Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Australian Stock Exchange  >  AUB Group Limited    AUB   AU000000AUB9

AUB GROUP LIMITED

(AUB)
  Report
End-of-day quote. End-of-day quote Australian Stock Exchange - 10/23
16.9 AUD   -1.92%
09/19AUB : Entitlement to indemnity under marine transit insurance
AQ
09/07AUB GROUP LIMITED : Ex-dividend day for final dividend
FA
07/21Lebanon's turmoil fuels brain drain
RE
SummaryChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector news

AUB : Entitlement to indemnity under marine transit insurance

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
09/19/2020 | 02:07am EDT

The decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Swashplate Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company trading as Liberty International Underwriters addresses the issue of when risk attaches pursuant to a transit insurance policy in a situation where there is conflict between the policy wording and a placement slip issued by the broker.

A full copy of the judgment can be accessed here.

Background

On 24 May 2017, Austbrokers, an Australian insurance broker, arranged an insurance facility with Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty), which set out the terms on which Liberty would issue single transit insurance for helicopters to insureds represented by Austbrokers (Facility).

The duration of the Facility specified in the Master Slip was expressed as covering risks attaching during the period from 23 May 2017 to 22 May 2018 inclusive LST (Local Standard Time). The Master Slip also incorporated the terms of the Institute Cargo Clauses (A) 2009 (ICC(A)), which provide for risk to attach from when the subject-matter was first moved for the purpose of immediate loading, to continue during the ordinary course of transit, and then to terminate on completion of unloading or the point at which transit ceased.

In May 2018Swashplate Pty Ltd (Swashplate) arranged to transport a recently purchased helicopter from Picayune, Mississippi to the Sunshine Coast Airport in Queensland.

While the helicopter was being packaged and prepared for transit on 18 May 2018, Swashplate requested that Austbrokers arrange insurance for transit of the helicopter. The subsequent Placement Slip provided by Austbrokers to Liberty provided that the period of insurance was from 19 May 2018 to the date of arrival at Sunshine Coast Airport.

As a result of insufficient packing in the shipping container on 18 Mary 2018, the helicopter sustained significant damage during transit and Swashplate made a claim under its policy to recover the costs of repair.

In reliance on the Placement Slip, Liberty rejected Swashplate's claim on the ground that the commencement of cover took effect on 19 May 2018 Mississippi time, which was after transit of the helicopter commenced and the damage occurred (18 May 2018 Mississippi time). This would mean that a clause that excluded cover for loss or damage caused by insufficient packing of the helicopter, where such packing was carried out prior to attachment of the insurance, applied.

Swashplate's position was that the insurance cover applied to the whole of the transit period, as well as for an additional five days before loading in accordance with a static cover extension included in the Master Slip. Since the packing of the helicopter took place within this period, Swashplate contended that it was entitled to be indemnified by Liberty.

The trial judge commented that the wording in the policy (in particular, clause 8.1 of ICC(A)) made it difficult to be precise as to when transit cover would commence, and that the specific wording in the Placement Slip overcame this uncertainty. He therefore agreed with Liberty that the policy exclusion applied, given that the helicopter was packed prior to the commencement of the cover on 19 May 2018 in Mississippi.

The Federal Court's decision

The Court held that the Facility did not contemplate cover that commenced from a nominated date; rather it provided cover for a single transit the duration of which commenced and terminated as provided for in the ICC(A). The Court accepted that it was not necessary for there to be certainty as to the date on which risk would commence and terminate.

The Court considered that the 'Period of Insurance' in the Placement Slip merely specified the basis upon which the particular transit is said to be within the insurance period as specified in the Master Slip, and was not determinative of when cover commenced and terminated. The construction contended for by Liberty was considered by the Court to be inconsistent with the express language identifying the voyage to be covered, and was inconsistent with the commercial context of the arrangement.

Accordingly, the Court found that the policy of insurance with Liberty covered the whole transit period, plus the prior five days pursuant to the static cover extension.

Our comment

The judgment demonstrates the difficulties that can arise in interpreting insurance contracts, particularly where the terms of a contract originate from a variety of different documents, and the importance Courts place on interpreting contracts in light of the commercial purpose behind the policy. Although a Placement Slip will generally show clearly when cover commences and terminates, it should always be read in conjunction with the terms of the policy, and care should be taken when the policy does not provide for certainty as to the date on which risk would commence and terminate (such as transit policies).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Simon Cartwright
Hesketh Henry
Level 11
41 Shortland Street
Auckland
1010
NEW ZEALAND

© Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing


share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
All news about AUB GROUP LIMITED
09/19AUB : Entitlement to indemnity under marine transit insurance
AQ
09/07AUB GROUP LIMITED : Ex-dividend day for final dividend
FA
07/21Lebanon's turmoil fuels brain drain
RE
03/05AUB GROUP LIMITED : Ex-dividend day for interim dividend
FA
2019AUB GROUP LTD : Ex-dividend day for final dividend
FA
2019AUB : Change in substantial holding from PPT
PU
2019AUB : Appendix 3X - Mike Emmett
PU
2019AUB : Appendix 3Z - Mark Searles
PU
2019AUB : Confirmation of Board Changes at AUB Group
PU
2019AUB GROUP LTD : Ex-dividend day for interim dividend
FA
More news
Financials
Sales 2021 308 M 220 M 220 M
Net income 2021 55,6 M 39,7 M 39,7 M
Net Debt 2021 83,5 M 59,6 M 59,6 M
P/E ratio 2021 22,5x
Yield 2021 2,67%
Capitalization 1 257 M 894 M 897 M
EV / Sales 2021 4,36x
EV / Sales 2022 4,07x
Nbr of Employees 3 000
Free-Float 99,9%
Chart AUB GROUP LIMITED
Duration : Period :
AUB Group Limited Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends AUB GROUP LIMITED
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 5
Average target price 18,11 AUD
Last Close Price 16,90 AUD
Spread / Highest target 29,6%
Spread / Average Target 7,14%
Spread / Lowest Target -5,33%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Michael Patrick Cheere Emmett Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director & MD
David Clarence Clarke Non-Executive Chairman
Mark Jonathan Shanahan Chief Financial Officer
Raymond John Carless Independent Non-Executive Director
Robin Jane Low Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
AUB GROUP LIMITED40.95%911
AON PLC-0.39%47 490
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY3.77%27 004
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.13.16%20 633
BROWN & BROWN, INC.18.14%13 190
EHEALTH, INC.-14.63%2 112