Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.

● According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is poor.


Strengths

● According to sales estimates from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's, the company is among the best with regard to growth.

● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.

● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.

● For several months, analysts have been revising their EPS estimates roughly upwards.

● Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.

● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.

● Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.

● Considering the small differences between the analysts' various estimates, the group's business visibility is good.


Weaknesses

● The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 49.86 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.

● The company's enterprise value to sales, at 5.09 times its current sales, is high.

● Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.