Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.

● According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is poor.


Strengths

● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.

● The group's high margin levels account for strong profits.

● The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.

● The equity is one of the most attractive in the market with regard to earnings multiple-based valuation.

● The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Sales forecast by analysts have been recently revised upwards.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.

● The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.

● Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.

● Predictions on business development from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's are tight. This results from either a good visibility into core activities or accurate earnings releases.


Weaknesses

● As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.

● The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.

● The company appears highly valued given the size of its balance sheet.

● The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.