CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED CN argument at close of public comment period fails to present convincing case that voting trust is in public interest
CN's reply doubles down on arguments for a voting trust that CP has already shown do not meet the Board's public interest test and sweeps under the rug the many public interest costs associated with CN's proposed use of a trust.
CN continues to try to limit the STB's discretion to determine what is in the public interest, repeating its flawed rhetoric about the Board's "narrow test" and asserting that concerns raised by "rail labor, communities and passenger rail…are not relevant to this voting trust decision." CN also repeats its false assertion that CN and CP are "identically situated" with respect to the relevant public interest factors, despite the fundamental differences in the public interest implications of their proposals that have already led the STB to subject the CN proposal to the 2001 merger rules and the elevated public test for voting trusts, pursuant to which approval shall be the "rare" exception rather than the routine.
CP looks forward to the Board's decision on CN's proposal, which will mark the next milestone in CP's ability to present the CP/KCS alternative, which offers all the same benefits and more without any of the competitive and other costs of a CN acquisition of KCS.
CN's reply falsely asserts that there is "no CP transaction" and that the Board would not "contrast" the CN transaction with a "hypothetical" CP/KCS transaction in any event. CN misses the point entirely: CP would not be asking the Board to "prefer" a CP/KCS transaction over a CN/KCS one, but merely revealing that the purported benefits CN is claiming for its own proposal should not be credited because they can be obtained in ways that do not harm the public interest. Though that lens, the CN/KCS deal should not be approved.
CP looks forward to offering KCS shareholders a realistic, achievable and ultimately superior path to realize the value of their stake in this proud company. On close inspection, CN's bid remains truly illusory.
CP-KCS remains the only viable Class 1 combination
CP filed comments with the STB on
Importantly, the STB has already approved CP's use of a voting trust and affirmed KCS' waiver from the new rail merger rules it adopted in 2001 because a CP-KCS combination is truly end-to-end, pro-competitive, and the only viable Class 1 combination.
As previously announced, CP is continuing to pursue its application process to acquire KCS so that the pro-competitive CP-KCS combination can be reviewed by the STB and implemented without undue delay, in the event KCS' agreement with CN is terminated or CN is otherwise unable to acquire control of KCS.
For more information on the benefits of a CP-KCS combination and the risks that a CN-KCS transaction would pose to the railway industry and
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION
This news release includes certain forward-looking statements and forward looking information (collectively, FLI). FLI is typically identified by words such as "anticipate", "expect", "project", "estimate", "forecast", "plan", "intend", "target", "believe", "likely" and similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be FLI.
Although we believe that the FLI is reasonable based on the information available today and processes used to prepare it, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and you are cautioned against placing undue reliance on FLI. By its nature, FLI involves a variety of assumptions, which are based upon factors that may be difficult to predict and that may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these FLI, including, but not limited to, the following: changes in business strategies and strategic opportunities; estimated future dividends; financial strength and flexibility; debt and equity market conditions, including the ability to access capital markets on favourable terms or at all; cost of debt and equity capital; potential changes in the CP share price; the ability of management of CP, its subsidiaries and affiliates to execute key priorities; general North American and global social, economic, political, credit and business conditions; risks associated with agricultural production such as weather conditions and insect populations; the availability and price of energy commodities; the effects of competition and pricing pressures, including competition from other rail carriers, trucking companies and maritime shippers in
We caution that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and is made as of the date hereof. Additional information about these and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties can be found in reports and filings by CP with Canadian and
Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any FLI, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All FLI in this news release is expressly qualified in its entirety by these cautionary statements.
ABOUT CANADIAN PACIFIC
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cn-continues-to-duck-key-issues-in-voting-trust-filing-with-stb-301327155.html
SOURCE Canadian Pacific
© Canada Newswire, source
