Results from a Phase II study of eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) and pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 unselected metastatic 2nd line head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Abstract # 359
López Pousa1, E Felip2, M Forster3, B Doger4, P Roxburgh5, P Bajaj6, J A Peguero7, E Carcereny8, M Krebs9, C Mueller10, F Triebel11
1Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; 2Vall d' Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; 3UCL Cancer Institute / University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation, London, UK; 4 START Madrid- Fundacion Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; 5Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow and The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; 6Tasman Oncology, Southport, Australia; 7Oncology Consultants, P.A., Houston, Texas; 8Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO group, Badalona, Spain; 9Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; 10 Clinical Development, Immutep GmbH, Berlin, Germany; 11Research & Development, Immutep S.A.S., Orsay, France
BACKGROUND
Figure 1. efti's mechanism of action
METHODS
Study Design and Patients
Eftilagimod alpha (efti) is a soluble LAG-3 protein binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules, thus mediating antigen presenting cell (APC) and CD8 T-cell activation (Figure 1). Such stimulation of the dendritic cell network and resulting T cell recruitment may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses in combination with pembrolizumab than observed with pembrolizumab alone. We report results from the 2nd line metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort (Part C) of the TACTI-002 study (NCT03625323).
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS | EFFICACY |
• | A total of 39 patients were enrolled and treated into this | Figure 3. Spider plot (N=31)* | |||||||||||
part of the study. Baseline characteristics are reported in | 100 | ||||||||||||
Table 1. | |||||||||||||
therapy | 80 | ||||||||||||
Table 1. Baseline characteristics (N=39) | 60 | ||||||||||||
Baseline parameters, n(%) | |||||||||||||
of | 40 | ||||||||||||
Age, median (years) | 62 (37-84) | to start | |||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||||
Female / Male | 4 (10.3) / 35 (89.7) | | |||||||||||
ECOG 0 / 1 | 13 (33.3) / 26 (66.7) | compared | 0 | ||||||||||
Non-smoker / Ex- or Current smoker | 6 (15.4) / 33 (84.6) | -20 | |||||||||||
Previous chemotherapy | 39 (100) | -40 | |||||||||||
change | |||||||||||||
Previous cetuximab | 16 (41.0) | -60 | |||||||||||
Patients with lung / liver metastasis | 19 (48.7) / 6 (17.6) | ||||||||||||
% | -80 | ||||||||||||
Primary tumor location, n (%) | |||||||||||||
-100 | | ||||||||||||
Oral cavity | 12 (30.8) | ||||||||||||
0 | 12 | 24 | 36 | 48 | 60 | 72 | 84 | 96 | 108 | ||||
Oropharynx | 14 (35.9) | ||||||||||||
Figure 4. Waterfall plot (N=31)*
100 | Best response : | |
iUPD/iCPD | ||
baseline | 75 | iSD | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iPR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | iCR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 84 | NE 1 | 100 | 2 | 70 | 55 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 85 40 | < 5 | 41 | PD -L1 | ||||||||||||||
change | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 10 | NE 28 | 0 | NE 0 | 41 | 1 | 49 | 0 | NY 15 | CPS | ||||||||||||
-25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best | -50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-100 | ** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- ORR (IRECIST) of 35.5% in evaluable patients (Table 2).
- 5 patients (13.5%) with complete responses (Table 2).
- 5 patients still under therapy and 1 patient completed 2 years of therapy (Figure 3).
- Responses seen in PD-L1 low and high expressors (Figure 4).
- 91% of responses confirmed.
- Median duration of response not reached; all ongoing responses lasting 9+ months (Figure 5).
- ORR, 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates for PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients are 40.7%, 41% and 48% respectively (Table 3).
- ORR, 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates for PD-L1 CPS ≥20 patients are 64.3%, 57.1% and 64.3%, respectively (Table 3).
Figure 5. Duration of response for confirmed responders (N=10)
- Non-randomized,multinational, open-label, trial for 2nd line, PD-X naive, PD-L1all-comer HNSCC patients.
- Simon's optimal two stage designed trial, sponsored by Immutep in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (MSD).
- Efti is administered as a 30 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for the first 8 cycles and every 3 weeks for the following 9 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered at a standard dose of 200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for maximum of 2 years (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Study design
Hypopharynx | 7 | (17.9) | Time | (weeks ) |
Larynx | 6 | (15.4) | ||
PD-L1 CPS score, n (%) | Table 2. Best overall response (iRECIST), all comer N=37# | |||
CPS <1 | 6 (15.4) | Best overall response, iRECIST | Investigator assessment | |
CPS 1-19 | 15 (38.5) | N (%) | ||
CPS ≥20 | 14 (35.9) | Complete Response | 5 (13.5) | |
CPS not evaluable or unknown | 4 (10.3) | Partial Response | 6 (16.2) | |
Stable Disease | 3 (8.1) | |||
*… evaluable set (N=31): ≥1 treatment and ≥1 post-baseline tumor staging | Progression | 17 (45.9) | ||
Not evaluable¶ | 6 (16.2) | |||
**… lymph node as target lesion | ||||
*** … disease progression despite target lesion decrease due to new lesions | Disease Control Rate | 14 (37.8) | ||
#... full analysis set (N=37): ≥1 treatment and no death due to COVID-19 prior | Overall Response Rate | 11 (29.7) | ||
to first post-baseline staging | ||||
[95% CI] | [15.9 - 47.0] | |||
¶ … not evaluable set (N=6): dropped off prior to first staging or were not | ||||
evaluable post-baseline for any reason | Overall Response Rate - Evaluable pts* | 11 (35.5) | ||
… still under therapy | [95% CI] | [19.2 - 54.6] | ||
… treated beyond progression | ||||
Table 3. Response according to PD-L1 subgroup
CPS score | All comer | ≥1 | ≥20 |
(N=37) | (N=27) | (n=14) | |
ORR (iRECIST) | |||
ORR, % | 29.7 | 40.7 | 64.3 |
Overall survival | |||
No. of events | 23 | 17 | 7 |
6-month OS, % | 54.7 | 55.5 | 71.4 |
12-month OS, % | 48.4 | 48.2 | 64.3 |
Progression-free survival | |||
No. of events | 30 | 17 | 8 |
3-month PFS, % | 37.8 | 48.2 | 64.3 |
6-month PFS, % | 32.4 | 40.7 | 57.1 |
100 | ||||
of Survival | 50 | |||
Probability | ||||
0 | ||||
0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | |
Time | (months) |
EXPOSURE AND SAFETY | CONCLUSION |
Assessments and Statistical Analyses:
• Primary Endpoint: Objective response rate (ORR), as per iRECIST. | |
• Secondary Endpoints: Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival | |
(OS), safety and tolerability, PK/PD and exploratory biomarkers. | |
• Central assessment of tumor cell PD-L1 expression (by Dako PD-L1 | |
immunohistochemistry (IHC) 22C3 pharmDx) after enrolment. | |
• Imaging performed every 9 weeks and reported according to iRECIST. | |
• | Safety was analyzed in all patients who received at least one dose of study |
medication. | |
• | Efficacy was analyzed in all patients with measurable disease at baseline, |
who received at least one dose of any study medication and did not die of | |
COVID-19 prior to the first post-baseline assessment. |
Table 4. General overview of adverse events (N=39)
Safety parameter | N (%) |
Patients with any TEAE | 35 (89.7) |
Patients with any SAE | 18 (46.2) |
thereof related to efti/pembro | 2 (5.1) / 2 (5.1) |
Patients with any grade ≥3 TEAE | 24 (61.5) |
thereof related to efti/pembro | 4 (10.3) / 3 (7.7) |
Patients with fatal TEAEs | 7 (17.9) |
thereof related to efti/pembro | 0 / 0 |
Patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of efti | 6 (15.4) |
thereof related to efti/pembro | 0 / 0 |
Patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of pembro | 7 (17.9) |
thereof related to efti/pembro | 1 / 2.6 |
Table 5. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring ≥10% (N=39)
Adverse event (PT) | Any grade N (%) | Grade 3 N (%) | Grade 4/5 N (%) |
Hypothyroidism | 8 (20.5) | 1 (2.6) | - |
Cough | 7 (17.9) | - | - |
Asthenia | 6 (15.4) | - | - |
Fatigue | 5 (12.8) | - | - |
Anaemia | 5 (12.8) | 4 (10.3) | |
Diarrhoea | 5 (12.8) | - | - |
Weight decreased | 5 (12.8) | - | - |
URTI | 4 (10.3) | - | - |
Back pain | 4 (10.3) | - | - |
Pain in extremity | 4 (10.3) | 2 (5.1) | - |
• Encouraging ORR (30% according to iRECIST) in patients |
unselected for PD-L1. |
• 13.5% complete responses observed. |
• Durable, deep responses with median DoR not yet reached and |
min. duration of 9+ months. |
• Trends compare favorably to KEYNOTE-040 (ORR ~15%)1 in a |
comparable patient population. |
• The combination of efti plus pembrolizumab is well-tolerated |
with no new safety signals. |
• Majority of most frequent adverse events are mild to moderate. |
• Data has led to fast-track designation by the US FDA for 1st line |
HNSCC, resulting in a phase IIb study comparing efti and |
pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone in PD-L1-positive 1st |
APC…antigen-presenting cell | PD-X...PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted |
CI…confidence interval | therapy |
ECOG…Eastern Cooperative Oncology | PFS...progression-free survival |
Group | PK...pharmacokinetics |
HNSCC...head & neck squamous cell | PT...preferred term |
cancer | ORR…objective response rate |
iRECIST…Immune Response | SAE…serious adverse event |
Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors | TEAE…treatment-emergent adverse |
LAG-3...Lymphocyte Activation gene-3 | event |
MHC…Major Histocompatibility | TRAE…treatment-related adverse |
Complex | event |
NSCLC...non-small cell lung cancer | |
PD...pharmacodynamics | 1. Cohen E, et al. Lancet 2019; 393: |
PD-L1...Programmed Death ligand-1 | 156-167.(KN-040) |
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA provided pembrolizumab for the study.
The trial identifiers are IMP321-P015 (Sponsor code), Keynote-PN798 (MSD code), 2018-001994-25 (EudraCT) and NCT03625323 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
• Database cut-off date was April 16, 2021 (safety) and August 4, 2021 |
(efficacy); minimum follow up for efficacy was 8+ months. |
- The most common TEAEs were hypothyroidism (20.5%), cough (17.9%) and asthenia (15.4%) (Table 5).
- No treatment-related deaths occurred (Table 4).
line HNSCC patients (NCT04811027). |
Corresponding author: Frederic Triebel, frederic.triebel@immutep.com
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Immutep Ltd. published this content on 12 November 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 12 November 2021 12:10:27 UTC.