Filed
Supreme Court of New Mexico
6/17/2022 2:01 PM
Office of the Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
NO. S-1-SC-39138
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO,
Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION,
Appellee,
and
SIERRA CLUB, NEW ENERGY ECONOMY,
WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES, and
COALITION FOR CLEAN AFFORDABLE ENERGY,
Intervenors-Appellees.
In the Matter of the Application of Public Service Company of New Mexico for Approval of the Abandonment of the Four Corners Power Plant and Issuance of a Financing Order,
NMPRC Case No. 21-00017-UT
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO'S CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF TO THE ANSWER BRIEFS OF THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION, NEW ENERGY ECONOMY, SIERRA CLUB AND THE COALITION FOR CLEAN AFFORDABLE ENERGY
(Oral Argument Requested)
Stacey J. Goodwin, Associate General Counsel | Richard L. Alvidrez |
PNM Resources, Inc. | Miller Stratvert P.A. |
Corporate Headquarters - Legal Department | 500 Marquette NW, Suite 1100 |
Albuquerque, NM 87158-0805 | P.O. Box 25687 |
(505) 241-4836 | Albuquerque, NM 87125 |
Stacey.Goodwin@pnmresources.com | (505) 842-1950 |
ralvidrez@mstlaw.com |
Raymond L. Gifford
Debrea M. Terwilliger
Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP
2138 West 32nd Ave., Suite 300
Denver, CO 80211
- 626-2350
- 626-2329
RGifford@wbklaw.com
DTerwilliger@wbklaw.com
June 17, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS | ||
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE………………………………….................ii | ||
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES…………………………………………………...iii | ||
I. | INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... | 1 |
II. | ARGUMENT................................................................................................ | 3 |
A. | Standard of Review........................................................................................ | 7 |
B. The Commission's Denial of Abandonment Was Unlawful....................... | 10 | |
The Commission's denial of abandonment based on its determination | ||
that PNM failed to provide evidence of "actual" replacement resources to | ||
satisfy Section 62-18-4(D) is contrary to the law and should be reversed. .... | 11 | |
a. The Commission legally erred in its interpretation of Section 62-18-4(D) | ||
and applicable abandonment standards under the ETA.................................. | 13 | |
i. Past Commission practice is not indicative of the current statutory | ||
mandate. .......................................................................................................... | 14 |
- A plain reading of Section 62-18-4(D) does not require identification of actual replacement resources before approval is sought, and such a requirement may detrimentally affect PNM's efforts to sign competitive bids…………………………………………………………………………..19
- PNM's right to defer approval of actual replacement resources is not
merely a process question. .............................................................................. | 21 |
- NEE's reliance on PNM's prior arguments in another Court proceeding
is misplaced..................................................................................................... | 21 |
- The Answer Briefs' arguments on the evidence of adequate potential
new resources are unpersuasive. ..................................................................... | 23 | |
The Commission's legal conclusion that abandonment can be denied | ||
because PNM "breached" an IRP commitment is unlawful and should be | ||
reversed. .......................................................................................................... | 28 | |
C. | The Commission May Not Impose Further Review of the Prudence of Four | |
Corners on Remand. ........................................................................................... | 31 | |
D. | Other Irrelevant Arguments Should be Rejected......................................... | 36 |
III. | CONCLUSION .......................................................................................... | 38 |
i
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Rule 12-318(G) NMRA, Appellant Public Service Company of New Mexico states that the body of this Consolidated Reply Brief is 38 pages and contains 8,978 words in Times New Roman 14-point font, a proportionally-spaced typeface, as calculated by Word for Microsoft 365 MSO Version 2108, and is therefore within the limits permitted by the Court's order issued on May 31, 2022.
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES | |
Federal Cases | |
Motor Vehicles Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., | |
463 U.S. 29 (1983).......................................................................................... | 8 |
Securities & Exch. Comm'n v. Chenery, | |
332 U.S. 194, 196 (1947)................................................................................ | 8 |
New Mexico Cases | |
Am. Fed'n of State, County & Mun. Empls. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of | |
Bernalillo County, | |
2016-NMSC-017..................................................................................... | 32, 33 |
Alto Vill. Servs. Corp. v. N. M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, | |
1978-NMSC-085, 92 N.M. 323 .................................................................... | 26 |
Atlixco Coal. v. Maggiore, | |
1998-NMSC-134, 125 N.M. 786 .................................................................... | 8 |
Attorney Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | |
2013-NMSC-042........................................................................................... | 36 |
Attorney Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, | |
1984-NMSC-081, 101 N.M. 549 .................................................................. | 26 |
Cibola Energy Corp. v. Roselli, | |
1987-NMCA-055, 105 N.M. 774 ................................................................. | 10 |
Citizens for Fair Rates & the Env't v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | |
2022-NMSC-010............................................................................... | 13, 14, 33 |
Leger v. Leger, | |
2022-NMSC-007........................................................................................... | 14 |
Montano v. N.M. Real Estate Appraiser's Bd., | |
2009-NMCA-009, 145 N.M. 494 ................................................................... | 9 |
iii |
N.M. Indus. Energy Consumers v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, | ||
1986-NMSC-059, 104 N.M. 565 .................................................................. | 24 | |
N.M. Indus. Energy Consumers v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, | ||
1991-NMSC-018, 111 N.M. 622 .................................................................. | 32 | |
N.M. Mining Ass'n v. N.M. Water Quality Control Comm'n, | ||
2007-NMCA-010, 141 N.M. 41 ..................................................................... | 9 | |
Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | ||
S-1-SC-37552 (Feb. 27, 2019) (non-precedential) ....................................... | 22 | |
Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | ||
2019-NMSC-012........................................................................................... | 34 | |
Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, | ||
1991-NMSC-083, 112 N.M. 379 .................................................................. | 14 | |
Resolute Wind 1 LLC v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | ||
2022-NMSC-011..................................................................................... | 34, 36 | |
State ex rel. Egolf v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n, | ||
2020-NMSC-018............................................................................... | 12, 23, 30 | |
Tenneco Oil Co. v. N.M. Water Quality Control Comm'n, | ||
1987-NMCA-153, 107 N.M. 469 ......................................................... | 8, 9, 10 | |
New Mexico Regulatory Cases | ||
Re Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M., | ||
101 P.U.R. 4th 126, 1989 WL 418588, NMPSC Case No. 2146 Pt. II | ......... 24 | |
In the Matter of the Application of Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. for the | ||
Abandonment and Decertification of the Las Vegas Generation Station in Las | ||
Vegas, N. M., | ||
NMPRC Case No. 10-00264-UT (2011) ..................................................... | 15 |
iv
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
PNM Resources Inc. published this content on 17 June 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 17 June 2022 23:03:03 UTC.