Results from a Phase II study of eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) and pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 unselected metastatic 2nd line head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

Abstract # 359

López Pousa1, E Felip2, M Forster3, B Doger4, P Roxburgh5, P Bajaj6, J A Peguero7, E Carcereny8, M Krebs9, C Mueller10, F Triebel11

1Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; 2Vall d' Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; 3UCL Cancer Institute / University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation, London, UK; 4 START Madrid- Fundacion Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; 5Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow and The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; 6Tasman Oncology, Southport, Australia; 7Oncology Consultants, P.A., Houston, Texas; 8Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO group, Badalona, Spain; 9Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; 10 Clinical Development, Immutep GmbH, Berlin, Germany; 11Research & Development, Immutep S.A.S., Orsay, France

BACKGROUND

Figure 1. efti's mechanism of action

METHODS

Study Design and Patients

Eftilagimod alpha (efti) is a soluble LAG-3 protein binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules, thus mediating antigen presenting cell (APC) and CD8 T-cell activation (Figure 1). Such stimulation of the dendritic cell network and resulting T cell recruitment may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses in combination with pembrolizumab than observed with pembrolizumab alone. We report results from the 2nd line metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort (Part C) of the TACTI-002 study (NCT03625323).

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

EFFICACY

A total of 39 patients were enrolled and treated into this

Figure 3. Spider plot (N=31)*

part of the study. Baseline characteristics are reported in

100

Table 1.

therapy

80

Table 1. Baseline characteristics (N=39)

60

Baseline parameters, n(%)

of

40

Age, median (years)

62 (37-84)

to start

20

Female / Male

4 (10.3) / 35 (89.7)

ECOG 0 / 1

13 (33.3) / 26 (66.7)

compared

0

Non-smoker / Ex- or Current smoker

6 (15.4) / 33 (84.6)

-20

Previous chemotherapy

39 (100)

-40

change

Previous cetuximab

16 (41.0)

-60

Patients with lung / liver metastasis

19 (48.7) / 6 (17.6)

%

-80

Primary tumor location, n (%)

-100

Oral cavity

12 (30.8)

0

12

24

36

48

60

72

84

96

108

Oropharynx

14 (35.9)

Figure 4. Waterfall plot (N=31)*

100

Best response :

iUPD/iCPD

baseline

75

iSD

iPR

50

iCR

25

from

0

84

NE 1

100

2

70

55

50

75

25

85 40

< 5

41

PD -L1

change

10

0

0

0

11

10

NE 28

0

NE 0

41

1

49

0

NY 15

CPS

-25

%

Best

-50

***

-75

-100

**

  • ORR (IRECIST) of 35.5% in evaluable patients (Table 2).
  • 5 patients (13.5%) with complete responses (Table 2).
  • 5 patients still under therapy and 1 patient completed 2 years of therapy (Figure 3).
  • Responses seen in PD-L1 low and high expressors (Figure 4).
  • 91% of responses confirmed.
  • Median duration of response not reached; all ongoing responses lasting 9+ months (Figure 5).
  • ORR, 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates for PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients are 40.7%, 41% and 48% respectively (Table 3).
  • ORR, 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates for PD-L1 CPS ≥20 patients are 64.3%, 57.1% and 64.3%, respectively (Table 3).

Figure 5. Duration of response for confirmed responders (N=10)

  • Non-randomized,multinational, open-label, trial for 2nd line, PD-X naive, PD-L1all-comer HNSCC patients.
  • Simon's optimal two stage designed trial, sponsored by Immutep in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (MSD).
  • Efti is administered as a 30 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for the first 8 cycles and every 3 weeks for the following 9 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered at a standard dose of 200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for maximum of 2 years (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Study design

Hypopharynx

7

(17.9)

Time

(weeks )

Larynx

6

(15.4)

PD-L1 CPS score, n (%)

Table 2. Best overall response (iRECIST), all comer N=37#

CPS <1

6 (15.4)

Best overall response, iRECIST

Investigator assessment

CPS 1-19

15 (38.5)

N (%)

CPS ≥20

14 (35.9)

Complete Response

5 (13.5)

CPS not evaluable or unknown

4 (10.3)

Partial Response

6 (16.2)

Stable Disease

3 (8.1)

*… evaluable set (N=31): ≥1 treatment and ≥1 post-baseline tumor staging

Progression

17 (45.9)

Not evaluable

6 (16.2)

**… lymph node as target lesion

*** … disease progression despite target lesion decrease due to new lesions

Disease Control Rate

14 (37.8)

#... full analysis set (N=37): ≥1 treatment and no death due to COVID-19 prior

Overall Response Rate

11 (29.7)

to first post-baseline staging

[95% CI]

[15.9 - 47.0]

… not evaluable set (N=6): dropped off prior to first staging or were not

evaluable post-baseline for any reason

Overall Response Rate - Evaluable pts*

11 (35.5)

… still under therapy

[95% CI]

[19.2 - 54.6]

… treated beyond progression

Table 3. Response according to PD-L1 subgroup

CPS score

All comer

≥1

≥20

(N=37)

(N=27)

(n=14)

ORR (iRECIST)

ORR, %

29.7

40.7

64.3

Overall survival

No. of events

23

17

7

6-month OS, %

54.7

55.5

71.4

12-month OS, %

48.4

48.2

64.3

Progression-free survival

No. of events

30

17

8

3-month PFS, %

37.8

48.2

64.3

6-month PFS, %

32.4

40.7

57.1

100

of Survival

50

Probability

0

0

10

20

30

Time

(months)

EXPOSURE AND SAFETY

CONCLUSION

Assessments and Statistical Analyses:

Primary Endpoint: Objective response rate (ORR), as per iRECIST.

Secondary Endpoints: Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival

(OS), safety and tolerability, PK/PD and exploratory biomarkers.

• Central assessment of tumor cell PD-L1 expression (by Dako PD-L1

immunohistochemistry (IHC) 22C3 pharmDx) after enrolment.

• Imaging performed every 9 weeks and reported according to iRECIST.

Safety was analyzed in all patients who received at least one dose of study

medication.

Efficacy was analyzed in all patients with measurable disease at baseline,

who received at least one dose of any study medication and did not die of

COVID-19 prior to the first post-baseline assessment.

Table 4. General overview of adverse events (N=39)

Safety parameter

N (%)

Patients with any TEAE

35 (89.7)

Patients with any SAE

18 (46.2)

thereof related to efti/pembro

2 (5.1) / 2 (5.1)

Patients with any grade ≥3 TEAE

24 (61.5)

thereof related to efti/pembro

4 (10.3) / 3 (7.7)

Patients with fatal TEAEs

7 (17.9)

thereof related to efti/pembro

0 / 0

Patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of efti

6 (15.4)

thereof related to efti/pembro

0 / 0

Patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of pembro

7 (17.9)

thereof related to efti/pembro

1 / 2.6

Table 5. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring ≥10% (N=39)

Adverse event (PT)

Any grade N (%)

Grade 3 N (%)

Grade 4/5 N (%)

Hypothyroidism

8 (20.5)

1 (2.6)

-

Cough

7 (17.9)

-

-

Asthenia

6 (15.4)

-

-

Fatigue

5 (12.8)

-

-

Anaemia

5 (12.8)

4 (10.3)

Diarrhoea

5 (12.8)

-

-

Weight decreased

5 (12.8)

-

-

URTI

4 (10.3)

-

-

Back pain

4 (10.3)

-

-

Pain in extremity

4 (10.3)

2 (5.1)

-

• Encouraging ORR (30% according to iRECIST) in patients

unselected for PD-L1.

• 13.5% complete responses observed.

• Durable, deep responses with median DoR not yet reached and

min. duration of 9+ months.

• Trends compare favorably to KEYNOTE-040 (ORR ~15%)1 in a

comparable patient population.

• The combination of efti plus pembrolizumab is well-tolerated

with no new safety signals.

• Majority of most frequent adverse events are mild to moderate.

• Data has led to fast-track designation by the US FDA for 1st line

HNSCC, resulting in a phase IIb study comparing efti and

pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone in PD-L1-positive 1st

APC…antigen-presenting cell

PD-X...PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted

CI…confidence interval

therapy

ECOG…Eastern Cooperative Oncology

PFS...progression-free survival

Group

PK...pharmacokinetics

HNSCC...head & neck squamous cell

PT...preferred term

cancer

ORR…objective response rate

iRECIST…Immune Response

SAE…serious adverse event

Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors

TEAE…treatment-emergent adverse

LAG-3...Lymphocyte Activation gene-3

event

MHC…Major Histocompatibility

TRAE…treatment-related adverse

Complex

event

NSCLC...non-small cell lung cancer

PD...pharmacodynamics

1. Cohen E, et al. Lancet 2019; 393:

PD-L1...Programmed Death ligand-1

156-167.(KN-040)

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA provided pembrolizumab for the study.

The trial identifiers are IMP321-P015 (Sponsor code), Keynote-PN798 (MSD code), 2018-001994-25 (EudraCT) and NCT03625323 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

• Database cut-off date was April 16, 2021 (safety) and August 4, 2021

(efficacy); minimum follow up for efficacy was 8+ months.

  • The most common TEAEs were hypothyroidism (20.5%), cough (17.9%) and asthenia (15.4%) (Table 5).
  • No treatment-related deaths occurred (Table 4).

line HNSCC patients (NCT04811027).

Corresponding author: Frederic Triebel, frederic.triebel@immutep.com

Attachments

Disclaimer

Immutep Ltd. published this content on 12 November 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 12 November 2021 12:10:27 UTC.