OVERVIEW
Net income in the first nine months of 2020 was$59.7 million , down 7.9% from$64.8 million for the comparable period of 2019. Diluted income per common share was$2.33 in the first nine months of 2020, down 7.5% from$2.52 in the comparable period of 2019. The decrease was primarily due to the Company recording a provision for loan losses of$13.9 million for the first nine months of 2020, an increase of$10.9 million , or 364.0%, compared to$3.0 million for the first nine months of 2019. The higher provision in 2020 was driven by the estimated potential negative impact to the Company's borrowers as a result of the economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, which was calculated using the incurred loss model. The provision expense for 2020 was partially offset by a$2.1 million increase in net interest income, a$1.2 million increase in noninterest income and a$1.0 million decrease in noninterest expense, in each case compared to the corresponding period for 2019. Pretax pre-provision earnings in the first nine months of 2020 were$87.1 million , an increase of$4.3 million , or 5.2%, compared to$82.7 million for the comparable period of 2019. Pretax pre-provision earnings is a non-GAAP measure calculated by adding net interest income to noninterest income and subtracting noninterest expense. Annualized return on average total equity was 12.96% in the first nine months of 2020 versus 15.68% in the comparable period of 2019. Annualized return on average total assets was 1.50% in the first nine months of 2020 versus 1.76% in the comparable period of 2019. The average equity to average assets ratio was 11.59% in the first nine months of 2020 versus 11.22% in the comparable period of 2019. Net income in the third quarter of 2020 was$22.8 million , an increase of$1.3 million , or 6.2% from$21.5 million for the comparable period of 2019. Diluted income per common share was$0.89 in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of$0.06 , or 7.2%, from$0.83 in the comparable period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of$2.4 million , or 21.8%, in noninterest income for the third quarter of 2020 versus the comparable period of 2019. Pretax pre-provision earnings in the third quarter of 2020 were$29.9 million , an increase of$2.3 million , or 8.5%, compared to$27.6 million for the comparable period of 2019. Annualized return on average total equity was 14.36% in the third quarter of 2020 versus 14.78% in the comparable period of 2019. Annualized return on average total assets was 1.64% in the third quarter of 2020 versus 1.72% in the comparable period of 2019. The average equity to average assets ratio was 11.43% in the third quarter of 2020 versus 11.65% in the comparable period of 2019. Total assets were$5.551 billion as ofSeptember 30, 2020 versus$4.947 billion as ofDecember 31, 2019 , an increase of$604.4 million , or 12.2%. This increase was primarily due to a$524.1 million increase in gross loans, offset by an increase in the allowance for loan losses of$10.1 million . In addition, this increase was driven by$35.8 million of growth in securities available-for-sale, a$29.7 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a$15.2 million increase in other assets, driven by higher valuations on the Company's back-to-back interest rate swap portfolio. Loan growth was driven by Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans originated primarily during the second quarter of 2020. The outstanding balance of PPP loans atSeptember 30, 2020 , was$557.9 million . Loans excluding PPP loans decreased by$33.8 million from$4.07 billion atDecember 31, 2019 to$4.03 billion atSeptember 30, 2020 . The Paycheck Protection Program has strengthened the company's borrowers' balance sheets and improved their operating performance. It has further provided a valuable cash injection for all clients who participated in the program. Yet, it has contributed to a reduction in usage of available credit facilities by clients, which decreased to 41% atSeptember 30, 2020 from 46% atDecember 31, 2019 . Balance sheet growth was primarily funded through growth in deposits during 2020, which was driven by the deposit of PPP loan proceeds into borrower accounts and government stimulus payments into individual accounts. Deposits increased$634.1 million while total borrowings decreased by$84.5 million sinceDecember 31, 2019 . Total equity increased by$38.7 million due primarily to net income of$59.7 million , an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of$13.2 million , offset by share repurchases of$10.0 million and dividends declared and paid of$0.90 per share totaling$23.0 million . 37
Table of Contents
Impact of COVID-19. The progression of the COVID-19 pandemic inthe United States has had an impact on our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and nine month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 , and may have a complex and significant adverse impact on the economy, the banking industry and our Company in future fiscal periods, all subject to a high degree of uncertainty. As a result of the pandemic, our financial condition, capital levels and results of operations have been and could continue to be significantly adversely affected, as described in further detail below. During the second quarter,Lake City Bank focused on its response to the crisis for its employees and its customers. The Bank closed branch lobbies onMarch 21, 2020 and directed its clients and communities to its drive-up facilities and by-appointment visits in addition to digital channels via online and mobile banking. The Bank created aBranch Reopening Task Force , which established guidelines under which the bank could safely open its offices. OnJune 15, 2020 , the Bank reopened all of its branch lobbies. During the third quarter most of all Company employees returned to the workplace in aLake City Bank facility. The Company invested in personal protective equipment, installed protective barriers and enhanced social distancing measures in order to prioritize the safety of bank customers and employees. These investments have totaled approximately$500,000 since the pandemic began. The Company will keep all safety protocols in place until it determines that the public health risks posed by COVID-19 no longer require them.
Active Management of Credit Risk
The Company'sCommercial Banking and Credit Administration leadership continues to review and refine the list of industries that the Company believes are most likely to be materially impacted by the potential economic impact resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The current assessment includes a smaller group of industries as compared to the initial list of potentially affected industries disclosed in the company'sApril 27, 2020 first quarter andJuly 27, 2020 second quarter press releases. The Company's current list of industries under review represents approximately 5.7%, or$228 million , of the total loan portfolio as ofSeptember 30, 2020 , versus$765 million , or 18.7%, as ofApril 27, 2020 and$261 million , or 6.6% as ofJuly 27, 2020 , in each case excluding PPP loans. The following industries are included in the 5.7% along with their respective percentage of the loan portfolio: hotel and accommodations - 2.5%, dairy - 1.1%, education - 0.9% entertainment and recreation - 0.8% and full-service restaurants - 0.4%. The Company has no direct exposure to oil and gas and limited exposure to retail shopping centers. The Company's commercial loan portfolio is highly diversified, and no industry sector represents more than 8% of the Bank's loan portfolio as ofSeptember 30, 2020 . Agri-business and agricultural loans represented the highest specific industry concentration at 8% of total loans. The Company'sCommercial Banking and Credit Administration teams continue to actively work with customers to understand their business challenges and credit needs during this time.
COVID-19 Related Loan Deferrals
As detailed below, loan deferrals peaked onJune 17, 2020 , at$737 million , which represented 16% of the total loan portfolio. As ofOctober 21, 2020 , total deferrals attributable to COVID-19 were$110 million , representing 63 borrowers, or 2% of the total loan portfolio. Total deferrals as ofOctober 21, 2020 represented a decline in deferral balances of 85% from the peak levels. Of the$110 million , 37 borrowers were commercial loan borrowers representing$107 million in loans, or 3% of total commercial loans and 26 borrowers were retail loan borrowers representing$3 million , or 1% of total retail loans. All COVID-19 related loan deferrals remain on accrual status, as each deferral is evaluated individually, and management has determined that all contractual cashflows are collectable at this time. As ofOctober 21, 2020 , 38 borrowers with loans outstanding of$70 million were in their second deferral period, most of which were additional 90 day deferrals. Additionally, 17 borrowers with loans outstanding of$32 million were in their third deferral period. Four borrowers represented 87% of the third deferral population and were commercial real estate nonowner occupied loans supported by adequate collateral and personal guarantors and consist of loans to the hotel and accommodation industry. 38 Table of Contents The Company's retail loan portfolio is comprised of 1-4 family mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and other direct and indirect installment loans. A third-party vendor manages the Company's retail and commercial credit card program and the Company does not have any balance sheet exposure with respect to this program except for nominal recourse on limited commercial card accounts. Total Loan Deferrals Peak % change June 17, 2020 June 30, 2020 September 30, 2020 October 21, 2020 from Peak Borrowers 487 384 102 63 (87) % Amount (In millions) $ 737 $ 653 $ 158 $ 110 (85) % % of Total Loan Portfolio 16 % 15 % 3 % 2 % NA Total Commercial Loans Deferrals Peak % change June 17, 2020 June 30,
2020
351 322 71 37 (89) % Amount (In millions) $ 730 $ 647 $ 155 $ 107 (85) % % of Commercial Loan Portfolio 18 %
16 % 4 3 % NA Total Retail Loan Deferrals Peak % change June 17, 2020 June 30, 2020 September 30, 2020 October 21, 2020 from Peak Borrowers 136 62 31 26 (81) % Amount (In millions) $ 7 $ 6 $ 3 $ 3 (57) % % of Retail Loan Portfolio 2 % 1 % 1 1 % NA Liquidity Preparedness Throughout the COVID-19 crisis, the Company has monitored liquidity preparedness. Critical to this effort has been the monitoring of commercial and retail borrowers' line of credit utilization. The Company's commercial and retail line of credit utilization at bothSeptember 30, 2020 andJune 30, 2020 was 41% versus 48% atMarch 31, 2020 and 46% atDecember 31, 2019 . The Company has a long-standing liquidity plan in place that ensures there are appropriate liquidity resources available to fund the balance sheet.
The Paycheck Protection Program
During the third quarter, the Company continued to fund PPP loans for its customers. In addition, the Bank has engaged a third-party Fintech technology partner to assist the Bank and its customers to automate the forgiveness application process. The software solution provides tools to facilitate communications with borrowers, gathering of information securely, calculation of forgiveness amounts and electronic transmission to the SBA for approval. The Company is utilizing a phased approach for the forgiveness application process and has begun to process forgiveness applications for borrowers. As ofOctober 21, 2020 ,Lake City Bank has 2,409 PPP loans outstanding representing$561.8 million in loan balances. Most of the PPP loans are for existing customers and 51% of the number of PPP loans are for amounts less than$50,000 . As ofOctober 21, 2020 , the Bank submitted 36 loan forgiveness applications to the SBA in the amount of$51 million , which represented 9% of total PPP loans outstanding. The SBA has not yet approved any of the Bank's forgiveness applications.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of the Company's accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Some of the facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and the valuation and other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities. 39 Table of Contents Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the principal is uncollectable. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocations of the allowance are made for specific loans and for pools of similar types of loans, although the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged against the allowance. A provision for loan losses is taken based on management's ongoing evaluation of the appropriate allowance balance. A formal evaluation of the adequacy of the loan loss allowance is conducted monthly. The ultimate recovery of all loans is susceptible to future market factors beyond the Company's control. The level of loan loss provision is influenced by growth in the overall loan portfolio, emerging market risk, emerging concentration risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity, general economic conditions and historical loss analysis. In addition, management gives consideration to changes in the allocation for specific watch list credits in determining the appropriate level of the loan loss provision. Furthermore, management's overall view on credit quality is a factor in the determination of the provision. The determination of the appropriate allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires significant estimates by management. The Company has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that generally includes consideration of the following factors: changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers' ability to repay. Consideration is not limited to these factors although they represent the most commonly cited factors. With respect to specific allocation levels for individual credits, management considers the current valuation of collateral and the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows as the primary measures. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon an ongoing review of those credits. With respect to pools of similar loans, allocations are assigned based upon historical experience subject to a floor, unless the rate of loss is expected to be greater than historical losses as noted below. A detailed analysis is performed on loans that are classified but determined not to be impaired which incorporates different scenarios where the risk that the borrower will be unable or unwilling to repay its debt in full or on time is combined with an estimate of loss in the event the borrower cannot pay to develop non-specific allocations for such loan pools. These allocations may be adjusted based on the other factors cited above. An appropriate level of general allowance for pooled loans is determined by portfolio segment using historical loss percentages subject to a floor, supplemented with other environmental factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These factors include consideration of the following: levels of, and trends in, delinquencies and impaired loans; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedure, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations. It is also possible that the following could affect the overall process: social, political, economic and terrorist events or activities. All of these factors are susceptible to change, which may be significant. As a result of this detailed process, the allowance results in two forms of allocations, specific and general. These two components represent the total allowance for loan losses deemed adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Commercial loans are subject to a dual standardized grading process administered by the credit administration function. These grade assignments are performed independent of each other and a consensus is reached by credit administration and the loan review officer. Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to an individual credit that indicate the loan is impaired. Considerations with respect to specific allocations for these individual credits include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) does the customer's cash flow or net worth appear insufficient to repay the loan; (b) is there adequate collateral to repay the loan; (c) has the loan been criticized in a regulatory examination; (d) is the loan impaired; (e) are there other reasons where the ultimate collectability of the loan is in question; or (f) are there unique loan characteristics that require special monitoring. Allocations are also applied to categories of loans considered not to be individually impaired, but for which the rate of loss is expected to be consistent with or greater than historical averages. Such allocations are based on past loss experience and information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values. In addition, general allocations are made for other pools of loans, including non-classified loans. These general pooled loan allocations are performed for portfolio segments of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and multi-family, agri-business and agricultural, other commercial, consumer 1-4 family mortgage and other consumer loans, and loans within certain industry categories believed to present unique risk of loss. General allocations of the allowance are primarily made based on a three-year historical average for loan losses for these portfolios, subject to a floor, and are adjusted for economic factors and portfolio trends. 40
Table of Contents
Due to the imprecise nature of estimating the allowance for loan losses, the Company's allowance for loan losses includes an unallocated component. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses incorporates the Company's judgmental determination of inherent losses that may not be fully reflected in other allocations, including factors such as the level of classified credits, economic uncertainties, industry trends impacting specific portfolio segments, broad portfolio quality trends and trends in the composition of the Company's large commercial loan portfolio and related large dollar exposures to individual borrowers.
Valuation and Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of
The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined on a recurring basis by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or pricing models, which utilize significant observable inputs such as matrix pricing. This is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Different judgments and assumptions used in pricing could result in different estimates of value. The fair value of certain securities is determined using unobservable inputs, primarily observable inputs of similar securities. At the end of each reporting period, securities held in the investment portfolio are evaluated on an individual security level for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with current accounting guidance. Impairment is other-than-temporary if the decline in the fair value of the security is below its amortized cost and it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a debt security will not be received. Significant judgments are required in determining impairment, which includes making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and the change in interest rates.
We consider the following factors when determining other-than-temporary impairment for a security or investment:
? the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than
amortized cost;
? the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
? the underlying fundamentals of the relevant market and the outlook for such
market for the near future; and
? our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to
allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
The assessment of whether a decline exists that is other-than-temporary, involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time. If, in management's judgment, other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the security will be written down to the computed net present value, and the unrealized loss will be transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income as an immediate reduction of current earnings (as if the loss had been realized in the period of other-than-temporary impairment). 41 Table of Contents RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview
Selected income statement information for the three months and nine months ended
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 2020 2019 Income Statement Summary: Net interest income $ 39,913 $
39,545
1,750 1,000 13,850 2,985 Noninterest income 13,115 10,765 35,061 33,878 Noninterest expense 23,125 22,737 66,293 67,302 Other Data: Efficiency ratio (1) 43.61 % 45.19 % 43.23 % 44.86 % Dilutive EPS $ 0.89 $ 0.83 $ 2.33 $ 2.52
Tangible capital ratio (2) 11.41 % 11.74 % 11.41 % 11.74 % Net charge-offs to average loans 0.00 % 0.09 % 0.12 % 0.03 % Net interest margin 3.05 % 3.38 % 3.16 % 3.40 % Net interest margin excluding PPP loans (3) 3.17 % 3.38 % 3.22 % 3.40 % Noninterest income to total revenue 24.73 % 21.40 % 22.86 % 22.58 % Pretax Pre-Provision Earnings (4) $ 29,903 $ 27,573 $ 87,063 82,741
(1) Noninterest expense/Net interest income plus Noninterest income.
Non-GAAP financial measure. The Company believes that providing non-GAAP
financial measures provides investors with information useful to
understanding the company's financial performance. Additionally, these (2) non-GAAP measures are used by management for planning and forecasting
purposes, including measures based on "tangible common equity" which is
"total equity" excluding intangible assets, net of deferred tax, and
"tangible assets" which is "total assets" excluding intangible assets, net of
deferred tax . See reconciliation on the next page.
Non-GAAP financial measure. Calculated by subtracting the impact PPP loans
had on average earnings assets, loan interest income, average interest
bearing liabilities, and interest expense. Management believes this is an
important measure because it provide for better comparability to prior (3) periods, given the low fixed interest rate of 1.0% and because the accretion
of net loan fee income can be accelerated upon borrower forgiveness and
repayment by the SBA, management is actively monitoring net interest margin
on a fully tax equivalent basis with and without PPP loan impact for the
duration of this program. See reconciliation on the next page.
Non-GAAP financial measure. Pretax pre-provision earnings is calculated by
adding net interest income to noninterest income and subtracting noninterest (4) expense. Management believes this is an important measure because it may
enable investors to identify the trends in the Company's earnings exclusive
of the effects of tax and provision expense, which may vary significantly
from period to period. See reconciliation on the next page. 42 Table of Contents A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures is provided below (in thousands, except for per share data). Three Months EndedSeptember 30 , Nine Months EndedSeptember 30 ,
(dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 2020 2019 Total Equity $ 636,839 $ 584,436$ 636,839 $ 584,436 Less: Goodwill (4,970) (4,970) (4,970) (4,970)
Plus: Deferred tax assets related to goodwill 1,176
1,191 1,176 1,191 Tangible Common Equity 633,045 580,657 633,045 580,657 Total Assets$ 5,551,108 $ 4,948,155 $ 5,551,108 $ 4,948,155 Less: Goodwill (4,970) (4,970) (4,970) (4,970)
Plus: Deferred tax assets related to goodwill 1,176 1,191 1,176 1,191 Tangible Assets 5,547,314 4,944,376 5,547,314 4,944,376 Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets 11.41 %
11.74 % 11.41 % 11.74 % Net Interest Income $ 39,913 $ 39,545$ 118,295 $ 116,165 Noninterest Income 13,115 10,765 35,061 33,878 Noninterest Expense (23,125) (22,737) (66,293) (67,302)
Pretax Pre-Provision Earnings $ 29,903
$ 27,573 $ 87,063 $ 82,741
Impact of Paycheck Protection Program on Net Interest Margin FTE
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Sep. 30, Sep. 30, Sep. 30, Sep. 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019
Total Average Earnings Assets$ 5,282,569 $ 4,698,937 $ 5,078,509 $ 4,625,820 Less: Average Balance of PPP Loans 557,290 0 339,149 0 Total Adjusted Earning Assets 4,725,279 4,698,937
4,739,360 4,625,820 Total Interest Income FTE$ 46,589 $ 55,308 $ 145,045 $ 164,449 Less: PPP Loan Income (3,294) 0 (6,323) 0
Total Adjusted Interest Income FTE 43,295 55,308
138,722 164,449
Adjusted Earning Asset Yield, net of PPP Impact 3.65 % 4.67 %
3.91 % 4.75 %
Total Average Interest Bearing Liabilities$ 3,433,326 $ 3,356,436 $ 3,393,274 $ 3,408,766 Less: Average Balance of PPP Loans 557,290 0 339,149 0 Total Adjusted Interest Bearing Liabilities 3,990,616 3,356,436 3,732,423 3,408,766 Total Interest Expense FTE$ 6,066 $ 15,224 $ 24,954 $ 46,733 Less: PPP Cost of Funds (350) 0 (630) 0
Total Adjusted Interest Expense FTE 5,716 15,224
24,324 46,733
Adjusted Cost of Funds, net of PPP Impact 0.48 % 1.29 %
0.69 % 1.35 %
Net Interest Margin FTE, net of PPP Impact 3.17 % 3.38 % 3.22 % 3.40 % 43 Table of Contents Net Income Net income was$59.7 million in the first nine months of 2020, a decrease of$5.1 million , or 7.9%, versus net income of$64.8 million in the first nine months of 2019. The decrease was primarily due to the Company recording a provision for loan losses of$13.9 million for the first nine months of 2020, an increase of$10.9 million , or 364.0%, compared to$3.0 million for the first nine months of 2019. The higher provision in 2020 was driven by the estimated potential negative impact to the Company's borrowers as a result of the economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, which was calculated using the incurred loss model. The provision expense for 2020 was partially offset by a$2.1 million increase in net interest income, a$1.2 million increase in noninterest income and a$1.0 million decrease in noninterest expense, in each case compared to the corresponding period for 2019. Net income was$22.8 million in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of$1.3 million , or 6.2%, versus net income of$21.5 million in the third quarter of 2019. The increase was primarily due to a$2.4 million increase in noninterest income as well as a$368,000 increase in net interest income. These increases were partially offset by increases of$750,000 in the provision for loan losses, a$388,000 increase in noninterest expense and a$258,000 increase in income tax expense. We anticipate that our net income for future fiscal periods will continue to be impacted as a result of the economic developments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, while we are not yet able to measure the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on our borrowers, we anticipate provision expense may remain elevated as the economic impact of COVID-19 continues to negatively affect some borrowers, and such effects may not be addressed by any future governmental policy responses. During the third quarter, provision expense declined relative to the first and second quarter provision expense of 2020. This decline was a result of stable asset quality trends and the declining balances of COVID-19 loan deferrals. However, the economic impact of the pandemic continues to evolve and as a result we continue to monitor the impact to borrowers very closely. In addition, due to the asset-sensitive nature of the Company's balance sheet, declines in interest rates, including theFederal Reserve Bank's reductions to the target Federal Funds Rate in the first quarter of 2020, have caused a reduction in net interest margin in the second and third quarters of 2020. Net interest income in 2020 has been negatively impacted by the net interest margin compression, which has been offset by significant loan and deposit growth during the year. Loan and investment security yields have been negatively impacted by the decline in interest rates. Correspondingly, deposit rates have also declined, however, it is possible that loan and investment yield declines may not be fully offset by declines in cost of funds, resulting in potential further net interest margin compression in 2021. Net interest margin compression will further be impacted from the PPP loan program and the low fixed rate of 1.0% on these loans. Borrowers that meet the loan forgiveness requirements outlined in the SBA program will result in loan balance paydowns for the Bank and an acceleration in unamortized PPP net loan fee income accretion through the income statement. The timing and impact to net interest margin will be contingent on how quickly the PPP loans are submitted for forgiveness by borrowers and approved for forgiveness by the SBA. In addition, loans could be repaid by borrowers in lieu of forgiveness over the course of the next few years. The Company also anticipates that potential further federal stimulus payments to retail customers or additional PPP loan program availability may impact net utilization of fee-based financial services and impact net interest margin
further. 44 Table of Contents Net Interest Income The following table sets forth consolidated information regarding average balances and rates: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 2019 Average Interest Yield (1)/ Average Interest Yield (1)/ (fully tax equivalent basis, dollars in thousands) Balance Income Rate Balance Income Rate Earning Assets Loans: Taxable (2)(3)$ 4,339,274 $ 130,759 4.03 %$ 3,940,812 $ 149,094 5.06 % Tax exempt (1) 20,248 681 4.49 24,585 897 4.88 Investments: (1) Available-for-sale 625,887 13,313 2.84 601,098 13,501 3.00 Short-term investments 32,671 67 0.27 6,751 114 2.26 Interest bearing deposits 60,429 225 0.50 52,574 843 2.14 Total earning assets$ 5,078,509 $ 145,045 3.82 %$ 4,625,820 $ 164,449 4.75 % Less: Allowance for loan losses (57,111)
(49,829) Nonearning Assets Cash and due from banks 60,695 137,700 Premises and equipment 60,676 58,910 Other nonearning assets 172,187 155,795 Total assets$ 5,314,956 $ 4,928,396 Interest Bearing Liabilities Savings deposits$ 260,668 $ 162 0.08 %$ 241,322 $ 205 0.11 % Interest bearing checking accounts 1,796,270 7,683 0.57 1,636,757 20,242 1.65 Time deposits: In denominations under$100,000 268,485 3,569 1.78 276,283 3,914 1.89 In denominations over$100,000 969,362 12,910 1.78 1,142,633 19,770 2.31 Miscellaneous short-term borrowings 40,460 458 1.51 80,843 1,295 2.14 Long-term borrowings and subordinated debentures 58,029 172 0.40 30,928 1,307 5.65 Total interest bearing liabilities$ 3,393,274 $ 24,954 0.98 %$ 3,408,766 $ 46,733 1.83 % Noninterest Bearing Liabilities Demand deposits 1,252,112 923,253 Other liabilities 53,660 43,411 Stockholders' Equity 615,910 552,966 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$ 5,314,956
Interest Margin Recap Interest income/average earning assets 145,045 3.82 164,449 4.75 Interest expense/average earning assets 24,954 0.66 46,733 1.35 Net interest income and margin$ 120,091 3.16 %$ 117,716 3.40 %
Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 21
percent tax rate. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt
securities acquired after
interest expenses. Taxable equivalent basis adjustments were
respectively.
Loan fees are included as taxable loan interest income. Net loan fees
(2) attributable to PPP loans were
taxable loan interest income for the periods presented.
(3) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans.
45 Table of Contents Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 2019 Average Interest Yield (1)/ Average Interest Yield (1)/ (fully tax equivalent basis, dollars in thousands) Balance Income Rate Balance Income Rate Earning Assets Loans: Taxable (2)(3)$ 4,541,608 $ 42,056 3.68 %$ 3,991,572 $ 50,139 4.98 % Tax exempt (1) 15,204 130 3.40 24,201 292 4.78 Investments: (1) Available-for-sale 637,523 4,359 2.72 614,784 4,509 2.91 Short-term investments 8,865 3 0.13 3,478 16 1.83 Interest bearing deposits 79,369 41 0.21 64,902 352 2.15 Total earning assets$ 5,282,569 $ 46,589 3.51 %$ 4,698,937 $ 55,308 4.67 % Less: Allowance for loan losses (59,519)
(50,732) Nonearning Assets Cash and due from banks 61,656 77,921 Premises and equipment 60,554 59,268 Other nonearning assets 175,601 156,109 Total assets$ 5,520,861 $ 4,941,503 Interest Bearing Liabilities Savings deposits$ 282,456 $ 53 0.07 %$ 235,957 $ 62 0.10 %
Interest bearing checking accounts 1,827,061 1,405 0.31 1,667,690 6,712 1.60 Time deposits: In denominations under$100,000 254,315 982 1.54 278,598 1,383 1.97 In denominations over$100,000 972,436 3,501 1.43 1,124,393 6,535 2.31 Miscellaneous short-term borrowings 22,058 51 0.92 18,870 113 2.38 Long-term borrowings and subordinated debentures 75,000 74 0.39 30,928 419 5.37 Total interest bearing liabilities$ 3,433,326 $ 6,066 0.70 %$ 3,356,436 $ 15,224 1.80 % Noninterest Bearing Liabilities Demand deposits 1,401,403 961,070 Other liabilities 55,154 48,132 Stockholders' Equity 630,978 575,865 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$ 5,520,861
Interest Margin Recap Interest income/average earning assets 46,589 3.51 55,308 4.67 Interest expense/average earning assets 6,066 0.46 15,224 1.29 Net interest income and margin$ 40,523 3.05 %$ 40,084 3.38 %
Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 21
percent tax rate. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt
securities acquired after
interest expenses. Taxable equivalent basis adjustments were
$539,000 in the three-month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Loan fees are included as taxable loan interest income. Net loan fees
(2) attributable to PPP loans were
taxable loan interest income for the periods presented.
(3) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans.
46 Table of Contents Net interest income increased$2.1 million , or 1.8%, for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared with the first nine months of 2019. The increased level of net interest income during the first nine months of 2020 was largely driven by an increase in average earning assets of$452.7 million , due primarily to loan growth of$394.1 million and growth in investment securities of$24.8 million . Average loans outstanding increased to$4.360 billion during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to$3.965 billion during the same period of 2019, with most of the growth being in fixed rate PPP commercial loans. The average balance of PPP loans was$339.1 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 . The earning asset growth was funded through an increase in deposits. Average deposits increased$326.6 million to$4.547 billion during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 , compared to$4.220 billion for the same period of 2019. During this same period average core deposits increased$427.2 million and average brokered deposits decreased$100.6 million . We define "core deposits" as total deposits (including all deposits by municipalities and other government agencies), excluding brokered deposits. PPP loan proceeds to borrowers impacted the increase in deposits and core deposits during the nine-months endedSeptember 30, 2020 as loan proceeds were deposited into borrower checking and savings accounts at the Bank. Average borrowings decreased by$13.3 million to$98.5 million in the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 , compared to$111.8 million during the same period of 2019. The tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.16% for the first nine months of 2020 compared to 3.40% during the first nine months of 2019. The yield on earning assets totaled 3.82% during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to 4.75% in the same period of 2019. Cost of funds (expressed as a percentage of average earning assets) totaled 0.66% during the first nine months of 2020 compared to 1.35% in the same period of 2019. The lower margin in the first nine months of 2020 was due to lower yields on loans and securities, partially offset by a lower cost of funds, driven by theFederal Reserve decreasing the target Federal Funds Rate by 225 basis points since the second half of 2019, inclusive of twoFederal Reserve emergency cuts to the target Federal Funds Rate duringMarch 2020 . The two emergency cuts reduced the target Federal Funds Rate by 150 basis points and brought the target Federal Funds Rate back to the zero-bound range of 0% to 0.25%. Additionally, the Company's net interest margin was negatively impacted by six basis points during the first nine months of 2020 due to the lower yield on PPP loans, and net interest margin excluding PPP loans was 3.22% during the period. Net interest income increased by$368,000 , or 0.9%, for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared with the three months endedSeptember 30, 2019 . The increased level of net interest income during the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020 was caused by an increase in average earning assets offset by net interest margin compression. Average earning assets increased by$583.6 million for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared with the same period of 2019. Average loans outstanding increased$541.0 million during the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared with the same period of 2019, with most of the growth being in fixed rate PPP commercial loans. The average balance of PPP loans was$557.3 million for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020 and makes up a majority of the loan growth relative to the comparable periods. In addition, investment securities increased by$22.7 million . The earning asset growth was funded through deposit growth as well as an increase in borrowings. Average noninterest bearing demand deposits increased by$440.3 million while average interest bearing deposits increased by$29.6 million and average borrowings increased by$47.3 million . The tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.05% for the third quarter of 2020 compared to 3.38% during the third quarter of 2019. The yield on earning assets totaled 3.51% during the third quarter of 2020 compared to 4.67% in the same period of 2019, while the cost of funds (expressed as a percentage of average earning assets) totaled 0.46% during the third quarter of 2020 compared to 1.29% in the same period of 2019. Additionally, the Company's net interest margin was negatively impacted by 12 basis points during the third quarter of 2020 due to the lower yield on PPP loans, and net interest margin excluding PPP loans was 3.17% during the period and during the second quarter of 2020. Earning asset yields and cost of funds each declined by 11 basis points during the third quarter of 2020.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company elected to delay the adoption of FASB's new rule covering the Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") standard as permitted by the CARES Act. The Company expects to adopt CECL on the earlier of the termination of the national emergency declaration, orDecember 31, 2020 , whichever comes first, with an effective date ofJanuary 1, 2020 . 47
Table of Contents
Under the incurred loan loss methodology, the Company recorded provisions for loan loss expense of$13.9 million and$1.8 million in the nine month and three month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 , respectively, compared to a provisions of$3.0 million and$1.0 million during the comparable periods of 2019, respectively. Net charge-offs were$3.8 million and$22,000 in the nine month and three month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 , respectively, compared to net charge-offs of$810,000 and$936,000 during the comparable periods of 2019, respectively. The net charge off activity in 2020 was driven primarily by one commercial manufacturing borrower that was on nonaccrual status and had a loan loss reserve allocation of$4.2 million as ofDecember 31, 2019 . The$3.7 million charge-off was due to the restructuring of this relationship during the first quarter of 2020. The primary factor impacting management's decision to record a higher provision in the nine month and three month periods of 2020 was the potential negative impact to the Company's borrowers as a result of the economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of the Company's commercial loan customers have been forced to temporarily suspend or reduce operations and some of the Company's retail customers are currently without a paycheck, which impairs their abilities to make debt payments. As a result, the Company has granted loan deferrals to customers which peaked onJune 17, 2020 at$737 million or 16% of the loan portfolio. As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , COVID-19 loan deferrals have declined and represent 4% of commercial loans and 1% of retail loans. As ofOctober 21, 2020 , total deferrals attributable to COVID-19 were$110 million , representing 63 borrowers, or 2% of the total loan portfolio. Total deferrals as ofOctober 21, 2020 represented a decline in deferral balances of 85% from the peak levels. Of the$110 million , 37 borrowers were commercial loan borrowers representing$107 million in loans, or 3% of total commercial loans and 26 borrowers were retail loan borrowers representing$3 million , or 1% of total retail loans In accordance with provisions of the CARES Act as well as the interagency guidance, loan deferrals granted to our customers that have been made as a result of the impact of COVID-19 and who were not past due are not considered troubled debt restructurings and are therefore not included in the troubled debt restructurings totals as ofSeptember 30, 2020 . See "Note 4 - Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality." All COVID-19 related loan deferrals remain on accrual status, as each deferral is evaluated individually, and management has determined that all contractual cashflows are collectable at this time. Additional factors considered by management included key loan quality metrics, including reserve coverage of nonperforming loans and economic conditions in the Company's markets, and changes in the allocation for specific watch list credits. Management's overall view on current credit quality was also a factor in the determination of the provision for loan losses. The Company's management continues to monitor the adequacy of the provision based on loan levels, asset quality, economic conditions and other factors that may influence the assessment of the collectability of loans. 48 Table of Contents Noninterest Income
Noninterest income categories for the nine-month and three-month periods ended
Nine Months Ended September 30, Dollar Percent (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Change Wealth advisory fees$ 5,594 $ 5,002 $ 592 11.8 % Investment brokerage fees 1,148 1,300 (152) (11.7)
Service charges on deposit accounts 7,452 12,791 (5,339)
(41.7) Loan and service fees 7,470 7,403 67 0.9 Merchant card fee income 1,933 1,982 (49) (2.5) Bank owned life insurance 1,476 1,246 230 18.5 Interest rate swap fee income 4,105 847 3,258 384.7 Mortgage banking income 2,945 1,256 1,689 134.5 Net securities gains 363 94 269 286.2 Other income 2,575 1,957 618 31.6 Total noninterest income$ 35,061 $ 33,878 $ 1,183 3.5 % Noninterest income to total revenue 22.86 % 22.58 % Three Months Ended September 30, Dollar Percent (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Change Wealth advisory fees$ 1,930 $ 1,736 $ 194 11.2 % Investment brokerage fees 421 386 35 9.1
Service charges on deposit accounts 2,491 3,654 (1,163)
(31.8) Loan and service fees 2,637 2,518 119 4.7 Merchant card fee income 670 690 (20) (2.9) Bank owned life insurance 932 515 417 81.0 Interest rate swap fee income 2,143 77 2,066 2,683.1 Mortgage banking income 1,005 636 369 58.0 Net securities gains 314 6 308 5,133.3 Other income 572 547 25 4.6 Total noninterest income$ 13,115 $ 10,765 $ 2,350 21.8 % Noninterest income to total revenue 24.73 % 21.40 % The Company's noninterest income increased$1.2 million , or 3.5%, to$35.1 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to$33.9 million in the prior year period. Noninterest income was positively impacted by a$3.3 million increase, or 384.7% growth, in swap fee income generated from commercial lending transactions, a$1.7 million increase, or 134.5% growth, in mortgage banking income, and a$592,000 increase, or 11.8% growth, in wealth management fees over the corresponding prior year period. The credit valuation adjustments on interest rate swaps, which is included in other income, increased noninterest income by$1.2 million in the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to the corresponding prior year period. Noninterest income was negatively impacted by a$5.3 million , or 41.7%, decrease in service charges on deposit accounts. Service charges on deposit accounts for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2019 included$4.5 million of fees from a former commercial customer. 49
Table of Contents
The Company's noninterest income increased$2.4 million , or 21.8%, to$13.1 million for the third quarter of 2020 compared to$10.8 million for the third quarter of 2019. Noninterest income was positively impacted by a$2.1 million increase in interest rate swap fee income, a$369,000 increase, or 58.0% growth, in mortgage banking income and a$194,000 increase, or 11.2% growth, in wealth management fees over the prior year third quarter. Bank owned life insurance income increased$417,000 , or 81.0%, primarily due to a variable bank owned life insurance product that contains equity based investments. Net securities gains increased$308,000 due to repositioning of the available-for-sale securities portfolio. Offsetting these increases were decreases of$1.2 million , or 31.8%, in service charges on deposit accounts driven by lower treasury management fees and lower transaction-based fees. Overdraft fee income declined by$344,000 , or 36%, during the third quarter as compared to the prior year third quarter, which is included in service charges on deposit accounts. Future noninterest income may continue to be impacted due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the scope of any future governmental policy responses. For example, reduced economic activity may result in lower merchant card fee income and lower interchange revenue that is reported in services charges on deposits accounts and loan and service fees.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense categories for the nine-month and three-month periods ended
Nine Months Ended September 30, Dollar Percent (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Change Salaries and employee benefits$ 35,696 $ 36,539 $ (843) (2.3) % Net occupancy expense 4,336 4,000 336 8.4 Equipment costs 4,216 4,143 73 1.8 Data processing fees and supplies 8,736 7,619 1,117 14.7 Corporate and business development 2,324 3,376 (1,052) (31.2) FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees 1,224 566 658 116.3 Professional fees 3,506 3,487 19 0.5 Other expense 6,255 7,572 (1,317) (17.4) Total noninterest expense$ 66,293 $ 67,302 $ (1,009) (1.5) % Three Months Ended September 30, Dollar Percent (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Change
Salaries and employee benefits$ 12,706 $ 12,478 $ 228
1.8 % Net occupancy expense 1,404 1,351 53 3.9 Equipment costs 1,369 1,385 (16) (1.2)
Data processing fees and supplies 3,025 2,620 405
15.5
Corporate and business development 586 999 (413)
(41.3)
322.5 Professional fees 1,306 1,479 (173) (11.7) Other expense 2,175 2,674 (499) (18.7) Total noninterest expense$ 23,125 $ 22,737 $ 388 1.7 % The Company's noninterest expense decreased by$1.0 million , or 1.5%, to$66.3 million in the first nine months of 2020 compared to$67.3 million in the corresponding prior year period. The decrease was driven by corporate and business development, which decreased$1.1 million , or 31.2%, due to reduced business development and training expense. Salaries and employee benefits decreased by$843,000 , or 2.3%, primarily due to lower incentive-based compensation expense. Offsetting the decreases were increases of$1.1 million , or 14.7%, in data processing fees and supplies. In addition,FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees increased$658,000 , or 116.3%, as insurance assessment credits have expired. 50 Table of Contents The Company's noninterest expense increased$388,000 , or 1.7%, to$23.1 million in the third quarter of 2020, compared to$22.7 million in the third quarter of 2019.FDIC insurance and regulatory fees increased$803,000 as allFDIC deposit insurance credits due the Company were received by the end of the first quarter of 2020. Data processing fees increased$405,000 , or 15.5%, driven by the Company's continued investment in customer focused, technology-based solutions and ongoing cybersecurity and data management enhancements. Offsetting these increases were decreases in corporate and business development of$413,000 , or 41.3%, due to reduced business development and training expense, which is deemed temporary due to the pandemic. The Company's efficiency ratio was 43.6% for the third quarter of 2020, compared to 45.2% for the third quarter of 2019 and 41.6% for the linked second quarter of 2020. The company's efficiency ratio was 43.2% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to 44.9% in the prior year period due to revenue growth outpacing expense growth during 2020. As previously disclosed, in the third quarter of 2019 the Bank discovered potentially fraudulent activity by a former treasury management client involving multiple banks. The client subsequently filed a bankruptcy case, captioned In reInterlogic Outsourcing, Inc. et al., which is pending in theUnited States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan . The Bank and the other banks are currently subject to document and information requests in the bankruptcy case, and various parties in the bankruptcy case have threatened to bring claims against the Bank and other banks. Based on current information, the Company has determined that a loss is neither probable nor estimable at this time, and the Bank intends to vigorously defend itself if any claim is filed. Future noninterest expense may continue to be reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, continued protracted economic inactivity may reduce balance sheet growth and resulting revenue growth which could decrease the amount the Company pays in incentive-based compensation. In addition, elevated provision expense may reduce net income and diluted earnings per share, another key performance metric that impacts the incentive-based compensation targets. The Company's income tax expense decreased$1.4 million and increased$258,000 , respectively, in the nine-month and three-month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019. The effective tax rate was 18.4% and 19.1%, respectively, in the nine-month and three-month periods endedSeptember 30, 2020 , compared to 18.7% and 19.3% for the comparable periods of 2019. The year-to-date effective tax rate for 2020 decreased as compared to the prior year period primarily due a lower state tax rate as well as a higher percentage of income being derived from tax-advantaged sources.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Overview
Total assets of the Company were$5.551 billion as ofSeptember 30, 2020 , an increase of$604.4 million , or 12.2%, when compared to$4.947 billion as ofDecember 31, 2019 . This increase was primarily due to a$524.1 million , or 12.9%, increase in gross loans, offset by an increase in the allowance for loan losses of$10.1 million , or 19.9%. In addition, the balance sheet increased due to growth in securities available-for-sale to$644.0 million atSeptember 30, 2020 from$608.2 million atDecember 31, 2019 , an increase of$29.7 million , or 29.9%, in cash and cash equivalents to$129.1 million atSeptember 30, 2020 from$99.4 million atDecember 31, 2019 and an increase of$15.2 million , or 37.0%, in other assets driven by higher valuations on the Company's swap portfolio. Total deposits increased$634.1 million , or 15.3%, while total borrowings decreased by$84.5 million , or 49.7%. The increase in deposits was primarily driven by growth in core deposits of$718.0 million offset by a decrease in wholesale funding of$83.8 million . Core deposits were$4.738 billion as ofSeptember 30, 2020 compared to$4.020 billion as ofDecember 31, 2019 , an increase of$718.0 million , or 17.9%. Loan growth was driven by Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans originated primarily during the second quarter of 2020. The outstanding balance of PPP loans atSeptember 30, 2020 , was$557.9 million . Loans excluding PPP loans decreased by$33.8 million , or -0.8%, from$4.07 billion atDecember 31, 2019 to$4.03 billion atSeptember 30, 2020 . Additionally, commercial deposits increased by$527.8 million , or 41.4%, to$1.804 billion atSeptember 30, 2020 compared to$1.276 billion atDecember 31, 2019 . The increase in commercial and retail core deposits has resulted from proceeds from the PPP loan program, federal stimulus payments made to individuals and an increase in the savings rate during the pandemic. 51 Table of Contents Uses of Funds
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents
Total cash and cash equivalents increased by$29.7 million , or 29.9% to$129.1 million atSeptember 30, 2020 , from$99.4 million atDecember 31, 2019 . Cash and cash equivalents atSeptember 30, 2020 reflect larger items in the process of clearing such as public funds checks outstanding for matured certificates of deposit which were distributed in the form of checks and cash letter deposits in transit. Short-term investments include cash on deposit that earn interest such as excess liquidity maintained at theFederal Reserve Bank . Cash and cash equivalents balances will vary depending on the cyclical nature of the bank's liquidity position. Investment Portfolio
The amortized cost and the fair value of securities as of
September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Amortized Fair Amortized Fair (dollars in thousands) Cost Value Cost Value
U.S government sponsored agencies$ 10,000 $ 10,026 $ 0 $ 0 Mortgage-backed securities: residential 238,062 248,266 283,817 288,181 Mortgage-backed securities: commercial 38,026 39,161 36,712 36,972 State and municipal securities 324,237 346,581
270,480 283,080 Total$ 610,325 $ 644,034 $ 591,009 $ 608,233 AtSeptember 30, 2020 andDecember 31, 2019 , there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than theU.S. government agencies and government sponsored entities, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders' equity. Management is aware that, as interest rates rise, any unrealized loss in the investment portfolio will increase, and as interest rates fall the unrealized gain in the investment portfolio will rise. Since the majority of the bonds in the investment portfolio are fixed-rate, with only a few adjustable-rate bonds, we would expect our investment portfolio to follow this market value pattern. This is taken into consideration when evaluating the gain or loss of investment securities in the portfolio and the potential for other-than-temporary impairment. Purchases of securities available-for-sale totaled$89.9 million in the first nine months of 2020. The purchases consisted primarily of state and municipal securities and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities. Paydowns from prepayments and scheduled payments of$63.0 million were received in the first nine months of 2020, and the amortization of premiums, net of the accretion of discounts, was$3.0 million . The increase in net amortization expense from the prior year is being driven by increased prepayment speeds given the current rate environment and prior period levels were elevated due to the adoption of ASU 2017-08. Maturities and calls of securities totaled$6.3 million in the first nine months of 2020. Sales of securities totaled$6.4 million in the first nine months of 2020. No other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in the first nine months of 2020. Purchases of securities available for sale totaled$91.7 million in the first nine months of 2019. The purchases consisted primarily of state and municipal securities and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities. Paydowns from prepayments and scheduled payments of$37.0 million were received in the first nine months of 2019, and the amortization of premiums, net of the accretion of discounts, was$2.9 million . Sales of securities totaled$38.5 million in the first nine months of 2019. Maturities and calls of securities totaled$14.0 million in the first nine months of 2019. No other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in the first nine months of 2019. The investment portfolio is managed by a third-party firm to provide for an appropriate balance between liquidity, credit risk, interest rate risk management and investment return and to limit the Company's exposure to credit risk in the investment securities portfolio to an acceptable level. The Company does not trade or invest in or sponsor certain unregistered investment companies defined as hedge funds and private equity funds under what is commonly referred to as the "Volcker Rule" of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act. 52 Table of Contents
Real Estate Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
Real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale increased by$5.6 million , or 123.0%, to$10.1 million atSeptember 30, 2020 , from$4.5 million atDecember 31, 2019 . The balance of this asset category is subject to a high degree of variability depending on, among other things, recent mortgage loan rates and the timing of loan sales into the secondary market. The Company generally sells conforming qualifying mortgage loans it originates on the secondary market. Proceeds from sales of residential mortgages totaled$90.6 million in the first nine months of 2020 compared to$39.0 million in the first nine months of 2019. Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of these loans were$359.7 million and$337.9 million , respectively, as ofSeptember 30, 2020 andDecember 31, 2019 .
Loan Portfolio
The loan portfolio by portfolio segment as of
Current September 30, December 31, Period (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Commercial and industrial loans$ 1,849,413 40.2 %$ 1,426,868 35.1 %$ 422,545 Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans 1,860,308 40.4 1,673,322 41.1 186,986 Agri-business and agricultural loans 338,154 7.3 379,531 9.3 (41,377) Other commercial loans 97,533 2.1 112,302 2.8 (14,769) Consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans 352,550 7.7 376,745 9.3 (24,195) Other consumer loans 105,285 2.3 98,617 2.4 6,668 Subtotal, gross loans 4,603,243 100.0 % 4,067,385 100.0 % 535,858 Less: Allowance for loan losses (60,747) (50,652) (10,095) Net deferred loan fees (13,319) (1,557) (11,762) Loans, net$ 4,529,177 $ 4,015,176 $ 514,001 Total loans, excluding real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale and deferred fees, increased by$535.9 million to$4.603 billion atSeptember 30, 2020 from$4.067 billion atDecember 31, 2019 . The increase was concentrated in the commercial real estate and commercial and industrial categories and was driven by$570.5 million in loans originated under the PPP, with$557.9 million of the PPP loans remaining outstanding atSeptember 30, 2020 . We anticipate that the portion of our loan portfolio attributable to PPP loans will continue to decline in future quarters, as borrowers avail themselves of loan forgiveness opportunities under the PPP. Total loans excluding PPP loans increased by$8.9 million , as ofSeptember 30, 2020 as compared toSeptember 30, 2019 . On a linked quarter basis, total loans excluding PPP loans were$4.0 billion , an increase of$96.2 million , or 2%, as ofSeptember 30, 2020 as compared to the second quarter of 2020. The balance of net deferred loans fees attributable to PPP loans was$11.5 million as ofSeptember 30, 2020 . 53 Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the Company's non-performing assets as of
September 30, December 31, (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Nonaccrual loans including nonaccrual troubled debt restructured loans$ 13,478 $ 18,675 Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing 19
45 Total nonperforming loans$ 13,497 $ 18,720 Other real estate owned 316 316 Repossessions 0 0 Total nonperforming assets$ 13,813 $ 19,036
Impaired loans including troubled debt restructurings
Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.29 % 0.46 % Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.25 % 0.38 % Performing troubled debt restructured loans $ 5,658 $ 5,909 Nonperforming troubled debt restructured loans (included in nonaccrual loans) 6,547 3,188 Total troubled debt restructured loans$ 12,205
$ 9,097 Total nonperforming assets decreased by$5.2 million , or 27.4%, to$13.8 million during the nine-month period endedSeptember 30, 2020 . The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets atSeptember 30, 2020 decreased from 0.38% atDecember 31, 2019 to 0.25% atSeptember 30, 2020 . The decrease in nonperforming assets was primarily due to a$3.7 million charge-off taken on a single commercial manufacturing borrower during the first quarter of 2020. A loan is impaired when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment for smaller loans that are similar in nature and which are not in nonaccrual or troubled debt restructured status, such as residential mortgage, consumer, and credit card loans, is determined based on the class of loans and impairment is determined on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Total impaired loans decreased by$5.3 million , or 19.0%, to$22.5 million atSeptember 30, 2020 from$27.8 million atDecember 31, 2019 . The decrease in the impaired loans category was primarily due to the$3.7 million charge-off on the single commercial relationship that was on nonaccrual status as ofDecember 31, 2019 . As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we anticipate that our commercial, commercial real estate, residential and consumer borrowers may continue to encounter economic difficulties, which could lead to increases in our levels of nonperforming assets, impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings in future periods. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses relating to specifically identified loans based on an evaluation of the loans by management, as well as other probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower's ability to repay. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon a monthly review of those credits. An appropriate level of general allowance is determined after considering the following factors: application of historical loss percentages, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentrations, new industry lending activity and current economic conditions. Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans: Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. The regulations also contain a Special Mention category. Special Mention applies to loans that do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management's close attention. The Company's policy is to establish a specific allowance for loan losses for any assets where management has identified conditions or circumstances that indicate an asset is impaired. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as a loss, the Company's policy is to either establish specified allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss or charge-off such amount. 54
Table of Contents
AtSeptember 30, 2020 , the allowance for loan losses was 1.32% of total loans outstanding, versus 1.25% of total loans outstanding atDecember 31, 2019 . The allowance for loan losses was 1.51% of total loans outstanding, excluding PPP loans of$557.9 million , as ofSeptember 30, 2020 . This reflects a more comparable ratio to prior periods, as PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and have not been allocated for within the allowance for loan losses calculation. AtSeptember 30, 2020 , management believed the allowance for loan losses was at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions fail to recover or continue to deteriorate due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require increases in the allowance for loan losses. The process of identifying probable incurred credit losses is a subjective process. Therefore, the Company maintains a general allowance to cover probable credit losses within the entire portfolio. The methodology management uses to determine the adequacy of the loan loss reserve includes the considerations below. The Company has a relatively high percentage of commercial and commercial real estate loans extended to businesses with a broad range of revenue and within a wide variety of industries. Traditionally, this type of lending may have more credit risk than other types of lending because of the size and diversity of the credits. The Company manages this risk by utilizing conservative credit structures, by adjusting its pricing to the perceived risk of each individual credit and by diversifying the portfolio by customer, product, industry and market area. As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , based on management's review of the loan portfolio, the Company had 97 credits totaling$221.3 million on the classified loan list versus 103 credits totaling$181.2 million onDecember 31, 2019 . The increase in classified loans for the first nine months of 2020 resulted primarily from three commercial borrowers recorded on the non-impaired portion of the watchlist. As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , the Company had$168.7 million of assets classified as Special Mention,$52.7 million classified as Substandard,$0 classified as Doubtful and$0 classified as Loss as compared to$96.6 million ,$84.6 million ,$0 and$0 , respectively, atDecember 31, 2019 . Allowance estimates are developed by management after taking into account actual loss experience adjusted for current economic conditions. The Company has regular discussions regarding this methodology with regulatory authorities. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the Company's loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type. In accordance with the incurred loan loss reserve accounting guidance, the allowance is provided for losses that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date and is based on past events and current economic conditions and does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. For a more thorough discussion of the allowance for loan losses methodology see the Critical Accounting Policies section of this Item 2. The allowance for loan losses increased 19.9%, or$10.1 million , from$50.7 million atDecember 31, 2019 to$60.7 million atSeptember 30, 2020 . Pooled loan allocations increased from$40.3 million atDecember 31, 2019 to$52.7 million atSeptember 30, 2020 , which was primarily due to management's view of current credit quality, the current economic environment, the impacts of COVID-19 and loan growth. Impaired loan allocations were$8.0 million atSeptember 30, 2020 and$10.4 million atDecember 31, 2019 . The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses was$3.2 million atSeptember 30, 2020 and$2.3 million atDecember 31, 2019 . The Company believes that the unallocated component is appropriate given the high level of uncertainty that exists regarding near term economic conditions. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses incorporates the Company's judgmental determination of inherent losses that may not be fully reflected in other allocations, including factors such as the level of classified credits, economic uncertainties, industry trends impacting specific portfolio segments, broad portfolio quality trends and trends in the composition of the Company's large commercial loan portfolio and related large dollar exposures to individual borrowers. Most of the Company's recent loan growth has been concentrated in the commercial loan portfolio, which can result in overall asset quality being influenced by a small number of credits. Management has historically considered growth and portfolio composition when determining loan loss allocations. Management believes that it is prudent to continue to provide for loan losses in a manner consistent with its historical approach due to the loan growth described above and current economic conditions. 55
Table of Contents
Total loans declined by$33.8 million for the first nine months of 2020, excluding the$557.9 million in PPP loans. On a linked quarter basis, total loans excluding PPP loans were$4.0 billion , an increase of$96.2 million , or 2%, as ofSeptember 30, 2020 as compared to the second quarter of 2020. Prior to the pandemic, economic conditions in the Company's markets were stable. During the last six months some industries have performed well during the pandemic, while others have not. The Company is monitoring industries and borrowers impacted by the pandemic as discussed. Watch list loans are$40.1 million higher at$221.3 million compared to$181.2 million atDecember 31, 2019 , which represents 4.82% of total loans atSeptember 30, 2020 compared to 4.43% atDecember 31, 2019 . When excluding PPP loans of$557.9 million as ofSeptember 30, 2020 , watch list loans were 5.49% of total loans. This reflects a more comparable ratio to prior periods, as PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and have not been allocated for within the allowance for loan losses calculation. Total impaired and watch list loans increased by$17.5 million , or 8.6%, to$221.3 million atSeptember 30, 2020 versus$203.8 million as ofSeptember 30, 2019 . On a linked quarter basis, total impaired and watch list loans increased by$13.1 million , or 6.3%, from$208.2 million atJune 30, 2020 . The increase in total impaired and watch list loans was due primarily to an increase in non-impaired watch list credits. Impaired watch list loans decreased by$5.6 million , or 19.9%, to$22.5 million atSeptember 30, 2020 versusSeptember 30, 2019 . On a linked quarter basis, impaired watch list loans decreased by$1.5 million , or 6.3%, from$24.0 million atJune 30, 2020 . The Company's continued growth strategy promotes diversification among industries as well as continued focus on the enforcement of a disciplined credit culture and a conservative position in loan work-out situations. As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , total deferrals attributed to COVID-19 were$158.4 million representing 102 borrowers. This represented 3.4% of the total loan portfolio. Of that total 71 were commercial loan borrowers representing$155.1 million in loans, or 3.7%, of commercial loans and 31 were retail loan borrowers representing$3.3 million , or 0.9%, of total retail loans. A summary of loan deferrals, by loan segment, as ofSeptember 30, 2020 is as follows: (dollars in thousands) Borrowers Balance CRE - Nonowner Occupied 16 13.7 %$ 69,219 43.7 %
Commercial and industrial loans 32 27.3 36,944
23.3 CRE - Owner Occupied 24 20.5 33,588 21.2 CRE - Construction 2 1.7 6,299 4.0 Other commercial loans 3 2.6 5,119 3.2 Residential mortgage 28 23.9 4,533 2.9 Installment - other consumer 6 5.1 1,627 1.0
Agri-business and agricultural loans 1 0.9 346
0.2 Other consumer loans 5 4.3 755 0.5 Total* 117 100.0 %$ 158,430 100.0 %
* The number of borrowers in the table is higher due to one single borrower impacting multiple loan segments.
As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , 77 borrowers with loans outstanding of$117 million were in their second deferral period, most of which were additional 90 day deferrals. Additionally, 12 borrowers with loans outstanding of$26 million were in their third deferral period. Two borrowers represented 84% of the third deferral population and were commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans supported by adequate collateral and personal guarantors and consist primarily of loans to the hotel and accommodation industry. 56 Table of Contents Sources of Funds
The average daily deposits and borrowings together with average rates paid on those deposits and borrowings for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2020 and 2019 are summarized in the following table: Nine months ended September 30, 2020 2019 (dollars in thousands) Balance Rate Balance Rate
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
0.00 % Savings and transaction accounts: Savings deposits 260,668 0.08 241,322
0.11
Interest bearing demand deposits 1,796,270 0.57 1,636,757
1.65 Time deposits: Deposits of$100,000 or more 969,362 1.78 1,142,633 2.31 Other time deposits 268,485 1.78 276,283 1.89 Total deposits$ 4,546,897 0.71 %$ 4,220,248 1.40 %
FHLB advances and other borrowings 98,489 0.85 111,771
3.11 Total funding sources$ 4,645,386 0.72 %$ 4,332,019 1.44 % Deposits and Borrowings As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , total deposits increased by$634.1 million , or 15.3%, fromDecember 31, 2019 . Core deposits increased by$718.0 million to$4.738 billion as ofSeptember 30, 2020 from$4.020 billion as ofDecember 31, 2019 . Total brokered deposits were$29.7 million atSeptember 30, 2020 compared to$113.5 million atDecember 31, 2019 reflecting an$83.8 million decrease during the first nine months of 2020. PPP loan proceeds to borrowers impacted the increase in deposits during 2020 as loan proceeds were deposited into borrower checking and savings accounts at the Bank. SinceDecember 31, 2019 , the change in core deposits was comprised of increases in commercial deposits of$527.8 million , retail deposits of$105.1 million and public funds deposits of$85.0 million . Total public funds deposits, including public funds transaction accounts, were$1.212 billion atSeptember 30, 2020 and$1.127 billion atDecember 31, 2019 . The following table summarizes deposit composition atSeptember 30, 2020 andDecember 31, 2019 : Current September 30, December 31, Period (dollars in thousands) 2020 2019 Change Retail$ 1,722,248 $ 1,617,133 $ 105,115 Commercial 1,803,872 1,276,048 527,824 Public funds 1,212,131 1,127,111 85,020 Core deposits$ 4,738,251 $ 4,020,292 $ 717,959 Brokered deposits 29,703 113,527 (83,824) Total deposits$ 4,767,954 $ 4,133,819 $ 634,135 Total borrowings decreased by$84.5 million , or 49.7%, fromDecember 31, 2019 , primarily due to FHLB advance net repayments of$95.0 million . The Company also drew$10.5 million on its holding company line of credit with a correspondent bank during the first quarter of 2020 to repurchase Company stock. The Company utilizes wholesale funding, including brokered deposits andFederal Home Loan Bank advances, to supplement funding of assets, which is primarily used for loan and investment securities growth. Additionally, management has completed the actions required to activate participation in theFederal Reserve Bank's Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility (PPPLF); however, there were no PPP loans pledged to the PPPLF as ofSeptember 30, 2020 . Management anticipates that the Company's deposit balances may fluctuate more than usual during the remainder of 2020 due to the impact of PPP loan fundings, which are made to PPP loan recipient deposit accounts. In addition, there will be fluctuations due toIRS stimulus payments direct deposited into the accounts of retail customers. The timing and use of these funds in addition to draws on unfunded commitments could impact our need to borrow throughout the year. 57 Table of Contents Capital
As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , total stockholders' equity was$636.8 million , an increase of$38.7 million , or 6.5%, from$598.0 million atDecember 31, 2019 . In addition to net income of$59.7 million , other increases in equity during the first nine months of 2020 included a$13.2 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income component of equity, which was primarily driven by a net increase in the fair value of available-for-sale securities. Offsetting the increases to stockholders' equity were decreases due to the repurchase of 289,101 common shares for$10.0 million under the share repurchase plan, dividends declared and paid in the amount of$23.0 million and$2.0 million in stock activity under equity compensation plans. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company repurchased 289,101 shares of its common stock for$10 million at a weighted average price per share of$34.63 . Share repurchases under the repurchase plan were suspended in March with$20 million of authorization remaining available under the plan. No shares were repurchased under the plan during the second or third quarters of 2020. The Company continues to evaluate the share repurchase program pursuant to its previously established criteria for execution. The impact on equity by other comprehensive income (loss) is not included in regulatory capital. The banking regulators have established guidelines for leverage capital requirements, expressed in terms of Tier 1, or core capital, as a percentage of average assets, to measure the soundness of a financial institution. In addition, banking regulators have established risk-based capital guidelines forU.S. banking organizations. As ofSeptember 30, 2020 , the Company's capital levels remained characterized as "well-capitalized" under the new rules.
The actual capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the Bank as of
Minimum Required to Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Be Well Capitalized For Capital
Actual Adequacy Purposes Conservation Buffer Action Regulations (dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio As ofSeptember 30, 2020 : Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated$ 662,267 14.90 %$ 355,578 8.00 %$ 466,696 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 658,231 14.84 %$ 355,578 8.00 %$ 465,646 10.50 %$ 443,472 10.00 %Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated$ 606,555 13.65 %$ 266,683 6.00 %$ 377,801 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 602,642 13.59 %$ 266,083
6.00 %
$ 606,555 13.65 %$ 200,012 4.50 %$ 311,130 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 602,642 13.59 %$ 199,562 4.50 %$ 310,430 7.00 %$ 288,257 6.50 %Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) Consolidated$ 606,555 11.07 %$ 219,246 4.00 %$ 219,246 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 602,642 11.02 %$ 218,751 4.00 %$ 218,751 4.00 %$ 273,439 5.00 % As ofDecember 31, 2019 : Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated$ 631,723 14.36 %$ 351,894 8.00 %$ 461,862 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 616,386 14.04 %$ 351,227 8.00 %$ 460,985 10.500 %$ 439,034 10.00 %Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated$ 580,982 13.21 %$ 263,921 6.00 %$ 373,887 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 565,645 12.88 %$ 263,420
6.00 %
$ 580,982 13.21 %$ 197,941 4.50 %$ 307,908 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 565,645 12.88 %$ 197,565 4.50 %$ 307,324 7.000 %$ 285,372 6.50 %Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) Consolidated$ 580,982 11.67 %$ 199,099 4.00 %$ 199,099 N/A N/A N/A Bank$ 565,645 11.43 %$ 197,923 4.00 %$ 197,923 4.00 %$ 247,404 5.00 % 58 Table of Contents FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the federal securities law. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are generally identifiable by the use of words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "project," "possible," "continue," "plan," "intend," "estimate," "may," "will," "would," "could," "should" or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events. The Company's ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain and, accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including, without limitation:
the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its effects on our customers,
? local economic conditions, our operations and vendors, and the responses of
federal, state and local governmental authorities;
? the effects of future economic, business and market conditions and changes,
both domestic and foreign, including the effects of federal trade policies;
? governmental monetary and fiscal policies and the impact the upcoming election
will have on these;
the timing and scope of any legislative and regulatory changes, including
? changes in banking, securities and tax laws and regulations and their
application by our regulators;
the risks of changes in interest rates on the levels, composition and costs of
? deposits, loan demand, and the values and liquidity of loan collateral,
securities and other interest sensitive assets and liabilities;
? the anticipated phase out of LIBOR by the end of 2021 and establishment of a
new reference rate
? changes in borrowers' credit risks and payment behaviors;
? changes in the availability and cost of credit and capital in the financial
markets;
? the effects of disruption and volatility in capital markets on the value of our
investment portfolio;
cyber-security risks and or cyber-security damage that could result from
? attacks on the Company's or third-party service providers networks or data of
the Company;
? changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial
real estate;
? the effects of competition from a wide variety of local, regional, national and
other providers of financial, investment and insurance services;
? changes in technology or products that may be more difficult or costly, or less
effective than anticipated;
the effects of war or other conflicts, acts of terrorism or other catastrophic
events, including storms, droughts, tornados and flooding, that may affect
? general economic conditions, including agricultural production and demand and
prices for agricultural goods and land used for agricultural purposes,
generally and in our markets;
? the risk of trade policy and tariffs could impact loan demand from the
manufacturing sector;
the failure of assumptions and estimates used in our reviews of our loan
? portfolio, underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses,
our analysis of our capital position and other estimates;
? changes in the scope and cost of
? changes in accounting policies, rules and practices, including as a result of
implementation of CECL; the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including, without
limitation, the related time and costs of implementing such transactions,
? integrating operations as part of these transactions and possible failures to
achieve expected gains, revenue growth and/or expense savings from such
transactions;
? the effects of any employee or customer fraud; and
59 Table of Contents
the risks noted in the Risk Factors discussed under Item 1A of Part 1 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
? Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the months ended
2020, as well as other risks and uncertainties set forth from time to time in
the Company's other filings with the
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
© Edgar Online, source