Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. United States
  4. Nasdaq
  5. Apple Inc.
  6. News
  7. Summary
    AAPL   US0378331005

APPLE INC.

(AAPL)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Analysis: In Apple vs Epic Games, battle of the experts gets personal

05/13/2021 | 07:03am EDT
FILE PHOTO: Fortnite installing on Android is seen in front of Apple logo in this illustration

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - In its ongoing case against Apple Inc, "Fortnite" creator Epic Games is counting on this week's testimony from its star expert witness David Evans, chairman of Global Economics Group, to make its case that Apple is an anticompetitive monopolist over app developers.

Apple has called its own experts to rebut Evans' views on the market, but with an added personal twist: It called MIT economist Richard Schmalensee, who has authored numerous books and academic papers together with Evans, to accuse Evans of contradicting his own prior research.

Legal experts said Apple's aim was to chip away at Evans' credibility in the eyes of the judge who will rule on the case.

The erstwhile collaborators - who together have written works cited extensively by the U.S. Supreme Court in landmark antitrust decisions - are duking it out over the central issue in the three-week trial in federal court in Oakland, California: What is the relevant market in the case?

Framed Epic's way, Apple and its app store are a monopoly that is abusing control over the mobile software market to extract commissions for payments made inside apps. But Apple argues that it is just one of many competitors in a healthy market for video game purchases.

Whichever side prevails in persuading Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on the question of market definition will likely win the entire case, antitrust experts said.

"Epic absolutely has to win the market definition," said Daniel Lyons, a professor at Boston College Law School. "If Apple is right that 'Fortnite' on iOS is just one small part of the larger 'Fortnite' universe, then Apple doesn't have market power and anything they do is unlikely to cause consumer harm because consumers can switch."

On the stand this week, Evans testified that Apple is what is known as a single-brand market, arguing that once consumers buy an iPhone, the costs of switching to an Android are so high that they rarely make the jump.

Since about 2010, Evans testified, Apple's App Store has effectively been its own market, and users rarely venture outside. After Apple kicked "Fortnite" off the App Store, Evans testified, only a small fraction of Apple users jumped to other devices like PCs or gaming consoles to play "Fortnite."

Schmalensee, by contrast, contends that the relevant market is gaming transactions, where Apple is just one platform among many - Microsoft Corp's Xbox and Sony Group Corp's PlayStation - sitting between game developers and gamers and charging commissions to facilitate transactions.

Apple's App Store is a two-sided marketplace, Schmalensee testified, a concept that he and Evans have written about extensively, including in an amicus curiae brief on behalf of American Express in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case.

American Express had prohibited merchants from steering their customers toward rival cards with lower swipe fees, arguing that its higher fees helped fund cardholder perks that benefited consumers. The court sided with American Express, citing Evans and Schmalensee extensively in its decision.

Schmalensee said Apple's rules that prohibit apps from steering consumers to less costly payment presented an almost identical issue, and that Evans had contradicted many aspects of his previous work.

Outside observers have been surprised by the split between the two star economists.

"I would say (Evans') views on AmEx haven't changed, but what he would say is the facts here are different and so the same result isn't appropriate," said Geoff Manne, president and founder of the International Center for Law & Economics research center. "Personally, I don't see how he gets there and gets it to stick."

Part of Apple's strategy in putting Schmalensee on the stand was to bring up the differences between Evans' previous work and his current view of the Epic case in a bid to make his testimony look less credible, observers said.

"Each of them knows though that whatever opinions they have said in the past have to be consistent with what they say now," said Steven Salop, professor of economics and law at Georgetown University and a self-described consultant to Epic on its case.

Schmalensee declined to comment, and Evans did not immediately return requests for comment.

(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco and Paresh Dave in Oakland, California; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Leslie Adler)

By Stephen Nellis and Paresh Dave


ę Reuters 2021
Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
ADLER GROUP S.A. -1.44% 20.6 Delayed Quote.-27.93%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY 1.18% 172.0003 Delayed Quote.40.62%
APPLE INC. 0.54% 145.7799 Delayed Quote.9.26%
IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED 1.47% 34.62 Delayed Quote.41.18%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 0.27% 286.955 Delayed Quote.28.68%
SONY GROUP CORPORATION 3.46% 11520 End-of-day quote.12.01%
All news about APPLE INC.
03:08pS&P 500, Dow reach records as earnings lift outlook
RE
12:52pFrom Facebook to Twitter, Big Tech sees social commerce driving sales growth
RE
11:09aAPPLE : GarageBand features new Sound Packs from Dua Lipa, Lady Gaga, and top pr..
PU
11:01aAPPLE : GarageBand Amps Up Music Creation with All-New Sound Packs From Dua Lipa..
BU
10:30aUPDATE : BofA Securities Downgrades Cirrus Logic to Neutral From Buy, Citing Pri..
MT
09:01aSTREET COLOR : Apple Launches Four Part US Corporate Bond Offering
MT
08:41aAPPLE : DA Davidson Adjusts Apple's Price Target to $175 From $167, Reiterates B..
MT
08:41aAPPLE : KGI Securities Adjusts Apple's Price Target to $170 From $160, Keeps Out..
MT
06:28aBEYOND THE MEME : finance gets serious on going viral
RE
06:15aEUROPEAN MIDDAY BRIEFING : Stocks Rise as -2-
DJ
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 366 B - -
Net income 2021 93 706 M - -
Net cash 2021 75 818 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 26,1x
Yield 2021 0,59%
Capitalization 2 397 B 2 397 B -
EV / Sales 2021 6,35x
EV / Sales 2022 6,15x
Nbr of Employees 147 000
Free-Float 99,9%
Chart APPLE INC.
Duration : Period :
Apple Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends APPLE INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 46
Last Close Price 144,98 $
Average target price 162,00 $
Spread / Average Target 11,7%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Timothy Donald Cook Chief Executive Officer & Director
Luca Maestri Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
Arthur D. Levinson Independent Chairman
Kevin M. Lynch Vice President-Technology
Jeffrey E. Williams Chief Operating Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
APPLE INC.9.26%2 400 425
XIAOMI CORPORATION-21.99%80 875
SHENZHEN TRANSSION HOLDINGS CO., LTD.8.99%20 052
WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD2.51%17 695
FIH MOBILE LIMITED15.79%1 081
DORO AB (PUBL)29.76%169