The Paris Agreement has been criticized for not imposing legally binding greenhouse gas emissions targets on countries, but that needn't mean it's toothless as the
On
This is the first time that a court order has been granted against a private company obliging it to reduce its aggregated and absolute CO2 emissions by a fixed percentage within a defined timeframe. According to the Court, RDS' solely intensity-based CO2 emissions reduction target is unlikely to achieve the climate goals of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change ("PA"). The Court adds that RDS' imminent violation of its reduction obligation does not in itself imply that RDS' current CO2 emissions are unlawful. The verdict is provisionally enforceable and will take direct effect even if RDS appeals the decision.
This decision builds on the landmark Urgenda decision of 2019 which found that the Dutch government's inadequate action on climate change violated a duty of care to its citizens under Article 6:162 of the Dutch Civil Code. In the suit against RDS, plaintiffs have successfully extended the open standard of care further coloured in and specified by the climate goals of the PA, scientific evidence on the dangers of climate change of the IPCC and human rights principles of the
While this judgment is primarily of interest for all companies incorporated in
From West to East, climate change is increasingly understood as an issue that entails responsibility from all organs of society, including businesses and human rights is one of the tools being picked up to hold companies accountable for their contribution to climate change. Although it will take time before the
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr
Rouse
4th Floor,
EC2V 5DE
Tel: 207536 4100
Fax: 845 280 0201
URL: www.rouse.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source