDecember 31, 2019 , stress scenarios involving interest rate declines greater than 200 basis points are not meaningful toAmbac's portfolios. Interest rate increases would also have a negative economic impact on expected future claim payments within the financial guarantee portfolio, most notably for RMBS and student loan policies. An increase in interest rates of 0.50% could increase our estimate of expected losses for RMBS and student loans by approximately$45 million and$20 million , respectively. |Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 59 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Credit Spread Risk Financial instruments that may be adversely affected by changes in credit spreads includeAmbac's outstanding credit derivative contracts, certain interest rate derivatives and investment assets. Changes in spreads are generally caused by changes in the market's perception of the credit quality of the underlying obligor. Market liquidity and prevailing risk premiums demanded by market participants are also reflected in spreads and impact valuations. The following table summarizes the estimated change in fair values onAmbac's net derivative liabilities assuming immediate parallel shifts in reference obligation credit spreads related to written credit derivatives and counterparty credit spreads related to uncollateralized interest rate derivatives atDecember 31, 2019 . It is more likely that actual changes in credit spreads will vary by obligor: Estimated Change in Net Fair ($ in millions) Value Estimated Net Fair Value 250 Basis Point Widening $ (20 ) $ (35 ) 50 Basis Point Widening (4 ) (19 ) Base Scenario - (15 ) 50 basis Point Narrowing 4 (11 ) 250 basis Point Narrowing 13 (2 ) Also included in the fair value of derivatives is the effect ofAmbac's creditworthiness, which reflects market perception ofAmbac's ability to meet its obligations. Generally, the need for anAmbac credit valuation adjustment is mitigated by the existence of collateral posting agreements under which adequate collateral has been posted. Derivative contracts entered into with credit exposure to financial guarantee customers are not typically subject to collateral posting agreements. As a result of runoff of uncollateralized interest rate and credit default swap liabilities,Ambac's credit valuation adjustment included in the determination of fair value has resulted in$0.1 million reduction to derivative liabilities as ofDecember 31, 2019 . An increase inAmbac credit spreads as much as 250 basis points would result in less than a$1 million impact to the fair value of derivatives atDecember 31, 2019 . Refer to Note 9. Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for further information on measurement of the credit valuation adjustment.Ambac's fixed income investment portfolio contains securities with different sensitivities to and volatility of credit spreads. Fixed income securities that are guaranteed byAmbac and were purchased inAmbac's investment portfolio have credit spread risk characteristics that behave inversely to those associated with future financial guarantee claim payments. Accordingly such securities are excluded from the company's spread sensitivity measures. The following table summarizes the estimated change in fair values ofAmbac's fixed income investment portfolio assuming immediate shifts in credit spreads across all holdings other thanAmbac guaranteed securities atDecember 31, 2019 . It is more likely that actual changes in credit spreads will vary by security: Estimated Change in Net Fair ($ in millions) Value Estimated Net Fair Value 250 Basis Point Widening $ (155 ) $ 2,189 50 Basis Point Widening (31 ) 2,313 Base Scenario - 2,344 50 Basis Point Narrowing 30 2,374 250 Basis Point Narrowing 71 2,415 Foreign Currency RiskAmbac has financial instruments denominated in currencies other than theU.S. dollar, primarily pounds sterling and euros. These financial instruments are primarily invested assets of AmbacUK . The following table summarizes the estimated net change in fair value of these financial instruments assuming immediate shifts in spot foreign exchange rates toU.S. dollars as ofDecember 31, 2019 . ($ in millions) Estimated change in fair value Change in Foreign Exchange Rates AgainstU.S. Dollar 20% Decrease $ (72 ) 10% Decrease (36 ) 10% Increase 36 20% Increase 72 | Ambac Financial Group, Inc. 60 2019 FORM 10-K |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
© Edgar Online, source