Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. Australia
  4. Australian Stock Exchange
  5. Greenland Minerals Limited
  6. News
  7. Summary
    GGG   AU000000GGG4


SummaryMost relevantAll NewsOther languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Greenland Minerals and Energy : Solid Progress in Closing out Environmental Studies

07/19/2017 | 03:13am EDT

Company Announcement, July 18th, 2017

Kvanefjeld Environmental Impact Assessment Update: Solid Progress in Closing out Environmental Studies
  • Following reviews by international expert groups in 2016, substantial progress has been made in closing out environmental studies associated with the Kvanefjeld Project
  • Recent meetings held in Copenhagen with representatives of Greenland's Environmental Agency for Mineral Resource Activities (EAMRA), and Danish Centre for the Environment (DCE) to work through outstanding gaps
  • Agreement reached on many areas of the Feasibility Design, including:
    • Location of the tailings management facilities
    • Water management plan
    • Dust modelling methodology, which shows very low impacts from the project
    • Very low additional radiation exposure for the general public and workers
    • No notable project impacts on flora and fauna
  • Based on recommendations from EIA reviews, work programs underway to supplement datasets and confirm the project has no significant impacts on the environment
  • Additional work is focussed on the following areas:
    • Supplementary waste rock stockpile stability studies
    • Waste‐rock stockpile design and recovery of run‐off waters
    • Additional base line data for air quality, and radiation impacts, water flow
  • Expert Consultancy 'Shared Resources' providing additional guidance to assist in benchmarking the EIA to international standards as reports are updated and finalised
Kvanefjeld Project, Permitting and Approvals Background

Through 2017, GMEL has been updating the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Kvanefjeld Project ('Project'), following detailed reviews conducted by the Government of Greenland (GoG), and its advisory groups in 2016. Independent consultants and regulatory bodies from Canada have also been involved in the review process. This detailed review phase (also referred to as the guidance phase) is the first step in the processing of a mining license application. Based on recommendations, the impact assessments are then updated prior to public consultation.

No major environmental risks have been identified for the project, and much of the feasibility design has been accepted as appropriate and suitable for Greenlandic conditions. In order to address feedback from advisory groups, GMEL personnel have conducted a number of meetings with GoG representatives through 2017.

In early June, representatives from Greenland's EAMRA, and the DCE met with GMEL representatives in Copenhagen to address outstanding issues. The additional work programs to expand some datasets are underway, and are expected to be concluded over the next couple of months. The results will then be incorporated into the updated studies.

As the GMEL advances through the permitting process, active work programs are also underway with strategic partner Shenghe Resources Holding Co. Ltd that aim to improve the Project cost structure and ensure that the Project is effectively aligned with downstream rare earth processing.

The Kvanefjeld Project is well‐positioned to become an integral cornerstone of new global rare earth supply networks.

Dr John Mair, GMEL Managing Director commented:

"Through 2017 we've made a lot of progress toward closing out all environmental studies associated with Kvanefjeld. Reviews by expert consultants on behalf of the Greenland Government provided recommendations and guidance to constructively assist in presenting very robust studies. Importantly, no major issues have been identified, but our aim is to deliver high‐quality assessments to support stakeholder confidence. With input from the EAMRA and DCE we planned some additional work programs, which have been implemented and are progressing well."

Current Environmental Work Programs Unmineralised (Waste) Rock Dumps

Over the initial mine‐life of 37 years, the strip ratio (non‐ore material to ore) for Kvanefjeld is approximately 1:1, which is considered highly favourable. During this phase of operation,

approximately 100 million tonnes of unmineralised (waste) rock will be mined and deposited on contoured dumps (see Figure 1 for location details). No issues have been identified as the majority of unmineralised rock is comprised of common igneous rock, such as basalt. However, owing to the significant volumes, GMEL has been requested to conduct further geochemical studies and investigations into the dumps.

Sample material to support these studies has been collected from drill cores stored in Greenland, and exported to laboratories for further geochemical work. SRK Consulting has been engaged to increase the design detail of the stockpiles, and to incorporate into the design the ability to capture run‐off water for use in processing facilities. This will decrease the amount of water sourced from the Narsaq River thereby decreasing the environmental impact; a strategy that aligns with GMEL's agenda of continuously looking for opportunities to improve the efficiency of the Project and reduce the environmental footprint.

Figure 1. Overview of the Narsaq Peninsula, southern Greenland, and the Kvanefjeld Project area. Unmineralised (waste) rock is to be deposited in contoured mounds (dumps), located to the northwest of the mine area. The waste rock dumps will not be visible from the town of Narsaq, and will consist of common rock types that are widely present throughout the Project area.

All of the barren rock types which will be mined with the ore (lujvrite) are common country rocks which are already exposed at surface throughout the Project area and surrounding environment. These rocks which include basalt, anorthosite, syenite, are made up of a range of common silicate minerals with stable chemistry. There will be no waste rock mined with the ability to generate acid mine drainage. There is insignificant clay in the area so stability of the waste rock stockpile will be favourable.

Initial chemical stability studies on waste rock samples have shown no significant releases of fluoride, radionuclides or alkaline water, or any other elements of environmental consideration. The additional chemical stability work will add to the existing data and provide strong confidence to all stakeholders that the waste rock stockpile will be physically and chemically stable.

Radiation Exposure for the General Public and Workers

As the Project will be producing uranium as one of a series of by‐products, the radiation exposure for the workers and general public is a focus for local stakeholders. Extensive work conducted to date as part of the EIA has shown that very low additional radiation exposure is caused by the Project.

However, reviews by expert consultants have recommended areas where additional data could be generated to provide further rigour and confidence to understanding the impacts of radiation associated with the Project.

GMEL has engaged the independent consultant Arcadis to address a range of additional queries regarding radiation exposure for the Project. These additional issues include a study on radon gas emissions (before and during operations) and radionuclides in dust. Work conducted to date indicates that the Project will have little impact on the natural (baseline) radon gas emission levels. Additional water samples from Narsaq town and surrounding area will also be taken to broaden the radiation baseline.

Hydrological Modelling

GMEL has prepared an extensive and rigorous model which examines the site hydrology during 37 years of operations, closure and post‐closure for a total time period of close to 100 years. A state of the art modelling software package called 'IDEAS' (sold by Andritz Automation) was used. This allows for the creation of a dynamic model which simulates seasonal rainfall and snowmelt. IDEAS is a highly regarded software package that has been adopted by a range of multinational companies operating in the mining, pulp and paper, and tar sands industry, due to its ability to perform dynamic simulations. Dynamic simulations allow large periods of time to be modelled with changing inputs such as precipitation and snow melt. Weather extremes including a one in ten thousand year rainfall

Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited published this content on 18 July 2017 and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 19 July 2017 07:13:10 UTC.

ę Publicnow 2017
04/21GREENLAND MINERALSá : Seeks Legal Advice Regarding Rare Earth Project in Greenla..
04/20GREENLAND MINERALSá : to begin talks with new govt over Kvanefjeld project
04/09Australia's Greenland Minerals says it is focused on rare earths not uranium
04/08Banks, miners help Australian shares notch 13-month closing high
04/07GREENLAND MINERALSá : Main opposition party against mining wins Greenland electi..
04/07GREENLAND MINERALSá : Left-wing party wins Greenland election, opposes big minin..
04/06GREENLAND MINERALSá : election shows divide over rare-earth metals mine
04/06GREENLAND MINERALSá : Polls close in Greenland election closely watched by globa..
04/05Greenland holds election closely watched by global mining industry
03/04GREENLAND MINERALSá : Five Eyes alliance urged to forge ties with Greenland to s..
More news
Sales 2020 0,16 M 0,12 M 0,12 M
Net income 2020 -3,08 M -2,34 M -2,34 M
Net cash 2020 36,0 M 27,3 M 27,3 M
P/E ratio 2020 -102x
Yield 2020 -
Capitalization 130 M 98,6 M 98,8 M
EV / Sales 2019 2 293x
EV / Sales 2020 2 018x
Nbr of Employees 28
Free-Float 81,4%
Duration : Period :
Greenland Minerals Limited Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends GREENLAND MINERALS LIMITED
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Managers and Directors
John Lefroy Mair Managing Director & Executive Director
Miles Simon Guy Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
Peng Ho Non-Executive Chairman
Simon Kenneth Cato Non-Executive Director
Xiaolei Guo Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
BHP GROUP12.18%166 774
RIO TINTO PLC9.69%137 742
GRUPO MÉXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V.8.99%35 151