Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

INTEL CORPORATION

(INTC)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Intel : Why the Decision Against Qualcomm Should Stand

11/29/2019 | 10:23am EDT

By Steven Rodgers

Today, Intel filed a brief supporting the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and opposing Qualcomm's appeal of the judgment rendered in May against Qualcomm by the United States District Court, Northern District of California. The District Court found that 'Qualcomm's licensing practices have strangled competition in the CDMA and premium LTE modem chip markets for years, and harmed rivals, OEMs and end consumers.' The District Court also found that Qualcomm's conduct 'unfairly tends to destroy competition itself.'

Intel agrees with the District Court's findings. Intel suffered the brunt of Qualcomm's anticompetitive behavior, was denied opportunities in the modem market, was prevented from making sales to customers and was forced to sell at prices artificially skewed by Qualcomm. We filed the brief because we believe it is important for the Court of Appeals to hear our perspective.

Qualcomm would have you believe that its position in the market today - as the last surviving U.S. supplier of premium modem chips - is due to its 'ingenuity and business acumen,' and that its rivals in the market failed simply because 'they did not offer good enough chips at low enough prices.' This is simply not true.

Instead, as detailed in the District Court's opinion and in our brief, Qualcomm maintained its monopoly through a brazen scheme carefully crafted and implemented over many years. This scheme consists of a web of anticompetitive conduct designed to allow Qualcomm to coerce customers, tilt the competitive playing field and exclude competitors, all the while shielding itself from legal scrutiny and capturing billions in unlawful gains.

The victims were Qualcomm's own customers (original equipment manufacturers or OEMs), the long list of competitors it forced out of the modem chip market, including Intel, and ultimately consumers. Intel fought for nearly a decade to build a profitable modem chip business. We invested billions, hired thousands, acquired two companies and built innovative world-class products that eventually made their way into Apple's industry-leading iPhones, including the most recently released iPhone 11. But when all was said and done, Intel could not overcome the artificial and insurmountable barriers to fair competition created by Qualcomm's scheme and was forced to exit the market this year.

As I have pointed out before, the District Court's decision finding Qualcomm violated the antitrust laws comes on the heels of governmental entities around the globe reaching the same conclusion. As a result of its anticompetitive practices, Qualcomm has been fined nearly $1 billion in China, $850 million in Korea, $1.2 billion by the European Commission and $773 million in Taiwan (later reduced in settlement). The FTC, however, did not seek monetary relief. Instead, it sought injunctive relief to prevent Qualcomm from continuing to engage in its unlawful conduct.

Among other things, the District Court prohibited Qualcomm from continuing to implement the central component of its scheme, its coercive 'no license, no chips' (NLNC) policy. Under the policy, Qualcomm cuts off handset OEMs' purchases of modem chips unless they enter into a patent license agreement on Qualcomm's terms. These onerous, one-sided terms enable Qualcomm to artificially lower the price of its modems while simultaneously inflating customers' costs of using modem chips manufactured by competitors, like Intel, by charging royalties as large as the price of the modems themselves. The District Court concluded that the NLNC policy, together with other anticompetitive behavior on Qualcomm's part, unlawfully distorted and, in fact, destroyed the competitive playing field.

The world benefits from fair competition in the wireless technology market. Given the importance of wireless technology to the future of connected computing, including the revolutionary promise of 5G, we strongly support the efforts of the FTC and other law enforcement agencies to require Qualcomm to obey the laws and compete on a level playing field. We hope our amicus brief will help in clarifying the full extent of the harm that Qualcomm's unlawful behavior has caused and will continue to cause if left unchecked. If you are interested in learning more, read a copy of the District Court's decision and a copy of Intel's amicus brief.

Steven R. Rodgers is executive vice president and general counsel at Intel Corporation.

Disclaimer

Intel Corporation published this content on 29 November 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 29 November 2019 15:22:06 UTC


ę Publicnow 2019
All news about INTEL CORPORATION
12:48aNvidia's closing of $40 bln Arm deal could hinge on Europe
RE
06/15INTELá : Recommends Stockholders Reject ‘Mini-Tender Offer' by Tutanota LL..
PU
06/15INTELá : Unveils Infrastructure Processing Unit
AQ
06/14INTEL - 2021 INVENTOR OF THE YEAR : 'There is No Limit'
AQ
06/11INTEL CORPá : Receives a Sell rating from Bernstein
MD
06/11Tech Companies Tell SEC They Support Regular Reporting on Climate Issues
DJ
06/10Intel debates buyout of SiFive to bolster chip technology against Arm -source
RE
06/10MARKET CHATTER : Intel Reportedly Offers to Acquire Startup SiFive for More Than..
MT
06/10STREET COLOR : Intel Reportedly Offered More Than $2 Bln for SiFive
MT
06/09FROM IPHONES TO IPADS : The Apple Gadgets You Should -- and Shouldn't -- Buy Rig..
DJ
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 72 796 M - -
Net income 2021 16 606 M - -
Net Debt 2021 14 291 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 14,2x
Yield 2021 2,39%
Capitalization 234 B 234 B -
EV / Sales 2021 3,41x
EV / Sales 2022 3,39x
Nbr of Employees 110 600
Free-Float 99,9%
Chart INTEL CORPORATION
Duration : Period :
Intel Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends INTEL CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 48
Average target price 65,59 $
Last Close Price 57,99 $
Spread / Highest target 55,2%
Spread / Average Target 13,1%
Spread / Lowest Target -31,0%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
Patrick P. Gelsinger Chief Executive Officer & Director
George S. Davis Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Omar S. Ishrak Independent Chairman
Daniel J. McKeon Vice President-Information Technology Group
Ann B. Kelleher Senior Vice President & GM-Technology Development
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
INTEL CORPORATION16.80%234 164
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED14.91%563 704
NVIDIA CORPORATION36.26%449 027
BROADCOM INC.8.67%195 214
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS14.92%175 710
QUALCOMM, INC.-9.87%154 886