Log in
Show password
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. Ireland
  4. Irish Stock Exchange
  5. Kingspan Group plc
  6. News
  7. Summary
    KRX   IE0004927939


SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Kingspan : Why we need to consider buildings as part of the global energy system

10/20/2021 | 02:41am EST

First the good news. Buildings are becoming more energy efficient. Average energy use per m2 has reduced by an impressive 25 per cent in the last 20 years1. Now the bad news. In that same period, total constructed space worldwide has increased by an astonishing 65 per cent, reaching 245 billion m2 2.
In fact, the global built environment has been growing at such a rapid pace that if every storey of every building were to sit on its own plot of land, it would now occupy space equivalent to the entire United Kingdom.
The energy efficiency gains we have seen in the past two decades are to be celebrated. They have been achieved primarily through more thermally efficient building materials and techniques and wider enforcement of building codes.

But efficiency improvements are simply not keeping pace with growth - nowhere near - and that's a big problem. During their operational phase buildings account for around 28 per cent of total carbon dioxide emissions3.
Ensuring that future construction complies with the highest standards of thermal efficiency is, of course, vital, but that alone will not deliver the improvements required to meet climate goals.
In developed economies, for example, eighty per cent of the buildings that will be standing in 2050 have already been built4, meaning that policymakers have to get to grips with the challenge of making the existing global building stock fit for the future.
Improving energy efficiency - for example by meeting Passivhaus standards - will be crucial if we are to avoid locking in energy demand and emissions over the longer term.
Unfortunately, progress has been slowing with energy use per m2 decreasing by only 0.5-1% per annum since 2010, while direct emissions from buildings grew 5% between 2010 and 20195.
We are demanding more and more from our buildings' energy systems; heating space and water and powering countless appliances and devices. And as heatwaves become more frequent and intense, the demand for air conditioning grows.
It's true that the carbon intensity of buildings will decline as the global energy system transitions to renewables, but we cannot sit around for decades waiting for that process to complete. In any case, transferring the job of heating space and water from fossil fuels to the grid without also addressing energy efficiency would place a heavy burden on the system and incur significant cost to boot.
Electricity consumption in buildings already represents around 55% of global electricity consumption6, and the transition of other sectors such as transport to electrification will place further strain on the system.
It is clear that the transition to renewable energy must go hand in hand with improving the energy efficiency of the global building stock. Together, energy transition and energy efficiency can deliver a 90% reduction in world's energy-related carbon emissions7.
The solution is simple to articulate, but hard to implement. There needs to be a concerted global effort to retrofit mature buildings.
According to the IEA, average annual energy retrofit rates in buildings are currently less than one per cent in most major markets8, which is well below the level required to achieve sustainability objectives. Annual renovation rates globally need to reach four per cent by 2050 to decarbonise the existing building stock9.
Retrofits are most effective at reducing demand and emissions when improvements are made to the building envelope, for example, adding insulation and improving glazing. Other measures include a shift to heat pumps or heat solutions based on renewable resources, and digital energy management, though it should be noted that without high levels of thermal performance these measures will be not be efficient.
This type of deep retrofit is disruptive, and the payback can take years. But the prize is big. According to one recent paper10 a fully integrated system retrofit can deliver energy savings of 84 per cent.
Innovative solutions have an important role to play in minimising the disruption of retrofit. Interesting examples are beginning to emerge, for example overcladding systems which have been manufactured offsite being used for housing development retrofits. Advanced insulation materials can also minimise disruption in certain instances, as their thinner profile can be used without requiring major structural rework.
Unfortunately, energy efficiency investment has been stagnant in recent years and it is expected to show a decrease due to the pandemic11. If investment does not keep pace with construction activity the overall efficiency of the global building stock may not be sufficient to meet the Paris goals by 2050.
A number of policy, financial and behaviour change levers are needed to deliver the renovation rate needed to reduce energy demand and help meet our carbon targets. These include tighter regulations for energy efficiency; stronger retrofit standards; training and upskilling the workforce; a financial sector willing to lend for energy efficiency projects; energy prices for renewables set within a level playing field; and supportive legal, financial and business environments.
Grants for building improvements are available in many markets, but these tend to be ad hoc, small-scale and carry significant risks, with insufficient attention paid to the choice of materials and workmanship.
A much more ambitious and coherent approach is required if we are to make our homes, public buildings and workplaces fit for the future. We need ambitious minimum energy performance standards for both new build and renovations, improvements to energy performance certification, and financial incentives and technical assistance for larger projects.
Improving the thermal efficiency of building stock also has the potential to contribute to solving fuel poverty, a problem that will accelerate without intervention12.
Most importantly, buildings must be recognised as an integral part of the global energy system and central to an economically viable decarbonised future.


Kingspan Group plc published this content on 20 October 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 20 October 2021 06:40:07 UTC.

© Publicnow 2021
12/02Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team announces Kingspan as Official Team Partner
11/29Jefferies Upgrades Kingspan To Buy From Hold, Lifts PT
11/16KINGSPAN : announces five-year global partnership with humanitarian aid agency GOAL
11/12Lithium Forklifts Raise Kingspan Insulation Site Towards Energy Target
11/09Kingspan Group launches ambitious charitable programme
11/09Kingspan Trading Update November 2021
11/08FTSE 100 Index Closes Slightly Lower
11/08GLOBAL MARKETS LIVE : Qiagen, Alcon, Boeing, Berkshire Hathaway...
11/08FTSE Edges Lower, Economy Seen Facing Hit From Covid-19, Brexit
11/08PETER COWGILL : FTSE Flat as Energy Shares Rise, Banks Fall
More news
Analyst Recommendations on KINGSPAN GROUP PLC
More recommendations
Sales 2021 6 399 M 7 199 M 7 199 M
Net income 2021 557 M 627 M 627 M
Net Debt 2021 542 M 610 M 610 M
P/E ratio 2021 32,5x
Yield 2021 0,46%
Capitalization 18 199 M 20 457 M 20 474 M
EV / Sales 2021 2,93x
EV / Sales 2022 2,68x
Nbr of Employees 15 500
Free-Float 82,8%
Duration : Period :
Kingspan Group plc Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends KINGSPAN GROUP PLC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 15
Last Close Price 100,35 €
Average target price 107,77 €
Spread / Average Target 7,39%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Gene M. Murtagh Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director
Geoffrey P. Doherty Chief Financial Officer & Executive Director
Jost A. Massenberg Non-Executive Chairman
Linda Hickey Senior Independent Non-Executive Director
John Cronin Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors