Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

INFINERA CORPORATION

(INFN)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector news

Infinera : All You Ever Wanted to Know About Optical Transmission Bands

08/26/2021 | 09:11am EDT

Figure 1: Summary of why wavebands are what they are

For the past 25 years since DWDM became commercially available most network operators outside of Japan have been perfectly happy operating in the C-Band for optical transmission. But C+L Band operation is becoming increasingly popular in long haul terrestrial networks including with Infinera's FlexILS open line system. With multiple presentations at OFC raising the idea that 5th generation transponders are approaching the Shannon Limit, there are increased discussions about the potential for to utilize additional wavebands in optical fiber.

But have you ever wondered why there are 'bands' of wavelengths at all? What makes one set of wavelengths distinct from another - to the point where we feel we need to apply a name to that band of wavelengths? As you'll see below for C-Band the explanation is pretty clear, but what about O, E, S and U-Bands? And why don't we have bands at shorter wavelengths than 1260 nm, and longer than 1675 nm? Fortunately, the reasons have not quite been lost in the mists of time and I've tried to summarize them in Figure 1. But here is the longer explanation…

Figure 2: Silica Fiber Attenuation and single mode wavebands

Early Fiber and Lasers

Figure 2 shows a typical attenuation curve for the original silica based fiber that may have been manufactured as far back as the 1980s. It also shows where the wavebands are located against this curve. N

The ITU G series - Supplement 42 document actually gives a great history of fiber deployment, but you can also check out my webinar on YouTube - 'How Optical Networking Transformed Our World'.

The first phase of fiber deployments in the late 1970s used multimode fibers and the semiconductor lasers of that era could only be built for short wavelength transmission - around 850 nm. At that time we transmitted just one wavelength on the fiber, and transmission distances and data rates were limited by high fiber attenuation at 850 nm, and modal dispersion caused by multimode fiber.

In the early 80s, laser manufacturers were working hard to increase the operating wavelengths for their devices by using InGaAsP semiconductors to allow 1300 nm transmission. At that wavelength the fiber attenuation is much lower than at 850 nm but, even so, transmission rates were limited to about 100 Mb/s by the modal dispersion of those multimode fibers.

Lab experiments in the early 80s showed that single mode fiber operation was possible and, by 1988 we have single mode commercial products able to transmit up to 1.7 Gb/s on a single wavelength at 1300 nm, over single mode fibers, and with repeater spacing of about 50 km.

This is a key moment because in these single mode fibers we first see references to wavebands…so let's take a look.

Lower Boundary of the O-Band: 1260 nm

Single mode fibers have to be designed with a cutoff wavelength in mind, because below the cutoff wavelength the fiber no longer behaves as a single mode fiber - it will allow multiple modes to propagate along the core, and this will result in modal dispersion which will severely limit transmission distances. Optical fiber manufacturers are able to engineer the cutoff wavelength, but this will inevitably have consequences for other aspects of the fiber's performance - because they may also be trying to engineer for characteristics such as bend radius sensitivity, and chromatic dispersion values and slopes.

To narrow down the scope of the problem for the first type of single mode fiber (SMF-28, defined by ITU-T G.652) ITU-T set the lower limit for the cutoff wavelength at 1260 nm. This decision created the lower bound of what became known as the Ordinary Band, or O-Band.

Lower Boundary of the E-Band: 1360 nm

But what defines the lower boundary of the next band - the Extended Band, or E-Band?

An uncooled laser will tend to drift around the band, depending on its operating temperature. Before DWDM there was no need to temperature-stabilize the laser because there were no other wavelengths it could interfere with. And optical receivers are wideband (within reason) - they don't care what wavelength they are receiving*.

*Note: Optical receivers can be built with different materials depending on the range of wavelengths they will be used to detect. Silicon can be used from 650 nm to 950nm; InGaAsP from 950 nm to 1150 nm; Ge from 1100 nm to 1550 nm; and . Component designers thus have a good selection of semiconductors for optical receivers. But within these bands, a given receiver will detect any light that falls upon it.

But the SMF-28 fiber being manufactured in the 80's tended to have a water absorption peak at 1383 nm, and this begins to appear in the attenuation curve at about 1360 nm, and its contribution to the attenuation is negligible by about 1460 nm. So 1360 nm and 1460 nm form the lower and upper boundaries of the E-Band. The fact that they are a nice even 100 nm is a coincidence, but it's likely that it was rounded up or round down to get it to that value.

The S-Band…it's basically just a gap! 1460-1530 nm

The next transmission band was dubbed the Short wavelength, or S-Band. And its limits are pretty basic - it starts at the end of the E-Band, and it stops at the start of the C-Band! Because the S-Band itself has historically not had much value in optical data transmission.

Why is this? The reason is that, by the time we could build S-Band lasers we could also build C-Band lasers. This was still in the single wavelength era, and operating at 1550 nm in the C-Band meant lower attenuation than in the S-Band.

Intriguingly G series Supplement 39, which is a really interesting historical account of why certain things are the way they are in optical transmission, notes that 'The boundary (1460 nm) between the E-band and the S-band remains under study'. I wonder what they're studying?

The S-Band does often contain vitally important 'non-data light'. For example, the Optical Supervisory Channel (OSC) is defined in this band, at 1510 nm plus or minus 10 nm.

We may also find EDFA pump lasers operating here - typically around 1480 nm. Note that EDFA pump lasers also operate at 980 nm. Typically pumping at 1480 nm will give higher optical power conversion efficiency but with higher noise compared to 980 nm pumping.

If you'd like to hear how S-Band could be used to extend fiber capacity in the future, check out Andre Souza's presentation at the upcoming ECOC show. That session is organized by Antonio Napoli.

The : 1530-1565 nm

I assume we're all familiar with the C-Band, or Conventional Band, the band of wavelengths that has delivered an astonishing increase in DWDM fiber capacity over the past 25 years. If you Google the C-Band you will be told that it's 'the band of wavelengths between 1530 and 1565 nm'. But this is really just true for the original C-Band in the mid to late 90s when Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs) were introduce commercially in DWDM networks.

When you design an EDFA you find that the gain profile of the amplifer is not uniform across a range of wavelengths, it usually has a big hump at about 1530 nm and a smaller hump at about 1550 nm. This would be unacceptable in a real deployment as different data wavelengths would receive different levels of gain, so gain flattening filters are used to trim off the excess gain.

The first generation of EDFAs the practical bandwidth they could amplify was 4 THz across the 1530 to 1565 nm waveband. This is what originally defined the C-Band, and we can think of this as the '4 THz' C-Band - enough capacity for 80 channels with 50 GHz spacing.

After a few years C-Band EDFAs were developed that could provide a flat gain over a 4.8 THz range - 96 channels at 50 GHz spacing. We generally refer to this as the Extended C-Band, and it spreads into the S-Band at the shorter wavelength end and the L-Band at the longer wavelength end.

More recently EDFAs are being developed to provide much wider usable gain , with up to 6 THz of spectral bandwidth which equates to 120 channels at 50 GHz spacing. This has been dubbed the Super C-Band.

But references will still base their definition on the good old 4 THz C-Band of the nineties.

The L-Band: 1565-1625 nm

The next waveband is the L-Band, or Long Wavelength band. Together the C and L-Bands are located at the minimum attenuation point for a silica-based optical fiber. There is no fundamental reason why this is the case - it's pure serendipity that the most cost-effective, multi-wavelength fiber amplification technology (EDFA) happens to operate effectively at this minimum attenuation point. However, as Figure 3 shows, to cover both C-Band and L-Band we need two different EDFAs installed in the amplifiers sites. L-Band EDFAs use somewhat longer lengths of doped fiber, but they use the same pump wavelengths as a C-Band EDFA. If a fiber is carrying both C-Band and L-Band data wavelength these do have to be amplified in parallel because a C-Band EDFA would represent a high loss length of fiber to L-Band wavelengths, and vice versa. So the wavebands are demultiplexed, amplified independently, then remultiplexed, at each amplifier site.

Figure 3: C+L Band EDFA configuration

The lower boundary of the L-Band is defined by the upper boundary of the 4 THz C-Band. A like the lower boundary of the O-Band (SMF-28 cutoff wavelength), the upper boundary of the L-Band is defined by an engineering specification in the fiber. As longer wavelength light is used, optical fiber becomes much more sensitive to bending losses, and this can make fiber installation more demanding because extra care must be taken not to exceed defined bend radii. To help fiber manufacturers design the fiber characteristics, ITU-T Study Group 15 states that 1625 nm is the longest wavelength of light that's expected to be supported in a fiber at a high performance level (ie. for data wavelengths).

C+L transmission is a very active area for terrestrial network operators today, and Infinera's FlexILS solution is a good example of a C+L line system that has been evolved to offer smooth expansion of fiber capacity.

Is C+L relevant in submarine networks? The situation is not a clear cut as in terrestrial networks because submarine cables are limited by the ability to provide electrical power to the amplifier chain. While there is one C+L capable submarine cable deployed today, the focus of submarine cable capacity expansion has turned to a technique called Space Division Multiplexing. You can see a one hour webinar on this topic here.

The U-Band: 1625-1675 nm

Today the final designated transmission band in single mode fiber is the Ultra-long wavelength, or U-Band. The lower boundary of the U-Band is defined by the upper boundary of the L-Band but I have to confess I have no idea why the upper boundary has been set at 1675 nm - the value is just stated as such in ITU documents without a specific reason. If you know the answer, please send me an email to put me out of my misery! Because of potential bending losses this band is not intended for data transmission, but it may be used for maintenance purposes under the current standards.

So that's it! I hope you've enjoyed my efforts to get to the bottom of the 'why are they like that' question. If any of you have further insights on the topic please let me know because it's not always easy to track down good information on these historical topics. One thing is for sure, that sooner or later we will see increased use of transmission outside of the C and L-Bands. It will probably be the S-Band initially and the combination of S+C+L could triple fiber capacity compared to C-Band only. To get there we'd need commercial S-Band amplifiers based on thulium, rather than erbium, or we could use Raman amplification - only time will tell.

Disclaimer

Infinera Corporation published this content on 26 August 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 26 August 2021 13:10:06 UTC.


ę Publicnow 2021
All news about INFINERA CORPORATION
10/26FINISHING STRONG : Insights from Infinera's 2021 Regional Partner Conference
PU
10/19INFINERA : to Announce Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results on November 3, 2021
AQ
10/18INFINERA : JPMorgan Downgrades Infinera to Underweight from Neutral, Adjusts Price Target ..
MT
10/13INFINERA : Telstra Deploys Infinera's Coherent 800G Solution Across Dispersion-managed Sub..
AQ
10/13INFINERA : Coherent Evolution, ROADMs, and Next-generation IP Networks
PU
10/13INFINERA : Telstra Deploys Infinera's Coherent 800G Solution Across Dispersion-managed Sub..
GL
10/13Telstra Deploys Infinera Corporation's Coherent 800G Solution Across Dispersion-Managed..
CI
10/07INFINERA : Face-to-Face Meetings Bring New Optical Networking Vibes
PU
09/30INFINERA : Coherent Point-to-Multipoint Pluggable Optics to the Rescue
PU
09/28NORTH AMERICAN MORNING BRIEFING : Stock Futures -3-
DJ
More news
Analyst Recommendations on INFINERA CORPORATION
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 1 410 M - -
Net income 2021 -93,6 M - -
Net Debt 2021 411 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 -13,7x
Yield 2021 -
Capitalization 1 519 M 1 519 M -
EV / Sales 2021 1,37x
EV / Sales 2022 1,22x
Nbr of Employees 3 050
Free-Float 98,0%
Chart INFINERA CORPORATION
Duration : Period :
Infinera Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends INFINERA CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 12
Last Close Price 7,28 $
Average target price 10,41 $
Spread / Average Target 43,0%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
David W. Heard Chief Executive Officer & Director
Nancy Erba Chief Financial Officer
George Andrew Riedel Chairman
Greg Greco Senior VP-Global Research & Development
Craig S. Cocchi Senior Vice President-Global Operations
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
INFINERA CORPORATION-30.92%1 519
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.24.72%232 566
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.44.60%41 639
ERICSSON-1.53%37 252
FOXCONN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET CO., LTD.-16.51%35 405
NOKIA OYJ58.09%32 665