Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.

(CAG)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Conagra Brands : Slips Away From Parkay Oil Spray Serving Size Claims

10/22/2020 | 10:12am EDT

Conagra Brands recently emerged victorious when Judge William H. Orrick of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in its favor, tossing claims that the company disguises the fat and calorie content of its Parkay Spray vegetable oil spray product ("Parkay") with artificially small serving sizes. Allen v. Conagra Foods, No. 3:13-cv-01279 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2020).

According to plaintiffs, Parkay contains a significant amount of fat and calories, which Conagra avoids disclosing by using a serving size "so ridiculously small" that Conagra is able to "round down the disclosed amount of fat to zero." Plaintiffs alleged Parkay's "0 fat," "fat free," and "0 calories" claims therefore violated California's CLRA, UCL, and other state consumer protection laws.

The case turned on the categorization of the product under FDA regulations, which set different serving sizes for "Fats and Oils: Butter, margarine, oil, shortening" as opposed to "Fats and Oils: Spray types." Treating Parkay as a "Spray type" product, Conagra labels it with a serving size of 0.25 grams. According to Plaintiffs, Parkay should be categorized as "Fats and Oils: Butter, margarine, oil, shortening," for which the FDA requires a larger serving size of one tablespoon.

The Court explained that to the extent Plaintiffs' claims sought to impose requirements beyond those required by FDA regulations, they were preempted, noting "[w]hether or not the plaintiffs would ultimately be able to prove that the Parkay label misleads or deceives consumers . . . the federal regulations set the standard for food labeling."

Plaintiffs argued Parkay "must belong in the butter/margarine category [with the larger serving size] because (i) Conagra intends Parkay Spray to be used as a buttery topping, (ii) Conagra markets Parkay Spray as an alternative to butter for foods like corn and bread, and (iii) consumers in fact use Parkay Spray as a topping." Conagra responded that Parkay consists of soybean oil suspended in water, is dispensed via a spray pump, and is therefore literally a "spray-type fat and oil."

Based on the summary judgment record, the Court found it was not possible to conclude Parkay belongs in the butter/margarine category. The Court noted FDA describes the "butter, margarine, oil, and shortening" grouping as consisting of four types of fats and oils "used interchangeably in food preparation." Plaintiffs' own expert testified to the myriad differences between Parkay and butter/margarine, and stated Parkay is a poor substitute for butter or margarine in baking or sautéing. Relying on this testimony, the Court found Parkay cannot be "used interchangeably" with butter or margarine, and therefore the plaintiffs' claims sought to enforce state law requirements that are "not identical to" federal food labeling requirements, and were preempted.

This decision underscores the FDA's broad regulatory authority over the labeling of food and beverage products, which cannot be circumvented by bringing claims under state law. Watch this space for further developments.

Slips Away from Parkay Oil Spray Serving Size Claims

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Lawrence Weinstein
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
(Eighth Avenue & 41st Street)
New York
10036-8299
UNITED STATES
Tel: 2129693000
Fax: 2129692900
E-mail: gpolk@proskauer.com
URL: www.proskauer.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.
06/08CONAGRA BRANDSá : Announces Details Of Fiscal 2021 Fourth Quarter Earnings Relea..
PR
06/04CONAGRA BRANDSá : Celebrates Employee-Led Sustainable Development Awards Program..
AQ
06/02CONAGRA BRANDSá : Celebrates Employee-Led Sustainable Development Awards Program
PR
05/26CONAGRA BRANDSá : Forms Multi-Year Partnerships with Thurgood Marshall College F..
PR
05/14Walmart to Stop Requiring Masks for Vaccinated Workers and Shoppers -- 3rd Up..
DJ
05/14Walmart to Stop Requiring Masks for Vaccinated Workers and Shoppers -- 2nd Up..
DJ
05/14Walmart to Stop Requiring Masks for Vaccinated Workers and Shoppers -- Update
DJ
05/13CONAGRA BRANDSá : Gardein« Launches Suprême™ Plant-Based Burger--and it's ..
AQ
05/10CONAGRA BRANDSá : Insider Selling at ConAgra Brands (CAG) Continues with Signifi..
MT
05/07INSIDER TRENDS : ConAgra Brands Insider Extends 90-Day Selling Trend
MT
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 11 132 M - -
Net income 2021 1 222 M - -
Net Debt 2021 8 848 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 14,2x
Yield 2021 2,85%
Capitalization 17 125 M 17 125 M -
EV / Sales 2021 2,33x
EV / Sales 2022 2,33x
Nbr of Employees 16 500
Free-Float 81,8%
Chart CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.
Duration : Period :
Conagra Brands, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 16
Average target price 39,31 $
Last Close Price 35,68 $
Spread / Highest target 23,3%
Spread / Average Target 10,2%
Spread / Lowest Target -4,71%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
Sean M. Connolly President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
David S. Marberger Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Richard H. Lenny Non-Executive Chairman
Mindy Simon Chief Information Officer
Thomas M. McGough Co-Chief Operating Officer & Executive VP
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.-1.60%17 125
NESTLÉ S.A.10.78%352 671
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.6.28%89 029
YIHAI KERRY ARAWANA HOLDINGS CO., LTD-19.22%73 513
THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY16.85%49 537
DANONE S.A.8.93%45 182