A Novel LAIR-1 Antibody Selectively Targets Acute Myeloid Leukemia
(AML) Stem Cells
Tae Kon Kim2, Rustin Lovewell1, Ana Paucarmayta1, Linjie Tian1, Karla Maloveste1, Junshik Hong2, Carly Hedgepath2, Kwang Woon Kim2, Ron Copeland1, Thomas O'Neill1, Linda Liu1, Sol Langermann1, Dallas B Flies1,
Shashank J. Patel1, and Han Myint1
1NextCure Inc., Beltsville, MD, USA; 2Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Background: Significant unmet need exists for AML patients that are not responsive to standard-of-care (SOC) treatments. In addition, SOC patients usually relapse due to persistence of chemotherapy-resistant leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Therefore, identification of unique strategies to preferentially target LSCs, promote immune responses to AML and prevent relapse are highly sought after. AML LSCs and blast cells are characterized by the higher expression of leukocyte-associatedimmunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR-1).LAIR-1 is a checkpoint receptor on T cells and myeloid cells that delimits immune cell activation when binding to endogenous collagen ligands. However, it has been demonstrated that LAIR-1 has differential activity in AML cells and may sustain AML survival signals since downregulation of LAIR-1 promotes AML cell death. We developed a LAIR-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), termed NC525, that disrupts LAIR-1 mediated survival signaling and preferentially targets and kills LAIR-1 expressing AML LSCs and blast cells.
LAIR-1 Overexpression on AML blast and stem cells
A | LAIR-1 Expression | |||
Blood | mRNA (AML subtypes) | |||
AML | Surface protein | |||
Patients | Bone Marrow | |||
B | FAB Classification | Molecular Mutations | ||
14 | ||||
mRNA | RSEM) | 12 | ||
10 | ||||
2 | ||||
LAIR1- | (log |
LAIR-1 mAb blocks LAIR-1 signaling and induces antibody dependent
cytotoxicity and phagocytosis
LAIR-1-Mediated LSC and Blast Survival | Multimodal Anti-leukemic Activity |
1. Inhibition of survival signal
3. ADCP
LAIR-1 | C1Q | Collagen | LAIR-1 mAb | 2. ADCC |
LAIR-1 mAb blocks binding of natural ligand collagen and signaling
A | B | activityreporter cellsGFP+) | LAIR-1 signaling blockade | |||||
100 | Ctrl IgG | |||||||
50 | ||||||||
LAIR-1 (% | LAIR-1 mAb | IC50=0.25nM | ||||||
LAIR-1 | LAIR-1 | LAIR ECD fused | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Ligand | mAb | to CD3ζ | -2 | |||||
mAb concentration (log µg/ml) |
Figure 2. A. Schematic illustration of LAIR-1-TCRζ reporter assay using UT-140NFκB-GFP cell line. B. LAIR-1 mAb blocks COLA1-mediatedLAIR-1 signaling activity in a dose-dependent manner.
LAIR-1 mAb induces ADCC mediated AML killing
LAIR-1 mAb inhibits colony formation of AML LSCs | |||||||||||
Ctrl IgG | LAIR-1 mAb | colonyof# unitsforming | 15 | ✱ | 60 | ✱ | LAIR-1 mAb | ||||
AML | |||||||||||
10 | 40 | Ctrl IgG | |||||||||
5 | 20 | ||||||||||
0 | 0 | ||||||||||
CFU-E | BFU-E | CFU-GEMM | CFU-G | CFU-GM | CFU-M | ns | LAIR-1 | ||||
LAIR-1 | colonyof# formingunits | 200 | |||||||||
Normal HSPCs | mAb | ||||||||||
150 | |||||||||||
mAb | Ctrl IgG | ||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||
Ctrl | 50 | ||||||||||
0 |
Figure 4. Effect of LAIR-1 mAb on the colony forming capacity of LSCs derived from two AML patients and HSPCs from a healthy donor using MethocultTM method.
LAIR-1 mAb eliminates AML cells via ADCP
A | CDX Model | B | Ex vivo | C | In vitro ADCP | ||||
MV411-Luc | cytometry spleen | Ctrl IgG | Mouse BMM MV411-Luc | ||||||
cells | Treatment | mAb | + | ||||||
2X / week | |||||||||
NSG mice | 0 | Day | 35 | Flow of | 0 25 | 50 75 100 | Time | Ctrl IgG LAIR-1 mAb | |
% of Dead MV411 cells | (min) | ||||||||
Leukemiagrowth | 6 | Ctrl IgG | 40 | IFImage ofspleen | αLAIR-1 | Ctrl IgG | 30 | ||
flux(Total×10p/s)8 | 10 | 20 30 | mCD45- mouse immune cells | ||||||
4 | LAIR-1 mAb | ||||||||
2 | 60 | ||||||||
0 | hCD45 - MV411 | ||||||||
Time post inoculation (d) | Nuclear stain | MV411 engulfment |
Figure 5. A. In-vivoCDX model of implanting MV411-Luccells into NSG mice and treating with LAIR-1mAb showed potent anti-leukemicactivity even without transfer of human PBMCs. B. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analyses of spleens harvested on day 35 from CDX model. Arrows indicate MV411 cells undergoing phagocytosis. C. LAIR-1mAb induces ADCP activity in an in-vitrophagocytosis assay utilizing Cell-Traceviolet labelled mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMM) cocultured with MV411-Luccells.
8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 UD | NPM1 | DNMT3A 11q3 FLT3 TP53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C | Amp | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BM Aspirates | Patient #A | Patient #B | Patient #C | |||||||||||||||||||||||
HSPC | Ctrl IgG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LSC | LAIR-1 mab | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADCC mediated cell lysis (%) | 40 | MOLT4 | Ctrl IgG | |||
LAIR-1 mAb | ||||||
20 | ||||||
0 | ||||||
-2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
mAb concentration (log µg/ml) |
20 | MV411 | Ctrl IgG | |||
ADCC mediated cell lysis (%) | LAIR-1 mab | ||||
10 | |||||
0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
-2 | |||||
mAb concentration (log µg/ml) |
LAIR-1 mAb restricts AML progression in PDX models
BM aspirates | Leukemiagrowth CD33+humancells) | 0 | PDX-donor #1 | 0 | PDX-donor #2 | |||||
treatment | ||||||||||
60 | 100 | Ctrl IgG | ||||||||
NSG-SGM3 | 40 | 80 | LAIR-1 mAb | |||||||
mice | 60 | |||||||||
6 | 20 | 40 | ||||||||
Weekly | 20 | |||||||||
12 | (% | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
Time post inoculation (w) | Time post inoculation (w) | |||||||||
Week | ||||||||||
Figure 1. A. Schematic illustration of study design to determine LAIR-1expression on AML blasts and leukemic stem cells. B. LAIR-1mRNA expression in AML subtypes defined by FAB classification, and mutation status. UD denotes undetermined. C.
Figure 3. LAIR-1mAb induces antibody dependent cytotoxicity on MOLT4 and MV411 cell lines in a dose-dependentmanner in primary PBMC: leukemic cell coculture assay.
Figure 6. NSG-SGM3mice were irradiated and implanted with BM aspirates from two AML patients. Mice were treated with mAbs on weekly basis from week 6 of BM implantation.
LAIR-1 protein expression on the cell surface of leukemic stem cells (LSCs; CD34+CD38-CD90-CD45RA+/- or CD34-CD117+CD244+/-) vs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs; CD34+CD38-CD90+CD99-) derived from bone marrow aspirates, and leukemic blasts from the peripheral blood of AML patients.
Conclusion: High expression of LAIR-1 on leukemic cells and its role in mediating survival signaling in LSCs makes it an attractive therapeutic target against AML. To this end, we developed a novel immunomedicine NC525, a LAIR-1 mAb, that potently eradicates LSCs and leukemic blasts while having a minimal effect on healthy HSPCs. We show that LAIR-1 mAb exerts its anti-tumor activity via disruption of survival signals in leukemic cells and Fc-mediated effector functions including ADCC and ADCP.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
NextCure Inc. published this content on 13 December 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 13 December 2021 14:35:04 UTC.