Corporate Presentation
November 2019
A LEADING GENE THERAPY BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANY
GENSIGHT-BIOLOGICS.COM
Disclaimer
This document contains forward-looking statements and estimates made by the GenSight Biologics S.A. (the "Company"), including with respect to the anticipated future performance of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the market in which they operate. They include all matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including the terms "developments," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "milestones," "potential," "value," "time to market," "targeting," "on track," "planned," "will," "move to," or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy and funding, as well as the Company's, its subsidiaries' and affiliates' technology, and are based on financial and non-financial information, including projections as to the future regulatory situation and other information and assumptions. Such statements, forecasts and estimates are based on various assumptions and assessments of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which were deemed reasonable when made but may or may not prove to be correct. Actual events are difficult to predict and may
depend upon factors that are beyond the Company's control. Therefore, actual results, the financial condition, performance or achievements of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates or industry results, may turn out to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements, forecasts and estimates. Forward- looking statements, forecasts and estimates only speak as of the date of this forward-looking statement, and no representations are made as to the accuracy or fairness of such forward-looking statements, forecasts and estimates. The Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates disclaim any obligation to update any such forward-looking statement, forecast or estimates to reflect any change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto, or any events, or changes in conditions or circumstances on which any such statement, forecast or estimate is based.
2 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Corporate Overview
Clinical-stage gene therapy company
- Focused on severe retinal degenerative pathologies leading to blindness as well as CNS diseases
- Well positioned to advance disruptive gene therapy technologies in ophthalmology to commercialization
Two disruptive technology platforms
- Mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS)
- Optogenetics
Lead projects target:
- GS010 - Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (Phase III)
- GS030 - Retinitis pigmentosa and dry-AMD (Phase I/II)
Listed on Euronext Paris (SIGHT)
- Established in 2012, IPO in July 2016 (EUR45m)
- GenSight Biologics Inc incorporated in the US in May 2017
3 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Executive Team
Bernard Gilly
Chief Executive Officer
PIXIUM VISION (Since 2011) Chairman of the Board, Founder
FOVEA PHARMA (2005-2009)Chairman & CEO - sold to Sanofi
SOFINNOVA PARTNERS (2000-2005)Managing Partner
TRANSGENE (1992-2000) Chairman & CEO
Ph.D. in biology and bio-economics
4 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Thomas Gidoin
Chief Financial Officer
DBV TECHNOLOGIES (2012-2015)
VP of Finance
IPSEN (2008-2011)
UK Operations Controller (London)
Senior Financial Analyst (Paris)
ERNST & YOUNG (2007-2008)
Auditor
Magali Taiel
Chief Medical Officer
ProQR THERAPEUTICS (2016-2018)VP of Clinical Development
ELI LILLY (2004-2016) Medical Department Lead
PFIZER (2001-2004) Medical Advisor
SERVIER (1999-2001)
R&D International Project Manager MD, Board-certified ophthalmologist
Our target: degenerative retinal diseases with underlying genetic causes
Unmet need: high
LEBER HEREDITARY OPTIC
NEUROPATHY (LHON)
1. Degeneration of RGCs | 1 |
- Inexorable progression to blindness for most patients
- No approved treatments*
Genetic mutations | The eye: an ideal laboratory | |
• | Intravitreal injections to introduce of genetic | |
• | Immune-privileged, closed system | |
Aging | • | material close to target cells |
Slow turnover of retinal cells support long- | ||
term expression of transduced genes |
2. Degeneration of photoreceptors | 2 | AAV: proven vector for gene therapy | ||
RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA (RP) | • | Proven safety and proof of effect in humans | ||
• | Efficient transduction of retinal cells | |||
GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY | • | No need to screen patients for Nab before | ||
(Late stage form ofAge-Related | • | treatment | ||
Macular Degeneration - AMD) | Validated manufacturing process |
Source: Company | |
5 November 2019 - Non-Confidential | *Except for exceptional circumstances for idebenone in Europe |
Pipeline: solid and advanced product portfolio in ophthalmic gene therapy
Product | ||||||
Technology | Candidate | Indication | Research | Preclinical Phase I/II | Phase III | Registration Next Expected Events |
GS010
(FDA & EMA LHON ND4
Orphan Drug
Designation)
MTS platform
REVERSE: Phase III top-line data reported in Apr (48w) & Oct (72w) 2018 and in May 2019 (96w)
RESCUE: Phase III top-line data reported in Feb (48w), Apr (72w) and Sep (96w) 2019
REFLECT*: Phase III recruitment completed in July 2019, top-line data expected in Q3 2020
GS011 | LHON ND1 | Initiate preclinical studies following | |||
GS010 Phase III clinical data | |||||
Undisclosed | |||||
Mitochondrial | Undisclosed | ||||
Target | |||||
GS030 | PIONEER: Second cohort ongoing in | ||||
(FDA & EMA | RP | PIONEER Phase I/II clinical trial. | |||
Orphan Drug | Report interim data one year after last | ||||
Optogenetics Designation) | subject treated | ||||
Dry AMD & | |||||
GS030 | Geographic | ||||
Atrophy | |||||
*Conducting this trial under a special protocol assessment with the FDA |
Lead candidate, GS010, is expected to file for MAA in Europe in the coming year
6 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS010
Fully enrolled Phase III trials for our lead product candidate dedicated to Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON)
GS010 aim: treat LHON, the most common mitochondrial disease causing bilateral blindness in the prime of life
Evolution of vision from onset
ONSET | 3M | 6 | 12 |
M | M | ||
1stEYE | 2ndEYE | ||
VISION | Blindness | ||
occurs | |||
sequentially | |||
within | |||
12 months | |||
of onset | |||
TIME |
Image source: illustrated from Newamn NJ et al., Am J Ophthalmom. 141(6), 1061-1067,2006
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness average change
30
20
10
0
-10 | baseline | |||
-20 | ||||
vs. | ||||
-30 | change% |
-40 |
-50 | PRE-ONSET | ONSET | 3M | 6M | 9M TIME | |
Image source: illustrated from Barboni et al Natural History
of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: An OCT Study
• Orphan maternally inherited mitochondrial disease | |||
Incidence | 0.15/100,000 | ||
• Painless sudden loss of central vision in the 1st eye with 2nd eye sequentially impaired: | |||
Prevalence | 1/31k-40k | • | symmetric disease with poor visual recovery |
Thinning of the Ganglion Cell Layer occurs after the onset of vision loss and stabilizes at | |||
Blindness | 15-35y | ||
approximately 6 months |
• 97% of patients have bilateral involvement < 1 year / 25% of cases are simultaneous
• Targets ND4 which accounts for ~75% of LHON in North America & Europe
8 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Solution: Gene therapy to produce working mRNA, with MTS* technology to shuttle mRNA directly to affected mitochondria
MTS in action for GS010:
The product of
research
collaboration with
Gene
encapsulated
in AAV
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |||
Retinal cell transduced | Wild-type | Wild-type mRNA | Finally, the wild-type | |||
with vector containing | mitochondrial gene | delivered by MTS | mitochondrial protein is | |||
wild-type mitochondrial | transcribed in the | directly to polysomes | translocated inside the | |||
gene | nucleus | located at the | mitochondrion, where it | |||
mitochondrial surface, | restores energy | |||||
where protein synthesis | production | |||||
occurs | ||||||
Gene therapy | MTS* |
9 November 2019 - Non-Confidential | *MTS = mitochondrial targeting sequence |
RESCUE & REVERSE Phase III trials
Time-based strategy to assess GS010 efficacy
Different patient inclusion criteria
REVERSE | • | Onset of disease |
• | 6 months to ≤ 1 year | |
37 patients enrolled | ||
• | Fully enrolled Feb 2017 |
RESCUE | • | Onset of disease |
• | ≤ 6 months | |
39 patients enrolled | ||
• | Fully enrolled July 2017 |
Source: Company
10 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Same design
- Double-masked,multi- center
- One eye randomized to GS010; other eye received sham injection
Group 1
GS010 | SHAM |
in right eye | in left |
eye | |
Group 2 |
SHAM | GS010 |
in right eye | in left |
eye |
Same endpoints
at Week 48
Primary
- Mean difference change from baseline, ETDRS letters, drug treated eyes vs. sham treated eyes (LogMAR used for statistical analysis) at Week 48
Secondary
- SD-OCT,visual field, color and contrast vision
- Responders analysis:
o Gain from baseline of 15 or more ETDRS letters
o Snellen acuity > 20/200 - Treated vs. sham eyes' BCVA for best-seeingand worst- seeing eyes
- Quality of life assessments
Visual Acuity: REVERSE 96-week
Visual Acuity bilaterally improved by +15 and +13 ETDRS letters equivalent from baseline to Week 96 in GS010- and sham-treatedeyes, respectively, sustaining the gain at Week 72
Mean visual acuity (BCVA) among GS010-treated eyes and sham-treated eyes evolved with similar trajectories, worsening to a post-treatment low point, or nadir, before recovering at Week 96 by +28 and +24 ETDRS letters equivalent, respectively
11 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Contrast Sensitivity: REVERSE 96-week
Like BCVA, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson) showed a bilateral trend, improving from baseline to Week 96 in both GS010-treatedand sham eyes
Mean contrast sensitivity for GS010-treated eyes showed a more robust improvement versus baseline over the course of the trial comparing to sham-treated eyes
12 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Responder Analysis: Subjects Mapping in REVERSE at 96 weeks
Visual Acuity Change of Sham eyes was correlated with that of GS010 eyes in most REVERSE subjects Subjects are well concentrated around the mean
REVERSE - Scatterplot of Change from Baseline at Week 96
Pearson Corr Coeff = 0.776; p - 1.677e-08 / Spearman Corr Coeff = 0.727; p = 3.492e-07
Quadrant superior right: Subjects get BCVA improvement from baseline in both eyes
13 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Natural History: REVERSE 96-week
Comparison to natural history based on a study by Santhera(1)
- In a natural history study conducted by Santhera(1), 15% of subjects with the ND4 (11778A) mutation achieved the following definition of "clinically relevant recovery" (CRR) from baselinein at least one eye:
- Improved by at least 10 ETDRS letters from their on-chart visual acuity, or
- Improved from an off-chart level of visual acuity to being able to read at least 5 ETDRS letters (on-chart)
By comparison …
- 68% of REVERSE subjects achieved this definition of CRR at Week 96, with GS010-treated eyes significantly more likely to achieve this than sham-treated eyes (62% vs. 43%, p = 0.0348, statistically significant difference).
"The data show that both the treated and the sham eye improved in both high and low contrast, defying the accepted natural history of this disease and improving upon it, based upon the clinical experiences of generations of neuro-ophthalmologists."
Dr. Robert C. Sergott
Director, Wills Eye Hospital, Neuro-Ophthalmology and Director, William
H. Annesley, Jr, EyeBrain Center, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, PA
REVERSE subjects experienced a significantly higher rate of "clinically relevant recovery" than natural history
- Silva et al (2019), "Natural History of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON): Findings from a Large Patient Cohort", Poster presented at NANOS March 16-21, 2019; Poster Session II: Scientific Advancements; Poster: 163
14 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Quality of Life: REVERSE 96-week
Sustained Quality of Life improvement
- Composite score and relevant sub-scores in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) showed sustained improvements versus baseline at Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
- Magnitudes of mean score improvement observed with GS010 correlate with clinically meaningful improvements in best-correctedvisual acuity (BCVA)
NEI VFQ-25 Results from REVERSE
Mean change from baseline (absolute score and percent)
Composite | Near | Distance | Dependency | Role | General | Mental | |
Score** | Activities | Activities | Difficulties | Vision | Health | ||
Week 48 | +7.2 | +10.4 | +9.6 | +12.4 | +14.5 | +10.3 | +11.2 |
+23.2% | +65.1% | +49.8% | +100.6% | +65.0% | +50.9% | +81.9% | |
Week 72 | +8.1 | +9.5 | +8.2 | +18.9 | +15.2 | +11.9 | +15.2 |
+25.2% | +58.1% | +42.5% | +130.2% | +70.9% | +54.1% | +105.6% | |
Week 96 | +9.5 | +13.3 | +10.7 | +18.5 | +15.9 | +6.5 | +16.1 |
+28.8% | +78.1% | +47.4% | 130.2% | +78.9% | +32.4% | +108.2% | |
Clinically | +3.90 to | +4.67 to | +5.15 to | +4.72 to | +3.31 to | +4.38 to | +4.70 to |
relevant | |||||||
+4.34 | +6.06 | +5.38 | +4.98 | +4.70 | +4.82 | +4.88 | |
difference* | |||||||
*Suñer et al. (2009): clinically relevant score differences based on a clinically significant 15-letter BCVA improvement at 12 months. **The composite score is an average of the vision-targetedsub-scale scores, excluding the general health rating question.
15 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Visual Acuity: RESCUE 96-week
Visual Acuity bilaterally improved by +26 and +23 ETDRS letters from nadir to week 96 in GS010- and sham-treatedeyes, respectively. Mean visual acuity has transitioned from off-chart to on-chart.
Time Course of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in LogMAR
Least-Squares Mean ± 1 Std. Error | Off-ChartOn-Chart |
Study Week
Mean visual acuity (BCVA) among GS010-treated eyes and sham-treated eyes evolved with similar trajectories, worsening to a lowest point, or nadir, before significantly improving to week 96 - coherent with REVERSE
16 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Natural History: RESCUE 96-week
Comparison to LHON Natural History
- In a natural history study conducted by Santhera(1), 28% of subjects with the ND4 (11778A) mutation achieved the following definition of "clinically relevant recovery" (CRR) from nadirin at least one eye:
»Improved by at least 10 ETDRS letters from their visual acuity, or
»Improved from an off-chart level of visual acuity to being able to read at least 5 ETDRS letters
- 63% of RESCUE subjects achieved this definition of CRR at Week 96, with GS010-treated eyes as likely to achieve this as sham-treated eyes (58% vs. 45%, p = 0.0956).
"Patients in RESCUE were treated before the nadir so, as expected, they continued to worsen early on. But then from week 48 until week 96 they experienced a recovery from the nadir. That is much better than the natural history in any prior studies."
RESCUE subjects experienced a significantly higher rate of "clinically relevant recovery" than natural history
Dr. Mark L. Moster
Neuro-Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Professor of Neurology and Ophthalmology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, and Principal Investigator in the REVERSE and RESCUE trials
- Silva et al (2019), "Natural History of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON): Findings from a Large Patient Cohort", Poster presented at NANOS March 16-21, 2019; Poster Session II: Scientific Advancements; Poster: 163
17 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Visual Acuity: Improvement from Baseline
REVERSE: Continuous bilateral improvement of Visual Acuity up to Week 96
RESCUE: Worsening VA compared to baseline reflects brutal progression of LHON
Change from BASELINE
Week 72 | Week 96 | |||||
LS Mean (SE) a | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters |
Equivalent | Equivalent | |||||
GS010 Eyes | 37 | -0.294 (0.063) | +15 | 37 | -0.308 (0.068) | +15 |
Sham Eyes | 37 | -0.246 (0.063) | +12 | 37 | -0.259 (0.068) | +13 |
Week 72 | Week 96 | |||||
LS Mean (SE) a | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters |
Equivalent | Equivalent | |||||
GS010 Eyes | 34 | +0.192 (0.104) | -10 | 34 | +0.168 (0.132) | -8 |
Sham Eyes | 33 | +0.216 (0.104) | -11 | 34 | +0.238 (0.132) | -12 |
- Efficacy Endpoint was assessed using a mixed model of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with change from baseline at week of interest as the response, and subject, eyes of the subject as random factor, treatment and the baseline LogMAR value as covariates.
Missing data were not imputed.
18 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Visual Acuity: Recovery from Nadir
Visual Acuity deteriorates to a low point before recovering significantly in both eyes
Change from NADIR a
Week 72 | Week 96 | ||||||||
Mean (SD) b | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | |||
Equivalent | Equivalent | ||||||||
GS010 Eyes | 37 | -0.553 (0.444) | +27.6 | 37 | -0.566 (0.450) | +28.3 | |||
Sham Eyes | 37 | -0.478 (0.498) | +23.9 | 37 | -0.490 (0.480) | +24.5 | |||
Week 72 | Week 96 | ||||||||
Mean (SD) b | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | n | LogMAR | ETDRS Letters | |||
Equivalent | Equivalent | ||||||||
GS010 Eyes | 34 | -0.509 (0.496) | +25.4 | 34 | -0.526 (0.479) | +26.3 | |||
Sham Eyes | 33 | -0.452 (0.495) | +22.6 | 34 | -0.457 (0.485) | +22.8 | |||
- NADIR: Nadir was defined as the lowest Visual Acuity value from baseline up to Week of interest. LP/NLP vision was assigned a LogMAR value of 4.0 and 4.5 respectively.
- Mean change from nadir was calculated using observed values (no data were imputed).
19 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Visual Acuity: Time Course in LogMAR values in REVERSE and RESCUE
REVERSE and RESCUE show coherent pattern of meaningful and durable bilateral visual recovery from nadir
Time Course of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in LogMAR,
REVERSE and RESCUE
LogMAR All eyes | GS010 | Sham | All |
Baseline | 1.67 (0.50) | 1.55 (0.42) | 1.61 (0.46) |
LogMAR All eyes | GS010 | Sham | All |
Baseline | 1.31 (0.52) | 1.27 (0.62) | 1.29 (0.57) |
20 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Safety: REVERSE & RESCUE
Favorable safety and tolerability profile
- GS010 was well tolerated throughout both studies
- No serious adverse events in GS010-treated eyes, and no discontinuation due to ocular events
- Most frequently seen ocular adverse events in the therapy group were mainly related to the injection procedure
- Except for the occurrence of intraocular inflammation:
- likely related to GS010
- accompanied by elevation of intraocular pressure in some patients
- responsive to conventional treatment and without sequelae
- No systemic serious adverse events or discontinuations that were related to study treatment or study procedure.
GS010 was well-tolerated through 96 weeks after injection
21 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Efficacy key findings: REVERSE & RESCUE
REVERSE: 96-WeekFollow-Up
- Sustained bilateral improvement in visual acuity (BCVA) at Week 96
- Versus baseline: +15 ETDRS letters equivalent in GS010 eyes and +13 ETDRS letters equivalent in sham eyes
- Versus nadir: +28 ETDRS letters equivalent in GS010 eyes and +24 ETDRS letters equivalent in sham eyes
- 68% of REVERSE subjects attained Clinically Relevant Recovery (CRR) from baseline in at least one eye, compared to 15% in a natural history study
- 78% of REVERSE subjects attained Clinically Relevant Recovery (CRR) from nadir in at least one eye, compared to 28% in a natural history study
- Patients' quality of life scores continue to increase, especially in ability to carry out vision-relatedactivities
- Preservation of anatomy for both eyes, as observed for retinal layers of interest: GCL, Temporal and PMB RNFL
22 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
RESCUE: 96-WeekFollow-Up
- Sustained bilateral improvement in BCVA from Week 48 to Week 96
- From Week 48 to Week 96:+10 ETDRS letters equivalent in GS010 eyes and +9 ETDRS letters equivalent in sham eyes
- Compelling bilateral improvement in BCVA from Nadir
- Versus nadir:+26 ETDRS letters equivalent in GS010 eyes and +23 ETDRS letters equivalent in sham eyes
- Clinically Relevant Recovery (CRR) from Nadir1
- 63% RESCUE subjects attained CRR
- compared to 28% in a natural history study
- Preservation of anatomy for both eyes, as observed for retinal layers of interest: GCL, Temporal and PMB RNFL
1 "Nadir" here is defined as the worst observed BCVA from baseline to the week of interest, including baseline. When the baseline is excluded from consideration, the proportion of RESCUE subjects achieving CRR is 58%.
GS010 Local Biodistribution: Evidence from Non-Clinical Primate Study
Viral vector DNA detected in uninjected eye potential mechanism for bilateral effect in REVERSE and RESCUE
• Three test monkeys injected in oneeye using dose equivalent of treatment in REVERSE and RESCUE trials
• Highly sensitive validated test for presence of GS010 DNA used on tissue samples from primates in study
• Key finding:
○ GS010 viral vector DNA was detected/quantified in many tissue samples from contralateral (uninjected) eye
"The presence of viral vector DNA in the optic chiasm and optic nerve of the contralateral uninjected eye points towards a possible diffusion pathway."
Dr. Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Senior Lecturer & Honorary Consultant Ophthalmologist at the University of Cambridge, Moorfields Eye Hospital, and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
23 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Notes: One control monkey was injected in one eye with saline solution. Three test monkeys were injected with GS010 in one eye using dose allometrically equivalent to that used in REVERSE and RESCUE. Tissue samples were taken at 3 months after injection and tested using a protocol that specifically targeted the CMV promoter of the GS010 DNA. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test were validated in a dedicated study.
REFLECT Phase III trial: assess efficacy and safety of bilateral injection
Double-masked, confirmatory study under Special Protocol Assessment from FDA | ||
Patient inclusion criteria | Design | Endpoints at Week 52 |
-
98 patients with vision loss
≤ 1 year - Initiation: 4Q 2017 (1st patient treated in March 2018)
- Recruitment completed in July 2019
Group 1
GS010 | GS010 |
in first | in second |
affected eye | affected eye |
First affected eye | Second affected |
eye randomized | |
always treated | |
between GS010 | |
with GS010 | |
and placebo | |
GS010 | Placebo |
in first | in second |
affected eye | affected eye |
Primary
-
Difference in change of vision compared to baseline between GS010 Treatment vs. Placebo in second affected/not yet affected eyes
(LogMAR visual acuity used for statistical analysis)
Secondary
- Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 2 years
- Spectral domain OCT biomarkers
- Humphrey visual field analysis
- Pelli Robson Low Vision Contrast Sensitivity
- Quality of life assessments
Group 2
24 November 2019 - Non-Confidential | Source: Company |
Engagement with EMA
Preparing for submission
6 weeks | |||
Pre-submission | Request pre- | Pre- | |
process | submission | submission | |
meeting | meeting | ||
Indicative timings | Early Q1 20 | Q1 20 |
Topics to be prepared
- Draft overviews for clinical, non-clinical and CMC data
- Draft SmPC, patient information leaflet, packaging
- Pediatric updates
- Information related to Conditional Marketing Authorisation and orphan market exclusivity
- Pharmacovigilance and other risk management aspects
25 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
5 months
FinalizedSubmission document for
e-submission
Q3 20 | Q3 20 |
Outcomes
- Assigned rapporteur
- Administrative guidance for dossier
Engagement with FDA
Type B meeting to provide updates
Request | 75 days | EoP2 | ~30 days | |||
End of Phase 2 | ||||||
EoP2 official | ||||||
process | meeting / send | meeting | minutes | |||
draft protocol + | ||||||
briefing package | ||||||
Indicative timings | Q4 19 | Dec 19 | Jan 20 |
Clinical updates
- Objective: provide updates relevant to clinical strategy
- Topics
- REVERSE and RESCUE results to date
- Implications for REFLECT
- Investigations into contralateral effect
- Potential new study with a more robust control arm
CMC updates
- Objective: provide updates on CMC
- Topics
- Comparability protocol
- Update on potency assay
- Align on data to be available at time of submission
- Discuss further data needs
26 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS010 Path to Market
Launch readiness and commercial platform | Pre-Launch |
2018 | 2019 | |
April | February | September | |||||
REVERSE | RESCUE | RESCUE | |||||
Week 48 | Week 48 | Week 96 | |||||
October | April / May | ||||||
REVERSE | RESCUE | ||||||
Week 72 | Week 72 | ||||||
& | |||||||
REVERSE | |||||||
Week 96 |
2020
Q3
REFLECT
Week 52
H2
BLA filing
Q3
MAA filing
27 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS030
Second lead product candidate targeting photoreceptor degenerative diseases (RP/AMD)
GS030 aim: treat degenerative diseases of photoreceptors that lead toblindness
Retinitis Pigmentosa | Geographic Atrophy (GA) in AMD |
(Age-Related Macular Degeneration) |
- Blinding genetic disease caused by mutations in over 100 different genes
- Sequential photoreceptor degeneration leads to slow & irreversible progression to blindness, usually at age 40-45
- 15-20,000new patients each year in the US and EU
29 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
- Early (dry-form) AMD evolves with age into late AMD, one of whose forms is GA
- AMD strikes 350-400,000 new patients a year, most of them at 55-60 years of age
- Prevalence of GA increases with age, from 3.5% among 75-year-olds to 22% among those over 90
- Late AMD patients with GA account for 10-20% of blind patients in their age group
Optogenetics using GS030: gene therapy-based approach to restore light sensitivity
AAV2.7m8 + ChrimsonR
Na+ | + |
The product of
research
collaboration with
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||
Gene therapy | Stimulation with | Retinal output sent | ||
transfer of the gene | optoelectronic | to brain for image | ||
that encodes light- | device to transform | processing | ||
sensitive protein | external light stimuli | |||
Expression in retinal | into signal that can | |||
ganglion cells (RGCs) | activate the RGCs | |||
30 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS030: activated RGCs provide visual information to the higher visual centers
Localization of light-sensitive protein in NHP retina | Restoration of a functional vision in P23H rats | ||
Expression of ChrR-tdT in midget cells of | Light-induced visual evoked cortical responses | ||
monkey perifovea | |||
Full field 590 nm light from ~ 4.7x1015 to 1.1x1017 photons/cm2/sec | |||
In vivo in NHP assessment 6 months after IVT injection | |||
Dose-ranging response to firing relationship in NHP
Active dose range : 5x1010 and 5x1011 VG/eye
MEA assessment 6 months after IVT injection in NHP
31 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS030: well-tolerated and safe in pre-clinical studies
Toxicity study of GS030 product in
non-human primates (n=32)
Bilateral IVT administration with vehicle vs 7.21x1010 VG/eye (low dose) vs 7.84x1011 VG/eye (high dose) in 100 µL
Ophthalmology
- Dose-dependentocular inflammation in the anterior
segment and vitreous, improving/resolving from Month 2 up to Month 6
- Not associated with any retinal tissue destruction or functional changes
- No or very slight residual inflammation in all animals at 6 months (self-resolution,no treatment before or after injection)
Histology
- Dose-dependentminimal mononuclear cell infiltration in eye tissues
- No histological findings in other tissues
Immunogenicity (anti-AAV2 NAb)
- Expected humoral immune response in serum starting at Day 15; tended to decrease at Week 13 then sustained up to Month 6
- Dose-dependentlocal immune response in aqueous humor and vitreous
Local tolerance of GS030 product with light
exposure in rd1 blind mice (n=36)
Bilateral IVT administration with vehicle vs 7.84x109 VG/eye in 1 µL; 590 nm LED light at 1.4×1016 vs 1.7×1017 photons/cm2/s vs ambient room light
Local tolerance
- No ophthalmic findings related to gene therapy (GS030- DP) or to LED light
- No microscopic findings in the retina related to GS030- DP or to LED light
- Transient corneal edema & lens opacity linked to anesthesia procedure
ChrimsonR-tdTomato expression
- Good expression of ChrimsonR-tdTomato in retinas and optic nerves
32 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
PIONEER Phase I/II clinical trial: A First-in-Man study
Study design
Cohort 1 (N = 3) | Cohort 2 (N = 3) | Cohort 3 (N = 3) | Extension Cohort |
5E10 vg/eye | 1.5E11 vg/eye | 5E11 vg/eye | Highest Best- |
Tolerated Dose | |||
Data Safety Monitoring Prior to Dose Escalation
4 weeks post-injection of 3rd (last) patient of each cohort
- First-in-man,dose-escalation safety study, multi-center (France, UK, US)
- Study population: end-stagenon-syndromic RP (vision < Counting Fingers)
- Primary analysis: Safety at 1 year
- Single intra-vitreal injection in the worst affected eye
- Decision to increase the dose taken by a DSMB
1st DSMB recommended to continue with cohort 2 without modification on April 30, 2019
33 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS030: CMC progress & Regulatory interactions
CMC
- Manufacturing process developed up to 25L
- Toxicology batch produced at 25L scale
- Drug Substance titers (> 2E13 vg/ml) and characteristics in line with expectations
- Scale up to 100L batch successful
- Manufacturing process successfully transferred to GMP
- GMP clinical supply ready
- 100L GMP batches manufactured
- Potency assay
- Development completed
- Transfer in progress
Regulatory
- Orphan Drug Designation granted in the US and in Europe
- Active strategy & interactions with US and EU Agencies to obtain advice on preclinical package to support FIM and exploit the existing process of expedited programs
- CTA approved in the UK and in France
- IND released by FDA in the US
34 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GS030 Key Milestones
2016-2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
CTA | CTA | IND |
Orphan Drug | October | Completion | |
Designation in | PIONEER | of patient | |
US and EU | FIM | enrollment | |
Early findings from | PIONEER | ||
first patients in | Preliminary | ||
PIONEER | Results |
35 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Building high strategic value
Curing blindness represents major market opportunity
285m people visually impaired
39m
totally blind
6M BLIND
PEOPLE IN
NORTH AMERICA
AND EU
Source: WHO, IAPB-VISION2020,NORC-Univ. of Chicago / The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Eye Disorders in the United States, 2014.
Favorable reimbursement conditions:
- Gene therapy in ophthalmology for rare diseases could be considered similar to organ transplants for payers
- Blindness imposes a high burden on health systems
- Total blindness costs exceed tens of billions USD per annum
- Absence of curative treatments
- Increasing pressure from patients and patients associations
Geographical Split - Blind people in major markets
Europe
North 3.0m Asia
America
3.2m16m
37 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Pricing and reimbursement environments are evolving to accommodate curative potential of innovative cell and gene therapies
Early entrants are setting pricing and contracting benchmarks, and authorities signal flexibility to new thinking
- Approved December 2017 for treatment of biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated retinal dystrophy
- List price: $425,000 per eye
- Early commercial agreements with select health plans
- Pay-for-performance
- Staggered payments
- Special procurement process using specialty pharmacies
- CMS policy (Medicare coverage) to be published in 2019
- Approved May 2016 for treatment of ADA-SCID
- List price: 594,000€ per patient
- Positive HTA assessments in UK and IT; covered by EU Directive 2011/24*
- Treatment administered only at the designated treatment center in Milan
Note: Luxturna received Marketing Authorization for Europe in November 2018.
So far, NHS England reached £613,410 per patient at full price ($744,000, -12% of US price).
A full list price has not yet been published.
- Openness to alternative pay-for-performance /risk-sharing options among individual plans
- Industry consultation into legislative initiatives covering new payment models for regenerative therapies
- Ongoing cross-border initiatives in the EU, e.g., European reference networks (ERN EYE for ophthalmology)
- HTA-industryconsultations on refining cost effectiveness models for curative treatments
*The directive sets out the conditions under which a patient may travel to another EU country to receive medical care and reimbursement. It covers healthcare costs, as well as the prescription and delivery of medications and medical devices.
38 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Potential applications of GenSight technology platforms
Current focus
Potential applications
MTSLHON
PLATFORM
SENSORIAL
Other LHON
Dominant Optic Atrophy
NON-SENSORIAL
NARP Leigh Syndrome
Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis
Parkinson's
RP
OPTOGENETICS
PLATFORMGA
Dry-AMD | Vagus Nerve Stimulation | |
Congenital Deafness
Abilityto leveragetechnologyplatformsand significantexpertiseto expand the pipelinein ophthalmologyand otherneurodegenerativedisorders
39 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
GenSight Biologics
Key financial information
Financing history
- March 2013 - Series A round - €20m
- June 2015 - Series B round - €32m
- July 2016 - Euronext IPO - €45m
- June 2017 - PIPE - €22m
- February 2019 - PIPE - €8m
Listed on Euronext Paris (SIGHT)
- Established in 2012, IPO in July 2016
Recognition from Blue-Chip specialist investors
- Perceptive, Fidelity, Abingworth, Versant, Sofinnova, JP Morgan AM and others
Analyst coverage
- Oddo & Cie - Martial Descoutures (FR)
- Gilbert Dupont - Jamila El Bougrini (FR)
- Chardan - Gbola Amusa (US)
- NIBC - Dylan van Haaften (NL)
40 November 2019 - Non-Confidential
Cash position
(as of Jun 30, 2019)
€14.3m
Number of
outstanding shares
29.0m
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Gensight Biologics SA published this content on 21 November 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 21 November 2019 10:00:09 UTC