Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement.

DRAGON MINING LIMITED

龍 資 源 有 限 公 司 *

(Incorporated in Western Australia with limited liability ACN 009 450 051)

(Stock Code: 1712)

VOLUNTARY ANNOUNCEMENT

UPDATE ON EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN IN

SOUTHERN FINLAND

This announcement is made by Dragon Mining Limited 龍資源有限公司* ("Dragon Mining" or "the Company") on a voluntary basis to inform the shareholders of the Company and potential investors of our recent activities.

Since August 2019, Dragon Mining has continued with exploration at the Jokisivu Gold Mine ("Jokisivu") and at the site of the Orivesi Gold Mine ("Orivesi") in southern Finland.

At Jokisivu, the Company completed a series of drilling campaigns that were designed to better define the extent and geometry of known mineralised zones and provide additional information to support future mine planning and development. Early stage exploration has recommenced at the site of Orivesi with the objective of evaluating the merit of the Company's project holding, in areas away from the known mineralisation that have been subject to limited exploration in the past.

The Company is pleased to announce that the drilling campaigns at Jokisivu yielded a number of significant intercepts, including highlights 6.50 metres @ 17.01 g/t gold, 2.00 metres @

28.7 g/t gold, 9.60 metres @ 5.16 g/t gold and the narrow, high grade 1.00 metre @ 92.80 g/ t gold, 0.85 metres @ 62.10 g/t gold, 0.90 metres @ 60.60 g/t gold and 0.80 metres @ 127.00 g/t gold.

- 1 -

Jokisivu Gold Mine

Underground diamond core drilling completed at Jokisivu since August 2019 comprised a total of 66 holes for 8,923.4 metres, drilled over four campaigns. These campaigns primarily targeted the two key deposits at Jokisivu, Kujankallio and Arpola and included:

  • a 35 hole, 5,128.70 metre campaign drilled from the 450m level directed at the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels ("Campaign 1");
  • a 17 hole, 1,906.30 metre campaign from the 470m level targeting the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m levels ("Campaign 2");
  • a 9 hole, 1,203.60 metre campaign drilled from the 170m and 190m levels directed at the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone ("Campaign 3"); and
  • a 5 hole, 684.80 metre campaign drilled from the 120m level directed at the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone ("Campaign 4").

Results have been received for all holes drilled in these campaigns, yielding a series of significant intercepts that support current geological models and further delineating the principal mineralised zones in the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone areas. Results at Arpola have provided confidence that the mineralised zones display good continuity, confirming a link between the Arpola Hanging Wall zone and the Osmos Zone, though the area remains structurally complex and challenging. Better intercepts (>20 gram- metres) received from these campaigns include:

Campaign 1

  • 2.65 metres @ 8.09 g/t gold from 67.75 metres in HU/JS-915;
  • 1.05 metres @ 21.70 g/t gold from 85.50 metres in HU/JS-940;
  • 4.30 metres @ 7.02 g/t gold from 48.00 metres in HU/JS-957;
  • 4.25 metres @ 6.39 g/t gold from 102.30 metres in HU/JS-957;
  • 1.00 metre @ 42.30 g/t gold from 75.60 metres in HU/JS-958;
  • 8.50 metres @ 3.30 g/t gold from 128.90 metres in HU/JS-960;
  • 8.30 metres @ 5.03 g/t gold from 114.90 metres in HU/JS-962;
  • 0.85 metres @ 62.10 g/t gold from 79.25 metres in HU/JS-964;
  • 4.70 metres @ 5.22 g/t gold from 105.05 metres in HU/JS-964;
  • 3.30 metres @ 6.16 g/t gold from 50.65 metres in HU/JS-966;
  • 0.90 metres @ 60.60 g/t gold from 40.90 metres in HU/JS-967;
  • 2.35 metres @ 9.74 g/t gold from 117.95 metres in HU/JS-997; and
  • 10.10 metres @ 2.59 g/t gold from 115.10 metres in HU/JS-999.

- 2 -

Campaign 2

  • 0.80 metres @ 127.00 g/t gold from 57.00 metres in HU/JS-969;
  • 6.50 metres @ 17.01 g/t gold from 121.30 metres in HU/JS-970;
  • 0.70 metres @ 30.20 g/t gold from 152.45 metres in HU/JS-972;
  • 0.65 metres @ 30.70 g/t gold from 73.35 metres in HU/JS-973;
  • 2.00 metres @ 28.70 g/t gold from 98.70 metres in HU/JS-974;
  • 1.00 metre @ 20.80 g/t gold from 96.00 metres in HU/JS-976;
  • 7.15 metres @ 5.54 g/t gold from 64.55 metres in HU/JS-981;
  • 9.60 metres @ 5.16 g/t gold from 60.70 metres in HU/JS-984; and
  • 1.00 metre @ 92.80 g/t gold from 103.75 metres in HU/JS-985.

Campaign 3

  • 2.80 metres @ 7.63 g/t gold from 97.00 metres in HU/JS-986.

Details of all significant intercepts above 1 g/t gold from the four campaigns are listed in Tables 1 to 4.

Updating of the Jokisivu Mineral Resource commenced in November 2019, incorporating all results from the 24 holes in the voluntary announcement dated 2 September 2019 - Promising Results from Drilling at the Jokisivu Gold Mine and 30 holes from the recent Campaigns 1 and 2, which were available at the date of commencement of the updating task. Results from the annual update of the Company's Mineral Resources will be released in early 2020.

Drilling has now recommenced at Jokisivu following a brief hiatus at the end of 2019. The initial campaign is a 13 hole, 1,750 metre campaign targetting the Kujankallio Main Zone, which is being drilled from the 495m level.

Orivesi Gold Mine

Following the cessation of mining at Orivesi during 2019, the Company has embarked on a campaign of early-stage exploration to evaluate the merit of the Company's project holding, in areas away from the known mineralisation that have been subject to limited exploration in the past.

Two programs are currently underway, including a high-level review of available airborne and ground geophysical data by geophysical consultants Resource Potentials in Perth, Western Australia. This is the first integrated review of geophysical data to be undertaken across the Orivesi area, with the objective of identifying new targets that could warrant follow-up activities in the future.

The second program is a base of till/top of bedrock geochemical survey in the western part of the Orivesi project area. This program has been designed to confirm and expand on areas of gold, arsenic and bismuth anomalism that were identified from a base of till survey undertaken in the area during the early 1990's.

Results from both programs will be available in early 2020.

- 3 -

Background

The Jokisivu Gold Mine and Orivesi Gold Mine form part of Dragon Mining's Vammala Production Centre in southern Finland, approximately 165 kilometres northwest of the Finnish capital Helsinki.

The Centre comprises the Vammala Plant, a 300,000 tonnes per annum conventional crushing, milling and flotation facility, the operational Jokisivu and Kaapelinkulma gold mines and the Orivesi Gold Mine where mining ceased in 2019.

The Jokisivu Gold Mine is located 40 kilometres southwest of the Vammala Plant and hosts two principal gold deposits, Kujankallio and Arpola, 200 metres apart. The deposits represent structurally controlled orogenic gold systems located within the Palaeoproterozoic Vammala Migmatite Belt. Gold mineralization at both Kujankallio and Arpola is hosted within relatively undeformed and unaltered diorite, in 1 to 5 metre wide shear zones that are characterised by laminated, pinching and swelling quartz veins. The Kujankallio deposit has been shown by drilling to extend to at least 530 metres in depth, whilst the Arpola deposit has been drilled down to 310 metres. Both deposits remain open with depth and partially along strike.

Open cut mining at Kujankallio commenced in 2009 and underground production in 2011. A small open pit was mined at Arpola in 2011 and underground production commenced from this deposit in 2014. Underground development has now extended at Jokisivu down to the 500m level, with 1.7 million tonnes grading 3.0 g/t gold being mined from the open-pit and underground operations by the end of 2019.

- 4 -

The Orivesi Gold Mine is located 80 kilometres to the northeast of the Vammala Plant and was initially in operation between 1992 and 2003. Dragon Mining recommenced mining at Orivesi in June 2007, initially on remnant mineralisation associated with the near-vertical pipe like Kutema lode system above the 720m level. Two of the five principal lodes at Kutema continued below the historical extent of the decline at the 720m level and this area became the subject of a program of staged development and production stoping down to the 1205m level between January 2011 and January 2018. Mining from the Sarvisuo lodes, 300 metres east of Kutema commenced in April 2008 and was conducted between the 240m and 620m levels, as well as between the 360m and 400m levels and the 650m and 710m levels in the Sarvisuo West area.

Mining at Orivesi ceased in June 2019, with the Company commencing work on closure of the mine. By the cessation of mining, 3.3 million tonnes of ore grading 7.1 g/t gold had been mined from the operation since mining commenced in 1992.

The Kutema and Sarvisuo lode systems occur within the Proterozoic Tampere Schist Belt, representing a metamorphosed palaeo-epithermal system. Gold mineralisation is associated with strongly deformed andalusite rich, silicified zones found in vertical pipe-like lode systems that exhibit depth extensions ranging from tens to hundreds of metres. These lode systems are located in a broad zone of hydrothermally altered rocks that cover an area of 40 hectares. Both Kutema and Sarvisuo remain partially open and potential remains for the identification of additional gold bearing pipes or pipe clusters within the surrounding hydrothermal alteration system.

By Order of the Board

Dragon Mining Limited

Arthur George Dew

Chairman

Hong Kong, 27 February 2020

As at the date of this announcement, the Board comprises Mr. Arthur George Dew as Chairman and Non-Executive Director (with Mr. Mark Wong Tai Chun as his Alternate); Mr. Brett Robert Smith as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director; Ms. Lam Lai as Non- Executive Director and Mr. Carlisle Caldow Procter, Mr. Pak Wai Keung Martin and Mr. Poon Yan Wai, as independent Non-Executive Directors.

  • For identification purpose only

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. Neale Edwards BSc (Hons), a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a full time employee of the Company. Mr. Neale Edwards has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code of Reporting for Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr. Neale Edwards has provided written consent for the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

- 5 -

Table 1 - Results from the underground diamond core drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine. All intercepts reported at a 1 g/t gold cut-off.

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-910

6779638.51

2426482.99

-370.14

340.58

-14.28

143.30

91.50

1.00

1.35

94.50

1.00

1.48

97.80

1.55

3.16

HU/JS-913

6779638.62

2426482.71

-370.50

345.18

-20.75

170.30

104.00

1.00

1.23

109.00

4.50

2.29

120.10

0.80

1.07

128.90

0.55

1.29

130.80

1.00

1.15

HU/JS-915

6779638.67

2426483.06

-369.94

355.22

-9.97

155.00

67.75

2.65

8.09

73.85

1.35

1.11

102.40

0.60

2.31

105.55

1.25

5.08

HU/JS-916

6779638.69

2426482.71

-370.14

358.34

-17.89

98.30

85.00

1.20

3.22

92.35

0.85

2.91

110.45

1.10

2.30

117.75

1.05

2.92

HU/JS-938

6779638.64

2426483.23

-369.95

7.29

-9.97

110.30

66.20

2.85

2.28

71.85

2.70

1.75

HU/JS-939

6779637.58

2426485.73

-369.66

21.27

-10.33

119.40

50.65

0.35

1.16

70.60

1.60

4.90

94.40

0.75

3.47

HU/JS-940

6779638.24

2426483.89

-370.03

17.31

-18.15

149.30

77.80

1.30

5.34

85.50

1.05

21.70

HU/JS-941

6779637.07

2426488.55

-369.88

23.08

-23.32

134.40

81.70

0.70

4.95

92.55

0.50

4.97

98.10

3.25

2.97

HU/JS-942

6779636.80

2426492.25

-369.82

28.04

-27.53

158.40

91.50

0.65

1.69

112.20

3.25

2.28

HU/JS-943

6779636.70

2426492.57

-369.84

33.44

-28.96

200.00

50.70

0.35

2.34

55.10

0.40

2.20

87.70

0.80

3.01

105.45

1.15

3.40

107.85

1.10

2.03

114.95

1.25

1.19

124.00

3.25

3.04

HU/JS-944

6779636.60

2426492.79

-369.76

38.02

-30.94

200.00

122.45

0.95

1.22

132.00

1.00

1.81

136.60

2.65

2.74

186.00

1.15

1.23

HU/JS-950

6779638.61

2426482.88

-370.44

356.50

-23.00

110.50

98.55

0.50

7.07

100.05

1.00

1.01

102.05

2.35

1.79

- 6 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-951

6779638.51

2426483.31

-370.24

9.12

-22.07

170.40

90.80

3.10

2.70

98.35

1.25

1.48

117.85

1.30

1.41

HU/JS-952

6779636.47

2426493.85

-369.60

28.19

-19.62

134.40

41.90

0.65

4.43

58.85

0.55

1.31

64.30

0.60

1.33

77.80

1.95

2.78

85.75

1.25

1.61

90.50

2.35

1.80

94.00

1.10

2.58

HU/JS-953

6779636.60

2426496.62

-369.21

35.54

-11.25

104.40

43.15

0.45

29.70

56.45

0.75

2.69

62.25

0.60

1.50

65.40

0.40

1.02

66.80

1.05

1.55

HU/JS-954

6779636.56

2426495.86

-369.68

35.22

-24.71

160.00

59.00

1.00

2.20

91.35

1.00

2.89

94.50

1.00

1.20

106.85

1.00

1.57

155.50

1.00

1.46

HU/JS-955

6779636.51

2426496.92

-369.84

37.26

-27.45

200.00

71.10

0.75

5.14

77.40

0.60

2.81

80.80

0.60

6.18

82.70

0.80

3.36

91.50

0.50

23.40

98.00

1.00

1.77

101.80

3.50

1.05

110.75

0.50

1.33

115.50

1.00

3.23

120.70

0.45

1.25

149.90

0.40

1.36

HU/JS-956

6779635.01

2426500.50

-369.64

46.31

-26.47

164.30

55.20

0.80

1.05

126.40

1.50

2.73

158.30

1.10

1.03

HU/JS-957

6779634.84

2426500.42

-369.54

48.19

-22.88

149.40

48.00

4.30

7.02

Includes 0.70 metres @ 38.70 g/t gold from 48.00 metres

84.40

1.20

1.78

93.55

0.95

1.07

98.00

1.20

1.38

102.30

4.25

6.39

Includes 1.10 metres @ 19.15 g/t gold from 104.70 metres

111.80

1.30

1.52

127.90

0.65

1.51

134.00

1.00

1.04

144.20

1.10

1.14

- 7 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-958

6779634.71

2426500.48

-369.27

52.54

-16.99

134.30

52.70

0.75

15.40

64.80

1.00

2.20

75.60

1.00

42.30

88.00

0.80

2.99

92.50

1.00

1.17

94.50

0.85

2.44

129.00

1.10

1.03

HU/JS-959

6779634.72

2426500.52

-369.01

54.54

-9.52

104.30

44.30

1.50

1.21

60.90

2.80

5.05

Includes 0.55 metres @ 22.60 g/t gold from 63.15 metres

79.70

0.70

7.66

85.90

0.70

2.21

89.15

1.00

1.66

HU/JS-960

6779633.83

2426500.33

-369.49

57.03

-23.87

200.00

79.20

1.00

1.71

86.50

1.00

2.28

91.30

1.00

3.08

109.10

4.40

1.33

128.90

8.50

3.30

Includes 0.85 metres @ 18.30 g/t gold from 136.55 metres

139.80

1.10

3.44

170.65

0.90

1.55

HU/JS-961

6779633.80

2426500.48

-369.54

61.21

-20.12

164.10

72.85

1.20

7.11

75.35

1.05

1.70

80.80

1.00

1.09

86.35

0.60

2.95

101.70

1.10

1.43

117.30

2.40

6.37

122.40

1.00

4.98

125.30

1.00

1.03

130.50

2.70

3.02

133.95

0.85

1.35

154.90

0.35

1.25

160.00

1.10

1.34

HU/JS-962

6779633.51

2426500.45

-369.65

67.07

-21.35

198.90

18.40

3.40

1.19

78.25

1.10

1.02

85.65

1.00

19.25

114.90

8.30

5.03

Includes 0.50 metres @ 58.40 g/t gold from 117.30 metres

145.95

3.45

1.39

151.00

0.85

1.64

158.95

1.05

2.45

174.75

1.10

1.02

- 8 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-963

6779633.68

2426500.50

-369.38

66.02

-14.01

143.30

35.95

1.35

1.73

69.40

1.10

1.16

102.20

1.25

2.11

112.10

0.85

5.71

130.50

1.05

1.21

HU/JS-964

6779633.36

2426500.47

-369.29

72.14

-17.04

185.00

0.10

1.25

1.08

17.50

0.40

1.29

71.70

0.60

1.76

79.25

0.85

62.10

105.05

4.70

5.22

130.90

1.60

1.63

148.60

0.95

18.80

HU/JS-965

6779633.67

2426500.50

-369.09

70.52

-6.70

119.30

15.80

0.90

1.01

50.90

0.65

1.73

59.05

2.85

1.83

64.90

3.10

1.74

81.80

0.95

4.55

90.85

1.00

1.89

100.95

0.95

2.72

113.80

1.10

4.32

HU/JS-966

6779634.62

2426500.63

-368.50

73.42

10.19

89.30

9.00

1.00

1.25

50.65

3.30

6.16

Includes 1.10 metres @ 16.75 g/t gold from 50.65 metres

63.20

0.80

4.80

69.00

0.75

2.56

HU/JS-967

6779632.84

2426500.48

-367.72

88.48

26.87

98.20

9.35

0.50

6.27

40.90

0.90

60.60

HU/JS-968

6779633.58

2426500.52

-369.10

82.33

-5.14

170.30

64.50

1.95

1.65

80.00

1.00

2.68

116.95

2.65

2.74

HU/JS-995

6779638.68

2426482.30

-370.58

348.01

-27.68

149.30

143.90

1.10

3.48

HU/JS-996

6779638.60

2426482.47

-370.56

357.57

-35.12

178.80

13.75

0.65

1.07

164.80

1.40

6.96

HU/JS-997

6779637.47

2426486.37

-370.40

359.27

-28.35

134.40

104.00

0.40

3.99

116.05

0.35

1.07

117.95

2.35

9.74

Includes 0.50 metres @ 34.00 g/t gold from 117.95 metres

122.30

1.00

1.50

HU/JS-998

6779637.47

2426486.47

-370.29

12.41

-29.59

134.40

114.60

2.80

3.58

122.05

1.00

4.49

HU/JS-999

6779636.73

2426491.19

-369.97

23.00

-30.57

143.50

1.55

0.90

5.18

46.35

0.55

6.72

115.10

10.10

2.59

- 9 -

Table 2 - Results from the underground diamond core drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine. All intercepts reported at a 1 g/t gold cut-off.

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-969

6779648.40

2426350.68

-385.37

11.01

-43.41

125.00

57.00

0.80

127.0

64.00

1.50

1.87

69.25

1.65

3.33

73.90

1.00

1.18

87.00

2.10

7.82

HU/JS-970

6779644.81

2426354.65

-384.93

17.16

-33.56

144.80

28.00

1.00

1.18

36.45

0.85

3.13

53.95

1.35

2.15

98.75

0.80

2.75

108.90

0.65

8.34

111.65

1.00

1.48

113.65

1.00

1.24

116.60

2.15

1.75

121.30

6.50

17.01

HU/JS-971

6779653.68

2426373.82

-386.01

14.16

-28.14

143.50

114.90

3.10

6.18

126.60

3.20

4.11

136.15

1.00

6.39

HU/JS-972

6779653.75

2426373.85

-385.76

19.25

-20.84

158.40

28.00

1.00

1.18

118.10

0.95

1.22

133.35

0.95

1.79

152.45

0.70

30.20

HU/JS-973

6779648.72

2426350.96

-385.14

8.39

-35.70

110.00

31.00

1.00

1.36

51.00

1.00

1.05

64.60

1.00

2.63

73.35

0.65

30.70

77.70

1.00

2.59

81.00

2.75

6.31

95.00

2.30

1.87

HU/JS-974

6779653.78

2426372.83

-385.94

3.32

-29.71

122.50

44.70

1.00

3.01

98.70

2.00

28.70

Includes 1.00 metre @ 55.00 g/t gold from 98.70 metres

HU/JS-975

6779653.83

2426373.07

-385.68

11.55

-17.04

130.00

21.80

1.35

1.97

28.50

1.50

8.01

99.00

1.00

1.31

101.00

0.55

6.01

104.75

0.65

4.88

107.50

1.00

17.00

- 10 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-976

6779653.05

2426372.44

-385.28

3.05

-12.14

109.70

89.90

1.95

9.42

93.50

0.85

1.29

96.00

1.00

20.80

HU/JS-977

6779648.95

2426350.88

-384.35

359.07

-3.81

104.40

9.00

1.00

1.60

24.90

1.10

2.57

49.00

1.00

1.24

83.40

0.55

6.50

85.55

0.85

9.87

HU/JS-978

6779648.78

2426351.07

-385.12

353.57

-28.38

95.00

8.30

0.80

3.85

53.20

1.00

11.70

63.00

1.20

2.00

68.30

1.35

6.21

78.80

1.10

2.14

HU/JS-979

6779653.73

2426372.23

-385.65

355.55

-19.11

113.30

44.30

1.00

1.60

62.25

0.55

3.73

81.50

1.00

1.03

90.05

0.50

36.60

HU/JS-980

6779648.60

2426350.11

-384.81

356.02

-18.55

114.90

13.70

1.35

2.16

20.20

3.60

4.18

26.25

1.75

2.43

32.30

1.20

1.15

78.30

5.00

2.52

103.70

1.00

1.01

111.50

0.50

6.99

HU/JS-981

6779648.24

2426349.67

-384.76

341.35

-17.70

77.00

10.45

1.45

2.21

35.00

1.25

5.73

56.90

2.30

2.07

64.55

7.15

5.54

HU/JS-982

6779647.35

2426348.82

-384.78

325.16

-15.47

74.40

4.35

0.40

3.41

8.70

0.35

5.09

21.75

1.25

2.36

27.60

1.05

1.78

39.20

0.40

2.93

43.55

1.00

1.31

45.55

1.10

1.61

51.40

0.35

4.71

55.20

1.00

3.24

57.20

1.00

4.53

61.20

0.65

4.14

- 11 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-983

6779648.58

2426349.86

-384.50

345.05

-10.80

80.00

19.80

0.40

14.50

59.70

1.00

5.53

69.70

0.40

2.87

74.30

0.75

5.97

HU/JS-984

6779647.78

2426348.97

-384.44

331.17

-5.40

80.30

7.70

0.45

1.95

54.00

2.25

1.47

57.50

0.90

13.50

60.70

9.60

5.16

HU/JS-985

6779653.82

2426373.05

-385.94

8.29

-23.50

122.80

20.50

1.00

1.01

103.75

1.00

92.80

113.50

2.40

2.59

Table 3 - Results from the underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 170m and 190m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine. All intercepts reported at a 1 g/t gold cut-off.

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-986

6779301.94

2426366.49

-107.46

28.59

7.68

125.00

97.00

2.80

7.63

102.70

0.90

2.11

HU/JS-987

6779302.37

2426364.99

-107.36

4.44

8.10

134.30

28.00

1.00

1.58

64.00

0.90

2.10

67.65

1.00

1.41

76.50

1.00

3.90

79.75

1.50

3.09

86.60

1.70

5.99

115.50

1.50

1.74

HU/JS-988

6779336.42

2426314.45

-99.57

14.59

4.51

119.00

36.00

1.00

1.30

45.05

1.00

1.27

78.00

1.50

1.20

99.45

0.80

1.33

HU/JS-989

6779336.71

2426313.29

-99.43

353.40

4.99

140.00

33.00

1.00

1.44

44.80

1.80

6.68

57.30

0.55

2.04

67.40

0.65

3.48

99.50

1.00

1.25

HU/JS-990

6779336.86

2426311.31

-99.37

333.19

5.39

172.70

48.00

3.50

1.28

73.40

1.60

1.29

80.00

1.00

7.72

94.00

1.00

1.17

171.00

0.70

1.11

- 12 -

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-991

6779302.27

2426364.97

-107.09

4.32

20.30

119.30

73.95

1.45

10.86

80.50

1.20

1.03

HU/JS-992

6779336.55

2426314.60

-98.96

14.27

20.17

110.00

39.45

2.55

3.92

50.00

1.20

1.11

62.30

0.90

1.07

HU/JS-993

6779336.55

2426314.05

-98.88

353.19

19.51

128.30

34.50

1.00

1.83

52.75

0.45

6.95

77.45

1.55

1.56

HU/JS-994

6779336.92

2426311.33

-98.61

333.40

19.94

155.00

43.70

2.95

5.42

Includes 0.65 metre @ 21.60 g/t gold from 43.35 metres

66.70

3.90

2.07

121.00

1.50

3.62

142.50

4.00

1.31

Table 4 - Results from the underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 120m level at the Jokisivu Gold Mine. All intercepts reported at a 1 g/t gold cut-off.

Down Hole

Hole

North

East

Elevation

Azimuth (°)

Dip (°)

Length (m)

From (m)

Interval (m)

Gold (g/t)

HU/JS-1000

6779279.22

2426287.87

-35.82

40.12

-0.49

118.90

37.25

1.75

1.53

56.90

0.85

1.07

92.55

0.60

2.64

100.50

1.50

1.56

HU/JS-1001

6779279.72

2426286.41

-35.76

27.53

-0.42

119.40

27.25

1.15

1.36

59.80

0.85

1.55

95.25

1.05

1.63

HU/JS-1002

6779279.79

2426285.79

-35.66

14.27

-0.21

128.40

29.20

1.20

6.20

54.90

0.90

1.48

56.80

1.40

4.54

60.15

1.00

16.55

64.70

2.25

2.80

87.80

1.05

10.35

HU/JS-1003

6779280.12

2426284.85

-35.60

0.00

-0.03

149.30

43.55

0.40

1.02

63.8

1.20

1.79

69.65

0.55

1.04

77.05

0.95

1.98

106.50

0.85

3.79

HU/JS-1004

6779280.21

2426284.50

-35.60

342.34

-0.13

168.80

34.00

4.80

3.69

65.00

1.00

1.38

107.30

0.60

1.21

119.50

1.00

1.58

- 13 -

Figure 1 - Vammala Production Centre.

Figure 2 - Jokisivu Gold Mine.

- 14 -

Figure 3 - Plan view of the underground drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels (Campaign 1) and the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m level (Campaign 2).

- 15 -

Figure 4 - Vertical view of the underground drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels (Campaign 1).

- 16 -

Figure 5 - Vertical view of the underground drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m level (Campaign 2).

Figure 6 - Plan view of the underground drilling program that targeted the Arpola Hanging Wall zone from the 170m and 190m levels (Campaign 3) and the Arpola Hanging Wall zone from the 120m level (Campaign 4).

- 17 -

Figure 7 - Vertical view of the underground drilling program that targeted the Arpola Hanging Wall zone from the 170m and 190m levels (Campaign 3) and the Arpola Hanging Wall zone from the 120m level (Campaign 4).

- 18 -

APPENDIX 1 - JORC TABLE 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data - Jokisivu Gold Mine

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Sampling

N a t u r e a n d q u a l i t y o f

techniques

sampling (eg cut channels,

random chips, or specific

s p e c i a l i s e d i n d u s t r y

standard measurement tools

appropriate to the minerals

under investigation, such

a s d o w n h o l e g a m m a

sondes, or handheld XRF

instruments, etc). These

examples should not be

taken as limiting the broad

meaning of sampling.

I n c l u d e r e f e r e n c e t o

measures taken to ensure

sample representivity and

the appropriate calibration

of any measurement tools or

systems used.

Commentary

In the reported campaigns, the Kujankallio and Arpola deposits at the Jokisivu Gold Mine have been sampled by an underground diamond core program.

T h e C o m p a n y c o m p l e t e d 6 6 underground diamond core drill holes for an advance of 8,923.40 metres in four campaigns that were designed to:

  • evaluate the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels;
  • evaluate the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m levels;
  • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are

M a t e r i a l t o t h e P u b l i c Report . In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 3 0 g c h a r g e f o r f i r e assay') . In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may w a r r a n t d i s c l o s u r e o f detailed information.

  • evaluate the Arpola hanging Wall Zone from the 170m and 190m levels; and
  • evaluate the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 120m level.

D r i l l h o l e s w e r e o r i e n t a t e d predominantly in a northerly direction (local mine grid) and drilled in a fan array at various angles which are approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the mineralised trends. Pierce p o i n t s a r e n o m i n a l l y s p a c e d at 20 metres vertically and 20 to 30 metres horizontally for underground drilling.

- 19 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse

c i r c u l a t i o n , o p e n - h o l e

hammer, rotary air blast,

a u g e r , B a n g k a , s o n i c ,

etc) and details (eg core

diameter, triple or standard

tube, depth of diamond

tails, face-sampling bit or

other type, whether core is

oriented and if so, by what

method, etc).

Drill hole collars and starting azimuths have been accurately surveyed with a Leica TCRP 1203+ Total Station. Azimuth deviations of the holes were surveyed with Reflex Maxibor II or Devico Deviflex equipment.

All drill core is geologically a n d g e o t e c h n i c a l l y l o g g e d , photographed and mineralised zones sampled with lithological control . Sampling and QAQC protocols are as per industry best applicable practice.

Drill cores are sampled with lithological control to a maximum down hole length of 1.5 metres. Sample intervals are measured by tape from depth intervals shown on core blocks labelled by the drillers.

Samples were collected by Dragon Mining personnel and dispatched via road transport to ALS for sample preparation and analysis for gold by fire-assay methods.

Diamond core, percussion, sludge, and reverse circulation (RC) are the primary drilling techniques that have been used at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

U n d e r g r o u n d d r i l l i n g i n t h e reported program was completed by T56/WL-56 (39.0mm) diamond core methods.

Core from underground drilling is collected with a standard tube. Core has not been orientated for definition drill programs but is sometimes for exploration drill programs. Hole deviation surveys are completed on all drill holes using Reflex Maxibor II or Devico Deviflex equipment.

- 20 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Drill sample

Method of recording and

recovery

assessing core and chip

s a m p l e r e c o v e r i e s a n d

results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise

sample recovery and ensure

representative nature of the

samples.

Whether a relationship

e x i s t s b e t w e e n s a m p l e

recovery and grade and

whether sample bias may h a v e o c c u r r e d d u e t o preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Commentary

Diamond core was reconstructed into continuous runs with depths checked against core blocks . C o r e l o s s o b s e r v a t i o n s w e r e noted by geologists during the logging process. All information is recorded in the database.

Sample recovery in the completed campaigns is high with drill core having recoveries >95%.

Experienced underground drilling contract groups were engaged to undertake the program of work. Drilling contractors are supervised and routinely monitored by Dragon Mining personnel.

Drilling is well planned to avoid existing underground development and is undertaken in primary rock material.

N o r e l a t i o n s h i p w a s n o t e d between sample recovery and grade. The mineralised zones have predominantly been intersected by diamond core with good core recoveries. The consistency of the mineralised intervals suggests sampling bias due to material loss or gain is not an issue.

- 21 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Logging

W h e t h e r c o r e a n d

c h i p s a m p l e s h a v e

b e e n g e o l o g i c a l l y a n d

geotechnically logged to

a level of detail to support

a p p r o p r i a t e M i n e r a l

Resource estimation, mining

studies and metallurgical

studies.

W h e t h e r l o g g i n g i s

qualitative or quantitative

in nature. Core (or costean,

channel, etc) photography.

T h e t o t a l l e n g t h a n d

percentage of the relevant

intersections logged.

Commentary

All holes were logged by Dragon M i n i n g g e o l o g i s t s t o a h i g h level of detail that will support Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation.

Diamond holes were logged for recovery, RQD, number and type of defects. The database contains tables with information recorded f o r a l p h a / b e t a a n g l e s , d i p s , azimuths, and true dips. Specific indicator minerals and the amount and type of ore textures and ore minerals were also recorded within separate tables.

Drill samples were logged for lithology, rock type, colour, mineralisation, alteration, and texture . Logging is a mix of q u a l i t a t i v e a n d q u a n t i t a t i v e observations.

It has been standard practice that all diamond core be routinely photographed.

All holes were logged in full.

- 22 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Sub-sampling

If core, whether cut or sawn

techniques and

and whether quarter, half or

sample preparation

all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled,

tube sampled, rotary split,

etc and whether sampled

wet or dry.

F o r a l l s a m p l e t y p e s ,

the nature, quality and

a p p r o p r i a t e n e s s o f t h e

s a m p l e p r e p a r a t i o n

technique.

Quality control procedures

a d o p t e d f o r a l l s u b -

sampling stages to maximise

representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure

t h a t t h e s a m p l i n g i s

representative of the in

situ material collected,

i n c l u d i n g f o r i n s t a n c e

results for field duplicate/

second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are

appropriate to the grain

size of the material being

sampled.

For definition programs Dragon Mining collect full core samples of select zones for analysis from underground diamond core drill holes.

All drilling in this report has been completed by diamond core methods. No riffle, rotary or tube sampling was required.

Samples of select zones were collected for analysis by company personnel. With respect to the nature of the mineralised system and the core diameter, the use o f e i t h e r f u l l o r h a l f c o r e i s considered appropriate.

Sample preparation is completed by ALS and follows industry best applicable practice . ALS procedures and facilities are o r g a n i s e d t o a s s u r e p r o p e r preparation of the sample for a n a l y s i s , t o p r e v e n t s a m p l e mixing, and to minimise dust contamination or sample to sample contamination.

Core samples are submitted to the ALS facility in Outokumpu, Finland for sample preparation by method PREP-31BY. Samples were weighed, assigned a unique bar code and logged into the ALS system. The sample was dried, fine crushed to >70% passing 2mm screen. A split off weighing 1kg is collected and pulverised to better than 85% passing 75 microns. A sub-sample is collected for analysis at the ALS facility at either Rosia Montana, Romania or Loughrea, Ireland.

- 23 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

The method selected for sample p r e p a r a t i o n i s c o n s i d e r e d appropriate.

Certified reference material and blanks are routinely inserted with the sample submission. Dragon has used systematic standard and pulp duplicate sampling since 2004. Every 20th sample (sample id ending in -00,-20,-40,-60,-80) is submitted as a standard, and every 20th sample (sample id ending in -10,-30,-50,-70,-90) is inserted as a pulp duplicate (with the original sample id ending in -09,-29,-49,-69,-89).

A review of the results of the certified reference material and blanks indicates that they are within acceptable limits.

A review of the results of the pulp duplicate samples indicates that they are within acceptable limits.

S a m p l e s i z e s a r e c o n s i d e r e d appropriate to correctly represent the moderately nuggetty gold mineralisation based on: the style of mineralisation, the thickness and consistency of the intersections, the sampling methodology and assay value ranges for gold.

- 24 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Quality of assay

The nature, quality and

data and

a p p r o p r i a t e n e s s o f t h e

laboratory tests

assaying and laboratory

p r o c e d u r e s u s e d a n d

whether the technique is

considered partial or total.

F o r g e o p h y s i c a l t o o l s ,

spectrometers, handheld

X R F i n s t r u m e n t s , e t c ,

the parameters used in

determining the analysis

including instrument make

and model, reading times,

calibrations factors applied

and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control

p r o c e d u r e s a d o p t e d

( e g s t a n d a r d s , b l a n k s ,

d u p l i c a t e s , e x t e r n a l

laboratory checks) and

whether acceptable levels

of accuracy (ie lack of bias)

and precision have been

established.

Commentary

Analysis has been completed at ALS in Rosia Montana, Romania or Loughrea in Ireland using procedures Au-AA25 (Detection Limit - 0.01 g/t gold; Upper Limit

  • 100.00 g/t gold) - 30g fire assay with AAS finish . Gold values exceeding 3 g/t gold are re-assayed by Au-GRA21 (Detection Limit
  • 0.05 g/t gold; Upper Limit -
    1,000.00 g/t gold) - 30g fire assay with gravimetric finish.

A L S a r e a c e r t i f i e d g l o b a l l a b o r a t o r y g r o u p . T h e y a r e monitored by an internal QAQC program and a QAQC program implemented by Dragon Mining, b o t h o f w h i c h i n c l u d e b l a n k material, duplicates and certified reference material.

The analytical techniques used are considered total.

N o g e o p h y s i c a l t o o l s , spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments or similar device was used for analytical purposes on sample material collected.

QAQC protocols are stringently adhered to throughout the duration of all drilling programs undertaken by Dragon Mining.

T h e p r o t o c o l s o f t h e Q A Q C program implemented by Dragon Mining includes the insertion of certified reference material (three ranges used - high, medium and low) and blank material on a 1 sample every 20 sample basis and the insertion duplicate samples on a 1 sample every 20 sample basis.

- 25 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Verification of

T h e v e r i f i c a t i o n o f

sampling and

significant intersections

assaying

b y e i t h e r i n d e p e n d e n t

or alternative company

personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary

data, data entry procedures,

d a t a v e r i f i c a t i o n , d a t a

s t o r a g e ( p h y s i c a l a n d

electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to

assay data.

ALS implement an internal QAQC program that includes the insertion of blanks, certified reference material and duplicates with each analytical run.

A review of both the Dragon Mining and ALS QAQC results indicates that the blank material, certified reference material and duplicates are within acceptable limits.

All significant intercepts are reviewed and verified by Dragon Mining geologists.

No twinned holes have been drilled in the reported programs.

P r i m a r y d a t a i s c o l l e c t e d b y Dragon Mining personnel at site using Excel work sheets . All measurements and observations are digitally recorded and transferred into an Access database.

Primary assay data is received direct from the laboratory in digital format. Primary assay and QAQC data is entered into an Access database.

Verification and validation of the databases is handled internally.

No adjustment has been made to the assay data.

- 26 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Location of

Accuracy and quality of

data points

surveys used to locate drill

holes (collar and down-

hole surveys), trenches,

mine workings and other

locations used in Mineral

Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid

system used.

Quality and adequacy of

topographic control.

Commentary

Drill hole collars and starting azimuths have been accurately surveyed by contract surveyors. Down hole surveys are undertaken on all exploration and resource development holes.

Collars and underground mine surveys are performed using a Leica TCRP 1203+ Total Station to a level of accuracy of 0.05 metres.

Down hole surveys are carried out on all drill holes using a Maxibor II, EMS multi - shot or Devico Deviflex device. Down hole dip values were recorded at 10m intervals.

Data spacing and

Data spacing for reporting

distribution

of Exploration Results.

  • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation

p r o c e d u r e ( s ) a n d

classifications applied.

W h e t h e r s a m p l e

c o m p o s i t i n g h a s b e e n

applied.

The grid system used for the reporting of results is the Finnish Grid System - KKJ2. A local mine grid is used at the Jokisivu mine.

The local grid system is parallel to National Grid System, and equivalence of systems as follows (examples of coordinate values):

NorthingNat 6,779,500.00 = NorthingLoc 9,500.00,

EastingNat 2,425,800.00 = EastingLoc 5,800.00,

ElevationNat 80.00 = ElevationLoc 0.00.

NorthingLoc = NorthingNat - 6,770,000m

EastingLoc = EastingNat - 2,420,000m

ElevationLoc = ElevationNat - 80m

A series of fixed points are located at the surface form the basis of all topographic control at the Jokisivu Gold Mine . Additional fixed points have been established along the underground development and function as the elevation control underground.

- 27 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Orientation of

Whether the orientation of

data in relation

sampling achieves unbiased

to geological

s a m p l i n g o f p o s s i b l e

structure

structures and the extent

to which this is known,

considering the deposit

type.

U n d e r g r o u n d d r i l l i n g h a s been undertaken in a fan array type pattern. Pierce points are usually spaced nominally at 20 metres vertically and 20 metres horizontally. Sample lengths down hole varies and is dependent on geology.

M i n e r a l i s a t i o n d i s p l a y s satisfactory continuity in both geology and grade from hole to hole and will be sufficient to support the definition of a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve and the classifications contained in the JORC Code (2012 Edition).

No sampling compositing has been applied.

D r i l l h o l e s a r e o r i e n t a t e d p r e d o m i n a n t l y t o e i t h e r t h e north or south (local mine grid) and drilled at an angle which is approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the mineralised trends.

  • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key

m i n e r a l i s e d s t r u c t u r e s i s c o n s i d e r e d t o h a v e introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

The majority of drill holes are u n d e r g r o u n d d r i l l h o l e s a n d completed at various angles in a 'fan' array to optimally intersect the orientation of the mineralised trends.

No orientation based sampling bias has been identified in the data.

- 28 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Sample security

T h e m e a s u r e s t a k e n t o

Chain of custody of samples is

ensure sample security.

m a n a g e d b y D r a g o n M i n i n g .

Dragon Mining personnel or drill

contractors transport diamond core to the core logging facilities where Dragon Mining geologists log the core. Core samples are transported t o t h e s a m p l e p r e p a r a t i o n laboratory and then on to the analysis laboratory using contract couriers or laboratory personnel. Dragon Mining employees have no involvement in the preparation or analysis of samples.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits

or reviews of sampling

techniques and data.

Dragon Mining undertakes its own reviews and audits of sampling techniques and data.

Dragon Mining has completed a u d i t s o f t h e A L S M i n e r a l s facilities at Outokumpu, Finland; Rosia Montana, Romania and Vancouver, Canada.

The completed reviews and audits raised no issues.

- 29 -

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results - Jokisivu Gold Mine

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Mineral tenement

T y p e , r e f e r e n c e n a m e /

and land tenure

n u m b e r , l o c a t i o n a n d

status

o w n e r s h i p i n c l u d i n g

agreements or material

issues with third parties

such as joint ventures,

partnerships, overriding

r o y a l t i e s , n a t i v e t i t l e

interests, historical sites,

wilderness or national park

and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure

held at the time of reporting

a l o n g w i t h a n y k n o w n

impediments to obtaining

a license to operate in the area.

Commentary

The Jokisivu Mining Concessions 'JOKISIVU' (K7244, 48.32 ha), 'JOKISIVU 2' (KL2015:0005, 21 . 30 ha) and 'JOKISIVU 3' (KL2018:0010, 8.97 ha) cover both the Arpola and Kujankallio deposits, which Dragon Mining are actively mining.

E x p l o r a t i o n L i c e n s e s a r e i m m e d i a t e l y a d j a c e n t t o t h e Mining Concession area, Jokisivu 4-5 (ML2012:0112, 85.76 ha) and Jokisivu 7-8 (ML2017:0131, 18.60 ha).

The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments exist.

Exploration done

A c k n o w l e d g m e n t a n d

by other parties

appraisal of exploration by

other parties.

T h e f i r s t i n d i c a t i o n o f g o l d mineralization in the Jokisivu area was obtained in 1964.

Outokumpu Oy began exploring the area in 1985 and continued until 2003, when Dragon Mining acquired the Project . Dragon Mining advanced the project over the ensuing years, undertaking extensive drilling and completing m i n i n g s t u d i e s t o e n a b l e production to commence in 2009.

Production from the Jokisivu Gold Mine commenced with open-pit mining of the near surface portion of the Kujankallio deposit in September 2009. The near surface portion of the Arpola deposit was also mined by open-pit methods in 2011.

- 30 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Geology

Deposit type, geological

s e t t i n g a n d s t y l e o f

mineralisation.

Underground development of the Kujankallio deposit commenced in September 2010 access achieved through a decline portal located at the eastern most end of the Kujankallio open pit. Underground production from the Arpola deposit commenced in 2014.

T h e J o k i s i v u G o l d M i n e i s located in the Paleoproterozoic Vammala Migmatite Belt, which is dominated by tonalitic and granodioritic gneisses, micagneiss, migmatites, intermediate and mafic metamorphosed volcanic rocks as well as felsic and mafic plutonic rocks.

Gold mineralisation is hosted within a sheared and quartz-veined diorite unit surrounded by mica gneiss. The Kujankallio deposit consists of several gold-bearing lodes, having a total length of at least 350 metres. The lodes strike northeast, primarily dipping 50 degrees to the southwest.

The nearby Arpola deposit consists of several east-west trending gold lodes that extend over length of 150 metres . The Arpola lodes strike northeast and dip 50 degrees to the southwest.

Both deposits represent structurally controlled gold systems.

- 31 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Drill hole

A

s u m m a r y

o f a l l

information

information material to

t h e u n d e r - s t a n d i n g o f

the

exploration results

including a tabulation of the

following information for

all Material drill holes:

easting and northing

of the drill hole collar

e l e v a t i o n o r R L

( R e d u c e d L e v e l -

elevation above sea

level in metres) of the

drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the

hole

down hole length and

interception depth

hole length

If the exclusion of this

information is

justified

o n t h e b a s i s t h a t t h e

information is not Material

and this exclusion does

n o t d e t r a c t f r o m t h e

understanding of the report,

t h e C o m p e t e n t P e r s o n should clearly explain why this is the case.

- 32 -

Commentary

T h e K u j a n k a l l i o a n d A r p o l a deposits form the Jokisivu mine.

The most recent diamond drilling has targeted the footwall zones of the Arpola deposit, confirming the continuity of these zones.

Full details of the holes drilled and their results is provided in:

T a b l e 1 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e u n d e r g r o u n d d i a m o n d c o r e drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 2 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e u n d e r g r o u n d d i a m o n d c o r e drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 3 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 170m and 190m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 4 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 120m level at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T h e J o k i s i v u G o l d M i n e h a s been operating since 2009. In the opinion of Dragon Mining, material drill results have been regularly reported previously to the market as required under the reporting requirements of the ASX Listing Rules and HKEx Listing Rules. No material information has been excluded from any of the releases compiled.

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Data aggregation

In reporting Exploration

methods

R e s u l t s , w e i g h t i n g

a v e r a g i n g t e c h n i q u e s ,

maximum and/or minimum

grade truncations (e . g .

cutting of high grades) and

cut-off grades are usually

Material and should be

stated.

Where aggregate intercepts

incorporate short lengths

of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade r e s u l t s , t h e p r o c e d u r e used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

Commentary

Weighted average gold intercepts are reported at a 1 g/t gold cutoff with up to 2 metres of internal dilution allowed. No high-grade cuts were applied.

High-grade intervals internal to broader zones of mineralisation are reported at a 15 g/t gold cut-off as included intervals.

No metal equivalent values have been used or reported.

The assumptions used for

a n y r e p o r t i n g o f m e t a l

equivalent values should be

clearly stated.

Relationship between

These relationships are

mineralisation

particularly important in

widths and

the reporting of Exploration

intercept lengths

Results.

I f t h e g e o m e t r y o f t h e

mineralisation with respect

to the drill hole angle is

known, its nature should be

reported.

T h e r e c e n t d r i l l h o l e s a t Kujankallio were orientated at an average local grid azimuths of 146° and angled to an average dip of -17° for Campaign 1 and 112° and angled to an average dip of -22° for Campaign 2. These angles are approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the targeted mineralised trends.

  • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known').

At Kujankallio the mineralised zones strike at approximately 280° (local grid) and are variably dipping between 45° and 65° to the north (local grid).

- 33 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Diagrams

A p p r o p r i a t e m a p s a n d

sections (with scales) and

tabulations of intercepts

should be included for any

significant discovery being

reported . These should

include, but not be limited

t o a p l a n v i e w o f d r i l l

hole collar locations and

appropriate sectional views.

The recent drill holes at Arpola were orientated at an average local grid azimuths of 134° and angled to an average dip of 12° for Campaign 3 and 119° and angled to an average dip of -0° for Campaign 4. These angles are approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the targeted mineralised trends.

At Arpola the narrow mineralised zones strike at approximately 280° (local grid) and are variably dipping between 45° and 65° to the north (local grid).

Only down hole lengths have been reported, true widths have not been reported.

Relevant diagrams have been included within the main body of text.

- 34 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Balanced Reporting

Accuracy and quality of

surveys used to locate drill

holes (collar and down-

hole surveys), trenches,

mine workings and other

locations used in Mineral

Resource estimation.

Reporting of drill details has been provided in this report . A l l m e a n i n g f u l a n d m a t e r i a l exploration data has been reported.

Full details of the holes drilled and their results is provided in:

  • W h e r e c o m p r e h e n s i v e reporting of all Exploration

Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades a n d / o r w i d t h s s h o u l d b e p r a c t i c e d t o a v o i d misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

T a b l e 1 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e u n d e r g r o u n d d i a m o n d c o r e drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Main Zone and Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 420m and 500m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 2 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e u n d e r g r o u n d d i a m o n d c o r e drilling program that targeted the Kujankallio Hinge Zone between the 500m and 530m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 3 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 170m and 190m levels at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

T a b l e 4 - R e s u l t s f r o m t h e underground diamond core drilling campaign that is targeting the Arpola Hanging Wall Zone from the 120m level at the Jokisivu Gold Mine.

- 35 -

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Other substantive

O t h e r e x p l o r a t i o n

Investigative geological work

exploration data

data, if meaningful and

completed at the Jokisivu Gold

m a t e r i a l , s h o u l d b e

Mine is dominated by diamond

reported including (but

core drilling . The results for

not limited to): geological

completed drilling campaigns have

observations; geophysical

previously been regularly reported

survey results; geochemical

to the ASX.

survey results; bulk samples

- s i z e a n d m e t h o d o f

treatment; metallurgical

test results; bulk density,

groundwater, geotechnical

and rock characteristics;

potential deleterious or

contaminating substances.

Further work

The nature and scale of

Mine development is ongoing.

planned further work (e.g.

Dragon Mining is undertaking

tests for lateral extensions

drilling underground at a number

o r d e p t h e x t e n s i o n s o r

of levels to better understand

l a r g e - s c a l e

s t e p - o u t

the nature and extent of the gold

drilling).

mineralisation.

D i a g r a m s

c l e a r l y

Refer to diagrams in the body of

h i g h l i g h t i n g

t h e a r e a s

text.

o f p o s s i b l e e x t e n s i o n s , i n c l u d i n g t h e m a i n geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

- 36 -

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

Dragon Mining Limited published this content on 27 February 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 27 February 2020 08:47:04 UTC