IROBOT CORPORATION

(IRBT)
  Report
Delayed Nasdaq  -  05/19 04:00:01 pm EDT
46.71 USD   -1.12%
05/06JPMorgan Downgrades IRobot to Underweight From Neutral, Adjusts Price Target to $45 From $65
MT
05/05IROBOT CORP Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (form 10-Q)
AQ
05/05TRANSCRIPT : IRobot Corporation, Q1 2022 Earnings Call, May 05, 2022
CI
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Fintiv Factors 2 And 4 Save Petitioner's Request For Rehearing

12/22/2021 | 04:32am EDT

In SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corp., No. IPR2021-00544, Paper 13 (PTAB Nov. 17, 2021), the PTAB granted the petitioner's Request for Rehearing and Institution of Inter Partes Review ("IPR").

The Board initially denied institution based on an analysis of the Fintiv factors.1  In its Request for Rehearing, the petitioner argued that the Board abused its discretion in denying institution.  The petitioner's arguments centered on two of the four Fintiv factors: factor 2 ("proximity of the court's trial date to the Board's projected statutory deadline for a final written decision") and factor 4 ("overlap between issues raised in the petition and in the parallel proceeding").

In its initial Decision Denying Institution, the Board determined that Fintiv factor 2 weighed "in favor of exercising our discretion to deny institution" based on a parallel U.S. International Trade Commission investigation.  SharkNinja, IPR2021-00544, Paper 13.  In its Request for Rehearing, the petitioner argued that the Board mistakenly treated the ITC's initial determination date as the final determination date and, consequentially, overlooked the target date for final determination.  Agreeing with the petitioner, the Board found that Fintiv factor 2 was neutral because of the close proximity between the ITC's target date and the expected final written decision.

  In its initial Decision Denying Institution, the Board determined that Fintiv factor 4 weighed "marginally in favor of not exercising discretion to deny institution."  SharkNinja, IPR2021-00544, Paper 13.  In its Request for Rehearing, the petitioner agreed to a broad stipulation of IPR estoppel.  As a result, the PTAB found that Fintiv factor 4 "weigh[ed] strongly in favor of not exercising [its] discretion to deny institution," since the petitioner's stipulation removed the concern of duplicative efforts between the three proceedings. Id. at 12.  The Board further noted that the stipulation promoted efficiency and would avoid conflicting decisions.

Concluding that the change in the Fintiv factor analysis justified rehearing and reconsideration of its previous decision, the Board considered the merits of the petition.  Ultimately, the Board determined that the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of establishing claim 1 of the challenged patent was obvious in light of the prior art and granted institution.

Footnote

1 Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (Mar. 20, 2020) (precedential) ("Fintiv").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Troy Viger
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20001-4413
UNITED STATES
Tel: 2024084000
Fax: 2024084400
E-mail: info@finnegan.com
URL: www.finnegan.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about IROBOT CORPORATION
05/06JPMorgan Downgrades IRobot to Underweight From Neutral, Adjusts Price Target to $45 Fro..
MT
05/05IROBOT CORP Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of..
AQ
05/05TRANSCRIPT : IRobot Corporation, Q1 2022 Earnings Call, May 05, 2022
CI
05/04IRobot Corporation Reports Earnings Results for the First Quarter Ended April 02, 2022
CI
05/04IROBOT : Q1 Earnings Snapshot
AQ
05/04IRobot Swings to Q1 Loss, Revenue Drops; Issues Lowered 2022 Guidance
MT
05/04Earnings Flash (IRBT) IROBOT CORPORATION Reports Q1 Revenue $292M, vs. Street Est of $3..
MT
05/04Earnings Flash (IRBT) IROBOT CORPORATION Posts Q1 Loss $-0.66, vs. Street Est of $-1.35
MT
05/04IRobot Corporation Provides Earnings Guidance for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2..
CI
05/04EARNINGS REACTION HISTORY : iRobot Corporation, 45.5% Follow-Through Indicator, 9.1% Sensi..
MT
More news
Analyst Recommendations on IROBOT CORPORATION
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2022 1 676 M - -
Net income 2022 -0,30 M - -
Net cash 2022 184 M - -
P/E ratio 2022 -2 916x
Yield 2022 -
Capitalization 1 281 M 1 281 M -
EV / Sales 2022 0,65x
EV / Sales 2023 0,57x
Nbr of Employees 1 415
Free-Float 98,1%
Chart IROBOT CORPORATION
Duration : Period :
iRobot Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends IROBOT CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 6
Last Close Price 46,71 $
Average target price 61,25 $
Spread / Average Target 31,1%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Colin M. Angle Director
Julie Zeiler Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Chris Jones Chief Technology Officer
Faris Habbaba Chief Research & Development Officer & EVP
Deborah G. Ellinger Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
IROBOT CORPORATION-28.29%1 281
ZHE JIANG DALI TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD-40.78%1 031
AEYE, INC.12.19%854
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.-54.03%588
TOBII AB (PUBL)-41.23%230
ACSL LTD.-10.06%181