The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, which are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2020 ("Fiscal 2020
10-K"). Fiscal year 2020 ended on August 1, 2020 and reflected a 52-week period
("Fiscal 2020"). Fiscal year 2019 ended on August 3, 2019 and reflected a
52-week period ("Fiscal 2019"). All references to "Fiscal 2021" reflect a
52-week period that will end on July 31, 2021.

INTRODUCTION



MD&A is provided as a supplement to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements and footnotes to help provide an understanding of our operational
results, financial condition, liquidity and changes in financial condition. MD&A
is organized as follows:

•Overview. This section includes recent developments, our objectives and risks, and a summary of our financial performance for Fiscal 2020.

•Results of operations. This section provides an analysis of our operational results for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019.



•Financial condition and liquidity. This section provides an analysis of our
cash flows for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, as well as a discussion of our
financial condition and liquidity as of August 1, 2020. The discussion of our
financial condition and liquidity includes (i) our available financial capacity
and (ii) a summary of our capital spending.

•Critical accounting policies. This section discusses accounting policies
considered to be important to our operational results and financial condition,
which require significant judgment and estimation on the part of management in
their application. In addition, all of our significant accounting policies,
including our critical accounting policies, are summarized in Note 4 to our
accompanying consolidated financial statements.

•Recently issued accounting pronouncements. This section discusses the potential
impact to our reported operational results and financial condition of accounting
standards that have been recently issued.
OVERVIEW

Our Business

Ascena Retail Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a national specialty retailer of apparel for women and tween girls with annual revenue of approximately $3.7 billion for Fiscal 2020. We and our subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the "Company," "ascena," "we," "us," "our" and "ourselves," unless the context indicates otherwise.

Recent Developments

Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11



On July 23, 2020 (the "Petition Date"), the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries (collectively, the "Debtors") commenced voluntary cases (the
"Chapter 11 Cases") under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the
"Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia ("the Bankruptcy Court"). The Company's Chapter 11 Cases
are being jointly administered under the caption In re: Ascena Retail Group,
Inc., et al., Case No. 20-33113. The Debtors will continue to operate their
businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy
Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code
and the orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Bankruptcy Court filings and other
information related to the Chapter 11 Cases are available free of charge online
at http://cases.primeclerk.com/ascena/.

                                       26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

The Debtors have filed the Chapter 11 Cases to implement the terms of a
Restructuring Support Agreement, dated July 23, 2020 (together with all exhibits
and schedules thereto, the "RSA"), by and among the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries (each, a "Company Party" and collectively, the "Company Parties")
and members of an ad hoc group of lenders (the "Consenting Stakeholders") under
the Term Credit Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2015 (as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Prepetition Term
Credit Agreement"), among the Company, AnnTaylor Retail, Inc., the lenders party
thereto and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as administrative agent. The RSA is
supported by Consenting Stakeholders holding approximately 68% of the borrowings
under the Prepetition Term Credit Agreement as of the Petition Date.

As part of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company has divested the Catherines' E-Commerce business and Justice's intellectual property and other assets. The Company has also entered into an agreement to sell assets relating to the Company's Ann Taylor, LOFT and Lane Bryant brands. See Note 24 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.



For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company's operations and ability
to develop and execute its business plan are subject to the risks and
uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11 process as described in Part I,
Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of
these risks and uncertainties, the amount and composition of the Company's
assets and liabilities could be significantly different following the outcome of
the Chapter 11 Cases, and the description of the Company's operations,
properties and liquidity and capital resources included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K may not accurately reflect its operations, properties and liquidity
and capital resources following emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

For more information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and for information regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, see Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

COVID-19 Pandemic



As described elsewhere herein, the coronavirus disease ("COVID-19") has had
far-reaching adverse impacts on many aspects of our operation, directly and
indirectly, including our employees, consumer behavior, distribution and
logistics, our suppliers, and the market overall. The scope and nature of these
impacts have been rapidly changing and is expected to continue to be so in the
near term. In light of the continued uncertain situation relating to COVID-19,
we took a number of precautionary measures in the second half of Fiscal 2020 to
manage our resources conservatively by reducing and/or deferring capital
expenditures, inventory purchases and operating expenses to mitigate the adverse
impact of COVID-19, which is intended to help minimize the risk to our Company,
employees, customers, and the communities in which we operate. Such measures
include the following:
•The temporary closure of our retail stores;
•The temporary furlough of a substantial portion of our workforce;
•Reductions in pay of ranging amounts for a substantial majority of those
employees not placed on temporary furlough;
•Working with our landlords to minimize costs associated with closed retail
stores;
•Drawing down $230 million under the Company's revolving credit facility as a
precautionary measure in order to increase its cash position and preserve
financial flexibility; and
•Extended vendor payment terms on merchandise and non-merchandise purchases.

In addition to the effects described above, our supply chain has been affected
by COVID-19. Certain of the Company's vendors in Asia were temporarily closed
for a portion of the third quarter of Fiscal 2020 as a result of COVID-19,
however the vendors had resumed production by the end of the quarter. It is
possible that if COVID-19 re-emerges in the countries where we obtain our goods,
it could cause our vendors to cease production again. At the current time, we
believe that we have sufficient inventory and supplies to support our demand in
the near future.
Besides the lower store sales impact, COVID-19 also significantly impacted our
margin rates and our long-term growth assumptions, which resulted in long-term
asset impairments in the second half of Fiscal 2020, as described more fully in
Notes 7 and 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
                                       27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)


In May 2020, the Company started to reopen its retail stores. As stores began to
reopen, the Company also began to bring certain employees back from temporary
furlough. Employees necessary to support the phased re-opening of the business
were brought back first. In addition, in June 2020, the Company restored all
employees who were not on temporary furlough back to their original pay rates.

Although each of the remedial measures discussed above were taken by the Company
to protect the business and preserve liquidity, each may also have the potential
to have a material adverse impact on our current business, financial condition
and results of operations, and may create additional risks for our Company.
While we started to reverse at least some of the temporary measures, we cannot
predict the specific duration for which other precautionary measures will stay
in effect, and we may elect or need to take additional measures, or reinstate
previous measures, as the information available to us continues to develop,
including with respect to our employees, distribution centers, relationships
with our third-party vendors, and our customers.

As the Company reopened its retail stores, it did so in accordance with local
government guidelines. As of the time of this filing, substantially all of our
retail stores have re-opened to the public with restricted operations. However,
the Company continues to closely monitor changes in government guidelines and of
the outbreak itself. In certain cases, we have had to close stores that had
re-opened. As a result, we continue to believe that COVID-19 will have a
significant negative impact on our results of operations, financial position and
cash flows through the first half of Fiscal 2021.

Seasonality of Business



Our individual segments are typically affected by seasonal sales trends
primarily resulting from the timing of holiday and back-to-school shopping
periods. In particular, sales at our Kids Fashion segment tend to be
significantly higher during the Fall season, which occurs during the first and
second quarters of our fiscal year, as this includes the back-to-school period
and the December holiday season. Our Plus Fashion segment tends to experience
higher sales during the Spring season, which include the Easter and Mother's Day
holidays. Our Premium Fashion segment has relatively balanced sales across the
Fall and Spring seasons. As a result, our operational results and cash flows may
fluctuate materially in any quarterly period depending on, among other things,
increases or decreases in comparable store sales, adverse weather conditions,
shifts in the timing of certain holidays and changes in merchandise mix.

Summary of Financial Performance

Discontinued Operations

Dressbarn Wind Down



The Company completed the wind down of its Dressbarn brand during the second
quarter of Fiscal 2020. All Dressbarn store locations were closed as of December
31, 2019. As a result, the Company's Dressbarn business has been classified as a
component of discontinued operations within the audited consolidated financial
statements for all periods presented, and when coupled with the sale of maurices
discussed below, we no longer present results of the Value Fashion segment. The
operating results of Dressbarn are excluded from the discussion below. In
connection with the Dressbarn wind down, we have incurred cumulative costs of
approximately $58 million, of which approximately $5 million was incurred during
Fiscal 2020 and included in discontinued operations.

Sale of maurices



On May 6, 2019, the Company and Maurices Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
("maurices") and wholly owned subsidiary of ascena, completed the transaction
contemplated by the previously-announced Stock Purchase Agreement with Viking
Brand Upper Holdings, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership
("Viking") and an affiliate of OpCapita LLP, providing for, among other things,
the sale by ascena of maurices to Viking (the "Transaction"). Effective upon the
closing of the Transaction in May 2019, ascena received cash proceeds of
approximately $210 million and a 49.6% ownership interest in the operations of
maurices, consisting of interests in Viking preferred and common stock. As
discussed in Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, upon
completion of the sale of maurices, the Company has classified
                                       28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

maurices as a component of discontinued operations within the audited consolidated financial statements for Fiscal 2019 and is also excluded from the discussion below.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment Charges



While overall performance during the second quarter of Fiscal 2020 was in line
with management's expectations, lower than expected sales at our Justice brand,
and lower than expected margins at our Ann Taylor brand, resulted in a
conclusion that these factors represented impairment indicators which required
the Company to test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment during the second quarter of Fiscal 2020. As a result of the
assessment, we recognized goodwill impairment charges of $54.9 million and
$8.5 million at the Ann Taylor and Justice reporting units, respectively, to
write-down the carrying values of the reporting units to their fair values. In
addition, we recorded non-cash impairment charges to write-down the carrying
values of our other intangible assets of $46.9 million which substantially
consisted of write-downs of our trade name intangible assets to their fair
values at Ann Taylor and Justice by $10.0 million and $35.0 million,
respectively.

Further, the impact of the retail store closures in response to COVID-19, along
with the continued declines in the stock price and the fair value of our Term
Loan debt, resulted in a conclusion that another triggering event occurred in
the third quarter of Fiscal 2020, thereby requiring us to test our goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment (the "April Interim Test"). The April Interim
Test reflected revised long-range assumptions that were reflected in
contemplation of the Chapter 11 Cases discussed above. Those assumptions
included the wind down of the Catherines brand, and a significant reduction in
the number of Justice retail stores, an overall reductions in the number of
retail stores at the Company's other brands, and a significant reduction in the
Company's workforce commensurate with the store reductions. As a result of the
revised assumptions, we recognized goodwill impairment charges of $15.0 million
and $70.5 million at the Ann Taylor and LOFT reporting units to write-down the
carrying value of the reporting units to their fair value. In addition, we
recorded non-cash impairment charges totaling $41.3 million to write-down the
carrying values of our trade name intangible assets to their fair values as
follows: $17.7 million at Ann Taylor, $7.8 million at LOFT, $7.8 million at
Justice, $3.0 million at Catherines and $5.0 million of our Justice
international franchise rights. These impairment charges are more fully
described in Note 7 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Finally, the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, discussed above, led the
Company to conclude this represented further impairment indicators. As a result,
the Company was required to test its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets for impairment during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 (the "Year-End
Test"). The cash flow projections underlying the Year-End Test reflected revised
assumptions for Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2022 based on the current consumer
demand, the continuation of the negative impacts of COVID-19 and the potential
release of a vaccine during Fiscal 2021 with the expectation that the Company
will be back in line with the original long-range projections for Fiscal 2023
and beyond. As of the third quarter of Fiscal 2020, only our LOFT brand had
goodwill remaining and was tested for goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter.
The Year-End Test indicated the fair value of the LOFT brand exceeded its
carrying value and as a result no goodwill impairment charge was required in the
fourth quarter. However, the Year-End Test resulted in the Company recognizing
impairment charges to write-down the carrying values of its other intangible
assets to their fair values as follows: $34.2 million on the LOFT trade name and
$1.3 million on the Ann Taylor trade name. In addition, the Company impaired the
remaining Justice international franchise rights of $5 million as the Company
will no longer be supporting this business strategy.

Tangible Asset Impairment Charges



As a result of the revised projections utilized in the Company's goodwill and
intangible asset impairment testing described above, which reflect significant
reductions in near-term cash flows of certain of our retail stores, as well as
the planned store reductions discussed above, we recognized impairment charges
of $196.8 million to write-down store-related fixed assets and right-of-use
assets to their fair values. Impairment charges by segment reflected $115.3
million at the Premium Fashion segment, $25.2 million at the Plus Fashion
segment, and $56.3 million at the Kids Fashion segment. In addition, a
long-lived Corporate asset impairment charge of $12.9 million was recorded
during the second half of Fiscal 2020 which reflects an $8.4 million write-down
of the book value of the Company's campus in Mahwah, NJ to fair market value
recorded in the third quarter of Fiscal 2020 in connection with its planned sale
and a long-lived asset impairment charge of $4.5 million was recorded in the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 relating to the Company's Duluth, MN building to
reflect a write-down of the book value to fair market value. These impairment
charges are more fully described in Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
                                       29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

Summary and Key Developments

Operating highlights for Fiscal 2020 are as follows:



•Sales decreased by 21.5%, reflecting decreases at all of our operating segments
due primarily to the temporary retail store closures;
•Gross margin rate decreased by 530 basis points to 50.6% primarily due to
markdown and promotional selling necessary to clear excess inventory that was
unable to be sold after the temporary retail store closures;
•Operating loss of $1,113.6 million compared to $638.3 million for the year-ago
period, resulting primarily from the lower Net sales and Gross margin decline,
higher store-related asset-impairment charges, and higher restructuring and
other related charges, which were offset in part by expense reductions,
primarily reflecting the furlough of a significant portion of our workforce in
response to COVID-19, the impact of our previously-announced cost reduction
initiatives, and lower impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; and
•Net loss from continuing operations per diluted share of $120.68 in Fiscal
2020, compared to $73.87 in Fiscal 2019.

Liquidity for Fiscal 2020 primarily reflected:



•Cash flows provided by operations was $131.6 million, compared to $21.1 million
in the year-ago period;
•Cash flows used in investing activities for Fiscal 2020 was $39.5 million,
consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $65.1 million, offset in part by
$20.6 million received from the sale of our corporate building in Mahwah, New
Jersey, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $67.7 million
in the year-ago period; and
•Cash flows provided by financing activities for Fiscal 2020 was $160.3 million,
consisting primarily of the $230.0 million borrowed under the revolving credit
facility during the third quarter, offset in part by the repurchased
$79.5 million of outstanding term loan debt for $49.4 million and the term loan
prepayment of $20.4 million compared to net cash provided by financing
activities of $0.3 million in the year-ago period.
                                       30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 2020 Compared to Fiscal 2019



The following table summarizes our operational results and expresses the
percentage relationship to net sales of certain financial statement captions:
                                                                      Fiscal Years Ended
                                                                 August 1,           August 3,
                                                                   2020                 2019             $ Change             % Change
                                                              (millions, except per share data)
Net sales                                                     $   3,718.1           $ 4,734.7          $ (1,016.6)                (21.5) %

Cost of goods sold                                               (1,836.2)           (2,088.0)              251.8                  12.1  %

     Cost of goods sold as % of net sales                            49.4   %            44.1  %
Gross margin                                                      1,881.9             2,646.7              (764.8)                (28.9) %
    Gross margin as % of net sales                                   50.6   %            55.9  %

Other operating expenses:


  Buying, distribution and occupancy expenses                      (825.8)             (953.8)              128.0                  13.4  %

Buying, distribution and occupancy expenses as % of net sales

                                                            22.2   %            20.1  %
  Selling, general and administrative expenses                   (1,421.1)           (1,545.8)              124.7                   8.1  %
    SG&A expenses as % of net sales                                  38.2   %            32.6  %
  Restructuring and other related charges                          (238.3)              (94.1)             (144.2)                      NM
  Impairment of goodwill                                           (148.9)             (276.0)              127.1                  46.1  %
  Impairment of other intangible assets                            (128.7)             (134.9)                6.2                   4.6  %
  Depreciation and amortization expense                            (232.7)             (280.4)               47.7                  17.0  %
Total other operating expenses                                   (2,995.5)           (3,285.0)              289.5                   8.8  %
Operating loss                                                   (1,113.6)             (638.3)             (475.3)                (74.5) %
    Operating loss as % of net sales                                (30.0)  %           (13.5) %
Interest expense                                                    (99.4)             (107.0)                7.6                   7.1  %
Interest and other (expense) income, net                             (7.6)                3.8               (11.4)                      NM
Gain on extinguishment of debt                                       28.5                   -                28.5                       NM
Reorganization items, net                                            (3.4)                  -                (3.4)                      NM

Loss from continuing operations before (provision) benefit for income taxes and income (loss) from equity method investment

                                                (1,195.5)             (741.5)             (454.0)                (61.2) %

(Provision) benefit for income taxes from continuing operations

                                                          (13.7)               23.9               (37.6)                      NM
    Effective tax rate (a)                                           (1.1)  %             3.2  %
Income (loss) from equity method investment                           3.1               (11.8)               14.9                       NM
Loss from continuing operations                                  (1,206.1)             (729.4)             (476.7)                (65.4) %
Discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes (b)                64.3                23.5                40.8                       NM
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of
taxes (c)                                                               -                44.5               (44.5)               (100.0) %
Net loss                                                      $  (1,141.8)          $  (661.4)         $   (480.4)                (72.6) %

Net loss per common share - basic:
Continuing operations                                         $   (120.68)          $  (73.87)         $   (46.81)                (63.4) %
Discontinued operations                                              6.43                6.89               (0.46)                 (6.6) %
Total net loss per basic common share                         $   (114.25)          $  (66.98)         $   (47.27)                (70.6) %

Net loss per common share - diluted:
Continuing operations                                         $   (120.68)          $  (73.87)         $   (46.81)                (63.4) %
Discontinued operations                                              6.43                6.89               (0.46)                 (6.6) %
Total net loss per diluted common share                       $   (114.25)          $  (66.98)         $   (47.27)                (70.6) %


                                       31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

________
(a) Effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the (Provision) benefit for
income taxes from continuing operations by the Loss from continuing operations
before (provision) benefit for income taxes and income (loss) from equity method
investment.
(b) Income from discontinued operations is presented net of income tax expense
of $0.2 million and $31.2 million for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2020 and
August 3, 2019, respectively.
(c) Gain on sale of discontinued operations is presented net of income tax
benefit of $4.0 million for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2019.
(NM) Not meaningful.

Net sales. Total Net sales decreased by $1,016.6 million, or 21.5%, to $3,718.1
million. Specifically, the total store and e-commerce revenue decreased by
$974.1 million and other revenue decreased by $42.5 million compared to the
prior year period. The decrease in Net sales was primarily driven by the
temporary closure of our retail stores as a result of COVID-19 during the second
half of Fiscal 2020.

Net sales data for our three operating segments is presented below.


                              Fiscal Years Ended
                           August 1,      August 3,
                             2020           2019          $ Change       % Change
                                  (millions)
Net sales:
Premium Fashion           $ 1,852.6      $ 2,415.1      $   (562.5)       (23.3) %
Plus Fashion                1,055.9        1,240.5          (184.6)       (14.9) %
Kids Fashion                  809.6        1,079.1          (269.5)       (25.0) %
Total net sales           $ 3,718.1      $ 4,734.7      $ (1,016.6)       (21.5) %

Comparable sales (a)                                                            NM


________
(a) Comparable sales represent combined store comparable sales and direct
channel sales. Store comparable sales generally refers to the growth of sales in
stores only open in the current period and comparative calendar period in the
prior year (including stores relocated within the same shopping center and
stores with minor square footage additions). Stores that close during the fiscal
year are excluded from store comparable sales beginning with the fiscal month
the store actually closes. Direct channel sales refer to growth of sales from
our direct channel in the current period and comparative calendar period in the
prior year. Due to customer cross-channel behavior, we typically report a
single, consolidated comparable sales metric, inclusive of store and direct
channels. In light of the store closures related to COVID-19, the Company has
not disclosed comparable sales as the results are not considered meaningful.

Gross margin. Gross margin, in terms of dollars, was primarily lower as a result
of a decline in sales and a decline in rate, which is discussed on a segment
basis below. The gross margin rate represents the difference between net sales
and cost of goods sold, expressed as a percentage of net sales. Gross margin
rate is dependent upon a variety of factors, including brand sales mix, product
mix, channel mix, the timing and level of promotional activities and
fluctuations in material costs. These factors, among others, may cause cost of
goods sold as a percentage of net revenues to fluctuate from period to period.

Gross margin rate decreased by 530 basis points from 55.9% for Fiscal 2019 to 50.6% for Fiscal 2020 resulting from lower margin at all three operating segments. Gross margin rate highlights on a segment basis are as follows:



•Premium Fashion gross margin rate performance declined to 51.5% for Fiscal 2020
from 56.5% for Fiscal 2019 primarily reflecting increased inventory reserves and
promotional selling to clear excess inventory that was unable to be sold in the
normal course due to the temporary closure of our retail stores as a result of
COVID-19 during the second half of Fiscal 2020 and higher shipping costs related
to increased direct channel penetration.
•Plus Fashion gross margin rate performance declined to 53.9% for Fiscal 2020
from 57.3% for Fiscal 2019 primarily reflecting inventory markdown reserves and
increased promotional selling to clear excess inventory that was unable to be
sold in the normal course due to the temporary closure of our retail stores as a
result of COVID-19 during the second half of Fiscal 2020 and higher shipping
costs related to increased direct channel penetration, offset in part by the
improved product acceptance experienced during the first half of Fiscal 2020.
                                       32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

•Kids Fashion gross margin rate performance declined to 44.3% for Fiscal 2020
from 53.0% for Fiscal 2019 primarily due to significant inventory markdown
reserves and increased promotional selling to clear excess inventory that was
unable to be sold in the normal course due to the temporary closure of our
retail stores as a result of COVID-19 during the second half of Fiscal 2020. The
gross margin decline also reflects increased markdowns in the first half of
Fiscal 2020 resulting from lower store traffic.

Buying, distribution and occupancy ("BD&O") expenses consist of store occupancy
and utility costs (excluding depreciation) and all costs associated with the
buying and distribution functions.

BD&O expenses decreased by $128.0 million, or 13.4%, to $825.8 million in Fiscal
2020. The reduction in expenses was driven by the furlough in the second half of
Fiscal 2020 of a significant portion of our workforce in response to COVID-19,
lower occupancy expense and lower-employee related costs, both resulting from
the continued impact of our previously announced cost reduction efforts, as well
as amounts received under the transition services agreement with maurices as
further discussed in Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. BD&O expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 22.2% in
Fiscal 2020 from 20.1% in Fiscal 2019.

Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses consist of compensation
and benefit-related costs for sales and store operations personnel,
administrative personnel and other employees not associated with the functions
described above under BD&O expenses. SG&A expenses also include advertising and
marketing costs, information technology and communication costs, supplies for
our stores and administrative facilities, insurance costs, legal costs and costs
related to other administrative services.

SG&A expenses decreased by $124.7 million, or 8.1%, to $1,421.1 million in
Fiscal 2020. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to the furlough in
the second half of Fiscal 2020 of a significant portion of our workforce in
response to COVID-19, the continuation of our previously announced cost
reduction initiatives, mainly reflecting lower store related expenses and
non-merchandise procurement savings, lower marketing expenses, and amounts
received under the transition services agreement with maurices, as further
discussed in Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
These savings were offset in part by higher store-related impairment charges.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 38.2% in Fiscal 2020
from 32.6% in Fiscal 2019.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $47.7 million, or 17.0%, to
$232.7 million in Fiscal 2020. The decrease was across all of our operating
segments and was driven by a lower level of store-related fixed-assets, offset
in part by incremental depreciation from capital investments placed into service
during Fiscal 2019.

Operating loss. Operating loss was $1,113.6 million for Fiscal 2020 compared to $638.3 million in Fiscal 2019 and is discussed on a segment basis below.

Operating results for our three operating segments are presented below.


                                                                Fiscal Years Ended
                                                           August 1,          August 3,
                                                             2020                2019            $ Change             % Change
                                                                    (millions)
Operating (loss) income:
Premium Fashion                                          $   (280.9)         $    35.1          $ (316.0)                        NM
Plus Fashion                                                  (90.1)            (101.6)             11.5                    11.3  %
Kids Fashion                                                 (226.7)             (66.8)           (159.9)                        NM
Unallocated restructuring and other related
charges                                                      (238.3)             (94.1)           (144.2)                        NM
Unallocated impairment of goodwill                           (148.9)            (276.0)            127.1                    46.1  %
Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets            (128.7)            (134.9)              6.2                     4.6  %
Total operating loss                                     $ (1,113.6)         $  (638.3)         $ (475.3)                  (74.5) %


________
(NM) Not meaningful.
                                       33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

Premium Fashion operating results decreased by $316.0 million primarily driven
by a decline in Net sales and a lower gross margin rate, as discussed above,
offset in part by lower operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were
primarily driven by the furlough in the second half of Fiscal 2020 of a
significant portion of our workforce in response to COVID-19, lower expenses as
a result of our continued cost reduction efforts, and lower depreciation
expense. These expense reductions were offset in part by significantly higher
store-related impairment charges.
Plus Fashion operating results improved by $11.5 million primarily due to lower
operating expenses, which were mostly offset by declines in Net sales and a
lower gross margin rate, as discussed above. Operating expense reductions were
primarily driven by the furlough in the second half of Fiscal 2020 of a
significant portion of our workforce in response to COVID-19 and lower expenses
as a result of our continued cost reduction efforts.
Kids Fashion operating results decreased by $159.9 million primarily due to a
decline in Net sales and a lower gross margin rate, as discussed above, offset
in part by lower operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were primarily
driven by the furlough in the second half of Fiscal 2020 of a significant
portion of our workforce in response to COVID-19 and lower expenses as a result
of our continued cost reduction efforts. These expense reductions were offset in
part by significantly higher store-related impairment charges.

Unallocated restructuring and other related charges of $238.3 million primarily
includes charges resulting from announcements and actions taken in connection
with the Chapter 11 Cases and included $29.3 million of severance and other
related charges, $19.3 million of professional fees, and $189.3 million of
non-cash asset impairments primarily related to right-of-use lease assets
associated with the stores identified to close as a result of the Chapter 11
Cases. The $94.1 million of unallocated restructuring and other related charges
in Fiscal 2019 primarily included $33.1 million for professional fees incurred
in connection with the identification and implementation of transformation
initiatives, $16.1 million of severance and other related charges, reflecting
severance associated with the cost reduction actions taken in the fourth quarter
of Fiscal 2019, and $44.9 million of non-cash asset impairments, reflecting the
write-down of the Mahwah, NJ corporate headquarters as a result of the Dressbarn
wind down and the write-down of a corporate-owned office building in Duluth, MN
to fair market value as a result of the sale of maurices.
Unallocated impairment of goodwill reflects the Fiscal 2020 write-down of the
carrying values of the Ann Taylor, LOFT and Justice reporting units to their
fair values as follows: $69.9 million at Ann Taylor, $70.5 million at LOFT, and
$8.5 million at Justice. The $276.0 million in Fiscal 2019 reflects the
write-down of the carrying values of the Lane Bryant, Catherines and Justice
reporting units.

Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets reflects the Fiscal 2020
write-down of the Company's trade name intangible assets to their fair values as
follows: $29.0 million of our Ann Taylor trade name, $42.0 million of our LOFT
trade name, $42.8 million of our Justice trade name, $4.0 million of our
Catherines trade name and $10.9 million of our Justice franchise rights. The
$134.9 million in Fiscal 2019 reflects the write-down of the Company's trade
name intangible assets to their fair values as follows; $15.0 million of our Ann
Taylor trade name, $60.3 million of our LOFT trade name, $37.0 million of our
Lane Bryant trade name, $6.0 million of our Catherines trade name and
$16.6 million of our Justice trade name.

Interest expense decreased by $7.6 million to $99.4 million for Fiscal 2020,
primarily due to a lower average outstanding term loan balance as a result of
the second quarter debt repurchases and a lower interest rate on our
variable-rate term loan during Fiscal 2020, partially offset by interest on our
revolving borrowings drawn down during the third quarter of Fiscal 2020. There
were no revolver borrowings outstanding during Fiscal 2019.

Gain on extinguishment of debt. In Fiscal 2020, the Company repurchased
$79.5 million of outstanding principal balance of the term loan at an aggregate
cost of $49.4 million through the open market transactions, resulting in a
$28.5 million pre-tax gain, net of the proportional write-off of unamortized
original discount and debt issuance costs of $1.6 million. There was no gain on
extinguishment of debt in the year-ago period.

Reorganization items, net of $3.4 million during Fiscal 2020 represent the post-petition costs directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases. These costs reflect professional fees incurred after the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases. There were no Reorganization items, net in the year-ago period.


                                       34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

(Provision) benefit for income taxes from continuing operations represents
federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. We recorded a tax provision of
$13.7 million in Fiscal 2020 on a pre-tax loss of $1,195.5 million, for an
effective tax rate of (1.1)%, which was lower than the statutory tax rate as a
result of non-deductible impairments of goodwill and changes in the valuation
allowance on U.S. federal and state and foreign deferred tax assets. In Fiscal
2019, we recorded a tax benefit of $23.9 million on a pre-tax loss of $741.5
million for a 3.2% effective tax rate, which was lower than the statutory tax
rate primarily due to non-deductible impairments of goodwill, a partial federal
valuation allowance, and GILTI.
Loss from continuing operations increased by $476.7 million to $1,206.1 million
in Fiscal 2020, primarily due to lower Net sales and Gross margin and higher
impairments of our retail store assets, which were offset in part by the costs
savings and lower impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets, which are
discussed above.

Loss from continuing operations per diluted common share was $120.68 per share
in Fiscal 2020 compared to $73.87 per share in the year-ago period, primarily as
a result of an increase in the loss from continuing operations, as discussed
above.




                                       35

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Cash Flows

Fiscal 2020 Compared to Fiscal 2019



The table below summarizes our cash flows for the years presented as follows:
                                                                   Fiscal Years Ended
                                                               August 1,          August 3,
                                                                  2020               2019
                                                                       (millions)
Cash flows provided by operating activities                $     131.6           $     21.1
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities            (39.5)                67.7
Cash flows provided by financing activities                      160.3                  0.3
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                  $     252.4

$ 89.1





Cash flows provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating
activities was $131.6 million for Fiscal 2020, compared with cash provided by of
$21.1 million during the year-ago period. The increase in cash flows provided by
operating activities in Fiscal 2020 primarily reflected reduced inventory
purchases and the extension of payment terms to vendors and landlords, offset in
part by lower earnings before non-cash expenses as a result of lower sales and
margin rates due to COVID-19.

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities. Net cash used in
investing activities for Fiscal 2020 was $39.5 million, compared with cash
provided by investing activities of $67.7 million for the year-ago period. Net
cash used in investing activities in Fiscal 2020 consisted primarily of capital
expenditures of $65.1 million, offset in part by $20.6 million received from the
sale of our corporate building in Mahwah, New Jersey and $5.0 million received
from the sale of intellectual property rights associated with the Dressbarn
direct channel operations. Net cash provided by investing activities in the
year-ago period was $67.7 million, consisted primarily of net proceeds from the
sale of maurices of $203.2 million, offset in part by capital expenditures of
$136.5 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities. Net cash provided by financing
activities was $160.3 million during Fiscal 2020 and reflects proceeds from our
revolving credit facility of $230.0 million offset by repurchases of our Term
Loan debt of $69.8 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.3
million during the year-ago period.

Capital Spending

With our continued focus on optimizing our capital resource allocation, especially in light of the impact of COVID-19, we significantly reduced our capital spending for Fiscal 2020. In Fiscal 2020, we had $65.1 million in capital expenditures, which included spending for capital investments in connection with our digital initiatives, infrastructure, and our retail store network.



Given the low level of capital spending in Fiscal 2020, the Company expects to
increase spending relative to Fiscal 2020 and, as a result, expects capital
spending for Fiscal 2021 to be in the range of $75-$100 million. Our capital
requirements are expected to be funded primarily with available cash and cash
equivalents, operating cash flows and, to the extent necessary, borrowings under
the Company's DIP Facilities, which is discussed below.

Liquidity



Our primary sources of liquidity are the cash flows generated from our
operations, proceeds from the sale of assets, available cash and cash
equivalents, and prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases on July 23,
2020, access to our Amended Revolving Credit Agreement and the Term Loan (both
of which are defined below). Upon the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the
Company may not make borrowings under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement. As
of August 1, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $580.4 million,
approximately $32 million, or 6%, which was held overseas by our foreign
                                       36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

subsidiaries. Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, these sources
of liquidity were used to fund our ongoing cash requirements, such as inventory
purchases and other changes in working capital requirements, construction and
renovation of stores, investment in technological and supply chain
infrastructure, acquisitions, debt service, open market purchases of debt, stock
repurchases, contingent liabilities (including uncertain tax positions) and
other corporate activities. For a detailed description of the terms and
restrictions under our amended and restated revolving credit agreement dated
February 27, 2018 (the "Amended Revolving Credit Agreement"), and the $1.8
billion seven-year term loan (the "Term Loan"), see Note 12 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.

As discussed elsewhere herein, COVID-19 has had a material adverse effect on our
revenues, earnings, liquidity, and cash flows, and may continue to have a
continued impact for the foreseeable future. As a result of the reduced cash
flows, our ability to meet our future debt service obligations has been impacted
by COVID-19. The Company projects that it will not have sufficient cash on hand
or available liquidity to repay such debt. Accordingly, on July 23, 2020, the
Company and certain of its subsidiaries commenced the Chapter 11 Cases.
Following the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company may not make
borrowings under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement.

Following the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, on September 16, 2020, the
Company and AnnTaylor Retail, Inc., as borrowers, entered into a Senior Secured
Super-Priority Debtor-in-Possession Term Credit Agreement (the "DIP Term Credit
Agreement") with the lenders party thereto and Alter Domus (US) LLC, as
administrative agent. The DIP Term Credit Agreement provides for a term loan
credit facility (the "DIP Term Facility") that consists of (i) $150.0 million in
new money term loans (the "New Money DIP Loans") and (ii) $162.3 million of
certain prepetition term loan obligations that have been rolled into the DIP
Term Facility. The proceeds of the New Money DIP Loans may be used, among other
things, to pay certain costs, fees and expenses related to the Chapter 11 Cases
and to prepay or repay up to $50.0 million of borrowings under the Amended
Revolving Credit Agreement, in all cases, subject to the terms of the DIP Term
Credit Agreement.

Also on September 16, 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as
borrowers, and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, entered
into a Senior Secured Super-Priority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement (the
"DIP ABL Credit Agreement") with the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, which provides the Company with a
superpriority senior secured debtor-in-possession asset based revolving credit
facility of up to $400 million in the aggregate with a $200 million letter of
credit sublimit (the "DIP ABL Facility" and together with the DIP Term Facility,
the "DIP Facilities"). Pursuant to the DIP ABL Credit Agreement, the commitments
and loans of the lenders party to the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement
converted into the DIP ABL Facility.

Management currently believes that cash flows from operations at anticipated
levels, and our existing sources of liquidity described above, including the New
Money DIP Loans, will be sufficient to support our operating needs, costs
savings initiatives, capital requirements, and our debt service requirements
through the Chapter 11 Cases. However, for the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases,
the Company's operations and ability to develop and execute its business plan
are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11
process as described in Part I, Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the amount and
composition of the Company's assets and liabilities could be significantly
different following the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the description of
the Company's operations, properties and liquidity and capital resources
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not accurately reflect its
operations, properties and liquidity and capital resources following emergence
from the Chapter 11 Cases.

For more information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, the RSA and the DIP
Facilities, see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
and for more information regarding the items causing substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, see Note 1 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Debt

For a detailed description of the terms and restrictions under our amended and restated revolving credit agreement dated February 27, 2018 (the "Amended Revolving Credit Agreement") and the $1.8 billion seven-year term loan (the "Term Loan"), see Note 12 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


                                       37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

Amended Revolving Credit Agreement



Prior to the Chapter 11 Cases, under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, the
maturity of the Company's revolving credit facility was earlier of (i) 5 years
from the closing date (or February 2023) or (ii) 91 days prior to the maturity
date of the Term Loan (unless (a) the outstanding principal amount of the Term
Loans is $150 million or less and (b) the Company maintains liquidity, as
defined in the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement (which can include (1)
availability under the revolving credit facility in excess of the greater of
$100 million and 20% of the credit limit and (2) cash held in a controlled
account of the administrative agent of the revolving credit facility) in an
amount equal to the outstanding principal amount of the remaining Term Loan, as
described in more detail in Note 12 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.

The commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases on July 23, 2020 constituted an event
of default under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement. Refer to Note 2 of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information. The
Company's obligations under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement are secured
and classified as Current portion of long-term debt in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of August 1, 2020.

Term Loan



In Fiscal 2018, we repaid a total of $225.0 million of Term Loan debt of which
$180.0 million was applied to future quarterly scheduled payments such that we
are not required to make our next quarterly payment of $22.5 million until
November of calendar 2020.

During the second quarter of Fiscal 2020, the Company repurchased $79.5 million
aggregate principal amount of its Term Loan debt in open market transactions. In
the third quarter of Fiscal 2020, the Company performed an additional repurchase
of $42.0 million of principal amount of debt, which has not yet been settled and
the underlying debt remains outstanding in order to maintain maximum financial
flexibility as a result of COVID-19. For more information, see Note 12 to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In July 2020, the Company used the cash proceeds from the sale of its corporate
campus in Mahwah, New Jersey to make a prepayment of $20.4 million. On July 23,
2020, the Petition Date, the outstanding Term Loan balance was classified as
Liabilities subject to compromise.

Common Stock Repurchase Program



There were no purchases of common stock during Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 under
the repurchase program. For a complete description of our 2016 Stock Repurchase
Program, see Note 19 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

We may from time to time repurchase shares under the repurchase program depending on our liquidity requirements and prevailing market conditions, subject to any restrictions under our debt agreements, among other factors.

CONTRACTUAL AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



Our off-balance sheet commitments, which include outstanding letters of credit,
amounted to approximately $99.8 million as of August 1, 2020. We do not maintain
any other off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions, obligations or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have a
material current or future effect on our operational results, financial
condition and cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES



The SEC's Financial Reporting Release No. 60, "Cautionary Advice Regarding
Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies" ("FRR 60"), suggests companies
provide additional disclosure and commentary on those accounting policies
considered most critical. FRR 60 considers an accounting policy to be critical
if it is important to our operational results and financial position and
requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its
application. Our estimates
                                       38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

are often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that
management believes to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain and
unpredictable. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. It is also possible that other professionals,
applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop
and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. We believe that the
following list represents the critical accounting policies as contemplated by
FRR 60. For a discussion of all of our significant accounting policies, see
Notes 4 and 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Inventories

Retail Inventory Method



We hold inventory for sale through our retail stores and direct channel sites.
Our Plus Fashion and Kids Fashion segments use the retail inventory method of
accounting, under which inventory is stated at the lower of cost, on a First In,
First Out ("FIFO") basis, or market. Under the retail inventory method, the
valuation of inventory at cost and the resulting gross margin are calculated by
applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of inventory.
Inherent in the retail method are certain significant management judgments and
estimates including, among others, initial merchandise markup, markdowns and
shrinkage, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as
well as the resulting gross margins.

We continuously review inventory levels to identify slow-moving merchandise and
markdowns necessary to clear slow-moving merchandise, which reduces the cost of
inventories to its estimated net realizable value. Consideration is given to a
number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including current pricing levels
and the anticipated need for subsequent markdowns, aging of inventories,
historical sales trends, and the impact of market trends and economic
conditions. Estimates of markdown requirements may differ from actual results
due to changes in quantity, quality and mix of products in inventory, as well as
changes in consumer preferences, market and economic conditions. Our historical
estimates of these costs and the markdown provisions have not differed
materially from actual results.

Weighted-average Cost Method



The Premium Fashion segment uses the weighted-average cost method to value
inventory, under which inventory is valued at the lower of average cost or net
realizable value, at the individual item level. Inventory cost is adjusted when
the current selling price or future estimated selling price is less than cost.

Reserves for inventory shrinkage, representing the risk of physical loss of inventory, are estimated based on historical experience and are adjusted based upon physical inventory counts.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and certain other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful
lives are not amortized. Rather, goodwill and such indefinite-lived intangible
assets are assessed for impairment at least annually, or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable.

To assist management in the process of determining goodwill impairment, we
review and consider an appraisal from an independent valuation firm. Estimates
of fair value are determined using discounted cash flows and market comparisons.
These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions, including projected
future cash flows and the timing of those cash flows, discount rates reflecting
the risks inherent in future cash flows, perpetual growth rates and
determination of appropriate market comparables. Estimating the fair value is
judgmental in nature, which could have a significant impact on whether or not an
impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such charge.

The fair values of the reporting units are determined using a combination of the
income approach (the discounted cash flows method) and the market approach
(guideline public company method and guideline transaction method). However, for
the April 2020 Interim Test and the Year-end Test, we only used the income
approach as the market approach was deemed unrepresentative due to the
volatility and disruption in the global financial markets caused by COVID-19.
The Company believes that the income approach is the most reliable indication of
value as it captures forecasted revenues and earnings for the
                                       39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

reporting units in the projection period that the market approach may not directly incorporate. Therefore, a greater weighting was applied to the income approach than the market approach.



The assessment is performed at the reporting unit level. The Fiscal 2020
reporting units identified for the purpose of goodwill impairment assessment,
after considering the economic aggregation criteria, were Ann Taylor, LOFT,
Justice, Lane Bryant, and Catherines.  During the second quarter of Fiscal 2020,
the Company completed the wind down of the Dressbarn brand.

Fiscal 2020 Second Quarter Interim Impairment Assessment



The second quarter of Fiscal 2020 marked the continuation of the challenging
market environment in which the Company competes. While the Company met its
overall expectations for the second quarter, lower than expected comparable
sales in the second quarter at the Justice brand, and lower than expected
margins at our Ann Taylor brand, along with the expectation that such trends may
continue into the second half of Fiscal 2020, led the Company to reduce its
level of forecasted earnings for Fiscal 2020 and future periods. Since these
brands had little or no excess of fair value over its book value at the
beginning of Fiscal 2020, the Company concluded that these factors represented
impairment indicators which required the Company to test its goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment during the second quarter of
Fiscal 2020 (the "January Interim Test").

As a result of lower forecasted revenue assumptions over the projection period,
the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $63.4 million as follows:
a goodwill impairment charge of $54.9 million at the Ann Taylor reporting unit
and $8.5 million at the Justice reporting unit to write-down the carrying values
of the reporting units (based on the revised carrying value after deducting the
trade name impairments discussed below) to their fair values. In addition, the
Company recognized an impairment loss of $46.9 million to write-down the
carrying values of its other intangible assets as follows: $10.0 million of our
Ann Taylor trade name, $35.0 million of our Justice trade name, $1.0 million of
our Catherines trade name, and $0.9 million of our Justice franchise rights. The
fair value of the trade names was determined using an approach that values the
Company's cash savings from having a royalty-free license compared to the market
rate it would pay for access to use the trade name (Level 3 measurement).

Significant assumptions underlying the discounted cash flows included: a
weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") of 25.5% for Ann Taylor and Justice
which was determined from relevant market comparisons and adjusted for specific
risks; operating income margin of low single-digits and a terminal growth rate
of 2%. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the
valuation model. As an example, the impact of a hypothetical change in each of
the significant assumptions is described below. In quantifying the impact, we
changed only the specific assumption and held all other assumptions constant. A
hypothetical 1% change in WACC rate would increase/decrease the fair value by
approximately $5 million at Ann Taylor and Justice. A hypothetical 1% change in
the operating income percentages in all periods would increase/decrease the fair
value by approximately $20 million at Ann Taylor and approximately $25 million
at Justice. Finally, a hypothetical 1% change in the terminal growth rate would
increase/decrease the fair value by approximately $2 million at Ann Taylor and
Justice. Any changes in fair value resulting from changes in the assumptions
discussed above would increase/decrease the impairment charges of the respective
trade name. However, since the goodwill balances have been written down to zero,
changes in the underlying assumptions discussed above would have had no impact
on the Justice goodwill impairment and may have resulted in an increase/decrease
in the goodwill impairment charge at Ann Taylor.

Fiscal 2020 Third Quarter Interim Impairment Assessment



The third quarter of Fiscal 2020 reflected a significant decline in the
Company's stock price and the fair value of our Term Loan debt due to the
financial market uncertainty from COVID-19 which also resulted in the closure of
our retail stores and led to a substantial decrease in our retail store revenue.
The Company concluded that these factors represented impairment indicators which
required the Company to test its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
for impairment during the third quarter of Fiscal 2020.

As a result of lower forecasted revenue assumptions over the projection period,
the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $85.5 million as follows:
$15.0 million at the Ann Taylor reporting unit and $70.5 million at the LOFT
reporting unit to write down the carrying values of the reporting units (based
on the revised carrying value after deducting the trade name impairments
discussed below) to their fair values. In addition, the Company recognized
impairment losses of $41.3 million to
                                       40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

write down the carrying values of its trade name intangible assets as follows:
$17.7 million of our Ann Taylor trade name, $7.8 million of our LOFT trade name,
$7.8 million of our Justice trade name, $3.0 million of our Catherines trade
name and $5.0 million of our Justice franchise rights.

Significant assumptions underlying the discounted cash flows included: a
weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") of 22.9% for Ann Taylor and 24.9% for
LOFT which was determined from relevant market comparisons and adjusted for
specific risks; operating income margin of low single-digits and a terminal
growth rate of 2%. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact
on the valuation model. As an example, the impact of a hypothetical change in
each of the significant assumptions is described below. In quantifying the
impact, we changed only the specific assumption and held all other assumptions
constant. A hypothetical 1% change in WACC rate would increase/decrease the fair
value by approximately $5 million at Ann Taylor and approximately $20 million at
LOFT. A hypothetical 1% change in the operating income percentages in all
periods would increase/decrease the fair value by approximately $30 million at
Ann Taylor and approximately $70 million at LOFT. Finally, a hypothetical 1%
change in the terminal growth rate would increase/decrease the fair value by
approximately $3 million at Ann Taylor and approximately $10 million at LOFT.
Any changes in fair value resulting from changes in the assumptions discussed
above would increase/decrease the impairment charges of the respective trade
name. However, since the Ann Taylor goodwill balances have been written down to
zero, changes in the underlying assumptions discussed above would have only
decreased the goodwill impairment charge at Ann Taylor and may have resulted in
an increase or decrease in the goodwill impairment charge at LOFT.

Fiscal 2020 Year-End Impairment Assessment



On July 23, 2020, the Company and certain of the Company's direct and indirect
subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 Cases with the United States Bankruptcy Court,
discussed further in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements, which led the Company to conclude this represented further
impairment indicators. As a result, the Company was required to test its
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment during the fourth
quarter of Fiscal 2020 (the Year-End Test").

The Year-End Test was determined with the assistance of an independent valuation
firm using the same methodologies as the April Interim Test. The cash flow
projections underlying the Year-End Test reflected revenue assumptions for
Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2022 based on the current consumer demand, the
continuation of the negative impacts of COVID-19 and the potential release of a
vaccine during Fiscal 2021 with the expectation that the Company will be back in
line with the original long-range projections for Fiscal 2023 and beyond. The
discount rate used for the LOFT brand in the Year-End Test was 25.5% which was a
slight increase from 24.9% used in the April Interim Test. The Year-End Test
indicated the fair value of the LOFT brand exceeded its carrying value by
approximately 11% and as a result no goodwill impairment charge was required in
the fourth quarter.

Based on the results of the Year-End Test, the Company recognized impairment
charges to write-down the carrying value of its other intangible assets of their
fair values as follows: $34.2 million on the LOFT trade name and $1.3 million on
the Ann Taylor trade name. In addition, the Company impaired the remaining
Justice franchise rights of $5 million as the Company will no longer be
supporting this business strategy. Indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
charges have been disclosed separately in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.

Other



If we continue to experience sustained periods of unexpected declines or shifts
in consumer spending, it could adversely impact the long-term assumptions used
in our Interim Tests and Year-End Test. Such trends may also have a negative
impact on some of the other key assumptions used in impairment tests, including
anticipated operating income margin as well as the weighted average cost of
capital rate. These assumptions are highly judgmental and subject to change.
Such changes, if material, may require us to incur additional impairment charges
for goodwill and/or other indefinite-lived intangible assets in future periods,
including at the LOFT reporting unit. As an example, the impact of a
hypothetical change in both of the significant assumptions is described below. A
hypothetical 1% change in WACC rate would increase/decrease the LOFT fair value
by approximately $20 million. A hypothetical 1% change in the operating income
percentage in all periods would increase/decrease the fair value of LOFT by
approximately $55 million. If that were to occur, the fair value of the LOFT
reporting unit would be less than its carrying value and result in an impairment
of goodwill.

                                       41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
                             (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
                    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
          FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Property and equipment, along with other long-lived assets, such as right-of-use
assets, are evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. In evaluating long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible
assets, for recoverability, we use our best estimate of future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. To
the extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to the
asset are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized equal
to the difference between the carrying value of such asset and its fair value,
considering external market participant assumptions. Assets to be disposed of,
and for which there is a committed plan of disposal, are reported at the lower
of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

In determining future cash flows, we take various factors into account,
including changes in merchandising strategy, the emphasis on retail store cost
controls, the effects of macroeconomic trends such as consumer spending, and the
impacts of more experienced retail store managers and increased local
advertising. Since the determination of future cash flows is an estimate of
future performance, there may be future impairments in the event that future
cash flows do not meet expectations.

During Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, we recorded total non-cash impairment
charges within continuing and discontinued operations of $319.3 million and
$85.8 million, respectively, to reduce the net carrying value of certain
long-lived tangible assets to their estimated fair value. Of these amounts,
$109.6 million and $45.4 million in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively,
are included within Restructuring and other related charges in the consolidated
statements of operations. There have been no impairment losses recorded on our
finite-lived intangible assets for any of the periods presented. See Notes 8 and
10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a further
discussion of impairments of long-lived assets.

Income Taxes



Income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method. Under this
method, income taxes (i.e., deferred tax assets and liabilities, current taxes
payable/refunds receivable and tax expense) are recorded based on amounts
refundable or payable in the current year, and include the results of any
differences between U.S. GAAP and tax reporting. Deferred income taxes reflect
the tax effect of net operating loss, capital loss and general business credit
carry forwards and the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax
purposes, as determined under enacted tax laws and rates. We account for the
financial effect of changes in tax laws or rates in the period of enactment.

Valuation allowances are established when management determines that it is
more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not
be realized. This determination requires significant judgment by management. Tax
valuation allowances are analyzed quarterly and adjusted as events occur, or
circumstances change, that warrant adjustments to those balances. We have
evaluated all evidence, both positive and negative, with currently available
information to determine sources of taxable income that the Company can use in
order to recognize its deferred tax assets. This includes taxable income in
carryback years if permitted by tax law, future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences (i.e. deferred tax liabilities), tax planning strategies
and future taxable income exclusive of taxable temporary differences (i.e.
forecasted book income). The Company is in a cumulative loss position and has
determined that it does not have sufficient taxable income, therefore, a
valuation allowance has been recognized on a portion of our deferred tax asset.
A valuation allowance is a non-cash charge, which does not eliminate the
deferred tax asset but instead reduces the benefit we expect to realize from it
in the future.

We also establish a reserve for uncertain tax positions. If we consider that a
tax position is more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon audit, based solely
on the technical merits of the position, we recognize the tax benefit. We
measure the tax benefit by determining the largest amount that is greater than
50% likely of being realized upon settlement, presuming that the tax position is
examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all
relevant information. These assessments can be complex and we often obtain
assistance from external advisors. We regularly monitor our position and
subsequently recognize the tax benefit if (i) there are changes in tax law or
analogous case law that sufficiently raise the likelihood of prevailing on the
technical merits of the position to more-likely-than-not, (ii) the statute of
limitation expires or (iii) there is a completion of an audit resulting in a
settlement of that tax year with the appropriate agency.

                                       42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a description of certain recently issued or proposed accounting standards which may impact our financial statements in future reporting periods.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses