The case is on-going, but the
Peloton argued that although it advertised that its library was "ever-growing," the Terms of Service to which the plaintiffs agreed clearly explained that the company reserved the right to remove content from its library at any time. The court wasn't sympathetic and relied on a principle that we've blogged about before. A consumer who sees an ad shouldn't be expected to search in other places to learn about important limitations. (Click here for a different example.)
After dismissing Peloton's argument that the "ever-growing" claim was puffery, the court considered Peloton's argument that the claim is true because the company consistently adds new content to its library. In other words, "ever-growing" was a representation about updates, not a representation about the aggregate size of the library. The court didn't buy it. Looking at the plain meaning of the words, the court determined Peloton arguably communicated a claim about the total size of the library.
We'll continue to watch this case as it develops but will leave you with two key points for now. First, although language in Terms of Service may protect a company against a breach of contract claim, it's less likely to offer protection against a false advertising claim. Second, be careful about claims that suggest promises about the future. Those claims could come back to haunt you if things later change.
Originally Published by
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Washington
DC 20007
© Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source