Fitch Ratings has upgraded Man GLG Euro CLO II DAC's class B notes and revised the Outlooks on the class C to F notes to Stable from Positive.

A full list of rating actions is detailed below.

RATING ACTIONS

Entity / Debt

Rating

Prior

Man GLG Euro CLO II DAC

A-1-R XS2034711064

LT

AAAsf

Affirmed

AAAsf

A-2 XS1516363576

LT

AAAsf

Affirmed

AAAsf

B XS1516362685

LT

AAAsf

Upgrade

AA+sf

C-R XS2034711734

LT

A+sf

Affirmed

A+sf

D XS1516363733

LT

BBB+sf

Affirmed

BBB+sf

E XS1516363063

LT

BB+sf

Affirmed

BB+sf

F XS1516363147

LT

B+sf

Affirmed

B+sf

Page

of 1

VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS

Transaction Summary

Man GLG Euro CLO II DAC is a cash flow collateralised loan obligation (CLO). The underlying portfolio of assets mainly consists of leveraged loans and is managed by GLG Partners LP. The deal exited its reinvestment period in January 2021.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Increased Credit Enhancement: The transaction exited its reinvestment period in January 2021. Any subsequent reinvestment of unscheduled principal proceeds and sale proceeds from credit-impaired and credit-improved obligations will be subject to the weighted average life (WAL), the Fitch 'CCC' and Moody's weighted average rating factor (WARF) tests, which we deem unlikely to be satisfied. This is due to a decreasing WAL covenant and the breach of several collateral-quality and Fitch's 'CCC' tests per the investor report dated 5 July 2022.

The trade date principal cash balance was EUR8.4 million as of the 5 July 2022 investor report. The senior A-1 and A-2 notes have repaid by EUR58.6 million and EUR2.8 million, respectively, since the last review in October 2021. As a result, credit enhancement has increased across the structure.

Given the manager is unlikely to reinvest, Fitch has assessed the transaction by notching down one level all assets in the current portfolio with Fitch-derived ratings (FDR) on Negative Outlook

Limited Deleveraging Prospect: The Stable Outlooks on all notes reflect Fitch's expectation that deleveraging of the notes would be constrained in the next 12-18 months by the small portion of assets maturing by 2023 and limited prepayment expectation in the current uncertain macroeconomic environment.

Resilient Asset Performance: The transaction's metrics indicate resilient asset performance, which together with increased credit enhancement, led to today's rating actions. This is despite the transaction is currently 3.6% below par and continues to fail its Fitch's 'CCC' limit, Moody's 'Caa' limit, Moody's WARF and WAL tests since the last review. Exposure to assets with FDRs of 'CCC+' and below is 10.3% as calculated by the trustee. The portfolio has EUR7.3 million exposure to defaulted assets.

'B'/'B-' Portfolio: Fitch assesses the average credit quality of the obligors at 'B'/'B-'. The Fitch-calculated WARF of the current portfolio was 25.99 and based on the notching stress for assets on Negative Outlook was 27.43.

High Recovery Expectations: Senior secured obligations comprise 98.3% of the portfolio. Fitch views the recovery prospects for these assets as more favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The Fitch-calculated weighted average recovery rate (WARR) of the current portfolio as reported by the trustee was 64.5%.

Diversified Portfolio Despite Amortisation: The portfolio has repaid EUR57.8 million since the last review but remains well-diversified across obligors, countries and industries. The top-10 obligor concentration is 18.7%, and no obligor represents more than 2.23% of the portfolio balance.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

A 25% increase of the mean default rate (RDR) across all ratings and a 25% decrease of the recovery rate (RRR) across all ratings of the current portfolio would have no impact to class A-1-R, A-2 and C-R notes and would lead to downgrades of no more than four notches for the class B, D, E and F notes.

Downgrades, which are based on the current portfolio, may occur if the loss expectation is larger than initially assumed, due to unexpectedly high levels of defaults and portfolio deterioration. Due to the better WARF of the current portfolio than that of the stressed portfolio, the class D notes display a rating cushion of one notch while other classes of notes have no rating cushion.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

A 25% reduction of the mean RDR across all ratings and a 25% increase in the RRR across all ratings of the Fitch current portfolio stressed for obligors with a Negative Outlook would lead to upgrades of up to three notches for the rated notes, except for the 'AAAsf' notes.

Upgrades, except for the 'AAAsf' notes, may occur on stable portfolio credit quality and deleveraging, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess spread available to cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by, Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Man GLG Euro CLO II DAC

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the information it has received about the performance of the asset pool and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any third party assessment of the asset portfolio information or conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing monitoring.

The majority of the underlying assets or risk presenting entities have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations and/or European Securities and Markets Authority registered rating agencies. Fitch has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio information or information on the risk presenting entities.

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by, Fitch in relation to this rating action

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above, Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies indicates that it is adequately reliable.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire