Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Irish Stock Exchange  >  CRH plc    CRG   IE0001827041

CRH PLC

(CRG)
  Report
Delayed Quote. Delayed Irish Stock Exchange - 12/04 11:35:00 am
34.5 EUR   +1.68%
11/26CRH PLC : Receives a Buy rating from UBS
MD
11/26CRH : Goldman Sachs sets new Sell rating
MD
11/25CRH : Jefferies keeps its Buy rating
MD
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

CRH : Are Employers Responsible For The Consequences Of Practical Jokes In The Workplace?

10/20/2020 | 02:11am EST

When a practical joke goes wrong at work, is the individual or the employer liable for the consequences?

From Practical Joke to Personal Injury Claim

In the case, Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Ltd, Mr Heath and Mr Chell both worked on the same site operated by Tarmac. Mr Heath was employed by Tarmac and Mr Chell was a contractor supplied by a third party. Mr Heath, as part of a practical joke, hit two 'pellet targets' with a hammer causing an explosion by Mr Chell's ear. Mr Heath was dismissed by Tarmac following the incident which caused Mr Chell to suffer a perforated ear drum, hearing loss and tinnitus.

Mr Chell brought a personal injury claim against Tarmac.

The High Court upheld the County Court decision that Tarmac was not liable for the consequences of Mr Heath's practical joke. The court held that there was not a sufficiently close connection between Mr Heath's employment and his actions and that it is not reasonable to expect an employer to implement health and safety policies that foresee and combat horseplay or practical jokes.

The 'target pellets' were not work equipment and had been brought to the site by Mr Heath specifically to carry out the practical joke, rather than for any work use. Additionally, Mr Heath was supposed to be working on another job in another part of the site and should not have been in the vicinity of Mr Chell at the time of the prank. The Court found that "work merely provided an opportunity to carry out the prank that he played, rather than the prank in any sense being in the field of activities that Tarmac had assigned to Mr Heath."

Best Practice

The decision follows the approach of the recent Supreme Court case, which we previously reported, where supermarket chain Morrisons was not vicariously liable for its employee's malicious data breach. In the Morrisons case, the Supreme Court emphasised that there must be a sufficiently close connection between the employee's work and the employee's wrongdoing for the employer to be vicariously liable.

All claims of this sort will turn on their particular facts. However, cases such as this are useful illustrations of how the courts will interpret the 'sufficiently close connection' test.

In the written judgment, it is noted that practical jokes in the workplace can amount to a form of bullying. Employers should ensure that they have appropriate policies in place to deal with workplace bullying and harassment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Michael Halsey
Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Narrow Quay House
Narrow Quay
Bristol
UK

© Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about CRH PLC
11/26CRH PLC : Receives a Buy rating from UBS
MD
11/26CRH : Goldman Sachs sets new Sell rating
MD
11/25CRH : Jefferies keeps its Buy rating
MD
11/25CRH : Buy rating from JP Morgan
MD
11/24GLOBAL MARKETS LIVE: Tesla, Best Buy, Qantas…
11/24CRH : Goldman Sachs reiterates its Neutral rating
MD
11/24CRH : Receives a Sell rating from Barclays
MD
11/24CRH : JP Morgan reiterates its Buy rating
MD
11/24CRH : Nine-Month Ebitda Rises 2%; Forecasts $4.4 Billion Ebitda for 2020
DJ
11/24CRH : Trading Update | November 2020
PU
More news
Financials
Sales 2020 23 769 M 28 808 M 28 808 M
Net income 2020 1 210 M 1 466 M 1 466 M
Net Debt 2020 5 352 M 6 486 M 6 486 M
P/E ratio 2020 22,7x
Yield 2020 2,30%
Capitalization 27 074 M 32 857 M 32 814 M
EV / Sales 2020 1,36x
EV / Sales 2021 1,26x
Nbr of Employees 80 300
Free-Float 98,0%
Chart CRH PLC
Duration : Period :
CRH plc Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends CRH PLC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 17
Average target price 37,96 €
Last Close Price 34,50 €
Spread / Highest target 27,5%
Spread / Average Target 10,0%
Spread / Lowest Target -22,1%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Albert Jude Manifold Chief Executive Officer, COO & Executive Director
Richard P. Boucher Chairman
Senan Murphy Group Finance Director & Executive Director
Heather Ann McSharry Independent Non-Executive Director
Lucinda Jane Riches Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
CRH PLC-3.28%32 857
ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED25.84%19 907
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY1.70%19 405
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC1.90%17 744
HEIDELBERGCEMENT AG-7.33%14 496
CHINA NATIONAL BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY LIMITED17.47%11 122