Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. Germany
  4. Xetra
  5. BMW AG
  6. News
  7. Summary
    BMW   DE0005190003

BMW AG

(BMW)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Bayerische Motoren Werke : European Commission Requires Diesel Car Makers To Clean Up Their Act In Ground-breaking Punishment Of Technical Cooperation

07/28/2021 | 06:42pm EDT

On 8 July 2021 the European Commission fined BMW and the Volkswagen group ?875 million for colluding to restrict the use of novel technology to clean diesel emissions (see the Commission press release here). Another participant, Daimler, notified the Commission of the conduct and so received immunity from fines.

The decision concludes a three year investigation and sets a new precedent for imposing fines regarding technical cooperation (an issue we previously considered here). It follows on the heels of the separate 2015 'diesel gate' scandal where VW was found to have manipulated emissions test results. All of the parties ultimately admitted their participation and liability.

As well as breaking new ground on the scope of issues which have been identified as cartel-type activity, it is a further example of the Commission's willingness to pursue conduct that impedes the development of environmentally-friendly technology. On this point Executive Vice-President Vestager noted "competition and innovation on managing car pollution are essential for Europe to meet our ambitious Green Deal objectives".

Conduct

From 2009 - 2014 Daimler, BMW and VW held regular meetings where they discussed the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR)-technology. SCR-technology eliminates harmful nitrogen oxide emissions in diesel cars by injecting urea (also called 'AdBlue') into vehicles' exhaust streams. Over the five years the manufacturers were found to have co-operated in a sustained plot to use less effective emissions technology than was potentially available to them. They exchanged commercially sensitive information and reached an understanding about each other's approach to SCR-technology, thus removing uncertainty about each other's future market conduct.

Specifically, the car manufacturers agreed sizes and ranges for AdBlue tanks as well as reaching consensus on the average estimated AdBlue consumption. This collusion restricted competition on product characteristics and limited technical development. The Commission held the conduct was a by-object infringement, and referenced Article 101(1)(b) TFEU (limiting or controlling product, markets, technical development or investment).

Comment

This decision is a timely reminder that companies must determine their own commercial strategy independently of their market competitors. Whilst the Commission continues to recognise the importance of technical collaboration that achieves pro-competitive outcomes (see for example, its recent highlighting of sustainability issues in its review of the guidance on horizontal cooperation agreements) it will not tolerate collusion that threatens innovation, particularly given the ever-growing demand for green technology.

The decision also raises an interesting question as to whether agreeing common technical standards - which can be beneficial to an industry as a whole - can still infringe competition law if they also involve limitations on technological advances. Standard development inevitably involves trade-offs between factors such as cost of manufacture of standard-compliant products, efficiency of different alternatives, compatibility with other related technologies - and at least formal standardisation often involves technology being developed in 'generations'. In all cases, an inevitable consequence is a crystallisation of a particular solution at a given point in time, with further significant development being deferred for future generations. The issue here is more likely to be the necessity of this form of technical cooperation at all - a small number of competitors getting together to set standards almost inevitably raises significant competition law risks.

Although Article 101(1)(b) TFEU makes clear limiting technical development is a competition law infringement this is the first time it has been the focus of cartel-type behaviour. The Commission will be keen to distinguish this offence from situations where companies legitimately co-operate in order to further innovation and improve product quality. The Commission acknowledges that working together can result in a number of pro-competitive benefits including cost savings and shared know-how, as well as allowing companies to combine complementary assets and skills.1 This is something that is also important in efficient collaboration to achieve sustainability or other (legitimate) technical goals. As a result the Commission has also given guidance on the aspects of the AdBlue collaboration that do not raise competition concerns. It is to be hoped that this guidance (or a summary) will be made available publicly in due course.

Footnote

1 Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 TFEU to Horizontal Co-operation Agreements, para 2.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Ms Sophie Lawrance
Bristows
100 Victoria Embankment
London
EC4Y 0DH
UK
Tel: (0)207400 8000
E-mail: valentina.ciolino@bristows.com
URL: www.bristows.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
BMW AG 0.00% 82.69 Delayed Quote.14.48%
VOLKSWAGEN AG -0.70% 190 Delayed Quote.24.66%
All news about BMW AG
09/27SMART PLANT LOGISTICS : Automated transport systems for outdoor use
PU
09/27European Commission Green-lights BMW, Daimler, BP's Joint CHARGE NOW Acquisition
MT
09/27FINALE IN THE BMW MOTORRAD ESPORTS C : Showdown at Portimão brings gamers and BMW Motorrad..
PU
09/27BMW : Gets a Neutral rating from Goldman Sachs
MD
09/26BMW : United States team wins 43rd Ryder Cup, as BMW debuts as Worldwide Partner of legend..
PU
09/26BMW : Guye Adla and Gotytom Gebreslase win the BMW BERLIN-MARATHON on the 10th anniversary..
PU
09/26BMW : Fatal accident overshadows WorldSBK race weekend in Jerez de la Frontera.
PU
09/25BMW : Junior Team races the BMW M6 GT3 to the podium also at NLS 8 – New BMW M4 GT3 ..
PU
09/24Maersk Makes Minority Investment In US-Based Electrofuels Startup
MT
09/23“THE ULTIMATE JOURNEY” : Worldwide Ryder Cup Partner BMW gives the prestigious..
PU
More news
Analyst Recommendations on BMW AG
More recommendations
Financials
Sales 2021 110 B 129 B 129 B
Net income 2021 9 711 M 11 346 M 11 346 M
Net cash 2021 17 668 M 20 644 M 20 644 M
P/E ratio 2021 5,47x
Yield 2021 5,19%
Capitalization 53 610 M 62 613 M 62 637 M
EV / Sales 2021 0,33x
EV / Sales 2022 0,29x
Nbr of Employees 120 726
Free-Float 57,3%
Chart BMW AG
Duration : Period :
BMW AG Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends BMW AG
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralBearishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 24
Last Close Price 82,69 €
Average target price 102,74 €
Spread / Average Target 24,3%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Oliver Zipse Chairman-Management Board
Nicolas Peter Chief Financial Officer
Norbert Reithofer Chairman-Supervisory Board
Susanne Klatten Independent Member-Supervisory Board
Manfred Schoch Deputy Chairman-Supervisory Board
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
BMW AG14.48%62 734
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION30.51%257 885
VOLKSWAGEN AG24.66%140 641
DAIMLER AG31.91%94 891
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY26.92%77 290
GREAT WALL MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED8.65%62 361